Thursday, February 24, 2011

LAUSD TO RECOMMEND CLOSING OF CHARTER SCHOOL

BY hOWARD bLUME -  la tIMES/lA now | http://lat.ms/hoRQhw

 

Cornerstone Prep Charter

7651 South Central Ave., Los Angeles, 90001

  • Charter school in the Los Angeles Unified district.
  • Grades K-8
  • 332 students
  • 16 faculty members

Cornerstone Prep Charter

More »

Source: California Department of Education

Sandra Poindexter, Ben Welsh Los Angeles Times

February 24, 2011 |  8:49 am - Officials will recommend the rare closing of a Los Angeles charter school for poor academic performance, the L.A. Unified School District has confirmed.

Cornerstone Prep, an elementary school in Florence, appeared Wednesday on a new list of 30 charter schools statewide that have consistently performed poorly. The database, which included top-performing schools, was compiled by the California Charter Schools Assn.

The association has released a new database intended to compare both charter schools and other campuses with their predicted performance. The goal is to show which schools are doing worse or better than expected based on the characteristics of their students.

Factors include family income, parent education, percentage of disabled students and student ethnicity. The data is gleaned from public records maintained by the California Department of Education.

Although charter schools are authorized by local school districts or other education agencies, they are managed independently and free from some restrictions that govern traditional schools.

This freedom comes in exchange for increased accountability, according to state law. But that accountability is not well-enforced, said Jed Wallace, chief executive of the charter association.

Among the top performing charter schools in terms of consistent, better-than-predicted improvement is Mohan High School, operated by Alliance College-Ready Public Schools, and Aspire Antonio Maria Lugo Academy.

Wallace said the new database suggests more charters are outperforming predicted results but some also are doing worse than they should.

Cornerstone Prep has acknowledged a need to improve while also defending the integrity of its program.

“Cornerstone Prep School is working closely with the Los Angeles Unified School District and the Los Angeles County Office of Education to monitor our school's improvement in curriculum, instruction, and student performance,” the school said on its website.

The school’s efforts have included enhanced teacher training, more focus on struggling individual students and increasing parent involvement.

To focus on its elementary program, the school dropped its middle school, but the move did not make enough of a difference, said Jose Cole-Gutierrez, director of charter schools for L.A. Unified.

smf: The District is reacting to a database of bad charter schools compiled by the Charter Schools Association? Talk about your sacrificial lamb.

TODAY@ 5PM: Community Briefing on Advisory Recommendation Vote Results for Public School Choice 2.0

from LAUSD | http://bit.ly/dKBtsO

smf: Spoiler Alert! -see the Daily News Article on the process: http://bit.ly/frilPW

Event:

Thursday, February 24, 2011 - 5:00pm - 6:30pm

Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) is hosting a community briefing on the results of the Advisory Vote Recommendation process held in January 2011.  This community briefing will include a panel of representatives from the League of Women Voters of Los Angeles, Families In Schools, and LAUSD.  The panel will review the report on the advisory recommendation vote prepared by the League of Women Voters of Los Angeles and the observer report prepared by Families in Schools.

Both reports will be released on Wednesday, February 23rd, and available on this website at http://publicschoolchoice.lausd.net/PSC_2.0_feedback.

Please RSVP to psc@lausd.net by noon on Wednesday, February 23, 2011.

MEETING LOCATION:

Los Angeles Unified School District

333 S. Beaudry Avenue

Los Angeles, CA 90017

For further details and parking information, please click here for the press release.

Call2Action: YOU CAN HELP SAVE PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING: The “LET US VOTE!” Campaign

email from educate our state – Educate our State are some of  the same wonderful folks who brought us the “Hot 4 Teachers” Video.


URGENT ACTION NEEDED: YOU CAN HELP SAVE PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING
“LET US VOTE!”

23 Feb 2011

Hello from the Educate Our State Team:

The “Let Us Vote!” campaign was started by seven moms looking for a way to save public education funding. We work around carpool schedules and practices, between homework and bedtime reading. We are working to let people know that, contrary to what has been reported in the media, public education funding has not been "spared" in the Governor's budget. The budget assumes an extension of taxes that are set to expire July 1st. But, Californian's will not be given the chance to vote on this issue if the legislature doesn't approve sending this to the people. This is our last chance to prevent an additional $5 billion in cuts to education. We are asking our legislators to "Let Us Vote!" to save public education funding. It's easy to send a prewritten email here, it only takes 2 minutes.

We are trying to get the word out. You can watch a news clip of us here on NBC Bay Area talking about the “Let Us Vote!” campaign. Thank you to everyone that has already sent a letter -- over 10,000 have been sent from 100% of California's legislative districts. Haven't sent a letter? Please make sure your legislators hear from you by Feb. 28th, prior to the critical vote in early March. We are asking that you please forward this email to a friend or ask them to visit www.educateourstate.org.

California’s public schools have been underfunded for decades. Look at any ranking and you’ll see almost every state in the nation is spending more money on public education. Now Sacramento is on the verge of cutting another $5 billion, that’s approx. $900/child. What will your school need to cut? Teachers? Small class sizes? Enrichment programs? Will you balance your budget with even more furlough days? Or will they simply shut down your school? Send a letter today!

For more information about the seven moms that started Educate Our State, a list of our partner organizations and our efforts to unite the voices of Californians in support of K-12 public education and demand real change visit the Educate Our State website at www.educateourstate.org. Follow us on facebook, twitter, purchase a car magnet or consider a donation.

Thanks!

The Educate Our State Team

www.educateourstate.org

Call2Action from Preschool California: PRESERVE + PROTECT FEDERAL SUPPORT FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION, HEAD START AND EARLY HEAD START

email from Preschool CaliforniaNew Advocacy Alert banner v1

February 24, 2011

Dear Friend,

Today, Feb. 24, is a national call-in day to urge senators to preserve and protect significant investments in early childhood programs, including the Child Care and Development Block Grant, Head Start and Early Head Start. The current continuing resolution (CR) for the federal budget expires on March 4 - just two weeks away. The bill passed by the House, H.R. 1, cuts 368,000 children from Head Start and child care programs. If this bill is enacted, 14,000 children in California would lose access to child care and preschool and an additional 25,000 would lose access to Head Start and Early Head Start programs across the state.

Even though we are already almost five months into the federal government’s fiscal year 2011, Congress still has not finished their appropriations process. And the current temporary fix – a continuing resolution – expires on March 4. A vote on H.R. 1 will soon move to the Senate, which will have to act before the March 4 deadline.

Please call 202-224-3121 and thank Senators Feinstein and Boxer for their continued support of California’s children and ask them to ensure that the final appropriations measure for FY 2011 protects these vital early learning programs.

The clock is ticking and we must do everything we can to help ensure that children do not lose the child care and early learning supports they need to succeed and their parents need to work. Please call 202-224-3121 today.

When you are put through to your Senator’s office, ask to speak to the staffer that handles child care and early education. Tell them your name, that you are a constituent and your affiliation with any organizations, Head Start or child care program. Then, ask them to:

  • Protect funding for child care, Head Start, and Early Head Start to help us build a smarter, healthier, and stronger America.
  • Sustain the funding for Head Start/Early Head Start and child care so that 368,000 children do not lose these valuable supports.

We are getting down to the wire, but we can’t rest until we see this through – the stakes are just too high. Thank you so much for your ongoing support.  We’ll keep you up to date as this unfolds.

EDITORIAL CARTOON: The La CaƱada shakedown +smf’s 2¢

by Ted Rall/LA Times | http://bit.ly/eT1Tqq

2cents smf: At a candidates' debate last light, I took offence at Mayor Tony + The Downtown Developer’s  chosen favorite  Luis Sanchez’ suggestion that it is the role of private partners to fund arts and music education. How is relying upon outside special interests to fund interests they find special all that different from asking parents to cough up money to pay for programs the schools should be providing to all kids as part of a free public education?

Of course public education isn’t free –we taxpayers invest billions, children invest thirteen years of their young lives – everyone has a right to expect a return on those investments. And that return includes a well-rounded in-depth quality education that include not just language arts and mathematics – but science and health and arts and music – and the ability to think critically.

Otherwise we should forgo the diploma and ad just award seniors a printout of their test scores.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

“Victims of the Churn”: NEW ED TRUST-WEST REPORT SHOWS THE DAMAGING IMPACT OF TEACHER LAYOFF POLICIES ON CALIFORNIA’S HIGHEST NEEDS SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS

education trust-west press release | http://bit.ly/ejtiEL

New ETW Logo

For Immediate Release                                                                                      
February 23, 2011 
Contact: Eric Wagner (510) 465-6444, ext 318
Email: ewagner@edtrustwest.org

(OAKLAND, CA)  With school districts across California announcing budget cuts and plans for massive teacher layoffs, a new report by The Education Trust—West titled, Victims of the Churn: The Damaging Impact of California’s Teacher Layoff Policies on Schools, Students and Communities in Three Large School Districts, shows the negative impact of California’s teacher layoff policies on students in high-poverty schools in three urban school image districts.  These students were found to bear more than their fair share of the pain when it comes to teacher layoffs, with their schools 65 percent more likely to have a teacher laid off than a low-poverty school.  Some high-poverty schools lost more than 15 percent of their teachers.

“While layoffs are a serious problem, the way they are conducted every year can make a bad situation even worse for some of our highest-need schools,” said Dr. Arun Ramanathan, Executive Director of The Education Trust—West, a statewide education advocacy organization.  “The effects of this process can disrupt the lives of teachers, students and community members who desperately need stability in their schools to close achievement and opportunity gaps.”

The new report reveals the extent to which over-noticing touches the lives of thousands of teachers each year who receive “false” layoff notices that are never finalized because districts must submit notices before their budgets are completed.  It finds that pink slips outnumbered actual layoffs in these districts by more than four to one.

The report makes a series of recommendations, including changing the layoff notification date to prevent over-noticing; giving districts explicit flexibility to protect high-poverty schools from the disproportionate impact of layoffs; replacing California’s seniority-based layoff laws with policies that emphasize job effectiveness; and providing additional authority to principals and school communities to maintain the stability of their school staff.

“With districts across the state already making plans for more layoffs this year, policymakers in Sacramento must take immediate steps to fix the impact of seniority-based layoff policies on our most vulnerable students and the future of California’s teaching corps,” Ramanathan continued. “It’s time for California to reform these dated policies and bureaucratic rules and protect the right of all students to be taught by effective teachers in stable schools.” 

The full report is available online at:  www.edtrustwest.org

# # #

About The Education Trust—West
The Education Trust—West works for the high academic achievement of all students at all levels pre-k through college. We expose achievement and opportunity gaps that separate students of color and low-income students from other youth, and we identify and advocate for the strategies that will forever close those gaps.

RACE TO THE BOTTOM?

Kathy Wylie writes on the Edutopia Facebook page

Only 5 states do not have collective bargaining for educators and have deemed it illegal. Their ranking on ACT/SAT scores:
South Carolina - 50th
North Carolina - 49th
Georgia - 48th
Texas - 47th
...Virginia - 44th
Wisconsin is currently ranked 2nd. Please Welcome them in the race to the bottom.

"The petition is materially non-qualifying and …insufficient": COMPTON SCHOOL BOARD REJECTS PARENT TRIGGER EFFORT + more

A unanimous vote by the Compton school board rejects McKinley Elementary parents' petition seeking to turn the struggling campus over to a charter operator.

By Teresa Watanabe, Los Angeles Times | http://lat.ms/h0LdOw

McKinley Elementary

Children play at McKinley Elementary in Compton, where parents petitioned to turn the school over to a charter operator. The school board has rejected the petition. (Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Times / December 7, 2010)

February 23, 2011 -- After two months of controversy, the Compton school board Tuesday rejected a petition by parents aiming to use a groundbreaking state law to turn over their struggling elementary school to a charter operator.

Board members with the Compton Unified School District voted unanimously, 7-0, to return the petition to parents at McKinley Elementary , saying it failed to include information required by state regulations. District officials also found that parents cited the wrong education code section and failed to provide evidence that they had selected their desired charter operator, Celerity Educational Group, after a "rigorous review process" as required by state emergency regulations.

"The petition is materially non-qualifying and is being returned as insufficient," the board found.

McKinley parents, whose school ranks in the bottom 10th among all California elementary schools, expressed outrage over the board action at the packed school board meeting.

"I'm very angry and disappointed because they threw away our petitions and destroyed our dreams for a better education for our children," said Marlene Romero, whose third-grade son attends McKinley.

But other parents and teacher union representatives spoke out against the petition, saying the school is making progress.

The closely watched case represented the first test of a new law giving parents the power to petition for major reforms of low-performing schools, including shutting them down, changing staff and programs, and turning the campus over to a charter operator. Charters are independently run, publicly financed schools.

Under the law, valid signatures representing parents of half the school's students are required to trigger the reforms. In Compton, the petition campaign was organized by Parent Revolution, a Los Angeles-based educational reform group and charter school ally. The group said it submitted parent signatures for 275 of 438 McKinley students, or 62%.

Ben Austin, executive director of the Parent Revolution, said the group would challenge the action in court and that the board "has decided to throw away the futures of McKinley's children."

But the petition campaign was plagued by charges and countercharges of deceit, harassment and lies and created bitter campus divisions. The district drew fire — and a class-action lawsuit — for requiring parents to verify their signatures in person with photo identification. More than 60 parent supporters refused to participate in the process and won a temporary restraining order barring the district from continuing those requirements. It is unclear how the board's decision to reject the petition will affect that legal action.

Compton officials reported Tuesday that they were unable to verify parent signatures representing 50% of the 442 students they said were officially enrolled at McKinley at the time the petition was submitted Dec. 7. The district said it could confirm only 250 of the 275 students named on the petition as actually enrolled at the time.

Among those students, district officials found potential problems with the parent signatures for more than 70. In 26 cases, the district had no school records to compare the signatures of the petitioner and the parent of record. In 29 cases, the signatures "appear to be inconsistent" with the school file, the district said. In addition, eight signatures belonged to someone other than the student's legal parent or guardian, and 10 parents indicated they would not participate in the district's verification process.

School Board Rejects Historic 'Parent Trigger' Petition

KTLA -

COMPTON (KTLA) -- School Board Members in Compton did not approve a historic petition Tuesday that would allow parents to have an upper hand in their children's education. The school board claimed that the McKinley Parent Trigger petition, ...

Star Litigator Jay Lefkowitz Goes Pro Bono in California School Reform Case

Lawyers and Settlements (blog) -

Lawyers Giving Back looks at a side of lawyers you don't hear too much about—the side that gives back…pays it forward..and shares the love. We've found quite a number of attorneys who log non-billable hours helping others—simply because they believe ...

