Wednesday, January 09, 2008

L.A. MAYOR PREVAILS IN BALLOTING AT SANTEE


4LAKids 2¢ : The C Track Teachers got to vote when they got back to school after their break ...the C Track Parents didn't!

By Howard Blume, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

January 9, 2008 - Given a second round of balloting, teachers at the Santee Education Complex voted Tuesday to join the school reform effort of Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, although questions persist about the election process.

On the first try, a substantial majority of teachers voted yes, but the Dec. 11 tally still fell short of the required majority of all 181 eligible voters at the high school south of downtown.

The Los Angeles Unified School District scheduled the second balloting for teachers who had been on vacation from the year-round school

The extra voting drew criticism because it wasn't called for in election rules. Critics have accused the mayor, along with his district and union allies, of trying to figure out any way to win. The district justified the second vote on the grounds that vacationing staff hadn't been able to attend an informational presentation while at school.

Computer teacher Trebor Jacquez said he voted for Villaraigosa's plan because he liked the mayor's pledge to give authority to school sites and, most of all, because he disliked the alternative: "At this point, anything can be better than . . . what the school district has given us."

Specific vote totals were not available Tuesday, but district officials said the mayor narrowly cleared the threshold.

"I think it will open up more opportunities for our kids," said culinary arts instructor Brent Boultinghouse.

Villaraigosa had sought significant control of the district, but the courts rebuffed his efforts. Instead, he settled on a reform plan through which a handful of schools could receive more authority and financial support under his stewardship.

On the initial vote, Villaraigosa lost at Jordan High but prevailed at Roosevelt High and four middle schools. But because the roster of teachers eligible to vote has fluctuated, the union representing administrators has raised concerns about tight results at two of the middle schools. Its bigger complaint is about the exclusion of its members.

No comments: