Wednesday, November 25, 2009

A DOLLAR A WEEK PER RESIDENT COULD SAVE THE CALIFORNIA COLLEGE DREAM

By thomas d. elias | op ed in the Palo Alto Daily News

11/24/2009 10:39:24 PM PST - The University of California now says it will ask state legislators for $913 million more next year than it received in this year's budget. The California State University system will ask for an increase of $884 million.

These requests come as public college and university tuition and other fees are climbing to levels that will soon approach those of top private campuses. What's more, despite the universities' requests, any likelihood of higher education getting more money next year seems like a pipe dream when estimates of next year's state budget deficit range from $7 billion to $24 billion, figures so daunting they helped spur the resignation of the state's finance director, who admits he considered ways to put California into bankruptcy last spring.

Meanwhile, enrollments are being cut, class sizes are rising, availability of small sections where students can get detailed instruction from graduate students on concepts discussed in large lecture classes are dwindling and community college enrollment is up, while successful transfers from them to four-year campuses are down to only about 40 percent.

Taken together, this sad picture translates into a serious truncation of the California dream.

Public higher education has always been a huge part of that dream, the vehicle of upward mobility for millions of enterprising students over the last century and the engine at the heart of almost all this state's many successes.

When the State Water Project pioneered the transportation of huge amounts of water over high mountains, UC-trained engineers did most of the conceptual work and drew the bulk of the plans. While big Silicon Valley successes like Hewlett-Packard and Google were founded by products of the private Stanford University, they could not have gotten far without thousands of talented programmers and engineers turned out by UC and Cal State schools — including the current chairman of Google. When California developed into the world's agricultural leader, it was in large part sparked by graduates of UC-Berkeley, UC-Davis, UC-Riverside and several Cal State campuses.

The list could go on and on.

All this is seriously threatened now by a trend in Sacramento toward cutting higher education first. Things are so bad that more money is now spent on state prisons than state universities, a startling turnabout from the decades when the UC and Cal State systems pioneered making quality education available and affordable to every qualified person.

One example of the consequences is what's happening at San Jose State University, where 2,500 fewer students will be enrolled next fall than entered this September, when the school already cut 3,000 slots. San Jose State will accept all qualified students from surrounding Santa Clara County, but will limit entry by non-area residents and toughen standards for admission to popular majors like engineering, business and nursing.

"We're downsizing," campus President Jon Whitmore told a reporter, "so if there is a smaller group of students and a smaller group of employees, we are still providing a quality education."

With the same sort of thing happening across the state, fewer qualified workers will be available to major industries. CSU plans to downsize by 40,000 students statewide, enough promising young people to fill a small city. True, there will still be more than 400,000 students on CSU campuses, but fewer university graduates will be able to start their own businesses. Meanwhile, the University of California plans to cut about 2,500 students, leaving it with just over 100,000 total slots. These numbers spell shrinkage for the California dream.

This impending tragedy could be avoided, of course, if attitudes were different in state government. Providing an additional $2 billion to the universities would end all these cuts and restore most classes and student slots. That would cost an average of $52 per year — a dollar a week — per Californian.

California voters repeatedly show in local elections they are willing to pay far more than that in parcel taxes, city sales taxes and other levies when they can see the benefits that money will provide. But statewide politicians have never even tried to make a case for higher education. It's far easier to cut and slash and raise tuition and fees and drive the state's once-proud university systems into something less than world-class stature, allowing them to contribute even less to the state's future.

So attitudes — and maybe a lot of politicians — need to change if the education component so vital to the California dream is to be revitalized. For Californians have shown time and again they are willing to pay when convinced their money is needed and won't be wasted.

Which means money isn't the only thing lacking in these days of fiscal and budgetary crisis. There's a lack of leadership with vision for this state's future.

Thomas D. Elias is a syndicated columnist who writes about state issues. E-mail him at tdelias@aol.com.

BRIEFLY: Texas’ Catch 22, Cal’s universities hard(er) to get into, Schools wait for H1N1 vaccine, Class size up, Feds may penalize budget cuts, Empty seats hit budgets

from various newsfeeds

Texas school districts are feeling impact of statewide budget crisis

Difficult economic times have forced two Texas school districts to halt construction of new schools because although they have the funds to build the schools, they do not have the money to operate them. Despite a small infusion of stimulus money, state funding for education stands frozen at the level it was three years ago, and officials say they do not anticipate much more in the near future. Houston Chronicle (11/25)

California’s Public Universities: Harder To Get Into

- californiabudgetbites.org

Gaining admission to California’s public universities is becoming more difficult. Not only are the University of California (UC) and the California State University (CSU) increasing student fees in response to state budget cuts, they are also reducing enrollment. The decisions to cut enrollments come at a time when applications to the UC and CSU are [...]

Schools could wait until January for H1N1 vaccine

School district health administrators from throughout the county learned last week that H1N1 vaccine for general student populations is not expected to be available until early January, the San Joaquin County Office of Education reported Monday.

Despite state subsidies, class sizes begin to rise again in California schools

Most of California's largest school districts are increasing class sizes in kindergarten through third grade, eroding the most expensive education reform in the state's history.

Column: Feds could penalize budget cuts for education

How much spending is cut for K-12 schools and higher education next year may be determined not in Sacramento but in Washington, D.C. – and perhaps by the White House.

Empty seats shrink school revenues

More kids are staying home sick from school this year, and local districts could face financial pain if the trend continues.

MARKHAM MIDDLE SCHOOL ISN’T WORKING: The problem-plagued Watts school needs teachers, but state regulations and contract rules are preventing officials from hiring educators who want the jobs …+ smf’s 2¢

LA Times Editorial

November 25, 2009 -- Even in these difficult times, many teachers would rather remain jobless than work at Markham Middle School. The school is located in a crime-plagued Watts neighborhood that encompasses the Jordan Downs and Nickerson Gardens housing projects and their rival gangs. Its test scores are among the lowest in Los Angeles, and during the 2006-07 academic year, more than 500 students were suspended, at least half of those for "attempted physical harm," including 19 assaults on staff members. Its reputation was further tarnished after an assistant principal, Steve Thomas Rooney, was arrested on charges of molesting students. He was sentenced in September to eight years in prison.

As a result of its unpopularity, Markham has six teacher openings in a year when hundreds of L.A. Unified School District teachers have lost their jobs. The school's leaders know of qualified teachers outside the district who would love to work there, but cannot hire them because of state regulations and contract rules that govern layoffs and rehirings according to seniority.

Instead, while Markham goes through the byzantine hiring process laid out in the L.A. Unified teachers contract, those classes are being taught by substitutes who rotate every month. That means students not only have under-qualified teachers, but enjoy no continuity of instruction. They're already on their fourth teacher of the year in those classes.

Taken over last year by Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's Partnership for Los Angeles Schools, Markham hired mostly new, idealistic teachers. But when California's budget crisis forced mass layoffs at L.A. Unified, the school, with one of the lowest-seniority faculties, lost close to half of its teachers. Under contract rules, Markham had to rehire for its vacant spots from pools of laid-off district teachers who had the most seniority. But after all the openings were filled last summer, several teachers changed their minds.

The school then had to go through the process all over again, hiring from new pools of teachers with successively less seniority. It made its latest round of offers two weeks ago -- and again, teachers who had accepted changed their minds. The school could hire long-term substitutes regardless of seniority, but of the relative few with the credentials Markham needs, none have accepted its offers.

Though various improvements have been made at Markham under the mayor's partnership, its already miserable score on the state's Academic Performance Index slipped another 10 points last year. But all efforts to turn around Markham or any other low-performing school are doomed if the state, the district and we as a society accept the idea of denying students qualified, coherent instruction even when teachers who want to help them are close at hand.

●●smf's 2¢ + a million dollars worth from the Times’ archives:  Compare and contrast this editorial with this article: SECURE IN THEIR STUDIES: An anti-violence effort at Markham Middle has opened a new chapter for the Watts school's students.

In the interim a number of things have happened:

  • The economy and the budget cuts …these effect socioeconomically challenged communities  disproportionately but they apply to all schools in the district, including charters and schools run by outside operators.
  • The mayor's partnership (PLAS) took over Markham. The new management and/or the fear of new management triggered an exodus of staff and management from Markham through transfers, reassignments and early retirement. The PLAS hired the staff it hired.
  • The City Attorney/LAUSD partnership at Markham described in the article expired and was not renewed. This had to have been a conscious decision by the City Attorney’s Office, PLAS.and LAUSD.
  • The City Attorney Partnership model has been replicated at other LAUSD middle schools – but it is doubtful with the change at the top in the City Attorney’s office that that office’s commitment remains the same. Absent that this becomes another pilot program that worked but was not implemented. In the end it was not the infusion of money from the City Attorneys office or outside partners in this program that made the difference for the bright shining moment – it was the hard work invested by hard workers.

HEALING THE WORLD, ONE SCHOOL AT A TIME

The Jewish Journal

By Rachel Heller | The Jewish Journal

Emerson Middle School principal Kathy Gonnella (wearing scarf), Rabbi Dara Frimmer (back, second from right) and congregants from Temple Isaiah meet with fifth-grade families at Brockton Avenue Elementary School.  Photo by Barry E. Levine
Emerson Middle School principal Kathy Gonnella (wearing scarf), Rabbi Dara Frimmer (back, second from right) and congregants from Temple Isaiah meet with fifth-grade families at Brockton Avenue Elementary School. Photo by Barry E. Levine

November 25, 2009 -- When Robyn Ritter Simon first checked out Canfield Avenue Elementary School for her sons in 1995, she didn’t like what she saw.

Test scores weren’t stellar. The school grounds needed improvement. And in the heavily Jewish Pico-Robertson area of West Los Angeles, where the public school is located, hardly any Jewish families were sending their kids. Ritter Simon’s eldest son would have been one of few white children — and even fewer Jewish children — in his class.

But while other mothers in her Beverlywood neighborhood were budgeting for private school, Ritter Simon and a group of friends went to work fixing up the school and wooing local families back to the campus. Over a nearly 10-year period, the “Beverlywood Moms” stumped for the school at neighborhood gatherings, organized house meetings and successfully recruited hundreds of local Jewish families back to Canfield. Today, the school her peers once shunned is “an anchor of the neighborhood,” Ritter Simon said, and that enthusiasm has caught on elsewhere.

“We really galvanized parents about public education, which ended up improving elementary schools throughout the Westside,” she said.

Now the group’s model for revitalizing Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) schools is graduating from elementary school to that place that still causes many Jewish parents to bite their nails in anxiety: middle school. And, for the first time, some major Jewish institutions are joining the effort.

Through a community organizing program, congregants of Temple Isaiah are mobilizing to kick up support for Emerson Middle School, one local intermediate school that serves a wide swath of West Los Angeles. Temple Isaiah activists are waging a two-pronged campaign — urging local Jewish families to look past the rumors and give the school a chance, and working to activate non-Jewish parents at Emerson’s feeder elementary schools so they’ll stay involved when their kids get to middle school.

To be sure, many Jewish families, including most Orthodox families, don’t send their children to local schools, choosing instead to enroll them in private day schools emphasizing Judaic studies from childhood through high school. But not all the effort from the Jewish community is about enrolling in a particular school, rather the focus is on getting involved in offering support. To that end, for example, the congregation at IKAR, which includes residents from throughout the city, is about to embark on an effort to bolster a public school in a struggling neighborhood that is not in their facility’s immediate neighborhood but is in great need of assistance.

If concerned parents of all ethnic and religious backgrounds work together, these congregations believe, they can help strengthen public education for children everywhere.

The timing is right, too. In a struggling economy with private school tuition rates climbing out of reach, more Jewish families are looking at their neighborhood schools. And they want to be assured the schools are good.

But this time of uncertainty also offers a chance to return to the core Jewish value of tikkun olam (repairing the world): Choosing public school, some say, is simply the “right” thing to do. In her Yom Kippur sermon in September, Temple Isaiah’s Rabbi Dara Frimmer made the case:

“The prophet Jeremiah said, ‘Seek the well-being of the city in which you dwell ... for in its peace you shall find peace,’” Frimmer said. “The well-being of the city in which we dwell depends on a strong, public education for all children. It’s about the future of Los Angeles.”


Building Relationships

At 4:45 p.m. on a drizzly October evening, about 40 parents of fifth-graders gather at the low-slung kiddie tables dotting Brockton Avenue Elementary School’s library. Principal Kim Lattimore opens the yearly parent meeting with a welcoming speech, also translated into Spanish, then she introduces a guest — Emerson principal Kathy Gonnella, who will have most Brockton graduates at her school next year.

Scattered among the crowd is a handful of elementary school parents from across town, Temple Isaiah congregants whose children are also zoned to go to Emerson in a few years. One of them, Jeremy Bollinger, introduces himself, saying he plans to send his two daughters to Emerson when they graduate from Westwood Charter Elementary School.

“I’m excited to come and meet you, because we all share the same interest in making Emerson a great school for our kids,” he says.

It’s a conversation many Brockton parents — who are predominantly Latino — would later say they’d never had before.

Starting dialogues like this is a fundamental part of Temple Isaiah’s approach. By building relationships among community groups that have a stake in the school, activists believe, they can create a network of involved parents who will advocate for higher-quality education all the way up through the system.

These relationships are key according to One LA-IAF, the community organizing agency Temple Isaiah partnered with in 2007 to get the ball rolling on this initiative. One LA works with congregations of all faiths, as well as nonprofits and unions, to help create momentum for tackling social issues such as housing, labor and health care. Other member synagogues include Temple Emanuel in Beverly Hills, Temple Israel of Hollywood and Wilshire Boulevard Temple.

When the 1,100-family Temple Isaiah first began work with One LA, organizers held a series of meetings to pinpoint civic concerns members wanted to address. Public education was a recurring answer and, more specifically, Emerson.

Parents told stories of paying top dollar for a home in the pricey Westwood area to be near a “good” elementary school, then by middle school getting scared off by Emerson’s reputation and scrambling to budget for private school anyway. Older congregants talked about using up the inheritance they had hoped to leave their children to help finance grandchildren’s private school tuition — to avoid the local middle school.

“We heard from parents who felt completely disconnected from the values they were brought up with and the ones they wanted to express — about equity and democracy and making friends in the neighborhood and letting their kids grow up with a realistic view of Los Angeles. They had abandoned all of that because they just couldn’t make the choice to go to the local school,” Frimmer said. “We need to start talking out loud about public education and why we’re not going. People are broken and stressed out and feeling compromised morally. People don’t feel empowered — they feel helpless.”

Synagogue members started by reaching out to Emerson principal Gonnella last year and touring the campus to understand what the school had to offer and what its needs were. Then they came back and held meetings, inviting other congregants to voice their concerns in a public forum.

The outreach was a boon to Gonnella, who had made wooing neighborhood families back to the school a priority in her first three years as principal.

“It was so heartwarming to hear a rabbi from our neighborhood say, ‘We want to help you get the local community back,’ and that we share a vision of having Emerson be the school of choice for Westwood families,” Gonnella said.

Members of IKAR hope their own outreach to a Los Angeles public school will be met with such enthusiasm as they get ready to start a similar school-improvement campaign.

Last year, the 400-member-unit congregation began a community organizing program that also turned up public education as a top concern. The group is still deciding on a specific focus — since the IKAR community is so spread out, there isn’t a central school of relevance to all members, so they’re instead looking at schools in the low-income south-central part of the city.

Participants want to take a “holistic approach,” viewing the school as a vehicle through which to strengthen an entire community, said IKAR member Matty Sterenchock, co-chair of the education initiative. That means taking into account where kids go after school, whether the neighborhood is safe for children and what services are already in place to aid local families. So far, members are talking about mentoring students, holding after-school workshops and coordinating adult literacy programs to get the whole community engaged.

But the ultimate goal in these efforts is not for a handful of Jewish activists (Temple Isaiah’s contingent includes about 50 active congregants; IKAR’s includes about 30) to bring about change on their own — they want parents of all backgrounds, including the neighborhood parents, to partner to improve local schools.

Temple Isaiah members are taking that message on the road, visiting principals and parent groups at Emerson’s feeder elementary schools including Westwood Charter, Brockton and Castle Heights, to encourage activism to begin early.

“They will have this culture of taking not just an interest, but ownership in their schools,” said synagogue member Bollinger, who has become the resident Emerson liaison at Westwood Charter. “When parents are involved in a school, it shows kids that school is really important. Kids achieve at a higher level when they believe that, teachers are more accountable, and, as a whole, it really lifts up the performance of a school.”

Language barriers come into play as well — at Brockton, for instance, the population is 77 percent Latino, and some parents shy away from participating in the school because they don’t speak English. Immigrant parents often feel intimidated by the school system and that they don’t have a right to get involved, said Sister Maribeth Larkin, Temple Isaiah’s One LA organizer. So when synagogue members show up to their school and say they want to work together, it’s an empowering statement. Throwing money at a school will buy kids a new playground; inviting parents into the school will ensure generations of families care enough to maintain it.

Urban Myths

One part of the problem keeping Jewish families away may be schools’ outdated reputations.

Of Emerson, Bollinger said, “We heard horrible things — that there were gangs, there was bullying, that it wasn’t a safe place and the scores were so bad you couldn’t get a good education. I wrote the school off, and immediately thought, ‘OK, we have to start saving for private school.’”

For a lot of families, the story stops there. But Bollinger and his wife talked to parents of Emerson students and went to meetings in support of the school. “We found that all of those rumors were false, and the people who were spreading them were people who had never stepped onto the campus,” he said.

At 10 a.m. on a recent morning, there were no signs of gangs roaming the school grounds — a spread of beige and salmon stucco buildings that sits behind the Mormon temple on Santa Monica Boulevard near Beverly Glen Boulevard. Inside, the halls are clean and students dressed in blue and white garb — the school’s dress code — wave hello and say “Good morning, Ms. Gonnella” as the principal walks by. Late morning, Gonnella makes her way to a busy pedestrian intersection outside and oversees student traffic. As kids stream past, she calls out orders to lower a sweatshirt hood, spit out gum, tie shoelaces, button a too-revealing shirt.

