Wednesday, October 19, 2011

GAPS IN THE LGBT LESSON PLAN: California's teachers need better guidance on how to meet a state law requiring positive messages about gays + Letters to the editor

LA Times Editorial |

David Columbus, a senior and president of Downtown Magnets High School's Gay-Straight Alliance club, said he was pushed around and called names since he was 3 because he liked Barbie dolls. But, he said, he has thrived in the school's supportive environment. (Robert Gauthier / Los Angeles Times)

    October 19, 2011 - This is what happens when school laws are passed for political reasons rather than educational ones. Starting in January, public school teachers from kindergarten on must include some sort of positive message about gay people in their lessons, but as The Times has reported, they have little idea how to comply with the law. What's more, the state lacks the time or resources to develop lesson plans or a curriculum to help guide them.

    It's appropriate for state lawmakers to ban discrimination in public schools and to require that students not be harassed or tormented. It's another matter when the Legislature interferes with issues that are properly the jurisdiction of educators and textbook authors.

    There is nothing wrong with teaching about people of various sexual orientations and the issues that affect them. But the California curriculum already is rightly criticized for packing in too much information at the expense of delving into subjects more deeply. Decisions about adding new subjects should be made by educators with an overall grasp of how best to structure education in the coming years. For each new subject that enters the school day, legislators should realize, another one has to leave or be given shallower treatment. Politicians, driven in large part by their desire to please one constituency or another, are not the best arbiters of what students should learn.

    Meanwhile, what's a kindergarten teacher to do? The state Board of Education should step in swiftly with interim regulations that provide local school districts with significant flexibility, while also clarifying the minimum requirements so that schools are protected from legal claims that they're flouting the law.

    During the first several years of school, those requirements should be truly minimal. Young children can learn that there are many different kinds of people and families and that all must be treated respectfully. But too much detail is not necessary at this age.

    Beyond that, many schools will need suggestions about where instruction about gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people or issues might best fit into the existing curriculum. Such information should be relevant to the subject under study. So where might this schooling be appropriate? In sex education, definitely. (The Los Angeles Unified School District already addresses the issue in its health classes.) In civics classes about the California initiative process, perhaps, where a discussion of Proposition 8 might be germane. Public schools have been given a poorly crafted, politically motivated mandate; the state board will have to be thoughtful where legislators were not.

    LETTERS: Lessons for first-graders

    LA Times Letters to the editor |

    Re "How to teach gay issues in 1st grade?," Oct. 16

    A person's sexuality is not why we teach about people. We teach about them because they have made a contribution to the good of society.

    Most of our leaders in the past did not talk about their sexuality; will these educators do gender assignment to people, as has been done to Langston Hughes in your article? His gift was that of a poet, not his sexuality.

    Why would an adult say that someone is gay if the person has not said so? Why would a teacher teach such a thing?

    Jean Solomon
    Los Angeles

    The headline completely misstates the purpose of SB 48. "Gay issues" are things like marriage equality and the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act and "don't ask, don't tell," and have nothing to do with the law.

    Simply, SB 48 is about teaching history, and making sure that the achievements of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans are noted. Your headline feeds to the fears of the right that the so-called gay agenda (whatever that is) is going to be taught to first-graders.

    By far, the better and more correct headline for the story was posted on "California schools scrambling to add lessons on LGBT Americans." That's the real story.

    Todd Duncan
    Aliso Viejo

    This article is the newest example of the lobby-driven silliness that so infuriates us everyday people, gay, straight or otherwise. Teachers should not be asked to spend valuable classroom time un-teaching biases that do not exist in first-graders.

    Robert Fulghum said it best: All I really need to know, I learned in kindergarten. Just be nice to each other, right?

    Anthony Moretti

    No comments: