By CAITLIN EMMA | Politico Morning Education | from Fritzwire via e-mail
A
negotiated rulemaking committee on the Every Student Succeeds Act (a rewrite of the Great Society ESEA (Elementary and Secondary Education Act), the previous rewrite being the execrable NCLB [No Child Left Behind]) meets
today for the last day of its first round of talks. On the agenda: the
inclusion of English-language learners in assessments and in
English-language proficiency tests. Expect the committee to sort through
more big-picture questions. For example, ESSA requires states to
identify among students languages other than English that are present to
a "significant extent" and "make every effort" to develop tests in
those languages. The committee will discuss what exactly that effort
would look like and what it means when a language is present to a
significant extent. Then they'll talk about how the actual regulatory
language should look - revealing where true consensus emerges and where
negotiations fall apart. The committee meets again for three days
starting April 6.
One
of the most heated debates Tuesday has centered on whether to define
"students with the most significant cognitive disabilities." The issue
resulted in the creation of a subcommittee first thing this morning.
Committee members representing the civil rights community said on
Tuesday that a definition is needed. And Lisa Mack, a member of the Ohio PTA representing parents and students, said one would be helpful so
parents know when their child falls under that umbrella. But other
members, including Wisconsin Superintendent Tony Evers, said it's not
necessary and will only make things more complex for states, which have
operated for years without a federal definition*. I have more: http://politico.pro/1ULmwcB.
There's
been a "surge" of legislative activity related to using test scores in
teacher evaluations after the enactment of ESSA, according to The
Brookings Institution: http://brook.gs/1pHpHa0 .
No comments:
Post a Comment