The facility needs a grass field (gym is currently held on a blacktop area) and $50,000 to replace the aging computers in the computer lab, but overall the campus is well-kept and bright, with the hedges trimmed and flower pots lining outdoor walkways.

Emerson didn’t always have an image problem. Opened in 1935, the neighborhood school changed when LAUSD closed several nearby middle schools in the 1970s and ’80s, and students from poorer neighborhoods had to be bused in. This prompted heavy “neighborhood flight,” Gonnella said, to private schools or, through permitting, to the Beverly Hills school district. Emerson’s white student population languished from the mid-’80s until Gonnella was charged with bringing it back up.

In the last three years, the school’s white enrollment jumped from 10 percent to about 17 percent, and parent involvement has increased “tenfold,” Gonnella said. Emerson’s Academic Performance Index (API) scores have been rising, too — to 709 this year, up from 701 last year and 689 in 2007. Emerson is still considered a “failing school” according to the controversial federal No Child Left Behind Act, but teachers are adjusting instruction to cater to struggling students, she said. And, with just under 1,000 children, the school is small by LAUSD standards.

Many families don’t take the time to find out about Emerson’s plusses, Temple Isaiah parents say — they either go private, try to get their children permitted into the neighboring Paul Revere Middle School five miles away, or ply the magnet program’s arcane points system to secure a quality public education they fear the local school can’t offer.

“It’s sometimes painfully slow to change the entire thought process of a community,” said Ritter Simon, the Canfield Elementary mother. “Parents talk to other parents and take their recommendations. As long as we have parents saying, ‘Don’t go there — don’t even go and look,’ it builds a climate of people just staying away.”

There are about as many Jewish school-age kids in L.A. public schools as private schools, according to the Bureau of Jewish Education (BJE) in Los Angeles. Out of about 52,000 Jewish children in grades K-12, around 20,000 attend Jewish and secular private schools, said BJE director of day school operations Miriam Prum Hess. The rest, Hess guesses, must be in public schools.

Ritter Simon thinks more families would choose public schools if they took the time to see what they have to offer.

“There are a lot of outstanding teachers and administrators and parents that are doing phenomenal work in making schools successful, and they don’t get enough attention,” she said. “All you hear about are the problems and the horror stories — not enough textbooks, not enough seats. But you don’t hear about the teacher that stays after school every day and works with the kids to make sure they get it.”

Since becoming Emerson’s principal, Gonnella has held outreach meetings and monthly chats she dubs “Croissants and Conversation With Kathy” — anything she can think of to dispel the longtime “urban myths” that poison local white and Jewish parents’ interest in the middle school. She’d rather they work through their concerns by becoming active parents at Emerson.

“A lot of parents feel that they don’t have the experience or the skill set to get involved in the school, so they just stay away,” she said. “I want to take away that fear and let them know that they are wanted and appreciated and respected, and they can then become an integral part of not only their student’s education, but the whole educational process.”

Work in Progress

The fruits of that strategy can be seen at elementary schools across the Westside, where Jews have for years been at the forefront of efforts to bring middle-class families back to the public school system. Involved parents are holding house meetings and starting conversations with friends, hoping to recruit families back to their neighborhood schools in a bid to strengthen public education for the broader community.

Canfield Elementary has been the most visible success story, with the vocal — and mostly Jewish — Beverlywood Moms group starting work in the mid-’90s to turn the school around. Starting when their sons were just months old, Ritter Simon and three friends recruited a swath of local families back to the school, helped raise needed funds and refurbished school grounds even before any of their children set foot on the campus.

Going to public school wasn’t a financial necessity for them, said Ritter Simon, a longtime community activist who has run for Los Angeles City Council twice. The mothers wanted to go on principle. “We didn’t feel like we took leftovers,” she said. “We chose public school. For a lot of families, it’s not because of money — it’s because they believe in what they’re doing.”

Local families have returned in recent years to nearby Castle Heights and Fairburn Elementary schools too. In the early 2000s, Fairburn catered mostly to students coming in on permits from other areas, recalled former two-term LAUSD school board member Marlene Canter. By the time Canter left office last year, the school had attracted so many neighborhood kids that there were no longer spots for kids on permits, she said.

“We started to invite parents to the schools and in the area now, eight years later, all my elementary schools are filled to the brim with parents, and their scores are much higher,” said Canter, who served as school board president from 2005 to 2007 and called on families to support their local schools during her tenure.

That primary school energy is already starting to spill over to Emerson. As a result of outreach, led in part by Temple Isaiah parents, 33 Westwood Charter graduates started at Emerson this fall — more than double the number from last year, according to administrators.

But the influx of middle-class families has drawbacks, too. Schools that receive Title I funding — federal funds for low-income students — find their revenue streams shrinking as the number of students for those programs falls.

Three years ago, 71 percent of students at Emerson qualified under Title I, meaning they are eligible for free or reduced-price meals. Last year, 56 percent qualified. That means the school received only $600 per qualifying student, down from $900 when the school was over the 65 percent mark. Over the last three years, Gonnella said, Emerson took a $200,000 hit.

Compounded by recent district budget cuts, she said, the revenue drop is hurting everything from extra security at the school to library supplies and field trips.

“That is going to have to be made up by the local families,” Gonnella said.

Jewish Values Breed Activism

Fortunately, Jews have a lengthy résumé in grass-roots organizing that they can leverage to benefit schools in need.

“Jews are an important political force, especially in West Los Angeles,” said author and columnist Bill Boyarsky, who writes for The Jewish Journal and the local blogs Truthdig and L.A. Observed. “They have a long tradition and continue to be politically active, and have vast knowledge of how to campaign to get things done. They know how to put pressure on the school board members and the principals to improve things.”

As LAUSD schools scramble to fill budget gaps caused by education spending cuts, active parents can pick up the slack, Boyarsky said, using their organizing savvy to raise the funds needed to salvage at-risk programs.

And in the Jewish community, that kind of action is more than just a noble goal — it’s a moral imperative.

“As Jews, we are taught the importance of being responsible for not just our children, but for the world’s children,” said Gonnella, who grew up attending Wilshire Boulevard Temple. “Jews have an obligation to be a voice. When inequities occur, when needs are apparent at the school, it’s a plus to have more parents who have knowledge of how to work systems, who aren’t afraid to make demands that are reasonable but need to be made. When they speak out, it benefits all the students at the school.”

The pursuit of social justice is enshrined in the Torah, part of a seemingly contradictory set of commandments that calls on Jews to remain separate as a people through unique customs but also to champion the strength of the wider community. “We have to figure out a way to balance preserving not only ourselves but also the city, and looking out for not just our best interests but everyone’s best interests,” Rabbi Frimmer said.

For Temple Isaiah member Janet Hirsch, who sends her two children to Emerson, that balance can be achieved when more Jewish parents abandon the notion that their kids would be “guinea pigs” in Los Angeles’ much-maligned schools, and start thinking about how supporting public education can boost the entire city.

“A lot of people are prepared to risk their kid until fifth grade, but then they go private,” Hirsch said. That kind of “my kid only” mentality, she said, perpetuates the problem.

Frimmer wants to see more families having that conversation out loud.

Supporting the local school is an appealing notion, most agree, but some parents say they just aren’t ready yet.

With two children at Castle Heights Elementary, Elissa Thompson said she wants to stick with public education for her kids’ intermediate school years, but the local Palms Middle School is “not where I’d want it to be.”

Palms, with about 1,800 students and a 2009 API score of 840, is generally seen as a good school.

But, Thompson said, the family is prepared to move as far as Calabasas or Orange County to be near a higher-performing school district.

“The process of picking a school for your child is very personal,” Thompson said. “A lot of parents feel differently, but I’m just not there yet.”

‘Escape’ to Charter Island

Charters and magnet schools have long been bright spots of Jewish enrollment in the public school landscape. Westwood Charter — a prized fixture of the heavily Jewish Westwood community — and magnet programs such as Millikan Middle School’s performing arts magnet and Hamilton High School’s humanities magnet have typically drawn a large Jewish student population.

There’s support at the Jewish institutional level, too. In 2007, the Skirball Foundation partnered with a Los Angeles-based charter school organization to open Jack H. Skirball Middle School in the Watts area. Uri Herscher, CEO and president of the Skirball Cultural Center in West L.A., said the move honors the memory of Jack H. Skirball, an ordained rabbi and film producer whose advocacy for education led him to help found the Los Angeles campus of Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion.

The school brings a “positive energy” to its Watts neighborhood, said principal Joy May-Harris. The school’s API score is almost 200 points higher than other neighborhood schools, and its college-prep curriculum pushes kids to achieve more, she said.

Jack Skirball called public education “the anchor of democracy,” Herscher said after the school’s official naming ceremony on Oct. 28. Funding the school also reflected the Jewish value of giving back to the community, he added.

That was Matt Albert’s motivation for last year’s opening of New Los Angeles Charter School, a middle school that serves the Carthay neighborhood and boasts a social justice-themed curriculum heavy on community service work.

A former Milken Community High School educator, Albert said he’s seeing a rise in students coming to the charter school from private Jewish day schools. Much of it, he believes, is because fewer Jewish families are able to afford tuition for a K-12 Jewish education.

“Middle-class Jews are getting priced out of being Jewish,” Albert said. “I don’t believe the current system of Jewish education is sustainable. There are fewer people who can actually afford it as we go from generation to generation. At a certain point, the system of grandparents helping pay for tuition will dry up.”

For a lot of families, charters and magnets are seen as a “safe” entry point into a system some still harbor misgivings about. The motivation in these cases often isn’t to support public schools, said former LAUSD board member David Tokofsky; it’s to escape from them.

Smaller schools and learning communities are often a vehicle for parents to “gate off” from the system and protect the interests of their own child, Tokofsky said — to board a life raft to escape what is often seen as a sinking ship.

“Jews have cherished the ideal of equality, so it’s that much more tragic that in the politics of today, we’re not speaking a language of inclusion,” he said.

Albert understands some of the concern. Charter schools are more intimate, with as few as 200 students compared to 2,000 at some LAUSD middle schools. Teachers know the kids better, and class sizes are smaller. Parents feel less like their children could be “lost in the system.” Ideally, he said, families should be able to trust that their local school can provide a quality experience — whether it’s charter or not — but that’s not always the case.

Many parents also view LAUSD gifted and talented programs the same way. Honors programs, which conspicuously favor white students, are often seen as safer “islands” within district schools, some said.

Caucasian students only make up 8.8 percent of the LAUSD population, which is 73 percent Latino and 10.7 percent African American. Yet 24.7 percent of Caucasian students are in gifted programs, compared with only 6.6 percent of Latino students and 5.7 percent of African American students, according to the California Department of Education.

“It’s seen as a safe stepping stone,” said Hirsch, the Emerson parent, whose children are in the school’s honors track. “For a lot of parents, to go into that program kind of makes it OK to choose Emerson. If you were not identified as gifted for that program, your kid went to Paul Revere [Middle School].”

The issue raises tough questions about race and class that many find difficult to face, parents said.

“There are people who think, ‘The school is too black, the school is too Mexican,’ and all of a sudden you see a lot of ugly things about people,” Ritter Simon said. “Prejudice still exists. For a lot of people, that’s a very uncomfortable zone.”

Hard Work Ahead

Community leaders agree it would take years of hard work to bring Jewish families, en masse, back to the system. Parents would have to abandon fears and biases to embrace a vision of what public education in Los Angeles could be if everyone collectively rolled up their sleeves and committed to turning mediocre schools around.

“It’ll take a lot of determination and a lot of principals like Kathy and rabbis like Rabbi Frimmer all over the city,” Boyarsky said. “It’s like organizing a political campaign. You have to go door-to-door, block by block to convince people.”

But observers say the kind of grass-roots programs taking place at Temple Isaiah and IKAR are on the right track.

Faith organizations can be a powerful arm of support for public schools, Emerson’s Gonnella said — they can reach out to parents who might otherwise be too intimidated by the system to voice their desires and provide guidance on how to get involved. A handful of public school activists at a church or synagogue can also help shift the opinions of the broader religious community. “Just being here sends an incredible message to other parents: ‘Hey, if it’s good enough for their kids, maybe my kid will go there too,’” she said.

Former school board member Canter called Temple Isaiah’s support for Emerson “amazing.”

“The way they stepped up to the plate, they can be a role model for what other faith institutions can do in the community,” she said. “People should follow their lead — the schools are there to meet everyone’s needs, and we should all be working toward that.”

Schools could do their part to appeal more to Jewish families by tweaking their curricula to spotlight ancient civilizations studies and promote social justice themes in the classroom, Tokofsky said. New L.A. Charter, for instance, engages kids in community service activities, such as reading to elementary school kids through The Jewish Federation’s KOREH L.A. literacy program, learning about the environment through Heal the Bay, and collecting food for SOVA food bank.

In the meantime, Frimmer is trying to stay realistic about the time it will take to reform the system — and Jews’ perceptions of it.

“I’m not looking for an overnight revolution,” she said. “My hope is that people build relationships and do the work necessary to transform public education; that this wouldn’t be a top-down revolution or a one-time, inspirational renaissance that a year later people fall away from. Hopefully this will activate these congregants’ Jewish identity as well as their sense of civic responsibility and in five or 10 years we’ll be amazed at how much more certain we feel about our ability to make change — not only in our lives, but in our whole neighborhood.”

For those still on the fence, Castle Heights Elementary mother Elan Levey offers concise encouragement: “If everyone went to public school, it would be everything we’d want it to be.”

counter
fake hit page

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

B U D G E T - LAUSD TO HALVE ITS LOCAL OFFICES: Even with closing local centers, deficit and thousands of layoffs still loom for coming year

By Connie Llanos, Staff Writer | LA Daily News

Updated: 11/24/2009 08:43:55 PM PST

In a concession to unions, Los Angeles Unified Schools chief Ramon Cortines said Tuesday he will eliminate half the number of local district offices he helped create a few years ago in a bid to reduce next year's deficit of nearly $500 million.

But Cortines said savings from the move will amount to just $12 million, and tougher cutbacks, including layoffs, will have to be made to balance the budget.

"There is no way to avoid cuts," Cortines said at a special budget meeting called to inform the school board about the district's worsening financial outlook.

"We have less state and federal money and fewer students ... the district has to adjust."

On Tuesday, district staff said LAUSD now faces a deficit of $495 million for the 2010-11 school year - up $15 million from earlier projections that included cost-of-living adjustments that the district now does not anticipate receiving from the state.

The eight local districts, including two in the San Fernando Valley, have been a major sticking point for a majority of LAUSD's employee unions. Union leaders complain too much money is wasted in these minibureaucracies and on their administrative staff positions.

Cortines, however, said cutting the local districts to four will only save him about $12 million - about 3 percent of the district's total deficit - and it will not prevent layoffs.

The elimination of all local district offices has been a long-standing request of United Teachers Los Angeles, the largest district employee union representing about 37,000 teachers and 4,000 counselors and social workers - a majority of LAUSD's employees.

UTLA president A.J. Duffy said he did not believe shutting down half of these offices would only save $12 million.

"We will have to look at exactly what offices are shut down, then we'll have to look at the properties they vacate and the personnel that leaves to figure out exactly how much is saved," Duffy said.

Set up in 2000 by Cortines, when he was acting superintendent for six months, the local district offices were created as a way to give schools, teachers, administrators and parents more support and access to LAUSD resources.

Currently the eight offices are spread across the city. With about 50 people per office, they oversee all aspects of instruction, operations and discipline of students and teachers at the district's more than 885 schools and preschools.

Valley offices scrutinized

In the San Fernando Valley there are two local district offices representing the eastern and western portions of the region. Under this plan it is likely that only one office will remain in the region.

"Things will be more impersonal and relationships will suffer at a time when the district wants more personalization," said Michelle King, local district superintendent for District 3, representing much of West Los Angeles.

King, who has been with the district for 25 years as a teacher, school administrator and now district administrator, said the addition of the local district offices nine years ago helped increase efficiency at schools since staff could go to one neighborhood office, rather than downtown headquarters to get answers and information. The office also gave parents more access to district personnel.

The move to shut down the offices comes just two weeks after Cortines gave all district employees an ultimatum to accept four furloughs days this year and a 12 percent pay cut next year or face layoffs of up to 8,500 employees.

Cortines asked that concessions be made by Dec. 8, before the district is required to submit its budget to the Los Angeles County Office of Education.

So far SEIU Local 99 - representing about 20,000 cafeteria workers, bus drivers and custodians - has agreed to the concessions, saving the district about $7.7 million this year.

Duffy said he is ready and willing to talk to Cortines about concessions, but he would not comment further.

"We choose to negotiate the way the law says we are supposed to - not in the media," Duffy said.

While most of the district's budget woes stem from the state's continued fiscal crisis, enrollment at LAUSD has also dropped to its lowest point in more than a decade.

Currently 51,000 students within LAUSD boundaries - or about 8 percent of the district's entire enrollment - attend charter schools. Independent charter schools traditionally do not hire LAUSD staff.

Meeting new deficit

Last year, when the district expected a budget shortfall of $258 million, it said it would balance that by increasing class sizes in kindergarten through third grade from 24:1 to 29:1. The district also said it would have to cut arts and music programs in half and reduce school nurses and cops.

To address the new deficit, that includes an estimated $50 million to $60 million this year, and a deficit of $495 million next year, Cortines said schools should budget cuts of between 10 to 20 percent in services.

Revenue generating opportunities are being looked at. Cortines said he expects to sell about 10 LAUSD owned properties this year - none located in the San Fernando Valley.

When a little transparency reveals a little too much: AALA & SUPERINTENDENT CORTINES’ FRIDAY THE 13th LETTER

From the AALA WEEKLY UPDATE NEWSLETTER Week of November 16, 2009

On Friday, November 13, Superintendent Cortines e-mailed a letter to LAUSD union presidents in which he stated that our District is facing a projected $480 million budget shortfall for the 2010-2011 school year. He asked each union “. . .to become a partner in finding a shared solution to the issue.” He further stated, “Without your shared commitment, this District will see layoffs of more than 7,500 to 8,500 personnel, which will result in more than 14,000 employees being noticed for possible reduction in force.”