 

One Response to “Star Litigator Jay Lefkowitz Goes Pro Bono in California School Reform Case”

  1. February 23rd, 2011 at 1:53 am Caroline G Says:

    It’s fascinating that the entity Kirkland & Ellis is representing pro bono is actually not a group of low-income parents at all but a well-funded organization representing charter school operators, Parent Revolution, which has funding from the Gates Foundation, the Walton Family Foundation and other high-net-worth backers.

    Parent Revolution researched statewide in search of a school to target, then pre-selected the charter school operator that would take over McKinley Elementary, before ever making contact with a single McKinley Elementary parent. Then it sent paid operatives out door to door in search of parents to sign its petitions.

    Jay Lefkowitz may support that deception, and that’s his right. And of course he may well wish to see the law followed scrupulously no matter whether the client is as Astroturf as all getout. But it’s just surprising to me that a major law firm is willing to provide pro bono services to an organization that has ample funding from billionaires and corporate titans.

PD Editorial: Failing grade

Santa Rosa Press Democrat - ‎Feb 22, 2011‎

DAMIAN DOVARGANES / AP Parents in Compton were the first to use California's trigger law to petition for conversion of a failing public school to an independent charter school. For the first time, a group of California parents has petitioned to convert ...

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

GIFTED PROGRAMS GO ON BLOCK AS SCHOOLS MUST DO WITH LESS

The Bay CitizenBy JENNIFER GOLLAN | The Bay Citizen / A version of this article appeared in print on February 20, 2011, in the National edition of the New York Times | http://nyti.ms/htfVvj 

Adithya Sambamurthy/The Bay Citizen - Teela Huff, right, liked school a lot more when Silver Oak Elementary in San Jose offered gifted programs that better exercised her mind.

February 19, 2011 - When she was just 3, Teela Huff understood how to add numbers. By third grade, she was tutoring her peers.

<<Adithya Sambamurthy/The Bay Citizen

“It helped me get through fourth grade.” Teela Huff, a fifth grader, on her now-defunct gifted classes.

“She can explain the problems to you without making you feel stupid,” one of Teela’s classmates wrote of her, according to her father, Tom.

But Teela’s quick mind — she is now a 10-year-old fifth grader but reads at a 12th-grade level — meant her classes at Silver Oak Elementary in San Jose were often boring and frustrating. She finally enrolled in a program for gifted children, where students wrestled with things like mind-bending math riddles and thought-provoking questions like how to survive on a desert island. And she loved it.

Her new adventures in learning ended in September, however, when the Evergreen School District eliminated all programs for its 790 or so gifted children. The move was part of a statewide wave of cuts in a program known as Gifted and Talented Education.

“I am worrying about keeping her engaged and getting educated,” said Tom Huff, a software developer. “In the long term, if schools are unable to engage bright children, as a society, we suffer. We need all of the smartest minds we can get.”

Budget problems, combined with policies and programs like the No Child Left Behind Act focused on improving overall educational performance in public schools, have put gifted programs in the expendable category. Local school districts, with permission from the Legislature, have been systematically taking money from the programs to cover budget shortfalls. School officials say they have no choice — but exceptionally talented pupils like Teela are paying the price.

There is acute awareness at the federal level that the country must invest in math, science and advanced education to invigorate economic growth and remain competitive. In his State of the Union speech last month, President Obama called for another Sputnik moment, referring to the Soviet Union’s launching of the Sputnik orbiter in 1957 that shocked Americans with its sophistication.

Investing in gifted-education programs is one of the surest ways to recreate that watershed moment, said Frank C. Worrell, faculty director of the Academic Talent Development Program at the University of California, Berkeley.

“We have focused on bringing up the bottom,” said Dr. Worrell, who has written extensively about gifted learners. “But we have failed to recognize that by ignoring the top, we are creating another problem. We are not sparking the creativity of those who have the most potential to make outstanding contributions, ranging from iPads to Post-it notes.”

In California, state money for Gifted and Talented Education (GATE) has fallen only modestly, to $44.2 million in 2009-10 school year, from $46.8 million in the 2008-9 school year. But those numbers obscure a more important change: in February 2009, the California Legislature adopted a plan that allowed public schools to divert state money for gifted children to “any educational purpose,” including closing budget deficits.

And divert they did. A study by the state Legislative Analyst’s Office, released last May, found that 68 percent of the 231 school districts surveyed had shifted resources away from education for gifted students since lawmakers approved the measure.

The plan, which was intended to give school districts more control over spending decisions as their finances eroded, has reverberated through classrooms across the state. At the beginning of this school year, the San Jose Unified School District stopped reimbursing schools for expenses related to the education of gifted students, including teacher pay and additional books and materials. Last fall, the Oakland Unified School District cut money for gifted programs by 25 percent.

“In a time when you are making steep reductions, the Legislature is trying to figure out the core activities that should be preserved in school districts,” said Edgar Cabral, senior fiscal and policy analyst with the Legislative Analyst’s Office. “This is the most flexibility that school districts have been given over the last 10 years in terms of eliminating restrictions for GATE funding.”

That latitude has manifested itself in the Evergreen School District, which shifted the money elsewhere this school year.

“We were facing incredible deficits, so we took advantage of the flexibility of the GATE funding to sweep those funds into our general fund to pay for things like salaries, health insurance and PG&E bills,” said Kathy Gomez, assistant superintendent of the Education Services Department at Evergreen. “I wish it didn’t have to be done.”

Before it cut the gifted program, Evergreen received roughly $97,300 from the state and supplemented that with about $123,000 from its general fund to pay for two teachers and materials.

Across the country, states vary wildly in terms of how much money they provide for gifted programs and the criteria they use to identify and test brainy students. State financing ranged from $250,000 in Montana to $91 million in Texas in the 2008-9 school year. While 32 states have a mandate to tend to the needs of gifted children, just 6 fully financed the programs in 2008-9, according to the National Association for Gifted Children.

School districts use various criteria to identify gifted students, including I.Q. tests, grades and standardized test scores. Gifted programs vary widely in the pace, depth and breadth of subjects they cover. Some promote intensive study of a core subject like reading, others foster analytical reasoning, and still others focus on creative problem solving.

In the Piedmont Unified School District, Zachary Crombie’s teachers recently encouraged him to go beyond the assigned homework by researching the design and financing of solar energy projects. Zachary, a gifted eighth grader, is also a year ahead in math at Piedmont Middle School.

“We would have to find a different program for him if the program didn’t exist,” said Zachary’s mother, Kathleen Crombie. “He would get in trouble because he would be bored.”

Despite the high praise from parents, gifted programs are sometimes criticized as elitist because they tend to be dominated by students from upper-income families, Dr. Worrell said. Wealthier parents are more likely to seek out such programs, and are more likely to enrich their children’s cognitive development with activities like reading.

But educators agree that, wealth aside, creative accomplishment is born from challenge. Teela Huff, a brown belt in karate who yearns to become a computer game designer, experienced this firsthand in the gifted program.

“It helped me get through fourth grade,” Teela said of the now-defunct gifted courses. “I would stare at the clock waiting for 8:30 a.m. when the gifted class started.”

Before the program was scrapped, Teela and other advanced students gathered in separate sessions away from the traditional classes for two half-days a month. They took on projects like dissecting a cow’s eye, which sparked a fascination with how the human body works.

“It was so cool and disgustingly weird,” said Teela, dressed in a gray T-shirt and jeans, her dark hair parted neatly in the middle. “We saw the lens of the cow’s eye and the blood vessels. It was a lot more interesting than seeing it in a book.”

CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP WITHOUT WIDENING A RACIAL ONE

By MICHAEL WINERIP - On Education column in the New York Times | http://nyti.ms/hyHpxf

February 13, 2011 - ALEXANDRIA, Va. — There is no more pressing topic in education today than closing the achievement gap, and there is no one in America who knows more about the gap than Ronald Ferguson.

<<Gretchen Ertl for The New York Times:  Ronald Ferguson of Harvard explores the reasons black students’ grades lag behind those of whites.

Although he is a Harvard professor based in Cambridge, Mass., Dr. Ferguson, 60, spends lots of time flying around the country visiting racially mixed public high schools. Part of what he does is academic, measuring the causes of the gap by annually surveying the performance, behaviors and attitudes of up to 100,000 students. And part is serving as a de facto educational social worker, meeting with students, faculty members and parents to explain what steps their schools can take to narrow the gap.

The gap is about race, of course, and it inevitably inflames passions. But there is something about Dr. Ferguson’s bearing — he is both big (6-foot-3) and soft-spoken — that gets people to listen.

Morton Sherman, the Alexandria school superintendent, watched him defuse the anger at a meeting of 300 people. “He talks about these things in a professorial way, a kind way,” Dr. Sherman said. “It’s not about him. He doesn’t try to be a rock star, although he is a rock star in this field.”

While he has a personal stake in closing the gap as an African-American parent who has raised three boys, Dr. Ferguson does not get emotional in tense situations — he gets factual.

He is frequently quoted in the news media, and in recent months, he has played a major role in four important educational stories: the Gates study on evaluating teachers (his research shows that when kids say a teacher is good, they usually know what they’re talking about); the Council of the Great City Schools study of the widening gap between white and black boys (12 percent of black fourth-grade boys were proficient in reading on a national test, compared with 38 percent of whites); a front-page story in The New York Times last year on the effectiveness of big high schools (at a time when small schools are in vogue); and as a member of the eight-person New York State panel that decided whether Cathleen P. Black should qualify for a waiver to be New York City’s chancellor (he won’t say how he voted).

Geoffrey Canada, president of the Harlem Children’s Zone and star of the documentary “Waiting for Superman,” calls him a “national treasure.” Michael Casserly, director of the Council of the Great City Schools says, “He has done more to help us understand the dynamics behind the achievement gap than anyone else in the country.” Marian Wright Edelman, founder of the Children’s Defense Fund, calls him “thoughtful, careful, fearless.”

And yet, as best he can remember — and he is a busy man with lots on his mind — he has never been the subject of a profile in the news media.

One reason may be that his views on the gap are too research-based and nuanced to accommodate in a sound bite.

He is not as famous as John Ogbu, the late African-born Berkeley professor who argued that the gap could be explained by the cultural behavior of African-Americans, like mocking hard-working classmates for “acting white.”

Nor is he as famous as Charles Murray, co-author of “The Bell Curve,” who suggested that the achievement gap is explained by inherited low intelligence.

Unlike Dr. Ogbu, an anthropology professor, and Dr. Murray, a political scientist, Dr. Ferguson has his doctorate in economics from M.I.T.; he has been trained to quantify everything. From his surveys of students in dozens of wealthy, racially mixed suburbs — including Evanston, Ill.; Maplewood, N.J.; and Shaker Heights, Ohio — he has calculated that the average grade of black students was C-plus, while white students averaged a B-plus. The gap.

At the high school here, T. C. Williams — the setting of the movie “Remember the Titans” — he found that 55 percent of white girls reported having an A or A-minus average, compared with less than 20 percent of black girls and boys.

His research indicates that half the gap can be predicted by economics: even in a typical wealthy suburb, blacks are not as well-to-do; 79 percent are in the bottom 50 percent financially, while 73 percent of whites are in the top 50 percent.

The other half of the gap, he has calculated, is that black parents on average are not as academically oriented in raising their children as whites. In a wealthy suburb he surveyed, 40 percent of blacks owned 100 or more books, compared with 80 percent of whites. In first grade, the percentage of black and white parents reading to their children daily was about the same; by fifth grade, 60 percent to 70 percent of whites still read daily to their children, compared with 30 percent to 40 percent of blacks.

He also works with teachers to identify biases, for instance: black children are less likely to complete homework because they are lazy. His research indicates that blacks and whites spend the same amount of time on homework, but blacks are less likely to finish. “It’s not laziness,” he says. “It’s a difference in skills.”

How these messages get delivered is crucial. “I don’t want to be another one of those people lecturing black parents,” he says. “I tell them we in the black community — we — need to build stronger intellectual lives at home.”

He recalls speaking to a primarily white group at Georgia State University. Afterward, a black parent came up to him. “He told me, ‘I’m not saying you’re wrong, but I’m not comfortable with you saying it in front of this audience,’ ” Dr. Ferguson said. “And I said, ‘It’s not ideal, but this was an opportunity to get these things to you.’ ”

Ronald Franklin Ferguson grew up the eldest of five boys in a blue-collar section of Cleveland. Getting a good education was a top priority for his family. His grandmother and mother were both public school teachers; six of the seven children in his father’s family attended college.

Two of his brothers picked careers that give back to the community. One is a rural doctor, the other works with children in the Fergusons’ old neighborhood, using karate lessons to instill good values. The two other brothers had drug problems, and one died at age 39. Dr. Ferguson is raising the living brother’s son.

Dr. Ferguson was not a typical child. “When I was 8, I wanted to know what’s a good job to help people,” he said. “The person I asked said, ‘city planner.’ So anyone who asked, I said, ‘I want to be a city planner when I grow up.’ ”

In 1986, he did his first educational study, and by the late 1990s, his work focused on the achievement gap. The first district he worked with was Shaker Heights. After the student newspaper published an article contrasting test scores of white and black students, all hell broke loose. Dr. Ferguson was invited in to help calm the waters.

He is a senior lecturer at the Harvard Graduate School of Education and the Kennedy School of Government. In 2005, he was a founder of the Achievement Gap Initiative at Harvard.

He is often surprised by what the numbers tell him. He was compiling test scores for special-education students when he noticed that the biggest school in Massachusetts, with more than 4,000 students, Brockton High, also had the largest gains in English scores by minority students. “Just popped out at me,” he said.

At meetings, he will turn passive-aggressive to move his agenda forward.

Shawn Thorpe, the T. C. Williams academic principal, suggested that teachers be given a list of Dr. Ferguson’s suggestions so they could comment on those they liked and didn’t like.

“I don’t do that,” Dr. Ferguson said. “You get so much input, it’s like a Tower of Babel.”

“Right,” Mr. Thorpe said.

“Too many cooks in the kitchen,” Dr. Ferguson said.

“A lot of pots on the stove,” Mr. Thorpe said.

Dr. Ferguson offered to aggregate and disaggregate the data. “Right,” Mr. Thorpe said, and they moved on to the next thing.

 

Children’s Homework

letter to the editor of the New York Times | http://nyti.ms/gconG4

Feb. 14, 2011 / Published: February 21, 2011

To the Editor:

Re “Closing the Achievement Gap Without Widening a Racial One,” by Michael Winerip (On Education column, Feb. 14):

The report on the achievement gap focuses correctly on the home environment and the support students receive there. This should be much more than just based on the number of books in the home, as was reported. Even parents who may not have had the advantage of a proper education can provide their children with very valuable support.

Aside from ensuring that they have a nondistracting workplace to do their homework, parents should ask their children to explain their homework to them. Even if parents haven’t the slightest knowledge of the work their children are doing, having them explain their work forces review and crystallization of their thoughts and work.

