Sunday, June 26, 2011


LA Times Editorial |

The takeover by charter operator Green Dot hasn't yielded the quick and dramatic results many had hoped for, but there has been some solid improvement.

Tenth-grade English teacher Beth Schmidt works with Locke students.  (Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Times)

Tenth-grade English teacher Beth Schmidt works with Locke students. (Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Times)

June 26, 2011 - Three years ago, the last graduating class of the "old" Locke High School listened to a commencement speaker whose main thrust was that only a small number of students had made it to that point. Odd words at most graduation ceremonies, but appropriate at Locke. Under the management of the Los Angeles Unified School District, the number of graduates at this public school in Watts was regularly a fraction of the number of students who had started out as ninth-graders.

The class of 2008 started with 1,451 freshmen, according to the state's education database. Only 595 made it to their sophomore year. About 350 ultimately walked at graduation — but just 261 of them actually received diplomas.

    The following fall, after a bitter battle, charter operator Green Dot Public Schools took over Locke. And last week, the "new" Locke High graduated its third class. These were the last students to have experienced Locke as a public school, back when they were freshmen, and the last to represent Locke High School as a whole; younger students have been placed in small, individual academies on campus, each of which reports separately to the state. So this is a final chance to compare state figures on the school before and after the takeover.

    How did Green Dot do at stemming the tide of students who disappear from campus into lives usually plagued by high unemployment and low wages? Solidly better, but not the quick and extraordinary transformation everyone had hoped for. Not yet, anyway.

    Charter schools are not the ultimate solution to bad public schools; rather, the solution lies in improving public schools so that they have adequate resources, good teachers and a stimulating curriculum. Like many charter operators, Green Dot has had financial help from outside foundations, help that isn't available to most public schools.

    Still, well-run charter schools have played a valuable role in pressuring public schools to improve, and they can be a lifeline to students who are sinking in crummy neighborhood schools or, in many cases, leaving school far too soon. In the case of Locke, the switch appears to be working, albeit more slowly and haltingly than Green Dot expected.

    The charter operator deserves praise for its massive and earnest effort at Locke. It was the first charter school in Los Angeles to accept all of the students within its attendance boundaries, just as public schools do, rather than restricting enrollment and accepting students through a lottery. Students who choose their charter schools are motivated to follow the rules and achieve; public schools take all comers. The Locke takeover served as the model for L.A. Unified's Public School Choice initiative, in which new schools and some failing schools were turned over to outside groups that filed the most promising applications. Some of those were groups of teachers, others were charter schools. All had to follow Green Dot's example and admit all students within their enrollment boundaries.

    Green Dot reports that it graduated 358 seniors at Locke on Thursday; it started with 617 sophomores. (The size of this class as freshmen isn't counted because Green Dot had no influence over those students.) That's a graduation rate of about 58%.

    Not so great, right? In fact, if Locke's numbers don't improve in coming years, its graduation rate would be considered unacceptable. But lined up against the same data from the L.A. Unified-run Locke, this figure represents substantial improvement. In 2008, the graduating class was 44% of what it had been in sophomore year. In 2007, even worse: about 32%.

    These numbers don't tell the full story of how many students drop out or stay in school for a diploma. Locke, where nearly all the students are either black or Latino and most of them are low-income, is located in a highly transient neighborhood in a highly transient district; more than a fourth of the students move every year. Those numbers have probably accelerated in the last few years as families left the Los Angeles area for more affordable areas with better job prospects.

    Green Dot retained most of its first sophomores through the beginning of senior year: 560 of the original 617, a remarkably high number for Locke. But by the end of the year, almost 90 of those seniors disappeared, and Green Dot officials don't know why or what happened to them. Another 110 or so lacked the credits to graduate, but Green Dot says those students all have individual plans for earning the needed credits over the next year and will be back. But Green Dot has kept substantially more students in school, and it did so while raising standards and prodding far more students into a college-preparatory curriculum. Attendance was higher. Far fewer students wandered the campus or left it during class time. A program that allowed students to make up courses through self-paced computer instruction helped many of those at high risk of dropping out get the credits they needed. Passing rates on the high school exit exam rose significantly (though it's worth noting that L.A. Unified's pass rates also made impressive gains this year). Meanwhile, retention rates appear higher so far at the small Locke academies that have been growing grade by grade since fall 2008.

    Green Dot did not pull off quick academic miracles, but these are all signs of long-overdue hope for students who have had too little.


    2cents smf smf: This is Year Three in a series of editorials from the Times that started out being called “A Year @ Locke“ + developed into a book that is a love letter to the Green Dot and Teach for America franchises. This installment ends “Green Dot did not pull off quick academic miracles…”  but neglects to mention that miracles – and 100% graduation/zero drop-outs/API of 700+ [Locke is 572] and 100% college admission was-and-is the Green Dot promise.  Green Dot’s manta when they took over was ‘incremental isn’t enough’ - ‘urgency’ was required! Green Dot still refuses to consider 9th graders in their grad-rate equation – yet it is 9th graders who fail to make it to the 10th (‘9-Rs’) that are the students that most need saving and consideration. Not enough mention is made of the huge extra unsustainable financial investment made by Green Dot and their sponsors into Locke that the regular schools can’t match ($7.8 million from Gates alone). Locke is the poster child for the argument that ‘throwing money at it’ isn’t the answer.

    “If money were the solution, the problem would already be solved."  - Jay Greene, author of Education Myths, What Special-Interest Groups Want You to Believe About our Schools – and why it isn’t so.

    And yet – you don’t have to read too far between the lines to decipher that Locke is still – in the proponents own vernacular: a “failing school”, still a ”dropout factory” – still Waiting for Superman. 

    These kids deserve every extra bit of help they can get. But I’m afraid the attaboys and ‘good jobs’’’ to Green Dot are misplaced.


    Robert D. Skeels * rdsathene said...

    If we needed further proof the the LA Times editorial board is composed of public relations types instead of actual reporters, this obsequious editorial does so and more. Not one of your so-called reporters checked Locke "graduate" college remediation rates versus the glowing graduation rates you gush over? Take the CSU for example: "For Fall 2010 Locke Senior High Admissions into the California State University system: 88% were NOT proficient in mathematics and an astonishing 98% were NOT proficient in English."

    If LAUSD was "graduating" students with single digit English proficiency rates, rest assured that Russ Stanton and Jim Newton would sick their most compliant yellow journalists, Jason Song and Jason Feltch to cover the "story." When their wealthy counterparts in the lucrative charter industry manage such a feat, it "represents substantial improvement."

    What passes for journalism at the Times is called propaganda everywhere else. It's no wonder that your paper, fit only as bird cage liner, is teetering on the edge of insolvency. Want a solution to low readership? Start telling the truth.

    A Teacher Anon said...


    The 2010 API scores for the following Green Dot charter schools are:

    Animo Locke #3: 495
    Animo Locke ACE: 537
    Animo Locke #1: 563
    Locke: 567
    Animo Locke #2: 605
    Animo Tech: 606
    Animo Ralph Bunche: 658