The Superintendent went on to outline his solutions to the budget crisis: (1) Four furlough days this school year, in 2010, and (2) A 12% salary cut for 2010-2011. He explained that each furlough day is worth $15 million to the District. One percent salary cut is equal to $40 million. Simple multiplication reveals that implementation of the Superintendent’s solutions yields $540 million. He wrote that layoffs will commence on July 1, 2010, if LAUSD bargaining units do not agree with his proposed “solutions.”

In AALA’s biweekly meeting with Superintendent Cortines on Monday, November 16, 2009, we asked for clarification regarding several points in his Friday the 13th Letter. Our questions and his responses follow:

AALA: Some of the statements in your letter are inconsistent with your comments at the Board meeting on Tuesday, November 10, 2009, where you said that you would ask for either a 9% salary cut or nine furlough days to address the 2010-2011 deficit.

Superintendent: There was no contradiction.

AALA: Could you please clarify if the four furlough days are for this year or next year?

Superintendent: This year.

AALA: Please explain what cuts you are going to recommend.

Superintendent: The Board already approved some cuts. I’m going to add some things and delete some things.

AALA: Did you look at the percentage of cuts each bargaining unit endured for 2009-2010?

Superintendent: No, and I’m not going to!

AALA: You cut over 500+ AALA members for the 2009-2010 school year—20% of our membership.

Superintendent: I’m not going to negotiate with you!

AALA: AALA has suggestions for budget savings and for the District to enhance revenue. When will AALA staff have the opportunity to discuss these recommendations with you?

Superintendent: I don’t know!

AALA has additional questions for the Superintendent:

• Why would you send a letter threatening to cut 8,500 employee positions if you are not willing to answer AALA’s questions and provide clarification?

• Why do you persist in calling your unilateral approach a request for “partnerships” with bargaining units when you seem to be unwilling to listen to our suggestions for budget savings and revenue enhancement?

• Why are you asking LAUSD employees to subsidize a $540 million deficit when you identified $480 million as the projected shortfall? Why should the bargaining units shoulder the entire burden of the deficit? What other solutions have you identified?

AALA requested last week that the District schedule immediate negotiations. Why has the District neglected to follow through?

●●smf: with time of the essence and the deadlines looming, this becomes the question!

• How much of the projected $480 million deficit will be caused by a potential hand-over of LAUSD schools to unregulated charter operators? If the Board did not pursue its Public School Choice Resolution, how much revenue would be saved?

●●smf: O.K., That was the question!

In past years when a budget crisis loomed, the District provided the County with potential reductions to reflect a balanced budget. The projected budget is always modified by variables yet to occur, such as the Governor’s budget projections in January 2010 and potential resource enhancements. Threatening employees does not create an atmosphere in which we can partner to address the current crisis. The District should interact now with the bargaining units to prioritize potential cuts, with the understanding that maximum preservation of school sites is necessary, along with essential services for all students and staff members.

SOME L.A. UNIFIED WORKERS AGREE TO FURLOUGHS / CORTINES IMPOSES HIRING, TRAVEL, FOOD FREEZE: Two SEIU units representing 20,000 cafeteria workers, bus drivers and other employees overwhelmingly approve the move to help close the district's large budget gap.

By Jason Song | LA Times

November 24, 2009 -- About 20,000 Los Angeles school district workers have agreed to four unpaid furlough days to help close a large budget gap, officials announced Monday.

Two units of Service Employees International Union Local 99 representing cafeteria workers, bus drivers and other employees approved the measure last week by a combined vote of 953 to 234, said Blanca Gallegos, a union spokeswoman.

The members will take one furlough day per month from February through May. The move will save about $7.7 million, according to union officials.

Earlier this month, district officials asked union members to accept the furlough days and a future 12% pay cut to offset a nearly $60-million budget deficit this year and a $480-million shortfall next year.

"By each of us taking on a bit of the hardship it is our goal to prevent more layoffs in the future and ensure that students continue to receive the services they need to learn," said Edward Reed, Local 99's president, in a statement.

The union did not vote on the pay cut, which must be negotiated.

District officials have said that they will need further concessions from unions.

"We're grateful that SEIU is the first group to stand up," said district spokeswoman Lydia Ramos. "We need everyone to stand up and do the same."

United Teachers Los Angeles President A.J. Duffy could not be reached for comment. Duffy has said he is willing to negotiate with district officials but wants more financial information.

Last year, the district approved, but did not require, four unpaid days off for most employees.

As part of the agreement, L.A. Unified agreed not to schedule any new SEIU Local 99 layoffs this year if the budget deficit does not grow beyond $59 million by late January. If the shortfall is more than $59 million, the union and district will begin negotiations.

Earlier this year, about 1,100 bus drivers who are also represented by SEIU Local 99 agreed to six unpaid days off this fiscal year.

To deal with the budget, Supt. Ramon C. Cortines on Monday announced an immediate districtwide spending freeze that affects travel and catering expenses and the hiring of non-classroom staff.

Teachers, administrators, bus drivers and other employees deemed essential to schools are exempted from the freeze.

ANOTHER GROUP FILES APPLICATION TO RUN 3o ‘PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE’ CAMPUSES: Misses deadline, accepted anyway

Daily Breeze website from staff reports

11/24/2009 07:09:10 AM PST | A fourth group has applied to run Gardena and San Pedro high schools under a Los Angeles Unified School District reform initiative.

The Daily Breeze previously reported that three groups - the internal school community, United Teachers Los Angeles and Illinois-based education consultancy Synesi foundation - had applied to run both schools.

The fourth group, which was not included last week on an initial LAUSD list of applicants to the Public School Choice program, is Phoenix-based American Charter Schools Foundation.

Like UTLA and Synesi, American Charter Schools Foundation applied to run all 30 campuses available under the initiative.

A school district spokeswoman said the foundation was not originally reported as an applicant because it had submitted letters of intent to an incorrect e-mail address.

 

The 11/20 memo from the superintendent

All the letters of intent from the applicants

Monday, November 23, 2009

NO UNIFORM SOLUTION: Uniforms make students look sharper and create a safer environment, but they can't raise a school's achievement level.

By: Erik Hayden  | News Blog: Miller-McCune Online Magazine

   |  feature photo

In assessing the pros and cons of school uniforms, it appears that one benefit is missing — better academic achievement.  Cathy Yeulet

 

  November 23, 2009  |  12:15 PM (PST) -- On Nov. 4, the Los Angeles City Council, looking to prod the city's school board into being proactive in addressing steep budget cuts, teacher unrest and chronic underachievement, unanimously passed a resolution recommending all students in L.A. public schools wear uniforms. Councilmember Jose Huizar (former president of the LAUSD's Board of Education) hailed this proposal as a harbinger for greater "order," "focus" and "higher achievement" in classrooms across the district.

Perhaps. The clothing company Classroom Uniforms certainly cheered — it announced a new line of uniforms the same week as the City Council vote.

It seems that ever since the surprising success of Long Beach Unified School District's 1994 mandatory school uniform policy — the first large urban school district to institute such a requirement — educators and administrators have been clamoring to announce the astounding benefits that uniforms can bring to struggling districts. In Long Beach, which is part of the Los Angeles metro area, the U.S. Department of Education found that school crime decreased 36 percent, sexual offenses fell 74 percent and fights between students dropped 51 percent after the policy went into effect. Is correlation, as the scientists say, causation?

About 14 percent of all public schools mandate their students wear school uniforms. While there's been some uncertainty and controversy regarding these uniform policies, the often bland outfits have made some schools safer, toned down excessive gang aggression and set a "business-like" tone for academic study. They've also eliminated the need for students to one-up each other with fashionable clothing (easing the strain on poorer families), easily identified trespassers on school property and helped foster community identity and school spirit.

But it's these benefits that have administrators and desperate school boards (like L.A.'s) believing that school uniforms can not only raise achievement levels but act as a panacea for deeply rooted problems.

New research published in the November issue of Educational Policy muddles this perception.

The study, authored by Ryan Yeung, suggests that school uniforms have little to no effect on boosting achievement levels and, in some cases, can hurt them.

The data analyzed was culled from the National Center for Educational Statistic's National Education Longitudinal Survey and Early Childhood Longitudinal Study. These surveyed both primary and secondary school students in waves dating from 1988 to 2004. Econometric analyses performed on these studies are the first to investigate the effects of school uniforms on achievement.

The research found that while some scores were higher in schools that had uniform policies — most notably in the reading portion for eighth- and 10th-graders — the vast majority of the data led to inconsistent and inconclusive results. The regression results from the National Education Longitudinal Survey study found that uniformed public school students, on every other examination other than reading, scored worse than their uniform-free counterparts.

In the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, children in private schools with uniform policies scored below their counterparts with no uniform policy in reading and math examinations. In public schools, uniform policies were found to have little or no effect on mathematics achievement. And, surprisingly, Catholic schools with required uniform policies scored lower in reading, science and history than their counterparts with no uniform mandate.

On first glance, these seem like head-scratching results. After all, most of the schools with strict uniform policies are clustered in poorer, mostly urban, districts that historically performed poorly anyway. But Yeung notes that both sets of data support one general conclusion: "Once I control for a number of factors, including race, sex and socioeconomic status, none of the regressions for the NELS and the ECLS-K are significant, leading me to conclude that there is little evidence that school uniforms have an impact on student outcomes."

Simply put: Even if teachers and administrators perceive that students look sharper, more disciplined and attentive in spiffy uniforms, they don't actually perform any better academically.

 

Educational Policy

Are School Uniforms a Good Fit?

Results From the ECLS-K and the NELS
Ryan Yeung

Syracuse University, New York

One of the most common proposals put forth for reform of the American system of education is to require school uniforms. Proponents argue that uniforms can make schools safer and also improve school attendance and increase student achievement. Opponents contend that uniforms have not been proven to work and may be an infringement on the freedom of speech of young people. Within an econometric framework, this study examines the effect of school uniforms on student achievement. It tackles methodological challenges through the use of a value-added functional form and the use of multiple data sets. The results do not suggest any significant association between school uniform policies and achievement. Although the results do not definitely support or reject either side of the uniform argument, they do strongly intimate that uniforms are not the solution to all of American education’s ills.

Key Words: achievement • education reform • educational policy • educational reform • policy • elementary education • secondary education

Educational Policy, Vol. 23, No. 6, 847-874 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0895904808330170

Full Text (PDF) [fee]

LA SCHOOLS CHIEF ORDERS HIRING FREEZE: Ramon Cortinez (sic) also announced other expense cuts.

LAUSD Superintendent of Schools Ramon Cortines.

Text Story by City News Service | MyFoxNewsLA.com Posted by: Scott Coppersmith

Monday, 23 Nov 2009, 2:54 PM PST -- Los Angeles - In the face of a multimillion-dollar budget deficit, Los Angeles Unified School District Superintendent Ramon Cortines ordered an immediate hiring freeze today and cut other expenses, including travel, conferences and food at district meetings.

Cortines said the district is facing an estimated $50 million to $60 million deficit this year and a possible $480 million deficit for the 2010-11 school year.

"As a result of the financial challenges that we are facing, it is imperative that we ensure that every dollar we spend is essential to the operation of this district, and more importantly, supports our instructional mission," he said. "Therefore, effective immediately, I am placing a freeze on the hiring and filling of vacancies; travel, conference and convention attendance; procurement of contracted professional development services; the rental of non-district facilities and the purchase of catering or refreshments to be served at employee meetings."

The only exceptions to the hiring freeze will be for classroom teachers, principals, assistant principals, cafeteria managers, school police officers, bus drivers teachers' assistants, education aides, special education assistants and plant managers.

According to the district, other exceptions will only be considered for requests that are considered essential to school and district operations.

Cortines said he ordered the cuts in response to the state's dire financial outlook, which will likely result in further reductions in the district's budget. The state Legislative Analyst's Office released a report last week indicating that California would be facing a $20.7 billion budget shortfall next year.

Cortines, who came under fire in the past year when the district issued thousands of layoff notices to teachers and other employees to help balance the budget, said LAUSD will again have to tighten its belt. The district is required to submit a 2010-11 budget to the county Office of Education by Dec. 15.

The LAUSD board is expected to meet Dec. 8 to vote on the district's budget.

"Despite the pressure of a severely curtailed budget, despite the challenge of meeting our education mandate, we will live up to our responsibility to educate the children of LAUSD," Cortines said. "We owe it to our students to provide them with the best instruction and support possible no matter the obstacles. Students are the core of our existence and we will not be distracted from our mission."

CHOICES ROILING VALLEY SCHOOL: Competition causes apprehension at San Fernando campus.

By Connie Llanos, Staff Writer | LA Daily News

11/23 -- The last two months have been a whirlwind of meetings and deadlines for Eduardo Solorzano, principal of San Fernando Middle School.

Visibly exhausted, the first-year principal has been working 12-hour days and weekends since his school was chosen as one of 36 Los Angeles Unified campuses that are up for grabs this year under a new district reform effort that lets both outsiders and insiders compete to run schools.

The School Choice plan is meant to breed better academic results at the district's new and failing schools through competition. This week it was announced that more than 200 bidders answered the district's call and submitted bids for the three dozen schools.

With so many in the ring, tensions are running high for administrators, teachers, students and parents who worry about the future of their schools while they sort through the competing visions, with little time to settle differences as the Jan. 11 deadline approaches.

"Based on the history of this community and this school, we can't afford to have our school given away," Solorzano said.

"The next two weeks will be crucial for us."

Solorzano, like most principals of existing campuses selected for School Choice, had to submit his own proposal to operate the school.

His was among eight bids for the 100-year-old campus. Other bidders include a local tutoring provider, a community nonprofit group and out-of-state organizations that have never worked with LAUSD before.

One of the applicants was ABC Learn Inc., a San Fernando-based tutoring service that serves students under a No Child Left Behind Act clause that allows kids at failing schools to get free academic help.

Debbie Greenfield, president and CEO of ABC Learn Inc., said her vision for San Fernando could include converting it to a charter and making it a "teaching school" similar to a "teaching hospital" where college students would shadow credentialed teachers.

"The school would have a major focus on literacy and would allow teachers to bring creativity and a joy of learning to the classroom," Greenfield said.

Also bidding for the school are Synesi Foundation and American Charter Foundation, neither of which has worked with LAUSD in the past.

Synesi Foundation is the non-profit arm of Synesi Associates, a school-management consulting firm based in Illinois. Gary Solomon, president of Synesi Associates, said his organization bid on all but one of the 36 schools as a way of developing a relationship with LAUSD, but ultimately may withdraw the bids and work with the district through other means.

Ted Frederick, a board member of the American Charter School Foundation, said his group placed bids on San Fernando and every other available district school just to seek out a "great opportunity." He said his Arizona-based organization is looking to expand and is seeking growth opportunities in other states as well.

But the worries by staff and parents at San Fernando don't just involve outside bidders.

From within the school two groups of teachers submitted applications to launch pilot schools - small schools that grant teachers more power over curriculum, staffing and budget - within San Fernando.

Speaking to a small gathering of parents and teachers recently, Pearl Arredondo, a multi-media teacher at San Fernando, explained that she submitted the independent application to benefit her students.

"We found something that works and we want to move ahead with it and continue the success of our kids," she said.

Before Arredondo could finish describing her proposal to take over only a section of the school, hands in the audience shot up as parents prodded her with questions about "dividing" the campus.

"Our kids are stressed about next year. ... If you say it's about the kids then keep your adult agendas away from them," said Christine Provencio, an LAUSD parent representative who has one child at San Fernando.

Ana Maria Barroso, mother of seventh- and eighth-grade students, said her children told her that kids were teasing each other about which schools they would end up at if several small schools opened at San Fernando next fall.

"Kids are saying `Oh you're dumb so you're going to go to the dumb school,"' Barroso said.

But even as tensions grow, so has the creativity, with plans for the future of San Fernando Middle getting more and more elaborate.

Solorzano's plan calls for joining forces with Project GRAD, a nonprofit that promotes college attendance among students in the Northeast Valley.

The proposal would also bring in California State University, Northridge, UCLA and the Los Angeles Educational Partnership to provide professional development to teachers and enrichment to students.

The Youth Policy Institute, a local nonprofit that brings educational and training programs to the Northeast Valley, has also applied to take over day-to-day operations at San Fernando.

The organization, currently operating under an annual budget of $28million, wants to enrich San Fernando with the same kind of resources that have allowed the group to give away 400 computers with a year's worth of Internet access to local families.

While the organization currently operates two charter schools - public schools that are free from most state regulations and don't have to hire district staff - it is not interested in converting San Fernando to a charter, said Iris Zuniga-Corona, YPI's director of youth services.

Instead the plan would be to work with teachers and parents to design the best model for the school. Currently, YPI is collaborating with some of the teachers who have submitted pilot-school plans, to see if they can devise a joint proposal.

The misinformation among parents has been especially frustrating for Zuniga-Corona, who also questioned the fairness of a process that naturally favors proposals from the school's current staff because they have the most interaction with students and parents.

"At the end of the day this is about choices and competition, and it's good because it puts everyone on their best game," Zuniga-Corona said.

"What I am not comfortable with is inaccurate information being spread to parents, and things need to be fair."

So much remains uncertain for San Fernando, just as it does for the other 35 schools, which in two months will learn who stays and who goes.

Final applications are due by Jan.11. They will then be reviewed by two panels, and teachers and parents will also vote on their favorite plan.

LAUSD Superintendent Ramon Cortines will then submit his recommendations to the Board of Education, which will make its final decision by Feb. 23.

The quick process is scary for nearly everyone involved, but change is inevitable.

"Things are never going to be the same as they have been in the past," said Maria Reza, a former LAUSD administrator and former principal of San Fernando Middle School.

However, Reza said she would remind the community that some things always stay the same.