This is something that all parents can do, and it will go a long way to close the achievement gap — once again exhibiting the most important role parents should play in their child’s education!

Alfred S. Posamentier
Dobbs Ferry, N.Y.,

The writer is dean of the School of Education and a professor of mathematics education at Mercy College.

Become an especially interested Grass Roots Campaigner + Community Organizer: MAKE COPIES AND INFLUENCE PEOPLE – Get Out the Vote for smf …and kids!

by smf for 4LAKidsNews - not in a self serving way – but in a children-serving way . . .what a concept!

Here's the deal: special interests are hijacking the campaigns for Board of Education. Big money is coming from downtown developers interested in building a football stadium to the mayor’s chosen candidates. Read the articles, here, here and here to see who I mean.

The connect from public education to professional football stadium downtown is a dubious one educationally or sportswise.  Maybe The Times can use the increased added-value in ads  in the sports pages to do more value-added teacher evaluations?

Not quite so big money is being spent by the teacher’s union to bolster the campaigns of their chosen candidates – read the same here, here and here as above – and read this and  this also – about how UTLA can’t make up their mind about who their choices are. Read this about how the relevance of UTLA may be in decline.

….and if you are a teacher please vote in the UTLA election to make UTLA relevant again.  Not dominant – but an authentic voice for teachers. We parents, you teachers and our students are partners in this enterprise.

Kids and parents are stuck in the middle and we don’t have lots of money. But we do have votes and we do have Right on our side – because if we don’t know what’s best for kids …who does? Mayor Tony? Eli Broad? The Anschutz Entertainment Group? I don’t think so!

Hardly anyone is expected to vote in the March 8 election. The election in June last year had a voter turnout in LA County of 7.8%. School Board races could be decided by a couple of hundred votes.

The idea is to have the right couple of hundred voters decide.

Make up your mind to vote. Make your vote count. Make some copies of my flier [below] at Staples or Office Depot ….or on the company copier if you can live with that kind of dubious ethics.

Please don’t use the School Copier!

Share the fliers and talk up the importance of this campaign because the Future of Public Education – The Incubator of the American Dream -  isn’t just on the table, it’s on the chopping block. Our schools are being divided up. The charter privatizers (public education with a private agenda) are huffing and puffing.

Carpool with like-minded folks to the polls. Make a couple of trips. Vote early and often. If you live in in Board District 5 – in the Northeast and Southeast*, write in Scott Folsom. S-C-O-T-T   F-O-L-S-O-M (spelling counts)  for LAUSD Board Seat #5.

It can be done! Lisa Murkowski got elected US Senator from Alaska on a write in campaign last year – and her name is harder to spell!

* NE & SE LA/LAUSD Board District #5: The communities of Atwater Village, Cypress Park, Eagle Rock, Echo Park, El Sereno, Garvanza, Glassell Park, Los Feliz, Mt. Washington, Silver Lake, City Terrace, East Los Angeles, Bell, Cudahy, Huntington Park, Maywood, South Gate, Vernon and Walnut Park.

B+W Flier 2up.
  1. print on two sides of paper, turning the copies so page two prints on the back of side one.
  2. cut in half.

SCHOOL BOARD CANDIDATES DEBATE WEDNESDAY NIGHT AT FRANKLIN HIGH SCHOOL: Candidates square off as campaign for District 5 seat enters stretch run.

By David Fonseca | Eagle Rock Patch | http://bit.ly/eQMgHb

smf: The great thing about being a write-in candidate is you get to write yourself in. The bad thing is you may have to.
I will be at this debate and I will be participating in it. I am on the program - even if I didn't get into this story. 
It’s an uphill race, but I’ll be there.

Feb 22 | 11:24am  - Northeast Los Angeles residents on Wednesday will have their chance to question the three  four candidates vying to represent District 5 on the LAUSD board of directors during a public forum to be held at 6 p.m. in the auditorium of Benjamin Franklin High School.

District 5 comprises the neighborhoods of Highland Park, Mount Washington, Eagle Rock, Glassell Park, as well as several East L.A. communities and the unincorporated city of East Los Angeles.

Running for the seat are two LAUSD teachers, Bennet Kayser and John Ferdnandez, as well as Luis Sanchez, a former city commissioner that currently serves as the chief of staff to Los Angeles Unified School Board President Monica Garcia.

Kayser enters the last two weeks of the campaign bolstered by the endorsement of Unified Teachers Los Angeles, the district's teachers union. Meanwhile Fernandez, who had originally earned UTLA's endorsement but had it revoked after union members learned of undisclosed tax liens and a bankruptcy on his record, is reeling.

Sanchez, the only non-teacher in the group, has the backing of renowned UTLA antagonist Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa.

Incumbent Yolie Flores Aguilar announced that she would not run for reelection so she could take on a new job as the director of an education advocacy reform organization formed by Bill and Melinda Gates.

Despite myriad issues facing the school district--including high dropout rates, competition with charter schools and the need for increased system-wide accountability--turnout in the most recent LAUSD election, held in 2007, was only 9 percent, according to the Los Angeles City Clerk.

"This is why it is so important to put on a fair, balanced and informative forum where the candidates can discuss how they will tackle the challenges facing LA’s sprawling school district," said Philip Iglauer, of the Northeast Coalition, which is hosting the forum. "This forum will provide candidates with a unique opportunity to distinguish themselves from one another vying for the unenviable task of education reform."

Benjamin Franklin High School

820 N Avenue 54, Los Angeles, CA

Be there!: SCHOOL BOARD CANDIDATE DEBATE WEDNESDAY NIGHT 6PM @ FRANKLIN HIGH SCHOOL

Philip Iglauer of the Northeast Los Angeles Coalition writes:

Hello, Friends and supporters of NELA Coalition:

The drop out rate at LA schools is alarming. It ranges from 25 to as much as 40 percent, depending on your source.

smf: Of course if you believe the sky-is-falling failure-bemoaners of the Mayor Tony stripe it’s 50%+  ….and, though unacceptable  -the national dropout rate is approximately 25%.

Yet, the LA City Clerk reported the voter turn out for the 2007 school board race, northeast LA's most recent school board election, as about 9 percent.

So, your participation is crucial to make education in Los Angeles better. Northeast LA Coalition in collaboration with Franklin High School
and a slew of local groups and community leaders will put on a LA School Board election candidate forum this Wednesday at 6:00PM.

Please forward this e-invite  among your friends, colleagues, family and others in your social network. Let's spread the word!

What: LA School Board District 5 election candidate forum

When: Wednesday Feb. 23 at 6PM

Where: Franklin High School auditorium 840 North Ave. 54 90042

Why: To get informed on education policy and who may decide that policy.

Notes: Free snacks and free parking!

LAUSD SCHOOLS TAKING CHARTER ROUTE: El Camino Real High School the latest to attempt shift.

By Connie Llanos, Staff Writer, LA Daily News | http://bit.ly/hmg8ee

22 Feb 2011 - On banners posted along Valley Circle Boulevard, El Camino Real High School publicizes its scholastic record, which includes six National Academic Decathlon championships and the title of highest-performing campus in Los Angeles Unified.

However, the Woodland Hills high school is just two weeks away from finalizing its plan to break off from LAUSD, joining nearly two dozen other district schools in converting to independently run charters.

As a charter, El Camino would receive about $415,000 more in state money each year than it does now, officials say - and greater flexibility in how to spend it.