"The best things for kids are always the same," she said. "It's the best teachers, with a supportive administrative staff and supportive parents that will make them successful. There is no magic there."

Friday, November 20, 2009

CELLPHONES IN SCHOOLS: FLIP 'EM OPEN

Education Week

EdWeek Commentary By Matt Levinson

Published Online: November 20, 2009 | Cheating in school is not a new phenomenon. The game has just changed a bit with the advent of cellphones and texting. Marc Prensky, an author on technology and a game designer himself, loves to share the story of a talk he once had with high school students. When he suggested that schools should have open-phone tests, as a measure to combat cellphone cheating, one of the students responded, “Dude, we already have open-phone tests. The teachers just don’t know it.”

Cellphone use among teenagers is rampant and growing at an exponential rate. Common Sense Media, a national, independent nonprofit organization that helps educators and parents teach kids how to be safe and smart in today’s 24/7 media world, worked with the Benenson Strategy Group to conduct over 2,000 interviews with teenagers about cellphone use. What they unearthed is staggering.

More than eight in 10 teenagers have cellphones, and more than half have had them since they were 12 years old or younger. On average, they send 440 text messages a week, 110 of which are sent during class. Restrictive school policies hardly matter, as 65 percent of young people use their phones on campus despite school policies. Parents are in the dark as well. Only 23 percent of those whose kids have cellphones think their children are using them during school, while 65 percent of kids say they use the devices in school.

In the area of cheating, the findings grow more alarming. More than a third of those questioned—35 percent—admit to having cheated at least once with their cellphones. The teenagers appear more likely to say that their friends are cheating than they are, with 65 percent in the survey saying they have seen or heard about other people in their school cheating with cellphones.

How do kids do it? They store information on their phone to look at during a quiz or exam. They text friends about answers during quizzes and tests (a practice that 57 percent of teenagers in the survey said others at their school had done). And they take pictures of test questions with a cellphone to send to friends.

How do they feel about it? Only 41 percent of young people say that storing notes or information on a cellphone to look at during a test is a serious cheating offense. Almost one in four (23 percent) say they don’t think it’s cheating at all. Similarly, only 45 percent say texting friends about answers during tests is cheating and “a serious offense,” while 20 percent say it’s not cheating at all.

Interestingly, kids consider cheating via the Internet to be more of a serious offense than cellphone cheating. But although teenagers in the survey viewed plagiarism more seriously than other types of cheating, a third of them (36 percent) said that downloading a paper from the Internet was not a serious offense, and 42 percent said copying text from Web sites was either a minor offense or not cheating at all.

Based on these findings, educators and parents are in trouble if schools keep doing business as usual. They won’t have control, because they won’t know what’s happening.

A cartoon I saw recently in The New York Times captures their dilemma. A teacher stands in front of a classroom presenting the time-honored assignment of having students write an essay about their summer vacation. One bold student pipes up with, “What, didn’t you follow me on Twitter this summer?” The message is clear: Students are using different tools to learn, and classrooms need to change to catch up with the times.

For teachers, it’s a matter of drastically overhauling the mind-set. In his book The Art of Possibility, Boston Philharmonic conductor Benjamin Zander offers a wonderful parable to illustrate how a shift in perspective can turn despair to opportunity. Two shoe salesmen head to a part of rural Africa to explore the viability of establishing a new market for their shoes. One writes back to the company: “Situation hopeless. No one wears shoes. Abandon project.” The other sees the flip side and writes, “No one is wearing shoes. Opportunity abounds. Huge market awaits. Send resources immediately.”

This is the situation teachers and schools face with mobile technologies. They can continue to fight a losing battle and draw harsh lines in the sand, confiscating cellphones or banning their use during school hours. Or, they can seize the teachable moment, and shift their approaches to embrace technology and engage students with these devices. One thing is very clear. Schools cannot continue to operate as if nothing is changing, with students or with technology.

Test design has to be reconsidered, of course. But beyond that, teachers need to think about ways to incorporate mobile technologies into their instruction. One creative foreign-languages teacher in California has seen the possibilities. She designs scavenger hunts in which her students need to call a number to get instructions (in Spanish) on where to go. Once there (ideally in a Spanish-speaking environment), they have to complete a task, perhaps buying something, using only Spanish, then call the next number to get further instructions. Each student has slightly different instructions, to differentiate the assignment.

School culture is shifting, and students are dictating the terms of this new culture. Schools need to meet them halfway and acknowledge the ubiquitous use of mobile technologies. Otherwise, students will find new and novel ways to skirt school rules, sneak texts under a desk during a test, and continue to bypass the trust of their teachers and schools.

We educators can alter these terms of engagement, however, by crafting creative uses for mobile devices in learning, and by designing testing situations that lend themselves less to multiple-choice copying and more to intellectual problem-solving.

  • Matt Levinson is the head of the middle school and an assistant director at the Nueva School, in Hillsborough, Calif.

Hiltzik on WWLA/KCRW: CALIFORNIA SCHOOL FUNDING SYSTEM 'RIDICULOUSLY COMPLEX'

LA Times LA Now Blog | November 20, 2009 |  2:21 pm

Michael Times business columnist Michael Hiltzik took measure of California's system for funding education this week and found it lacking … to put it mildly. Here's an excerpt from Thursday's column:

Anyone who has spent time in or around government, from the deeply embedded bureaucrat to the young policy wonk, knows that there are two important issues in funding a public program.

One, is it getting enough money? Two, is the money being spent wisely?

On both counts, California's method of financing its schools gets a big fat F. On a per-pupil basis, our schools are among the most poorly funded in the country, and no one can be sure that the money they do get serves its purpose.

Ask those who have devoted time to examining the system: The way this state doles out money to K-12 education isn't merely inefficient and ineffective, it's insane.

Hiltzik spoke about the issue with Warren Olney on KCRW-FM's "Which Way, L.A.?" Thursday. Click link below to listen.

Michael Hiltzik on "Which Way, L.A.?"

wsj: THE EDSEL OF EDUCATION REFORM - The Ford Foundation finds a needy cause: teachers unions.

The Wall Street Journal

Wall Street Journal Editorial

NOVEMBER 17, 2009 -- We hate to say it, but don't be misled by headlines. The biggest headline in education circles last week was that the Ford Foundation is making a whopping $100 million grant "to transform secondary education in the nation's most disadvantaged schools."

Our eyes raced to see which piece of the vibrant school-reform movement Ford was going to support. Would it be America's 4,600 charters schools, many outperforming their traditional school peers and some even closing the race gap? Maybe it would be Teach for America, busting at the seams and turning down Ivy League applicants by the hundreds. Or, who knows, maybe Ford's really on the leading edge, and would want to support voucher programs in cities like Washington.

Would you believe the recipients of Ford's largesse are the teachers unions? Yup. The folks at Ford are giving new meaning to the word "retro."

Ballyhooing the $100 million, the foundation's president Luis Ubinas said, "Improving our schools, and giving the most vulnerable young people real educational opportunities, benefits all of us. With this initiative we want to shake up the conversations surrounding school reform and help spur some truly imaginative thinking and partnerships."

And yet the Ford press release contains not one mention of charter schools, vouchers, merit pay or even Teach for America. Literally speaking, this really does shake up, not to say shock, "the conversations surrounding school reform."

Ford's formula for reform involves more money, less accountability and a bigger role for the unions. "Many state finance systems fail to allocate enough resources to provide quality schooling for all students," Ford's daring analysts write. And, "standardized tests are a blunt and inadequate tool by which to gauge student learning and school effectiveness."

But one of the screaming ironies of public education, known to all, is that some of the worst school districts in the country spend the most money on students. Standardized tests may be a "blunt" instrument, but they are also the only way that parents have had of holding bad teachers and terrible students accountable. This is why the unions dislike student testing, as well as teacher pay based on student performance.

One of Ford's first grants will go to the new American Federation of Teachers Innovation Fund, a "union-led initiative to make grants to AFT affiliates nationwide for innovative efforts established jointly by teachers, administrators, and parents." Here's guessing the main such innovation will be more money for everyone regardless of results.

The fact that Ford is supporting the unions—the biggest barrier to school reform in America—is no surprise. The foundation has funded just about every major failed liberal establishment program since the Great Society. Head Start, Job Corps and the Community Development Corporation were launched from Ford templates. In the 1970s, the foundation supported forced sterilization programs to curb overpopulation in the third world. A few years ago it gave money to an Arab NGO that wanted to wipe Israel off the map. It also largely paid for the University of Michigan's defense of affirmative action at the Supreme Court.

Last Wednesday, by contrast, the Gates Foundation offered $10 million to help the wildly successful KIPP charter schools expand in Houston. One might have hoped that Ford's administrators would have looked at some of the real innovation being done by philanthropies such as Gates or the Walton Foundation and seen how truly far behind the times Ford's ideas are.

Oh, well, another $100 million for education down the drain.

REPUBLICANS CRITICIZE DISMISSAL OF AMERICORPS WATCHDOG: A GOP report contends that the Obama White House was politically motivated when it fired inspector general Gerald Walpin after his 2008 investigation of Kevin Johnson, now Sacramento's mayor.

●● If Public Education is Tragedy and LAUSD is Farce, the goings-on in the US Dept of Ed approach Soap Opera: Bi-coastal Romance… Intrigue… Basketball.

By Tom Hamburger and Alexander C. Hart | LA Times

Kevin Johnson

<< Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson, a self-described friend and supporter of President Obama, was accused of misusing federal AmeriCorps funds and of inappropriate behavior with volunteers. (Robert Durell / Los Angeles Times / May 14, 2008)

 

November 20, 2009 - Reporting from Washington - When Kevin Johnson, the former NBA star who is now mayor of Sacramento, was under investigation last year for alleged financial misdeeds and inappropriate behavior with female students, he had an important ally behind the scenes.

Michelle Rhee, the nationally known education reformer who is now head of the Washington, D.C., public schools, had several conversations with a federal inspector general in which she made the case for Johnson and the school he ran in Sacramento, according to the inspector general. Rhee, who had served on the board of the school and is now engaged to marry Johnson, said he was "a good guy."

Rhee's position had little effect on the inspector general, Gerald Walpin, who filed a criminal referral to the U.S. attorney on Johnson, a self-described friend and supporter of President Obama. But both the Sacramento police and federal attorneys declined to pursue charges. Walpin, who protested the prosecutors' handling of the case, was ultimately fired by the Obama White House in June.

Rhee's previously undisclosed role and the Walpin firing are now part of an unfolding drama in which outspoken Republicans contend that the Obama administration has not faithfully adhered to a law designed to protect executive-branch investigators from political interference.

The White House said Walpin was fired simply because he had lost the confidence of the president and the board of the Corp. for National and Community Service (which includes AmeriCorps), the agency he oversaw.

Republicans are skeptical.

"The claim that Gerald Walpin was removed for legitimate, nonpolitical reasons is unsupported and unpersuasive," says a 62-page joint staff report on the firing, to be released today by Republicans Rep. Darrell Issa of Vista, Calif., and Sen. Charles E. Grassley of Iowa.

Some Democrats are complaining as well. "I think the Obama administration made a mistake here," said Bernard Nussbaum, a White House counsel under President Clinton and a longtime acquaintance of Walpin.

The report, obtained by the Los Angeles Times, includes previously undisclosed documents and details, including the 30-page criminal referral Walpin prepared for the U.S. attorney in Sacramento in August 2008, and sworn statements from witnesses.

Click here to read the full 62 page report: The Firing of the Inspector General for The Corporation for National and Community Service

Click here for the appended documents

 

Walpin, who is receiving free help from a conservative public relations firm associated with the Swift boat ads that opposed Democrat John F. Kerry in the 2004 presidential election, is convinced his firing was directly related to his investigation of Johnson.

"There is no doubt in my mind," Walpin said in an interview this week. "You'd have to be a babe in the woods not to see the link."

The White House denies any political motivation to the firing, contending that Walpin, 78, was unfit for service.

White House Counsel Greg Craig said the bipartisan board unanimously requested a White House review of Walpin after a May board meeting at which Walpin "was confused, disoriented, unable to answer questions and exhibited other behavior that led the board to question his capacity to serve."

Walpin began his investigation in 2008, seeking to discover what happened to $848,000 in grants and payments to Johnson's charter school, St. Hope Academy, from AmeriCorps, the federally funded national service organization.

The funds were to be used to pay for tutoring and other community programs at St. Hope. Walpin said he found that there was little or no tutoring at the school, and that many of the young AmeriCorps volunteers who went to St. Hope in lieu of a first year of college were assigned other tasks, including washing Johnson's car.

The final four pages of the criminal referral discussed three instances of alleged inappropriate actions by Johnson involving a minor, who had reported she was fondled, and two young volunteers, who reported that Johnson went to their apartment and climbed into bed with one of them. The criminal referral notes that the two educators who reported the allegations left the charter school upset with the way the complaints had been handled.

As federal and local officials declined to follow Walpin's suggestions for criminal prosecution and lifted a ban on Johnson receiving federal grants -- a ban the inspector general had fought to have imposed -- Walpin became only more adamant, irrationally so according to critics.

A spokesman for the mayor said it was "sad and unfortunate that these allegations are being rehashed. There is no merit to them, as the Sacramento Police Department confirmed after their review. In addition, the U.S. attorney also has independently verified that this report by [the] inspector general was misleading. Professional prosecutors, the police and federal officials have closed the books on this case and moved on because there is no merit to these charges, period."

Walpin, a former federal prosecutor who was appointed the corporation's inspector general by President Bush in 2007, said he learned he was being fired June 10 in a telephone call from White House special counsel Norman Eisen.

In response to congressional questions on the firing, the White House cited concern from the service organization board about Walpin's behavior at the board meeting in May.

In an interview, Walpin acknowledged feeling unwell that day but denied any loss of cognitive power. Members of the board declined to be interviewed Thursday, but notes obtained from the board indicate widespread concern over Walpin's demeanor that day.

The Grassley-Issa report criticizes Eisen, who also serves as White House ethics counsel, for not examining what Walpin had been investigating at the time of his dismissal, including the allegations of sexual misconduct by Johnson.

According to the report, Rhee met with Jacqueline Wong-Hernandez, a teacher at St. Hope, after hearing about the allegations, and promised she would "take care of the situation."

At first, Wong-Hernandez said she felt relieved. But she said her relief turned to a chill when she was called to a meeting with Johnson and one of the alleged victims and was told by Johnson that he and the 18-year-old girl had spoken privately and "everything was OK between them."

A few months later, in June 2007, Wong-Hernandez left the school, telling Rhee that the handling of that incident was the major reason.

Rhee did not comment Thursday on the allegations in the Grassley-Issa report. In response to questions, her spokesman said Rhee had not asked Walpin to drop his investigation.

Her role in the incident may have repercussions among city officials in Washington, where she has developed the profile of a contentious and controversial schools chief.

By picking public battles with school employees and laying off 250 teachers after the school year was underway, Rhee has found herself at odds with the District of Columbia Council, education labor unions, the philanthropic community and many parents.

tom.hamburger@latimes.com

alex.hart@latimes.com

 

MORE: Kevin Johnson is currently the Mayor of Sacramento, this is how the SacBee is covering this story:

BRIEFLY: Education Headlines from L.A. Now

PARCELING PAIN: The ghost of proposed parcel tax returns to haunt L.A. homeowners

LA Daily News Editorial

20 November 2009 -- THE Los Angeles Unified School District has taken its lumps from the current recession - teachers and other workers have been laid off, class sizes have been increased and still the district must cut $480 million to balance its 2010-2011 budget.

Superintendent Ramon Cortines sent a letter to his employees and their unions late last week saying, here's your choices: a 12 percent pay cut next year and four furlough days this year, or the layoff of up to 8,500 employees.

Up jumped A.J. Duffy, president of United Teachers of Los Angeles, and fires off a letter to his union members saying this is an outrage - 2,000 teachers have been laid off, class sizes increased and a "host of other serious challenges caused by LAUSD actions." He's entirely correct.

Duffy said the district needs to work with all the unions involved and consider other cuts and alternative sources of funding - such as a parcel tax.

We were with Duffy, right up to the black magical words: parcel tax.

Draw back for a moment from the school district's troubles and look around. Unemployment in Los Angeles County is officially at 12.7 percent, which means it's really at 17.5 percent because of the many laid-off workers who have run out of benefits or just given up. Foreclosure rates are at highs not seen since the Great Depression. The cost of health care and insurance have climbed to a point where it is unaffordable to many Americans.

Things are tough all over - for teachers and everyone else. The last thing people need right now is a tax increase, no matter how righteous the cause.

Duffy's note wasn't the first time the idea of a new parcel tax came up. Last January, two months after the district officials and their high-paid consultants persuaded Los Angeles voters to approve a $7 billion construction bond - the fifth one so far - paid for by homeowners in their tax bills, Cortines floated the idea of asking for a parcel tax increase to supplement ongoing operational costs. The idea was so abhorrent in the bleak depths of the recession that it didn't go anywhere. But clearly it hasn't been forgotten, as it should be.

Those of us outside government have been living with reduced money since this recession began. Private enterprise can't just say to its customers, this is just too hard, you'll have to give us more money. It doesn't work that way for us. It shouldn't for public enterprises, either. Government has to be weaned from the idea that when times get tough, you just ask for more money.

And certainly other government entities have had to grin and bear it. State workers are absorbing up to 26 furloughed days this year and will probably get hit again now that the state's budget deficit is heading toward $21 billion.

Even beyond the issue of taxing people when they're down, using parcel taxes to pay for ongoing education costs is unfair to individual homeowners. They aren't the only ones with kids in public schools, but they are the only ones hit by property taxes, especially with incomes flattened. Yes, renters pay through increases in the rent, but the rental market is a buyer's market right now and rents are going down, not up.

We sympathize with teachers and other LAUSD workers, but that's the way it works in this economy. Only bank executives and workers at the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power seem to be exempt from pay cuts. The really big guys are recovering and per worker production has risen so they are making more money from a reduced work force. But for the people who do the actual work, salaries are flat or have fallen.