For the cash-strapped district, El Camino's defection would mean the loss of funding it now receives for the 3,500-student school - and bragging rights over the academic powerhouse.

"It is threatening to the district ... It threatens our fiscal ability to provide the level of services we've been providing," said John Deasy, who will take over in April as superintendent of the nation's second-largest district.

"Economies of scale become compromised when you shrink ... We're going to have to find new models as soon as possible to make staying with the school district as attractive an alternative as leaving."

Like traditional schools, charter campuses receive taxpayer money, but under a different formula that may increase their allocation. They are also free from many of the rules and regulations governing how they can spend the money.

Unlike district schools located in impoverished or working-class neighborhoods, campuses in upscale areas - like El Camino - find themselves excluded from many programs that provide additional money to help low-income or minority students.

As independent campuses, however, charters receive state funding under a different formula that provides additional money for every student on campus.

In the 2009-10 school year, for instance, charter high schools received an average of $7,369 per student, compared with $6,417 per student at traditional high schools.

Leaders of local schools that have converted to charters say the financial incentives are a factor in making the change - but not necessarily the most important one.

Charters are overseen by a board of directors - composed of teachers, parents and residents - who help make decisions impacting the campus.

"It's like going from being a renter versus an owner," said Brian Bauer, principal of Granada Hills Charter High School.

Bauer said the sense of ownership extends to the school's students, whose academic performance improved.

"That is a fundamental shift that takes place when you go charter," Bauer said.

Taking advantage of these benefits, 23 Los Angeles Unified campuses have converted to charters in recent years - about half located in affluent suburbs and one-third in the San Fernando Valley.

And that number is expected to grow.

LAUSD board member Tamar Galatzan, whose district encompasses much of the Valley, said she knows of at least five local elementary schools that plan to convert to charter status by next year.

"A break-up is happening," she said. "Charter (schools) are breaking up the school district ... and we don't know yet if this is a good thing or not."

TAFT HIGH PARENTS OBJECT TO DISTRICT’S OFFER TO SHARE SPACE WITH CHARTER: A school board member suggests residents file suit to block the move.

By Bob Pool, Los Angeles Times | http://lat.ms/eOS8Qy

At a town hall meeting, parents said they had no desire to share the school's facilities with Ivy Academia. The district had offered to turn over 24 classrooms to the charter.

February 22, 2011  - A District trustee has advised Woodland Hills residents that they may have to sue the school system if they want to block 600 charter school pupils from being sent to Taft High.

Board member Steven Zimmer's suggestion came as hundreds of parents and students crowded into Taft's multipurpose room last week to protest the district's offer to turn over 24 of the high school's classrooms to Ivy Academia.

Ivy Academia's operators would send pupils in grades 6 through 12 to the west San Fernando Valley high school under the tentative offer.

"Ivy believes with an almost religious fervor that they have a right to be on a LAUSD campus," Zimmer told the crowd. "You're going to need to get an injunction — a temporary restraining order — to stop it."

Charter schools are guaranteed access to school district classrooms and other facilities under provisions of Proposition 39, approved by voters in 2000.

Banners and flyers posted on the Taft campus before Thursday night's 2 1/2-hour town hall organized by parents proclaimed that the high school has "No Vacancy" and no desire to share its gym, athletic fields, cafeteria, library or classrooms with the charter school.

Zimmer counseled parents that they would need to argue in court that introduction of the Ivy pupils, "if allowed to go forth, will cause a level of harm" that only a restraining order could stop.

A parade of students and parents told Zimmer and a panel of other school district officials that Ivy pupils will cause plenty of pain if they are squeezed into the 2,549-student high school.

"There is no room here. Where are they going to go?" asked Camille Saucier, a 16-year-old Taft junior.

Tenth-grader Rebekka Boyes, 15, referred to the charter school pupils as "Ivy leaguers."

"If they wanted to come to Taft, they should have enrolled at Taft, not Ivy," she said.

A representative of the Valley area's Parent Teacher Student Assn. warned that uniform-clad Ivy pupils would be met with hostility from high school students, prompting Zimmer to pledge that "Taft will be a safe school" no matter what happens.

Ivy Academia is not the first charter school to bump up against Taft parents and administrators. In 2008, a performing arts charter ran into opposition when district officials considered locating it at Taft.

School officials indicated that classroom allocations will be finalized in April. Several other campuses with unused classrooms have also been identified as potential charter school sites.

According to the school district, Taft had 18 empty classrooms last fall and an additional 18 rooms used for computer labs, college-information centers and other non-teaching purposes. Last week, however, a Taft administrator said the school has only eight unused classrooms out of a total of about 130.

It will be up to Taft's administrators "to figure out" where Ivy pupils are housed if the high school is used by the charter school, Parker Hudnut, executive director of L.A. Unified's innovation and charter schools division, told parents.

"This is an implementation nightmare," Hudnut said.

Representatives of Ivy Academia did not speak at the meeting, which several parents suggested was a sign of the charter school's "smugness" and an indication that the move-in agreement "is a done deal."

Ivy's school sites in nearby Warner Center, Canoga Park, Chatsworth and West Hills were closed for a four-day Presidents Day holiday, and administrators could not be reached for comment.

The charter school, which officials say is "educating the next generation of entrepreneurs," is no stranger to controversy, however.

Last year the co-founders of the school — Russian immigrants Eugene Selivanov and his wife, Tatyana Berkovich — were charged with stealing more than $200,000 in public funds through embezzlement, money laundering and filing false tax returns. The pair have denied wrong-doing and are no longer affiliated with Ivy Academia.

Linda Del Cueto, L.A. Unified's Valley-area superintendent, promised parents and students that their protest message would be delivered to incoming district Supt. John Deasy.

"The passion here has certainly shown me your concern," she said.

Monday, February 21, 2011

MORE LAUSD SCHOOLS CONVERT TO CHARTERS AS FUNDS DIP

By CHRISTINA HOAG, Associated Press from The Miami Herald | http://bit.ly/ijmJiS

Sunday, 02.20.11 -- LOS ANGELES -- El Camino Real High School has won six national academic quiz championships, boasts test scores that rank it as one of California's top secondary schools, and offers two dozen college-level courses ranging from macroeconomics to human geography. Activities include a model United Nations and mock trials.

The school is a source of immense pride for the beleaguered Los Angeles Unified School District, but like other successful schools before it, El Camino is about to break off from the district to get more funding and flexibility in how it spends its dollars as a charter school.

"This is a huge loss for us," said LAUSD school board member Nury Martinez at a recent meeting. "This feels like a divorce."

With budget woes showing no signs of letting up, El Camino and other traditional neighborhood schools like it are converting to public charter schools, bleeding scarce dollars from cash-strapped districts and siphoning students.

It's a troubling pattern for school districts - every student enrolled in a charter means a funding loss, and defections of their own schools and principals are a blow to district esteem.

Although conversions are holding steady at about 10 percent of new charters nationally, in California they're on the rise. Long a leader in the charter school movement, the Golden State saw a jump in the number of conversions from six in 2009 to 15 in 2010, according to the California Charter Schools Association, although in the two previous years the number was steady at around a dozen.

Besides LAUSD, Campbell Union in Santa Clara County and San Diego Unified school districts have had clusters of conversions.

At LAUSD, the nation's second largest school system that grapples with a raft of low-achieving inner-city schools, conversions are a cause for dismay - some of the district's star schools mostly located in a swath of affluent suburbs are breaking away.