Duffy was right in his assessment that the teachers and other workers shouldn't have to absorb to all. Reductions should be heavier outside the classrooms all the way up to political offices, before they strip mine the teaching staff. The district should look at cutting new programs and take a harder examination of the management structure of LAUSD.

And if it comes down to pay reductions and forced days off, the high as well as the low should bear the burden equally - not the hapless taxpayers.

GROUP CALLS FOR PILOT SCHOOL SYSTEM ON THE EASTSIDE

Grupo Quiere Nueva Tradición de Rendimiento Excelente, Comenzando con la Nueva Preparatoria Torres

By Gloria Angelina Castillo, EGP Staff Writer (Eastside Sun / Northeast Sun / Mexican American Sun / Bell Gardens Sun / City Terrace Comet / Commerce Comet / Montebello Comet / Monterey Park Comet / ELA Brookyln Belvedere Comet / Wyvernwood Chronicle / Vernon Sun)

20 November 2009 -- Meeting near the fenced entrance to the new Esteban E. Torres High School in East Los Angeles, parents, students, organizers, educators and former Congressman Torres himself on Nov. 13 called on the community to embrace empowerment and expand Pilot Schools in the Los Angeles Unified School District.

LaCausaYouthBuild.TorresHS.Nov2009

Members of 'La Causa Youth Build' are ready to be empowered through choice. EGP Photo by Gloria Angelina Castillo

The Torres high school in unincorporated East Los Angeles is scheduled to open in September 2010. Some Eastside residents want it to be modeled after the Belmont Zone of Choice, Lizette Patron of InnerCity Struggle told EGP.

The group, in addition to InnerCity Struggle, included La Causa Youth Build, SEIU 99, Volunteers of East LA (VELA), and Father Rigoberto Rodriguez of Guadalupe Church. They say they want both Torres and Garfield high school campuses to become “East Los Angeles Education Empowerment Zones of Choice,” thereby allowing students and their parents the choose the school that better suits their aspirations, rather than district imposed attendance areas.

“This zone will give parents and students the choice to decide what school they would like to attend in East LA,” Maria Brenes, executive director of InnerCity Struggle, said. “This zone will give all students access to the classes they need to go to college. This zone will give parents, students and teachers a stronger voice in our schools.”

The Belmont Zone of Choice schools are proof that pilot schools work to improve academic achievement and they want the same for East LA, said Brenes.

Belmont Zone of Choice Schools are theme based college prep schools based on the Boston Pilot School Network. Some of the Belmont Zone of Choice Schools are: the Los Angeles High School of the Arts (LAHSA) on the Belmont campus, the Civitas School of Leadership (Civitas Sol) on the Roybal Learning Complex campus, the Academic Leadership Community High School (ALC) on the Miguel Contreras Learning Complex campus, and the Los Angeles Teacher Preparatory High School (LATP) on the Belmont campus.

Those present called for collaboration between LAUSD and the teachers’ union to make sure East LA gets pilot schools.

“We want to start a new tradition at Esteban E. Torres High School of academic excellence,” Brenes said.

Former Congressman Esteban E. Torres, who the new high school is named after, supports pilots schools in East LA. EGP Photo by Gloria Angelina Castillo

Former Congressman Esteban E. Torres, who the new high school is named after, supports pilots schools in East LA. EGP Photo by Gloria Angelina Castillo

A retired congressman and Garfield High School alum, Torres told the audience he supports the pilot system being implemented at the school named after him, and encouraged the crowd to continue fighting for change.

“This empowerment zone is key to bringing about a pilot school here and at other places still organizing themselves,” Torres said in Spanish. “But you, as parents, as teachers, and as students need to work together, unite to bring about this vision, because the programming and planning for this school is in your hands.”

In an editorial, published on Nov. 5 in EGP newspapers, Torres said he supports Empowerment Zones at eastside schools, because he remembers when California was known for having one of the best educational systems in the country. Today, they rank 50th. Making matters worse, in East LA only 45 percent of incoming freshmen graduate within four years, he said.

LAUSD School Board Vice President Yolie Flores Aguilar, who authored the Small School Resolution, also supports the effort.

“It [the educational model] should be what the community asks for and it should be what’s in the best interest of the students. If a pilot presents to this community the best educational model than that’s what they should have. But if a charter school presents to the parents and to the students what they believe will help them achieve and excel and go on to college and have a great career, than that should be the option. This is about creating more choices and more options for parents and not limiting for them what’s available to their children. Every parent wants the absolute best for their child so lets open up the world of possibilities, demand excellence, and have the community’s voice be part of the process,” Flores Aguilar told EGP.

She noted that just like LAUSD has failing and good schools, there are also charters that have failing and excelling schools.

“My hope is that we look past what the institution is and to what is going to be offered to students. To me, that’s the most important thing,” she said.

Alejandra Muñoz, who has a student at Griffith Middle School, said everyone should support the pilot schools.

“Our community dreams of having a new educational system that guarantees our children will graduate prepared for college and good jobs. An Educational Empowerment Zone for East Los Angeles offers new hope for the future of our children and our community, said Muñoz.

Muñoz said this is the first time parents and students are being given an opportunity to choose the school of their dreams.

The plan calls for five schools, each with less than 500 students, located on the Torres high school campus, as well as a series of small learning communities at Garfield.

María León, a local mother, said the pilot schools will help prepare students to go to college.
“[We have to] work with the school district to move ahead. We already see that traditional schools aren’t working, and we want to work with those schools to improve them, … said León.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Headlines that say it all: MIAMI-DADE SCHOOL BOARD BANS SCHOOL BUS DRIVERS FROM TEXTING WHILE DRIVING

…just like that; they looked up from answering e-mails and twttering amongst themselves and voted!  Imagine.  - smf

THE PLAYERS ARE REVEALED FOR REFORMING SAN FERNANDO MIDDLE SCHOOL

Written by Diana Martinez, Editor | San Fernando Valley Sun

Wednesday, 18 November 2009

Image

Ford Roosevelt from Project Grad submitted a letter of intent with San Fernando Middle School Principal Solorzano and other partners to submit a collaborative plan to reform the school.

The LAUSD website indicates that five letters of intent have been submitted by various groups interested in operating and reforming San Fernando Middle School.

Letters were received from the Synesi Foundation, the San Fernando Middle School Collaborative, Youth Policy Institute,ABC Learn, Inc. and the San Fernando Visual & Performing Arts Academy. They now have until Jan. 11 to submit their specific plan to the district under the school choice reform plan. After reviewing the plans, Superintendent Cortines will make his final recommendations to the school board that is expected to make the final decision to select one of the five plans as the model to run the school.

The Synesi Foundation [according to the Daily Breeze formed by Illinois-based education  consultancy Synesi Associates]  submitted letters of intent for every available school in the district not just for San Fernando Middle School.  [smf notes that UTLA submitted letters of intent for every school except SFMS]   A group of teachers currently working at the school submitted a letter as The San Fernando Visual & Performing Arts Academy and the school itself is partnering with Project Grad under the name San Fernando Middle School Collaborative.

District-wide LAUSD received 181 letters of intent to submit plans to run the 36 either new or underperforming "focus" schools under the district's new reform plan. Because of poor test scores, San Fernando Middle School has been put of the list of "focus schools" now available to be run by an external group.

Superintendent Ramon Cortines said meetings are planned near schools that are available for external operations, "LAUSD, in collaboration with Families in Schools and the United Way of Greater Los Angeles, will facilitate meetings of parents and community members at 20 regional sites near or at each focus school and new school participating in the Public School Choice (PSC) Resolution process."

San Fernando Middle School Principal Solorzano said meetings to discuss what he called "the new vision for the school," are being held on Dec. 1 and Dec. 5.

Ford Roosevelt President of Project Grad said his organization has been working with the San Fernando Middle School Principal to develop a collaborative plan between Project Grad Los Angles Educational Partnership, CSUN, UCLA Graduate School of Education and San Fernando Middle school.

They submitted their letter of intent under the name, The San Fernando Middle School collaborative.

"With a collaborative partnership Principal Solórzano agreed that this would be the best approach for him," said Roosevelt.

He cites the success Project Grad has had working with a professor from CSUN who has achieved positive results working with math students at San Fernando High School and with middle school teachers and students at San Fernando Middle School during the summer.

The collaborative plan, Roosevelt describes as, "A kind of a way at creating change from within, I'm not interested in running a school, I'm interested in collaborating with the leadership of the school, the Principal, working with the district and the other community partners."

Roosevelt said through a collaborative model, the community could come together to create a community school as he said U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan describes in an interview with Charlie Rose on Utube.

"If San Fernando Middle School was the hub of community activities from morning all the way into the evening with classes for parents and classes for kids with after school programs and ESL and other classes for parents," said Roosevelt.

"Imagine the school serving as a hub for the community with people really engaged there and that's how we envision the collaborative effort over time in San Fernando and Pacoima as serving students and their families in a real enriching way."

Newly-elected school board member, Nury Martinez said community meetings should be held during evening and weekend hours for working parents and she said in the end, whatever model is selected, change and accountability is needed at San Fernando Middle School.

Meetings at San Fernando Middle School will be held on Dec. 1 from 1:45 to 4 p.m. and Dec. 5 from 9 a.m. to noon.

ADVOCATING PUBLIC EDUCATION ROUNDUP

from the solidaridad blog by Robert D. Skeels

Separate is never equal. corporate charter schools

Monday, November 16, 2009 -- I recently interviewed Peri Lynn Turnbull of the California Charter Schools Association, who maintained the CCSA and its constituents believe in the obligation to educate every child. She stated that even though the charters are negotiating with LAUSD over this requirement in the current RFP, that CCSA is committed to Special Education. We can take Ms. Turnbull at her word, that this is the official position of the CCSA.

In practice however, the corporate charter-voucher establishment perpetrates something completely different. The recent documents from the Modified Consent Decree expose corporate CMO charter-voucher school discrimination and exclusivity. Very telling is the statement that children with disabilities are "significantly underrepresented" at CMO run charter schools. The executive summary of the report, and the data tables from the report. Marco Petruzzi's concerns that special education programs cut into his massive salary aside, even these corporate run schools should be obligated legally, ethically, and morally to educate every child! The easy solution is to just keep schools public and ditch the failed CMO experiment altogether, but that's a battle that will take some time.

My little missive to the LAUSD Board President about aligning with and co-signing the outrageous lies about UTLA coming from highly paid corporate charter-voucher proxies including Veronica Melvin, Maria Casillas, and Jarad Sanchez has proved popular. Let's say it caused some real consternation on the board. If you haven't seen it: Open letter to LAUSD Board President Monica Garcia regarding the press conference.

Brian Jones is his usual brilliant self in The charter school charade. This is one of those articles that you want to print out tons of copies and give to everyone you know! New York has a vibrant parent-teacher-student movement fighting back against the corporate charter-voucher establishment called the Grassroots Education Movement (NYC).

In 'Market Share' as a goal for privatization attacks on public schools... Charter master plan targets gaining 'market share' in urban districts Kenneth Libby and George Schmidt expose Arne Duncan's strong ties to the reactionary right wing extremist firm "John Galt Solutions, Inc." modeled on the bankrupt ideologies of Ayn Rand, who George pegs perfectly as a "right wing fundamentalist." Make no mistake, the Andy Smarick Ken discusses in the article works with range of right wing think tanks and is the ideological muse of Steve Barr and other DLC/DFER disciples of public school destruction. We've mentioned the Smarick article published in a journal from The Hoover Institution used by Green Dot Schools and their front group LAPU/PR to implement their hostile takeover plans before in the notes of a recent article here.

Jeff Bleich unknowingly spells out the racist priorities of empire in California's higher-education debacle:

"California's public universities and community colleges have half as much to spend today as they did in 1990 in real dollars. In the 1980s, 17% of the state budget went to higher education and 3% went to prisons. Today, only 9% goes to universities and 10% goes to prisons."

Adam Sanchez looks at this administration's reactionary education policies in Race to the top or to the bottom? I'd be remiss not to reprint this quote:

"One study reviewed in the book showed that family income supplements as low as $4,000 a year improved children's school achievement by 10-15 percent. So what would a real "Race to the Top" program look like? We could start by taking the largely taxpayer-funded $23 billion in bonuses that Goldman Sachs is giving out this year, and put that money toward giving nearly 6 million families that $4,000 income supplement."

For more on the infamous Vielka McFarlane self-colonization (aka teach civil rights at a charter school -- loose your job) incident, there's a much older, but well thought out piece on Firedoglake L.A. Charter School: Emmett Till Deserved to Die.

More math and mendacity lessons from Green Dot Public Schools. The corporate hacks at Green Dot love to crow about their ability to place their graduates in college. Well, it sure isn't because of their proficiency levels. There are tables published by the CSU system for all schools available, with a wealth of statistics. I choose one of Green Dot's better performing corporate CMO schools, since they recently accused me of just picking on their Animo Watts II campus.

Let's look at Animo Venice Charter High School. Of the Green Dot students admitted to the CSU system in 2008 67% WERE NOT PROFICIENT IN MATHEMATICS. This is compared to just 49% of the much maligned LAUSD students. Moreover, only 33% of the children graduating the Green Dot corporate factory school were proficient, while children attending public schools comprised a much more respectable 51%. More evidence of the Silverlake snake oil salesman Steve Barr's exceedingly arrogant, but obviously erroneous statement "our model should work in any educational context, because the principles are embodied in all high-performing schools." I'm sure the right wing corporate charter-voucher apologists Jarad Sanchez and Veronica Melvin of the so called Alliance for a Better Community could find a way to spin Green Dot's abysmal numbers, but maybe instead of listening to washed up businessmen, Wall Street hucksters, and political hacks like Barr et al, we should have educators leading the way for education.

This Green Dot Math and Mendacity theme is going to be a continuing series on this blog, since Green Dot is constantly guilty of the most egregious manipulation of facts and statistics.

Posted by Robert D. Skeels * rdsathene at 13:45

THE CALIFORNIA MODEL …as seen by the students of Arizona State University

By: Editorial Board of The State Press - An independent daily serving Arizona State University

Thursday, November 19, 2009 – The cost of education is something students care deeply about.

Fee hikes have rallied the masses at ASU in the past, and recently, they have caused a huge uproar in our neighbor school to the west, the University of California.

Eight students were arrested Tuesday after singing several rounds of “We Shall Overcome” to protest proposed heightened fees, according to The San Diego Union-Tribune.

The UC Board of Regents discussed a 32 percent increase in fees for UC students. A 32 percent increase would up undergraduate tuition by nearly $3,000 annually, costing students more than $10,000.

ASU students know all too well what these types of fees can do to our pocketbooks and our drive to pursue higher education.

California’s proposed hike makes our Board of Regents look like nice fluffy kittens with their surcharge.

And though we’d like to thank California for once again improving Arizona’s outlook by comparison, we shouldn’t be too quick to sympathize and move on.

For the first time in the state’s history, Arizona is being forced to take out a loan. The state has already borrowed more than $500 million against internal accounts, but the stack of IOUs is becoming too much to handle without the help of institutional lenders.

While in straits this dire, we would not be surprised if Arizona students were soon in the same position that our compatriots and friendly rivals in California are experiencing.

A proposal like UC’s not only makes a mockery of college affordability, it does little to encourage an influx of educated people — something that the ailing state could use a lot of right now.

But before we start desperately looking for songs to protest a one-third tuition increase, we might start looking at the benefits California’s problem could bring to us.

We hate to be to Darwinian, but Arizona universities might start benefiting from the overwhelming UC costs.

Arizona schools, and ASU in particular, have a lot to offer students looking for a good education in a warm climate. If the price of a California education shoots dramatically upward, ASU may start seeing an influx of out-of-state students who are willing to give up a beach for a bit more cash in their coffers.

And out-of-state tuition dollars mean benefits for all students. When the University succeeds, so do the students. If ASU can attract students who are wary of seeing costs spike, it could mean big strides for the New American University.

Despite the potential benefits a dumb decision from the UC governing board of regents could give Arizona, we are still very much on the side of the students.

Educated people don’t only benefit themselves, they benefit society. Keeping education funding a priority will go a long way to improving the economies of both states.

Both California and Arizona could stand to remember that.

STUDENTS STORM UCLA BUILDING TO PROTEST FEE HIKE "Education should be a priority for California and not 'sold' off to the highest bidder like LAUSD is doing with charter schools."

by My-Thuan Tran – LA Times LA Now Blog

November 19, 2009 |  7:17 am Updated 8:39 am

Ucregents
About 30 students stormed UCLA’s Campbell Hall and barricaded the doors with chains and bike locks early this morning to protest a student fee increase that is expected to be endorsed by the University of California’s Board of Regents today.

[Updated at 8:39 a.m.: The UC Regents have started to meet, and hundreds of students have surrounded the building, protesting the proposed fee hike.]

Students who spent the night were sprawled outside Campbell Hall in sleeping bags. They carried posters and signs that read, “Don’t take our education away” and “Don’t privatize, democratize.” Many wore bandannas over their faces.

Dozens of other students spent the night camped out in tents on top of Parking Structure 4. Hundreds of other students are expected to join the protesters and demonstrate at the UC Regents meeting that will take place later today.

The proposed two-step student fee increase would raise UC undergraduate education costs more than $2,500, or 32%.The annual cost of a UC education, not including campus-based fees would rise to $10,302.

Kyle Tramberly, a junior at UC San Diego, said he did not sleep since arriving at UCLA late Wednesday night.

“I’m here in solidarity with people across the state of California that are being subjugated to these outrageous fee increases,” he said. “I can’t afford the fee increases, personally. I have to take out private loans in order to cover this. It’s completely unjust to put the burden on students.”

[from previous version of story]  "Education should be a priority for California and not "sold" off to the highest bidder like LAUSD is doing with charter schools. I support these students ..."

A key committee of the UC Regents backed the two-step hike Wednesday, despite appeals from students who urged the board to at least postpone a vote. About 500 student and labor-union activists demonstrated outside the meeting. Fourteen were arrested.

 

Photo: Students march in front of Covel Commons at UCLA, where regents will be voting on a fee increase later in the day. Credit: Al Seib / Los Angeles Times

from Google News:

Students storm UCLA building to protest expected UC system fee increase

Los Angeles Times - ‎3 hours ago‎ (@11 am 11/19)

Education should be a priority for California and not "sold" off to the highest bidder like LAUSD is doing with charter schools. I support these students ...

VETERAN SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS WIN BACK SENIORITY RIGHTS IN L.A. UNIFIED

by Howard Blume | LA Times Online

November 19, 2009 |  8:41 am

Veteran substitute teachers in Los Angeles will get more work and a shot at keeping their health benefits after the teachers union approved an agreement restoring their seniority rights.

The agreement approved Wednesday night puts back in place a system that gives the most experienced substitutes the first shot at jobs when regular teachers call in sick within the Los Angeles Unified School District. That traditional system had been altered in June under a one-year pact between district officials and A.J. Duffy, president of United Teachers Los Angeles, the district’s teachers union.

That pact gave priority in substitute assignments to former full-time teachers who had been laid off July 1 because of budget cuts. About 1,800 laid-off teachers signed on as substitutes; the district uses about 2,200 substitutes per day. The specifics of the deal, which came to light two months later, caused immediate outrage among veteran substitutes and also among many full-time teachers. They said they objected both to the treatment of their part-time colleagues and to the idea that seniority rights could be so easily and quickly abrogated.

Duffy insisted that he signed the June pact to benefit district students. The laid-off teachers would have incentive to remain with L.A. Unified as substitutes, he said, stabilizing school staffs that were subject to massive turnover because of the layoffs. But Duffy also said he would abide by the decision of the union if it wished to restore seniority.

When UTLA’s governing House of Representatives did just that in October, Duffy asked the school district to reopen negotiations. After some initial resistance, the district agreed to tear up the June deal. And last night, the union’s House of Representatives overwhelmingly ratified the restoration of seniority.

The laid-off teachers are still likely to get work because full-time teachers can request any substitute by name. The veteran substitutes now hope there’s enough time and opportunity for them to work at least 100 days this year -- that’s the minimum required to earn health benefits.

Overall work opportunities are down for a number of reasons: the larger pool of substitutes, larger class sizes (and thus fewer classes), fewer year-round schools and shrinking enrollment.

For now, at least, the veteran substitutes are celebrating.

“This is a landmark decision,” substitute Audrey Linden wrote in an e-mail.  “A handful of substitutes, since the end of August, worked diligently without ceasing and we got back the rights for all the substitute teachers.” She added: “I will not complain about being woken up at 5:30 a.m. ever again.”

STATE'S SCHOOL FUNDING PROCESS IS FAILING: "The way this state doles out money to K-12 education isn't merely inefficient and ineffective, it's insane."

Education funding

Those who have devoted time to examining the funding system say the way California doles out money to K-12 education isn't merely inefficient and ineffective, it's insane. Above, students rush between class periods at Fairfax High School. (Don Bartletti / Los Angeles Times / September 15, 2009)

By Michael Hiltzik | LA Times Columnist

November 19, 2009 - Anyone who has spent time in or around government, from the deeply embedded bureaucrat to the young policy wonk, knows that there are two important issues in funding a public program.

One, is it getting enough money? Two, is the money being spent wisely?

On both counts, California's method of financing its schools gets a big fat F. On a per-pupil basis, our schools are among the most poorly funded in the country, and no one can be sure that the money they do get serves its purpose.

Ask those who have devoted time to examining the system: The way this state doles out money to K-12 education isn't merely inefficient and ineffective, it's insane.

This is the standard opinion of economists, education experts and business leaders. Eric Hanushek, an economist at the conservative Hoover Institution, told me he finds the system "just crazy." UC Davis education professor Thomas Timar calls it "completely disconnected from reality."

The system is so infested with complexities, state mandates and unaccountability that Ted Mitchell, president of the state Board of Education and former president of Occidental College, says that "it's remarkable that school administrators can open the doors of their schools on a daily basis."

We treat this problem lightly at our peril. California's economic future depends on the effectiveness of its schools. Corporate managers whine constantly about the declining qualifications of young people seeking jobs.

Hanushek says he has personally warned Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger that "if California is going to continue to be a hotbed of innovations and entrepreneurship, it's going to do it with people it imports from other states and other countries, because our schools aren't up to maintaining the level of innovation we need."

Adding to the urgency, California's education policies are so dysfunctional that the state risks being entirely shut out in the competition for

$4.35 billion in federal grants to stimulate innovation in education, so-called Race to the Top funds to be handed out early next year.

Although the state funding system is byzantine, explaining how we got here is pretty simple. The first step was a pair of state Supreme Court decisions in the 1970s Serrano vs. Priest case, which required the state to reduce disparities in education funding between rich and poor school districts. Then came 1978's Proposition 13, which cut the guts out of the property tax, the source of 60% of school funding at that time.

In response to these events, the state largely took over responsibility for school funding from local authorities. Pre-Serrano and Proposition 13, the state provided 34% of K-12 funding, Timar says. Today it's 67%.

The real problem is that the Legislature dictates how 40% of that state share can be spent -- it's "restricted," in educational parlance. By some estimates there are more than 130 separate state mandates, including requirements for teacher training, special education and programs for non-English-speaking pupils. Restricted funds pay for the class-size reductions ordered, during a fiscal surplus, by Gov. Pete Wilson. The state earmarks funds for districts to spend on textbooks, but only on textbooks approved by the state.

Not all of this is bad. Some mandates have broad support from districts, teachers and parents. And district administrators appreciate how earmarking funds rather than providing them as block grants keeps them from being entirely consumed by teacher salary increases in union contract talks.

Yet the Legislature's tendency to promulgate one-size-fits-all policies puts local administrators in an intolerable position.

"There are a thousand different school districts in California, one with 700,000 students [Los Angeles, actually with 688,000] and 50 with fewer than 100 students," Hanushek observes. No one could fashion a regulatory scheme applying equally well to each, he says.

Moreover, the system holds local schools hostage to the state's roller-coaster fiscal cycle and chuckleheaded budget policies in Sacramento.

Consider what happened after Schwarzenegger slashed the car tax in 2003. That money (this year it would have been more than $6 billion) had been going to cities and counties. In the aftermath of the cutback, the state made the localities whole by handing over to them property taxes that had been going to school districts, then covered the districts' loss from the general fund -- which made it look like the state was giving the schools more money.

Can you follow this? Me neither. "This is the only state where a tax cut shows up as increased spending for schools in the state budget," says Rick Pratt, a finance expert at the California School Boards Assn.

Possibly the most baleful effect of this system is that it destroys local communities' interest in their own schools.

"It's pretty clear that participation in school board elections has decreased, because people feel they don't have a stake in the game anymore," Mitchell says. "That's even true of people with kids in the school district."

Where does our "pro-education governor" stand on all this? Schwarzenegger's most recent initiative on school policy came Oct. 12. That day he vetoed a measure creating a panel to draft a finance reform bill, dismissing it, nastily, as "yet another working group" providing "the appearance of activity without actually translating to achievement." (Does anyone know more about that style of governing than Schwarzenegger?)

The governor's veto message did touch on one inescapable fact: The state's school-financing process has been studied nearly to death. From 1999 to 2002, five separate study commissions proposed master plans to improve the administration of public education. In April 2005 Schwarzenegger impaneled the Governor’s Committee on Education Excellence, proclaiming that "there is no issue more important to me." The panel, which Mitchell chaired, helped launch an 18-month survey of state education policies titled "Getting Down to Facts."

The panel proposed in 2007 to streamline mandates, give local administrators more flexibility in spending to go with their accountability for results (today the state controls the money but the locals are on the hook for performance) and delink the school funding process from the annual budget cabaret in Sacramento. But its program was "DOA" in the Legislature, Mitchell says, because additional spending was needed for a transition to a new funding and governance system, and the state budget was in the red.

The bill vetoed by Schwarzenegger was designed to move the reform process again off square one by creating "a final bill," says its sponsor, Assemblywoman Julia Brownley (D-Santa Monica).

"For years we've said this is a problem, and for years the governor and the Legislature haven't done anything about it," she told me.

The need is desperate. Californians don't understand how badly our schools are shortchanged, because it's impossible to track the education dollar and determine whether it's being spent effectively. If we had a more rational and transparent funding process, we'd see not only where our money should go to get the biggest bang for the buck, but also how much more we need to invest to get the world-class education system we deserve.

Michael Hiltzik's column runs Mondays and Thursdays. Reach him at michael.hiltzik@latimes.com

Related stories
From the L.A. Times
From other L.A. sources

CAL STATE TRUSTEES APPROVE BUDGET; SEEK $884 MILLION IN SUPPORT. PROTESTERS RALLY OUTSIDE LONG BEACH HEADQUARTERS

by Carla Rivera | LA Times

November 18, 2009 | 11:48 am - The California State University's Board of Trustees today approved a 2010-11 budget that seeks $884 million in state support to bolster a system struggling to recover from severe funding shortfalls.

The trustees, who were meeting in Long Beach as their UC counterparts gathered at UCLA, adopted the budget plan with little discussion, a day after it was approved by their finance committee. About 100 protesters gathered outside the Cal State headquarters, marching in a circle, chanting and carrying signs urging the trustees to "Stop the Program Cuts Now" and "Stop the War on Higher Education." The demonstrators did not disrupt the meeting.

The budget plan requests $305 million to restore one-time cuts imposed in 2009-10; $283 million to restore money for collective bargaining agreements not funded in 2008-09 and 2009-10; and $296 million for mandatory cost and compensation increases and improvements in student services and instruction.

The budget plan would increase Cal State’s general fund support from $2.3 billion to $3.2 billion. [Updated 1:59 p.m.: An earlier version of this post incorrectly said the budget plan would increase Cal State’s support from $2.3 million to $3.2 million.]

State support for the 23-campus system has been slashed $625 million over the last two years, resulting in staff and faculty furloughs, reduced enrollment and student fee increases.

COMMUNITY COLLEGES TO GET BACK TO BASICS

KCBS’ (SF Bay Area) Barbara Taylor Reports:

 

18 Nov 2009 -- SAN FRANCISCO (KCBS)  -- With an expanded enrollment and funds decreasing, the Chancellor of California's community college system is calling for changes.

Student enrollment grew over 3 percent this year with almost 1.9 million students enrolled this fall.

The increase came as the state cut community college funding by 8 percent.

Because of this, Chancellor Jack Scott is recommending that the state's 110 community colleges get rid of classes that don't fulfill the core mission of offering transfer classes, career technical programs and basic skills.

"It doesn't help to just moan and complain. We have to pick ourselves up and we have to say okay, we're going to prioritize," Scott said.

Scott said 95 percent of the classes were full this year and some students gave up and left when they realized they couldn't get the classes they needed.

"A class that maybe had 25 in it and had a capacity of 30 is now at 30 with 5 people standing in the doorway," said Scott.

Other ideas floated by the chancellor include fundraising, renting out unused space on campuses and consolidating assessment testing for transfer students.

UC EXPECTED TO RAISE STUDENT FEES 32%: Regents are expected to approve yet another increase, arguing it's needed to avoid further course reductions and staff furloughs. The plan draws statewide protests. Police arrest 14 at UCLA.

By Larry Gordon | LA Times

Protesting at UCLA

Students and labor-union activists rally at UCLA to protest a proposed increase in student fees in the University of California system. Police arrested 14 demonstrators. Protests were also held at several other UC campuses. (Barbara Davidson / Los Angeles Times / November 18, 2009)

 

November 19, 2009 - Caught between state funding cuts and rowdy student protests, a key committee of the University of California's Board of Regents on Wednesday reluctantly approved a two-step student fee increase that would raise undergraduate education costs more than $2,500, or 32%, by next fall.

If the action is endorsed as expected by the full board today, the annual cost of a UC education, not including campus-based fees, would rise to $10,302 -- about triple the UC costs of a decade ago. Room, board and books often add an additional $16,000.

The regents faced a large and noisy rally at the UCLA hall where they met, and demonstrations were held at several other UC campuses across the state. But regents, some saying it was the toughest decision of their tenure, contended they could not avoid the fee hikes without damaging the academic quality of the 10-campus, 229,100-student university.

"I hate to say it, but if you have no choice, you have no choice," UC President Mark G. Yudof told reporters after the committee vote. He empathized with student anger, but said it would be better directed toward state lawmakers who have cut education funding.

The regents acted despite appeals from students such as Victor Sanchez, president of the UC Student Assn., who urged the board at least to postpone a vote until the outlines of next year's state budget are clear.

"These proposals are egregious to say the very least," said Sanchez, a UC Santa Cruz senior. "The dreams of so many are being shattered as we speak. When will enough be enough?"

The meeting was interrupted three times with anti-fee-hike chants and choruses of "We Shall Overcome," leading to 14 arrests. Outside, some in a crowd of about 500 students and labor-union activists threw sticks and other objects and pushed against a large contingent of campus police in riot gear. Several students and police suffered minor injuries, police said.

"Fees are going to be so high that people are not going to be able to attend this institution," said Kenia Acevedo, a UCLA law student who attended the meeting. "It is a devastation to what is supposed to be a public institution."

The UC fee hikes and similar increases by the California State University system earlier this year are part of a national trend. As the recession has brought sharp declines in tax revenues, states have shifted more of the cost of public colleges and universities to students.

The regents' finance committee approved the new fees for UC's undergraduates 10 to 1, with only student Regent Jesse Bernal voting no. The full board is expected to endorse the change today, along with even higher increases for students in professional schools such as law and medicine.

In addition to a jump in basic fees for graduate students, those in professional schools will see an increase in the surcharges for their degrees ranging from $280 to nearly $5,700 more a year depending on their major and campus. For 2010-2011, fees for graduate students at UC Berkeley's business school would be $41,654, not including living expenses; for UCLA's law school, $40,522; for UC San Francisco's medical school, $31,095.

If regents approve the increases, undergraduates would first see a $585 rise in UC fees for the rest of the current academic year. With another increase starting next fall, the total cost would be $2,514 higher than it was this fall.

Given large cuts in state financing and grim predictions for next year, the regents said they had to hike fees to avoid further reductions in course offerings, faculty hiring and student services. They also said they do not want to extend into a second year a furlough program that reduces most UC employees' pay by 4% to 10%.

UC administrators emphasized that a third of the income from the undergraduate fee hikes and half of the extra graduate fees would go toward financial aid, and that more than half of undergraduates would be fully cushioned from the increases. The regents panel also approved a policy that would cover all the basic education fees with UC, state and federal aid for families with annual incomes under $70,000, up from $60,000 this year.

The promises about financial aid did not calm students' anger at the regents, however. At one point, the crowd outside the meeting hall at UCLA's Covel Commons surged against the doors and a few people threw sticks, plastic bottles and rags dipped in vinegar at police, according to UCLA police spokeswoman Nancy Greenstein. She said campus police used taser guns twice in light stun mode. No arrests were made outside the building. Of the 14 arrested inside, 12 were students, Greenstein said.

Critics say UC should first take more steps to reduce wasteful spending, trim the highest executive salaries and use more income from profitable medical centers to aid other programs.

UC often compares its finances to four other public universities: the State University of New York at Buffalo and top universities in Illinois, Michigan and Virginia. With the new fee hikes, UC's costs for undergraduates for the first time would be higher, by about $300, than the average of those four institutions, according to a UC report.

In January, the regents reduced freshman fall enrollment for the current year by 2,300 students, or about 6%, because of what they described as insufficient state funding. On Wednesday, they approved a request to the state that would increase funding by $913 million and warned that they might cut the freshman class next fall by another 2,300 if enough money is not available.

Meanwhile, outside a Long Beach meeting of the Cal State Board of Trustees, about 100 students, faculty and staff members from campuses as far away as San Francisco marched, chanted and carried picket signs to protest fee hikes and enrollment cuts.

Trustees of the 23-campus Cal State system approved what they called a "Recovery and Reinvest" budget that seeks $884 million in restored and new funding from the state. Chancellor Charles B. Reed exhorted the governor and legislators to "keep their promise" to support the system, which is struggling with severe funding shortfalls.

The protesters did not disrupt the meeting, but said they were very angry about how the university is being managed and about undergraduate fee increases of 30% approved earlier this year.

Megan Hinojosa, 20, a psychology student at Cal State L.A., said that many of the classes she needs have been cut or are oversubscribed and she fears it will take her far longer than planned to graduate.

"It's just harder to be a student in this system," she said.

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

CTA WEIGHS BALLOT MEASURES TARGETING BIG BUSINESS TO FUND SCHOOLS

Capitol Alert

CapitolAlert -The latest on California politics and government | The Sacramento Bee

November 17, 2009 -- The California Teachers Association continues to grapple with whether to pursue either of two proposed ballot initiatives it filed this month to generate billions for schools from large businesses.

CTA President David A. Sanchez said a final decision will be made in January by the group's state council.

"They'll take a look at the two initiatives that we filed and they will give us further direction as to whether or not to proceed," Sanchez said Tuesday at a news conference lamenting the effects of this year's school budget cuts.

Both initiatives, filed Nov. 5 with the state Attorney General's Office, would alter Proposition 13 to extract vast sums from large businesses for schools.

One of the initiatives would impose an additional half-percent ad valorem tax on commercial property, the other would loosen Proposition 13 restrictions by assessing such property at current market rates.

Each of the CTA initiatives promise a tax break for homeowners and for small businesses.

Sanchez said the initiatives were filed now to meet a deadline for qualifying for the November 2010 ballot.

"We certainly are very much concerned about the fact that we're giving big tax breaks to large corporations and that they are not paying their fair share as we all are," Sanchez said.

"We believe that we need to look at all areas out there to find additional revenues to support our public schools -- and (these were a possibility)," he added.

Sanchez also was asked whether CTA would prefer closing corporate tax loopholes rather than seeking a tax increase. He was noncommittal but conceded that hiking taxes is not popular with voters.