El Camino is the fourth suburban high school to seek charter conversion over the past eight years - two others were stellar performers, as well - Granada Hills and Palisades. Another large school, Birmingham, went charter in 2009. Two other suburban high schools are mulling charter conversion.

Top-ranked suburban elementaries are no exception - two went charter last year and another recently filed its petition to the district.

"We're losing our high performing schools," Martinez said. "Are we going to be a district of struggling schools if everyone decides to leave - struggling schools and children with learning disabilities that no one wants to teach?"

While many charter schools accept students by application and are often criticized for eschewing special needs kids and low achievers, the converted charters still operate as neighborhood schools - they accept all students within their attendance boundaries. If they have room, they can accept students from outside their areas.

At high performing schools like Palisades and Granada Hills, students from all over the district queue up to get in, further sapping dollars from the main district.

The crux of the dilemma is different state funding formulas for charter schools versus traditional district schools.

High schools, especially, stand to gain financially by going charter because many independents receive the state's high-school funding rate instead of the "blended" rate given to schools in a unified district, which includes elementary and secondary schools.

The difference adds up. For the 2009-10 school year, the state paid independent high schools an average of $7,369 per pupil, while unified districts received $6,417 per pupil. An independent elementary received $6,134.

"There's long been a feeling that high schools are subsidizing the rest of the district because of the revenue difference," said Brian Bauer, executive director of 4,100-student Granada Hills Charter High School, one of the nation's largest charter schools that went independent in 2003. "The pressure is on these schools. The district's concern that this will create a domino effect is legitimate."

The extra funds go a long way. Granada Hills, which ended last year with a $10 million reserve, operates a mandatory four-week summer enrichment program for all incoming 9th graders. "We could not have done it as a school in the district," Bauer said. "There would not have been the funding for it."

At Palisades, teachers earn 8 percent more than their counterparts at district schools, ensuring a top flight teaching staff, said Mike Smith, interim executive director. One drawback - the school does not get busing funds.

As a charter, El Camino, as well as some elementaries, would also get extra funds for low-income students. Currently, El Camino is the only district high school that does not receive anti-poverty funds because only 25 percent of its student body qualifies as disadvantaged, below LAUSD's 40 percent threshold.

By going charter, it would get $415,000 in supplemental funds for those students.

Charters also have a lot more freedom in how they spend state money. While much of the money given to districts is earmarked for specific purposes, say special education, charter funding is not earmarked.

"How do you say no to something like that?" said LAUSD board member Tamar Galatzan, who met with El Camino Real administrators numerous times to try to find other funding avenues, to no avail. "The state has to take a really hard look at how they're funding charters and districts. It's really hard for districts to compete."

For some schools, freedom from onerous teachers' union contracts can be another motivator.

Although charter teachers are generally not unionized, teachers at converted charters remain in the main district union but under separate bargaining contracts that usually give the schools more flexibility in setting salaries, evaluating performance and hiring and firing.

That was a key reason why Birmingham Community Charter High School went independent in its quest to boost student achievement, said Executive Director Marsha Coates.

Under its separate teachers' contract, the school has more freedom from both union and district red tape surrounding hiring and firing, as well as trying different techniques, she said.

"We're doing what we feel is best for kids," Coates said. "Things are slow to change with the district."

For top academic schools, the stakes are high when budget cuts loom. Teacher layoffs often boost class size, threatening to lower all-important standardized test scores. Programs such as art and music are the first to be slashed, as well as enrichment programs that set the schools apart from their counterparts.

At El Camino, parents fear the school's performance could slide, said Jackie Keene, mother of three El Camino students, past and present.

El Camino lost seven teachers during last year's layoffs, said Principal Dave Fehte. "To maintain our academic reputation and move on, we feel this is the only way given the economic climate," he told the school board, which is scheduled to vote on the application in March.

Teachers are on board with the move - 86 percent voted to support the charter application. "I think they see this would be the best option to keep our academic excellence," said history teacher Karen Ritchie.

Superintendent Ramon Cortines said he expects the conversion trend to continue, although he's been working with high schools to free them from various rules so they stay in the district, and plans to continue operating about 25 small schools that don't pay for themselves so they don't go charter.

But unless state funding rules change, he said he foresees the day when the district's enrollment of 650,000 will plummet to 400,000. "We're going to get down to that," he said. "This will always be a district of challenges. This is who we are."

Sunday, February 20, 2011

SUPER SUPPORT FOR EDUCATION …or after the football, commercials and the Black Eyed Peas let’s solve the problems of Public Education in L.A.

By Patt DiRoll, Pasadena Star News Social Reporter | http://bit.ly/gaS7y8

Cherna Gitnick, Fulfillment Fund CEO Andrea Cockrum, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, Lu Parker and Dr. Gary Gitnick. For the 25th consecutive year, Gary Gitnick, Chief of the Division of Digestive Diseases at UCLA School of Medicine and his wife Cherna opened their Encino home to 350 friends for their annual Super Bowl party. (Photo by Vince Bucci)

02/20/2011 -- For the 25th consecutive year, Cherna and Gary Gitnick opened their Encino home to 350 friends for their annual Super Bowl Party on Feb. 6.

The Gitnicks are co-founders of the Fulfillment Fund, the nonprofit mentoring organization that has been providing educational and scholarship opportunities for L.A. youth since it was established 34 years ago. The Fulfillment Fund is a college-access program that assists 1,700 kids a year, all from under-performing L.A. schools.

For the first time, the event departed from the Gitnicks' customary halftime format, which in the past has been a showcase for an assortment of politicians. This year, the halftime rhetoric was confined to a discussion on best ways to repair the Los Angeles Unified School District.

The blue-ribbon panel included L.A.U.S.D. Superintendent John Deasy, United Teachers L.A. President A.J. Duffy, L.A. County Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky, L.A. City Controller Wendy Greuel, L.A. City Councilmembers Paul Krekorian and Jan Perry, California State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson, Partnership of L.A. Schools CEO Marshall Tuck, L.A.U.S.D. Board President Monica Garcia, L.A. City Attorney Carmen Trutanich and L.A.U.S.D. Board member Tamar Galatzan.

Also on hand to meet and greet were L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, former Gov. Gray Davis and his wife Sharon, and L.A. County Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas.

"What must be done to make the L.A. public school system the best in the world?" Gitnick asked the panel.

This prompted a litany of solutions ranging from alternative energy, new technology, health care, safe neighborhoods, expansion of local control, extension of the school day, evaluation and elimination of low-performing teachers and principals, expansion of pre-school programs, and increased parental involvement.

And, of course, the bottom line, where to get the money to make it all happen.

"Everyone needs to get involved," Tuck said.

"Teachers and principals must believe that all kids can go to college, give them a hard curriculum, motivate them, and make them accountable. Everyone needs to step up. Go to your local school and talk about your job, and how you got there."

ONCE-MIGHTY UTLA LOSES POLITICAL MUSCLE: In a series of missteps, the teachers union has lost influence in L.A. Unified elections and in negotiations with board members backed by Mayor Villaraigosa.

By Howard Blume, Los Angeles Times

A.J. Duffy

February 18, 2011, 9:47 p.m. [Published Feb 20 ]- Critics portray the Los Angeles teachers union as politically all-powerful, able to swing elections and exert control over the Board of Education in the nation's second-largest school system. But in recent years United Teachers Los Angeles hasn't lived up to that reputation.