"When you use the 'T' word to the public, it gets them pretty riled up," Sanchez said.

31st CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT STUDENT ART COMPETITION

Nicolas Rodriquez writes 4LAKids

mai107A

2009 Winner Joshua Frausto, Eagle Rock HS

Please distribute this info to high school students and teachers in your area!  Great competition and we are looking forward to a new winning student travelling to Washington, D.C. in the summer of 2010.  If you have questions, give me a call.

Nicolas Rodriquez

Field Deputy

Office of Congressman Xavier Becerra (CA-31)

1910 W. Sunset Blvd., Suite 810

Los Angeles, CA 90026

(213) 483.1425

(213) 483.1429 fax

http://www.house.gov/becerra

SUPERINTENDENT’S BOARD INFORMATIVE RE LETTERS OF INTENT RE PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE - 17 Nov 2009

Psc Letters of Intent Board Informative 11 17 09

Briefly: CHICAGO SCHOOL BOARD PRESIDENT COMMITS SUICIDE

Michael W. Scott, president of the Chicago Board of Education, who died of a gunshot wound.

By EMMA GRAVES FITZSIMMONS | NY Times

Michael W. Scott, who had served in a variety of prominent posts in the city, came under scrutiny this year for two local controversies.  [FULL STORY]

<< Michael W. Scott, president of the Chicago Board of Education, who died of a gunshot wound.  photo: William DeShazer/Chicago Tribune, via Associated Press

OBAMA AND DUNCAN ARE WRONG ABOUT CHARTERS

 

from Bridging Differences in Ed Week By Diane Ravitch on November 16, 2009 1:12 PM

Bridging Differences is a series of Open Letters between Diane Ravitch and Deborah Meier

Dear Deborah,

The legislators who passed the Elementary and Secondary Act in 1965 repeatedly assured their colleagues and the American public that the federal government would never interfere with state and local control of schools. The purpose of the law was clear: To provide additional funding to the nation's neediest students.

Of course, that vow did not preclude federal intervention to abolish racial segregation, because segregation was one of the sources of inequity and there was a Supreme Court decision requiring an end to state-sponsored segregation.

Now, we see that the original promise has not only been forgotten, but broken. Today we see the Obama administration using federal dollars to bribe states to pursue remedies that are highly contested and whose results are uncertain. They do this in the name of "reform," but today anyone with a plan—good or bad—calls himself or herself—a "reformer." Calling something a "reform" does not mean that it will improve education.

Here is some news. I went to the NAEP Web site and used a function called NAEP Data Explorer (http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/naepdata/). This made it possible to compare charter schools and regular public schools on the NAEP 2009 math assessments, which were released a few weeks ago. No one else has done this, so our blog will be the first place in which these results appear.

As you know, charter schools have been assessed by NAEP since 2003. They have never outperformed regular public schools, and their defenders say it is because they enroll more disadvantaged students. Fair enough.

 

But over time, we have heard, charter schools will close the achievement gap. This is not happening, at least not yet. In fourth grade, students in charter schools were six points behind their peers in regular public schools in 2003; now the gap is eight points. In eighth grade, the gap favoring public schools was 10 points in 2005; now it is seven points.

In cities, the gap favoring public schools in 4th grade was six points in 2003; now it is nine points. Also in cities, the gap favoring public schools in 8th grade was three points; now it is eight points.

Overall, public schools continue to outperform charter schools. The public schools' performance is significantly better overall and in cities, and among students who are not eligible for free or reduced-price lunch (the federal measure of poverty in school data). Among other groups—those eligible for free or reduced-price lunch, whites, blacks, and Hispanics—the test scores of public schools and charter schools are not significantly different.

Don't get me wrong. I am not opposed to charter schools on principle. My beef with charter schools is that most skim the most motivated students out of the poorest communities, and many have disproportionately small numbers of children who need special education or who are English-language learners. The typical charter, operating in this way, increases the burden on the regular public schools, while privileging the lucky few. Continuing on this path will further disable public education in the cities and hand over the most successful students to private entrepreneurs.

My own view, which you will see in my new book, is that charters should educate the children who are most at risk, rather than drawing away the most motivated. That would make them collaborators, rather than competitors, with the regular public schools.

Partisans of the current approach to charters point to the recent study by Stanford professor Caroline Hoxby as proof of the superiority of the charter sector. Hoxby claimed that the charters in New York City were so remarkable that students who completed grades K-8 in a charter would almost close the gap between Harlem and Scarsdale (the most disadvantaged and the most advantaged communities). Editorials in many newspapers hailed this study as the last word proving the superiority of the competitive market model.

What the editorialists did not realize was that the study had not been peer reviewed. The first peer review was released last week, by Stanford professor Sean Reardon. He found statistical flaws in the Hoxby study, but, to my eyes, of greater importance was his point that the Hoxby study rests on extrapolations of data. In other words, the study does not represent the real accomplishments of real students, but rather statistical projections. There may or may not actually be a cohort of actual students who attended a New York City charter school from grades K-8 and in fact almost closed the gap. Unless someone is able to call a meeting and produce the 12, 25, 200, or 2,000 students in this miraculous cohort, we should suspend judgment on the miraculous findings. (As you know, I have never believed in miracles, especially in education.)

No doubt we will hear more about this in the future, as Hoxby (a brilliant economist) responds, and other peers weigh in with additional reviews of her study.

The Obama administration is using its unprecedented billions to advance a strategy of deregulation and deprofessionalization. This strategy will push American schools into untested waters, with thousands of untried leaders, and with results that are far from certain. This is not a reform strategy, but a risky strategy. My own view is that the federal government should not mandate or bribe states and districts to take actions unless there is a clear Constitutional imperative or an undisputed research basis. Neither exists in this case.

- Diane

Deborah Meier and Diane Ravitch have found themselves at odds on policy over the years, but they share a passion for improving schools. Bridging Differences will offer their insights on what matters most in education.

FUNDING CUTS MAY LEAVE GIFTED KIDS BEHIND

By Cheri Carlson  | Ventura County Star

Funding cuts may leave gifted kids behind

Photo by Juan Carlo - Fifth-graders Huy Ho and Izzy Stewart read books at Camarillo Heights School. The federal government’s support for gifted children now stands at only 2 cents of every $100 it spends on K-12 education, according to a report from the National Association for Gifted Children.

Monday, November 16, 2009  - Tyler Tsuji and Lauren Zibell want extra schoolwork.

The fifth-graders at Camarillo Heights School have been identified as gifted and talented students and don’t want a bunch of easy questions. They want something that really makes them think.

“It gives us more chance to study what we like,” Tyler said of the Gifted and Talented Education programs at his school. GATE programs also can keep students from getting bored and backsliding academically, experts say. But as California’s public school funding plummets, many advocates worry that gifted kids will be the children left behind.

“The gifted program is the first to be eliminated or cut,” said Margaret Gosfield, a retired Ventura teacher and former GATE coordinator. “It’s seen as an extra, instead of a necessity.”

There’s a myth that gifted students do fine without special instruction. They have special needs, Gosfield said, and without services, they are at risk of dropping out, either physically or mentally.

“If they’re not challenged ... they will just regress,” said Lisa Stafford, the Hueneme School District’s GATE coordinator.

In California, state money for gifted education dropped by 15 percent this year, funding that has always been small compared with other educational programs. The federal government’s support for gifted children, which pays for research in the field, now stands at only 2 cents of every $100 it spends on K-12 education, according to a report from the National Association for Gifted Children.

Plus, the state this year put GATE money into a funding category that allows school districts to redirect it to their general funds in light of all the other education cuts. Districts now can use GATE money, for example, to instead preserve teacher jobs or prevent class sizes from ballooning even higher.

Some districts kept GATE intact, while others eliminated everything, said Martha Flournoy, an Oxnard teacher and legislative chairwoman for the California Association for the Gifted.

“The state is in an extraordinarily bad financial position,” said Flournoy, former GATE coordinator for the Oxnard School District. State cuts “are hitting the core of everything” in schools, not just GATE programs. But whatever happens with funding, the needs of gifted kids still need to be addressed, she said.

The Ojai Unified School District used its GATE money, about $30,000, for its general fund. Former GATE stipends for teachers were lost, as were some materials and other support.

The district, however, is continuing tests to identify gifted children, and teachers still provide GATE instruction for groups of students in their classes.

“We didn’t want to make any cuts,” said Assistant Superintendent Dannielle Pusatere. The state cut millions from the Ojai district, so it used cash from several flexible funds this year, including textbook, GATE and library money. By doing so, it balanced the budget and kept class sizes lower, Pusatere said.

The Rio School District also moved GATE money to its general fund, and it is forming a committee to identify ways to keep some gifted services in schools. The Oxnard School District eliminated a GATE coordinator position but kept its gifted magnet school program this year.

The Ventura Unified School District has less money overall this year but made a commitment to maintain GATE funding at individual schools, officials said.

The Hueneme and Pleasant Valley school districts both kept their GATE funding intact, officials said, although there is less money because of the state GATE cut.

In Hueneme, Stafford said, the major push is staff training. About 20 teachers have gone through the advanced UC Santa Barbara GATE certification program so far. Others have received in-house training.

Training is key, officials said, because teachers must find ways to challenge each student in classes with a wide range of abilities. GATE instruction is a very small piece of regular teacher credential programs, Stafford said.

Pleasant Valley dropped a symposium program for gifted kids and shifted its GATE coordinator responsibilities to a principal with a background in gifted education. Funding this year will be about $46,000, down from $63,000 last year, said Darci Knight, the district’s state and federal programs director.

In the past, most of the money supported the symposiums, she said, but those voluntary sessions only served third- through fifth-graders for a few hours a week.

“We knew we had to get back into the classroom, where the instruction is occurring,” she said. “Losing that symposium ... it really did allow us to be more creative and really put our money where our biggest bang would be.”

Gifted students are now clustered in small groups in classes. The district is offering more support for classroom teachers, including having a lead GATE teacher on each campus as a coach. A parent group also is trying to raise money for the university certification program.

Camarillo parent Carolyn Triebold said Pleasant Valley is doing a good job trying to keep services in place. But there’s no guarantee for the future, she said. She wants to see mandated funds for gifted education.

“These kids are easily overlooked,” Triebold said. “I wish the state would say that these kids are a priority.”

NEW CELL TOWER NEAR TAPER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DRAWS FIRE: San Pedro parents, residents join officials to protest new tower

By Melissa Pamer Staff Writer | Daily Breeze

Bill Korakis is one of many concerned parents and residents opposed to new T-Mobile cell phone tower at the left is on Westmont Drive less than 100 feet from Taper Elementary School in San Pedro. (Robert Casillas Staff Photographer)

November 15, 2009 --  When unmarked white trucks showed up several weeks ago to do work next to Westmont Drive in San Pedro, neighborhood residents didn't think much of it.

The workers said they were contractors but were evasive about what exactly they were doing, the residents said.

Then, after a trench was cut in the recently resurfaced street and utility boxes installed, a new array of T-Mobile cell phone antennas appeared suddenly overhead, looming on a utility pole behind Ken Kato's manicured yard.

"I'm getting ready to retire, and that was my solace, sitting in the backyard. Now, I don't even want to go in the backyard any more. It's such an ugly looking thing," Kato said of the installation.

Mild neighborhood curiosity about the construction work turned overnight into fury, motivated in part by the fear of potential health effects from radiation coming off the antenna.

Parents at Taper Elementary School, just across the street, were particularly upset, partly because the school's raised playground brings it closer to the level of the antennas. About 75 of them turned out at a meeting at the school last week.

Now, with the backing of Los Angeles City Councilwoman Janice Hahn and officials from the Los Angeles Unified School District, which moved earlier this year to oppose the erection of cell towers near schools, the parents are planning a battle to get the antennas removed.

"This is going to be a precedent-setting fight," said Bill Korakis, who has three children at the school. "T-Mobile is going to have a hard time selling anything around here. It's a slap in the face."

But there isn't much residents - or the school district - can do to prevent cellular equipment from going up, even if they had known about it beforehand.

That realization of powerlessness is occurring all over the country as increasing demand for wireless services is causing cell- phone providers to rapidly expand into residential areas.

"It's a global issue. These fights are taking place everywhere," said Doug Loranger, a spokesman for a new nationwide group called CLOUT, Coalition for Local Oversight of Utility Technologies.

Recent court rulings have affirmed the rights of cities to regulate cellular installations on aesthetic grounds - notably in a lawsuit that Palos Verdes Estates won on appeal last month.

But federal communications law prohibits local governments from relying on health reasons for regulation.

The Federal Communications Commission is set to vote Wednesday on a request from the wireless industry to make clear the precedence of federal law over state and local codes on the placement of towers and transmitters.

On its Web site, the FCC states that cellular antennas produce "exposure levels on the ground that are typically thousands of times below safety limits," and that studies on human-health effects from radio-frequency radiation are inconclusive.

Nonetheless, numerous local governments - including the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors - have called on the FCC to allow limits on cellular equipment because of health concerns.

In May, the LAUSD Board of Education passed a resolution citing possible health effects, opposing cell sites near schools and asking local jurisdictions to notify the district about proposed installations and their potential health risks.

"All we wanted was an opportunity to say 'No,"' said Richard Vladovic, who represents San Pedro on the board and lives close to Taper Elementary.

Los Angeles Councilman Bill Rosendahl, whose district includes Westchester, has asked for a report on whether the city can strengthen its regulations on the basis of recent court rulings.

Hahn said she supports that, and also plans to ask for a re- evaluation of the city's membership in the Southern California Joint Pole Committee, an obscure group that lets municipalities and utilities share use of power poles - an arrangement that eased T- Mobile's installation on a Los Angeles Department of Water and Power pole.

LAUSD officials said they were irked that the DWP did not notify them of the pending installation.

But they did get a notice from the city on the project.

Notification of a city permit to install power boxes was sent in June to Kato and other neighbors, as well as to Hahn's office and LAUSD headquarters.

The city letter referred to an "Above Ground Facility within the public right-of-way near your property," later stating T-Mobile was the applicant.

There was no reference to cell-phone equipment, and a 14-day appeal period passed with no complaint.

"They followed the letter of the law but they really were disingenuous. Everything they did was in the stealth of the night," Vladovic said of T-Mobile, adding that he is encouraging others to boycott the company.

Vladovic, residents and parents have questioned why T-Mobile didn't locate its antenna at the nearby Home Depot or Target, or on the Gaffey Street commercial and industrial corridor that is a third of a mile east of the school.

A T-Mobile representative said multiple sites were considered and the Westmont location was selected because it is "tall enough, without obstructions, to maximize coverage in this neighborhood."

Rod De La Rosa, a company spokesman, said in a statement that T- Mobile followed relevant local guidelines and federal policy on health concerns.

"T-Mobile antennas operate well within national safety guidelines established by the federal government," De La Rosa wrote. "At this location, the antennas are pointed east and west toward the horizon because of coverage needs. Taper Elementary School is to the south."

Regardless, parents and officials said they hope to pressure T- Mobile into moving its antennas away from the school.

"If they get away with it here and the cell-phone tower stays up, it's kind of open season to expand and do it anywhere," said LAUSD Local District 8 Superintendent Linda Del Cueto. "There had to have been other places they could put it."

melissa.pamer@dailybreeze.com

CORTINES NOV 13 LETTER: “Dear LAUSD Union Presidents . . .”

Friday the Thirteenth, Be afraid, be very afraid

image image

Ed Coalition: PARENTS, STUDENTS, EDUCATORS, SCHOOL EMPLOYEES AND OTHERS STAND UP FOR CALIFORNIA’S SCHOOLS DURING “AMERICAN EDUCATION WEEK” 11/16 – 11/20

clip_image002

**Media Advisory**

November 13, 2009

Contact: Robin Swanson (916) 204-6890

California’s Students Subjected to Increased Class Sizes, Fewer Bus Routes to School and a Range of Canceled Classes and Dwindling Resources as a Result of $17 Billion in Cuts to Public Schools Over Two Years

Students and educators across the state will make their voices heard during “American Education Week,” 11/16 – 11/20, hosting events and rallies to tell their own stories of how devastating statewide budget cuts are denying many students the opportunity to receive a quality education in the state of California. Below please find information about some of those events.

Los Angeles – Local Protest and Press Conference

Contact: Bob Samuels – (805) 680-2719

WHAT: Students and Faculty hold 24 hour protest

WHEN: Press Conference – Noon, Wed., Nov 18, 2009

WHERE: UCLA – Covel Commons

Other events:

San Francisco – Town Hall on School Cuts

Contact: Mike Myslinski - (408) 921-5769WHAT: Town hall with teachers and parents

WHEN: 7-8 p.m., Mon., Nov 16 2009

WHERE: John O’Connell High School of Technology, 2355 Folsom St., San Francisco

Sacramento – Education Coalition Press Conference

Contact: Robin Swanson – (916) 204-6890

WHAT: Press Conference with Education Coalition Leaders

WHEN: 1 p.m., Tue., Nov 17, 2009

WHERE: California Teachers Association

1118 10th St., Sacramento

Orange County – Local Protest and Press Conference

Contact: Kimberly Claytor – (949) 510-1988

WHAT: Local Protest and Press Conference

WHEN: NOON, Tue., Nov 17, 2009

WHERE: Newport-Mesa Unified School District

Adult Education Center, 2045 Meyer Place, Costa Mesa

Watsonville – Local Protest and Press Conference

Contact: Francisco Rodriguez – (831) 726-6866

WHAT: Local Protest and Press Conference

WHEN: NOON, Wed., Nov 18, 2009

WHERE: Pajaro Valley School District

294 Green Valley Road, Watsonville

San Diego – Press Conference

Contact: Jim Miller (619)702-6335

WHAT: Local Press Conference

WHEN: 1 p.m., Wed., Nov 18, 2009

WHERE: San Diego City College

1313 Park Blvd, San Diego

Public School Choice - CORTINES TO CHOOSE BETWEEN MAYOR TONY AND UTLA: He used to work for one, he’s in contract negotiations with the other

 

Villaraigosa, teacher groups vie for 4 schools: Jefferson High is one of the campuses that both Los Angeles' mayor and groups backed by the teachers union have bid to run. Supt. Ramon Cortines will decide.