<<A.J. Duffy, president of United Teachers Los Angeles. UTLA has lost influence in elections. (Jay L. Clendenin/Los Angeles Times / March 10, 2010)

It's been eight years since UTLA backing put a candidate on the Board of Education in a race in which another contender also had strong financial support. And this year, the union has quietly given up on reclaiming a majority of allies on the seven-member Board of Education in the March 8 election.

This concession is noteworthy: When union-backed candidates win, especially when they prevail because of union support, UTLA gains a sympathetic ear. And there are implied political consequences for board members who stop listening.

But insiders and civic leaders, both pro- and anti-UTLA, describe the union as an organization that has lost clout at the ballot box as well as in the day-to-day proceedings of the backrooms and the board room.

"When I read 'the powerful teachers union,' I think: What powerful teachers union?" said Becki Robinson, a UTLA vice president from 1996 to 2002 who remained active in the union until her retirement two years ago. "I don't believe that the current UTLA has any political influence in the district at all. It is completely 180 degrees from what it used to be."

Interviews with board members suggest that the empathy and intimidation factor have ebbed.

"There's definitely not a majority of the board that puts UTLA in the middle of every conversation or is concerned about needing to consult with them or get their blessing," said a board member who spoke on condition of anonymity, having no desire to offend even a diminished union. "Most of us roll our eyes when things come up with UTLA because they're less and less influential in the conversations we're having."

Some civic leaders have countered UTLA's influence by raising massive campaign funds for their own competing slates of candidates. But they could harness only modest grassroots, volunteer help compared to the potential army of ground support from thousands of teachers that UTLA commands. And yet UTLA's opponents have frequently prevailed in the wake of union gaffes and strategic errors.

Recently, union officials withdrew support for two candidates after learning about indiscretions in their past that the candidates failed to disclose and that incomplete background checks failed to uncover.

Both of them, Jesus Escandon and John Fernandez, still will appear on the ballot, although Escandon has abandoned his campaign. The union remains active in two contests, supporting incumbent Marguerite Poindexter LaMotte and opting this month for retired teacher Bennett Kayser in the race for the one board seat not filled by an incumbent.

Union President A.J. Duffy delivered a less than resounding call to arms.

"We believe there are some reasonable moderates on the board that quite often hold views that we do, but who feel that there is a board majority that is very powerful," Duffy said. "If we could get some other moderates on the board we could influence the current group of moderates."

Barring an upset, the largest bloc on the school board will remain generally allied with Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, a former UTLA organizer who has become a strong critic of the teachers union. He has backed three candidates — considered to be favorites — and helped raise more than $1.5 million for an independent committee working to elect them.

The Villaraigosa-backed board has passed key measures opposed by the teachers union. Early on, it delivered control of Locke High to a charter school organization. Overall, the board has approved dozens of nonunion, startup charters. And last year the school board began allowing outside groups to bid for control of new campuses and low-performing ones as well. The board also has approved a succession of ground-shifting policies affecting teachers' evaluations. And the district recently agreed to weaken long-held "last hired, first fired" safeguards to protect many younger teachers from being laid off due to budget cuts.

As in many school systems, the teachers union was, for years, the most influential political force in L.A. Unified. The union's clout has been based on financial strength and sheer, often impassioned numbers; teachers also appealed successfully to public sympathies.

In 2003, a union-financed campaign unseated board members Caprice Young and Genethia Hayes. They had been leaders among a board majority endorsed by former Mayor Richard Riordan, billionaire philanthropist Eli Broad and their allies.

The new board majority immediately clashed at times with then-Supt. Roy Romer.

"I love the people in the union, but I thought they had undue influence," Romer said. "They have influence through the money they contributed in the board races and the organization they had. During board meetings, I had board members in direct phone or e-mail connection with union members in the audience. I remember going to a labor negotiation and there were two board members sitting on the other side with the labor group. Symbolically, it was startling."

In 2005, a group of longtime insurgents, allied with Duffy, took charge of the union. They intended to mobilize the political force of the union as never before.

It hasn't happened.

One embarrassing incident occurred in the 2006 election to fill a vacated seat. The union had endorsed its own youthful staffer, Christopher Arellano, and launched a campaign that spent more than $100,000. The union later learned about two past theft convictions, missed court appearances and the claim of a master's degree that was, in fact, not yet completed.

The collapse of his campaign opened the door for Monica Garcia, who became — and remains — the first and tightest ally of Villaraigosa.

In 2007, the union reelected LaMotte, but lost three other seats to a Villaraigosa-backed campaign. In that cycle, the union backed one unsuccessful incumbent who was dying of cancer and couldn't mount an energetic campaign. And the leadership resisted efforts to oppose Villaraigosa-financed candidates in two races that political consultants judged winnable. In one of them, the UTLA leadership had helped to nudge a relatively popular incumbent, David Tokofsky, to the sidelines.

"They have this reputation of being like Godzilla, but at times, they're really like The Three Stooges," said Tokofsky, who has nonetheless continued to work with the union during a subsequent career as a consultant.

Union leaders and their supporters insist that UTLA has made crucial contributions to improving schools and retains valuable political clout.

Indeed, no one is ready to write off UTLA's influence. For one thing, key reform initiatives and budget cutting measures must, by law, be negotiated with the union.

"The union's power relationship with the board is not what it used to be," board member Yolie Flores said. "But you can't ignore the union or discount the legitimate power of teachers that it represents. And we're obviously conscious that we can't solve any of this by ourselves."

Times staff writer Jason Song contributed to this report.

SUNDAY FUNNIES:

classic peanuts for 2/20/2011 from comics .com | http://bit.ly/fFoMFLPeanuts

Saturday, February 19, 2011

EX-PRINCIPAL GETS PRISON IN MOLESTATION OF FOUR GIRLS

by smf for 4LAKidsNEWS

19 February 2011 - Today's LA Times has a story EX-PRINCIPAL GETS PRISON IN MOLESTATION':

A former principal at a Lynwood high school who allegedly had a history of inappropriate behavior with young girls was sentenced Friday to eight years in prison for sexually molesting four students. >more>

The school is in Lynwood USD; the story gets wide coverage elsewhere - it could happen here – and has.

The story is a familiar, pathetic and tawdry one - with a backstory of intimidated young women and girls and imitations of coverup and defending the indefensible - some sloppy reporting and recordkeeping - and the truly angering information that the offender had a prior conviction for unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor.

How did such a person get his job or a credential?

The answer is well explained in an article from two years ago in the Los Angeles Wave: QUESTIONS RAISED ON SILVERIO’S CREDENTIAL - a tip o' th' 4LAKids cap to writer Marisela Santana for a excellent piece of journalism. Also see her current story: SILVERIO SENTENCED TO EIGHT YEARS IN PRISON

All of this said, there is an important lesson to be learned here - and while the Wave article concludes that the sort of thing that happened here probably can't happen again - it seems obvious to me that the actual thing that happened here: a prior child molester getting a teaching credential after his or her record has been expunged in the past - can happen again. Pleading no contest, serving probation and behaving oneself for a year is not rehabilitation for this offense. Children need more protection than that.

The power of a judge to expunge the record of an offender is greater than that of a governor or the president to grant a pardon - and perhaps it should take more than a judge to expunge the records of those who prey on children?

 

from WikiPedia: When an expungement is granted, the person whose record is expunged may, for most purposes, treat the event as if it never occurred. A pardon (also called “executive clemency”), on the other hand, does not “erase” the event. Rather, it constitutes forgiveness. In the United States, an expungement can be granted only by a judge, while a pardon can be granted only by a governor (for state law offenses) or the President (for federal offenses).