L.A. schools

10th-grader Dalila Zuniga, left, listens as teachers and parents attend a UTLA news conference at Jefferson High. A group backed by the teachers union submitted an application to run the school -- and so did the mayor. (Al Seib / Los Angeles Times / November 16, 2009)

By Howard Blume | LA Times

November 17, 2009 - Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and groups of teachers backed by the Los Angeles teachers union will compete for control of four campuses, including Jefferson High School, as part of a groundbreaking reform initiative.

The impending face-off emerged Monday as groups inside and outside the Los Angeles Unified School District scrambled to meet a 5 p.m. deadline for applications to run 30 district schools. In separate news conferences, the union and the mayor lauded their own education records as they marked a milestone in the widely watched reform effort.

After filing "letters of intent" for their targeted schools, the bidders, including charter school operators, now have until Jan. 11 to develop full-fledged proposals.

Backers say the school-control plan, approved in August, will spur rapid progress at 18 new and 12 low-performing campuses in the nation's second-largest school district.

In 2005, Jefferson High, in the Central-Alameda area south of downtown, was the setting for racially tinged brawls involving black and Latino students. In the wake of the unrest, Steve Barr, founder of Green Dot Public Schools, pushed unsuccessfully to have his charter school organization take over Jefferson. Green Dot later opted to open charter schools near Jefferson instead.

Jefferson has become notably calmer in recent years, but academic growth has remained sluggish and the dropout rate high. The new principal, Michael Taft, was handpicked by L.A. schools Supt. Ramon C. Cortines, who has said he was impressed by Taft's success at a small academy that is part of the Jefferson campus.

The Partnership for Los Angeles Schools, the nonprofit overseen by Villaraigosa, took over management of 10 schools in July 2008 and gained control of another, a new high school, this fall. On Monday, the mayor made the case that his nonprofit deserves more campuses by saying that his schools, all historically low-performing, had demonstrated more progress than either L.A. Unified or the state's schools as a whole.

Such comparisons have annoyed Cortines, who will choose among the competing applications. He has characterized the performance of the mayor's schools as mixed. For its part, the teachers union, United Teachers Los Angeles, has repeatedly called on Villaraigosa to replace his school management team with more inclusive administrators.

Besides Jefferson, Villaraigosa's partnership said it would seek control of Carver Middle School in South Park, Griffith Joyner Elementary in Watts and a new elementary school south of downtown. The idea is to nurture a feeder pattern for students from kindergarten through 12th grade, officials said.

The proposal from Jefferson's teachers, meanwhile, involves building on the school's incremental progress, said social studies teacher Nicolle Fefferman. The plan is to make courses more rigorous and the school's small academies more autonomous and responsible for individual students.

The Jefferson group, which includes parents, students and administrators, also wants to expand the school's ties to organizations such as the city's Museum of Contemporary Art, which offers internships to Jefferson students.

A final list of all bids was not available Monday, but union leaders said teachers were planning to vie for every available school, which would put them in competition with charter-school operators.

Charter schools are publicly funded but independently managed and exempt from the district's union contracts, as well as from some state and district regulations. Some Jefferson teachers have persistently criticized charter schools, and the message has stuck with some students, including student body President Rosa Hernandez, who said she aspired to become a teacher but not at a Green Dot school.

Green Dot was the only charter to bid for Jefferson, but Chief Executive Marco Petruzzi said his nonprofit has no takeover plans but seeks to work collaboratively with either the mayor or Jefferson's teachers.

Another charter group, the Alliance for College-Ready Public Schools, plans to seek control of Burbank Middle School in Highland Park, according to the California Charter Schools Assn., which compiled information on charter bids. Another organization, ICEF Public Schools, submitted a bid for Hillcrest Drive Elementary in Baldwin Hills/Crenshaw. For the most part, however, charter operators bid for the new schools.

No charter signaled interest in East L.A.'s Garfield High, the subject of earlier contention among community factions. But the adjacent Montebello Unified School District did submit a surprise entry for Garfield.

Montebello's staff would be eager to team up with Garfield's faculty but could not provide funding for the effort, Associate Supt. Art Revueltas said.

Instead of a run at Garfield, several charters chose instead to bid for five small high schools at the neighboring, soon-to-open Esteban Torres campus. That move sets up a potential legal battle over whether charters can hire their own faculties or whether Garfield teachers have the right, under the district's union contract, to follow former Garfield students who are transferred to the new schools.

At his news conference, Villaraigosa, surrounded by charter operators and allied community groups, declined to dwell on the likely turbulence ahead. Instead, he chose to praise competition and invite all comers.

"Everybody's got to be welcome and step up to the plate," he said. "Hold all of us accountable."


Charters, teachers union among those bidding for control of campuses

By Connie Llanos, Staff Writer | LA Daily News

Updated: 11/16/2009 08:21:39 PM PST - Dozens of charter school operators, non-profit groups and even the teachers union have made it clear that they think they can do a better job running L.A. public schools than Los Angeles Unified bureaucrats.

All met a Monday deadline to submit bids to operate some or all of the 36 schools up for grabs under an ambitious reform plan that lets outsiders - and insiders - take daily operational control of public schools.

"Today we have finally stopped talking about reform and we've taken a deliberate and strong step towards ending business as usual at this district," said LAUSD boardmember Yolie Flores-Aguilar, who authored the School Choice plan.

"By opening up the opportunity to external entities, we also create the pressure needed to push us all to do better."

The final list of applicants is expected to be released today, but as of Monday afternoon more than 15 charter operators, including Green Dot and Alliance for College Ready public schools, as well as the Mayor's Partnership of Schools and non-profit organizations like Youth Policy Institute, had expressed interest in the selected schools.

The district is expected to select operators of the 36 schools by February, and the groups will begin running them in fall 2010.

Most outside bidders were interested in the 24 new schools that will open next fall, as opposed to the 12 chronically underperforming campuses that were also available.

Still, United Teachers Los Angeles, the teachers union, teamed up with LAUSD staff to submit proposals for every one of the 36 sites.

Of the 24 new schools, five will open in the Valley. San Fernando Middle School was the only Valley school among the existing schools eligible for takeover.

While many charter operators, which run public schools independent of the district and free of most state mandates, have complained about the district's process for implementing the School Choice plan, at least 15 of them had bid for some of the 36 campuses by late Monday.

Charters oppose a district requirement to admit students based on attendance boundaries - a process that violates charter law and could limit access to federal funding. They also worry they could be forced to use LAUSD campus services - like cafeteria and custodial services - at the 36 campuses.

"There is much work yet to be done, but there is a strong sense of momentum building," said Jed Wallace, president of the California Charter Schools Association. "I think that will allow this reform to stand a chance while allowing charters to maintain the flexibilities they need to remain successful."

Charter school operators, who have fought with LAUSD for years to get more access to facilities, could finally get access to brand new schools - something many desperately need to meet demand.

For example, Ivy Academia, a Woodland Hills-based charter school, is applying for a new elementary school opening next fall in Winnetka.

The charter has its students spread over three West Valley school sites, but if Ivy wins its bid, it could combine all of its elementary classes on one site.

At a Monday morning news conference, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa also celebrated the launch of LAUSD's reform plan that, just four years after his failed attempt to take over the school district, could give him control over more campuses.

"We are celebrating a major milestone today," Villaraigosa said. "I have said from the beginning that the only way to turn around a district of this size - the second-largest district in the nation - we have to do it as a community."

The Mayor's school team has applied for four schools, including Carver Middle School, Griffith Joyner Elementary School, a new elementary in South Los Angeles, and Jefferson High School.

At Jefferson, though, the mayor will be competing against United Teachers Los Angeles and parents, who have submitted a plan to keep control of the South Los Angeles campus. Green Dot Charter public schools also wants to take over Jefferson, after failing to take over the low-performing school six years ago.

Jefferson staff, parents and union officials hosted a 7 a.m. rally, and at the mayor's press event spoke out against any outside entities taking over their school.

"We are going to war," said Jefferson High teacher Nicole Fefferman. "Not just to war against a charter, but to war against the dropout rate and sagging academic achievement."

The competitive fight for Jefferson could be replicated at schools like San Fernando Middle School. At least four different proposals have been submitted for the only underperforming San Fernando Valley campus on the takeover list.

That includes competing plans by teachers at the school, a proposal by the Youth Policy Institute, a non-profit that currently operates two charters in the Northeast San Fernando Valley, and Synesi Foundation, an Illinois-based education consulting firm that specializes in turnaround services for schools and districts.

One sign of the intensity over school control was a flier distributed earlier this month to Latino parents in the Pico Rivera [smf CORRECTION: Pico-Union] area that threatened them with deportation if they signed a petition supporting a charter school.

"Things have gotten ugly," Flores-Aguilar said.

"I do expect for people to behave like adults, though, and be respectful. This is about future of young people, and we need to be modeling for them."

The ‘09-‘10 Contract: UTLA SAYS “NO WAY”

Teachers Say LAUSD's "Terror Tactics" Won't Work - Superintendent: "This is real. I just think that we have to make payroll."

By OLSEN EBRIGHT | NBC-TV LA

- Getty Images

Updated 1:40 PM PST, Mon, Nov 16, 2009 - The hits just keep on coming for Los Angeles teachers.

On Monday, Los Angeles Unified Schools Superintendent Ramon Cortines said the school district can expect even more cuts next year.

"We've already received a notice from the governor's office that there's probably going to be another hit to the budget after the first of the year. That will be in addition to this. This is real. I just think that we have to make payroll. I don't think any of us want the district to be taken over, to go into receivership," Cortines said.

Cortines says every school union must come to the table by the second week in December and be willing to take four furlough days and a 12 percent salary reduction.

The LAUSD is facing a $480 million budget deficit. Each furlough day would save $15 million and each percentage point of reduction would save $40 million, according to the district.

United Teachers Los Angeles president A.J. Duffy said the district's "terror tactics" won't work.

"We are demanding that the district open up their books to transparency, not just by UTLA, but by the community. It's about time everybody knows what LAUSD is doing. We want to see, for instance, what programs they have they want to bring on board, at what cost. We want to see the expensive and useless mini-districts close down," Duffy said.

Cortines has called the current situation "the worst budget crisis in years."


Teachers, LAUSD at odds over cutbacks

By Connie Llanos, Staff Writer | LA Daily News

Updated: 11/16/2009 08:10:14 PM PST - As Los Angeles Unified officials scrambled to avert up to 8,500 layoffs, leaders of the teachers' union demanded Monday that the district slash bureaucracy and disclose spending before imposing furloughs and deep pay cuts.

Superintendent Ramon Cortines announced last week that layoffs are the only way to close a looming $500 million budget deficit unless employees take a four-day furlough this year and a 12 percent pay cut next year.

A.J. Duffy, president of United Teachers Los Angeles, on Monday rejected Cortines' ultimatum, but said the union was "willing to talk" about options.

"First I want the (district's) books open completely and I want to know what they are spending their money on," he said.

"I also want to see those expensive and useless mini-districts shut down," Duffy added, referring to the eight offices that oversee the day-to-day operation of local schools in the 700-square-mile district.

UTLA and the district's seven other employee unions will have to agree to concessions before Dec. 8, when the district must submit a balance three-year budget to the Los Angeles County Office of Education.

Cortines said he plans to meet with all employee unions this week to discuss what he previously described as "the worst budget crisis in years."

"I suppose I could have told my employees that we'll continue to do things as usual and go belly up, Cortines said in an interview.

"But you tell me what happens to the union when this district goes into receivership," he added, referring to the potential for the district to be taken over by a court-appointed trustee if it becomes insolvent.

CLARIFICATION/smf: When a school district becomes insolvent it is taken over by the L.A. County Office of Education; LACOE and the State Dept of Education appoint a trustee/administrator. See the Fiscal Crisis Management Assistance Team website for details. In such an instance – as has happened in Oakland and Compton -

  • the state loans the district needed funds,
  • the superintendent and the board of education are removed from day-to-day decision making and
  • decisions by the trustee take precedence over existing policy, including collective bargaining agreements.

Cortines also said the district will not be offering early retirement incentives as it did to help ease last year's budget crunch, nor will it have access to federal stimulus money to help avert layoffs.

If the district and its unions cannot agree on concessions, LAUSD will notify an estimated 14,000 teachers - or 20 percent of the workforce - that they might be laid off.

There are typically more notices than layoffs because of uncertainty over which employees will actually be subject to layoff.

Cortines said while he plans to cut positions at the district's central and local district offices, he also said that he would not agree to Duffy's demand to eliminate the regional offices.

"Doesn't UTLA have regional offices?" Cortines said. "Who is going to manage the district if those people are gone."

Sunday, November 15, 2009

MELODY ROSS (1993 – 2009) ‘What if you knew her and found her dead on the ground?’

In her profile on the murdered young woman, Times reporter Cathleen Decker  begins “Sixteen years. Not long enough.”

The tragedy of a young life needlessly snuffed out cannot be exaggerated.  A reporter cannot get too maudlin – there is no over-the-top. Excess has been exceeded. To have children is to make a promise to the future - great promises have been broken; there is forever a hole in the future.

Hopefully you remember their names:

  • Melody Ross, 16, killed in a gang crossfire on Oct 30
  • Lisa Burk, 17,  murdered in a car highjack to score drugs on July 24.
  • Dae’von Bailey, 6,  beaten to death by an abusive drug user on July 23.

Collateral damage in the drug war that rages in Juarez and Columbia and on the streets of our neighborhoods.

This is a blog about public education; but it is first and foremost about children and the future. Melody and Lisa and Dae’von have no future except as symbols of the madness and our failure to stop it and save them.   Remembering who they were and their tragic ends is not enough …we need to imagine who they could’ve been and make sure other Melodys and Lisas and Dae’vons get the chance to imagine and live their futures.

-smf

Melody Ross' family

Sary Choeun, left, aunt of Melody Ross, sits with the girl's parents, Chantha and Vanareth Ross, right, at the funeral service. People across the country have expressed their sympathy and sorrow on a memorial Web page. (Barbara Davidson / Los Angeles Times / November 14, 2009)

 

Melody Ross touches the world

Friends and strangers respond to the tragic death of a Long Beach girl killed in gang crossfire.

By Ruben Vives | LA Times

November 15, 2009 -- Melody Ross, the Wilson High School honors student whose shooting death after a Long Beach football game touched off an outpouring of sympathy from around the country, was buried Saturday in Whittier.

A hushed throng of family members, friends and dignitaries gathered at SkyRose Chapel at Rose Hills Memorial Park and Mortuary, where her first name was spelled out in a collage of photographs taken over the 16 years of her life.

A slide show was screened above her open wooden casket, set amid wreaths of flowers. Nearby, a Wilson football helmet, a Gatorade bottle and a football sat on marble stands, each bearing signatures of those who knew her.

Looking over the crowd, Melody's Uncle, Sam Che, 36, said he was touched by the expressions of love for his niece. He pointed to a photograph of Melody and gently said, "Look at her smile."

At the podium, a family member read a eulogy written by her parents, describing the family's journey from Cambodia to the United States in the mid-1980s to escape the Khmer Rouge.

Melody's parents had moved to North Long Beach only a month ago, tired of the violence in their former neighborhood near Anaheim Street, the center of Long Beach's large Cambodian community. They had hoped to raise their three daughters -- Emily, 17, and Kimberly, 6, as well as Melody -- in a new home.

"In the same house, we hoped to raise our girls to be good citizens and to grasp the potential for a great future," the eulogy said.

But that changed two weeks ago when Melody was gunned down near Ximeno Avenue and 10th Street as she and friends left the homecoming football game.

Authorities said Melody was fatally shot during feuding between rival gangs. Two 16-year-olds have been charged as adults in the killing.

Two other men -- ages 18 and 20 -- were wounded and survived.

Melody's death sparked several candlelight vigils and bake sales to help raise money for her funeral. Music videos and slide shows have been posted on the Web in her honor. Thousands of strangers from across the country also shared their sympathy and sorrow on a memorial page.

"We have lost one of our best people," Long Beach Mayor Bob Foster said. "We're here to celebrate the life of an engaging, caring, vibrant, energetic and intelligent young woman."

Students, coaches and Wilson's principal said the loss of Melody, a track athlete, had a strong effect not only on the community but also on the school.

"In the last 15 days, we all have had the opportunity to see and feel the impact one person has on us," said Wilson High Principal Dr. Sandy Blazer.

Weeping, Melody's best friend, Tori Rowles, read a letter to Melody describing how that night replays in her head, how she struggles to understand why it happened. Rowles was a witness to the shooting but was not injured.

"You understand me the best," she said. "I miss you so much."

The three-hour ceremony came to an end as everyone lined up to view Melody's body. Family members wept and stroked her black hair, placing items near her fingers.

During the burial, 16 white doves and a balloon were released into the air. As a prayer was said and a hymn sung, each mourner dropped a rose on the casket, bidding a final farewell.

ruben.vives@latimes.com

MELODY ROSS TOUCHES THE WORLD: Friends and strangers respond to the tragic death of a Long Beach girl killed in gang crossfire.

By Cathleen Decker | LA Times

November 8, 2009 -- Sixteen years. Not long enough.

Not long enough for Melody Ross to get her driver's license. Nor to maneuver the perils and promise of high school, much less college. Not long enough to figure out where life might take her. Nor actually to live it.

She was gunned down on a Long Beach street, in front of her beloved Wilson High School, when the air was still suffused with the frolic of the hauntingly named homecoming game. An alleged gang member fired into a crowd of hundreds. Two men were hit. And a bullet flew into the side of Melody Ross, who until that moment nine days ago was fixed on the trivial excitements of junior year.

Within seconds her beckoning smile was stilled, 16 years and a month after her birth, and that could have been the end of it. But the grief of family and close friends rippled outward last week, unexpected, unforeseen.

In a matter of days, there were candlelight vigils and bake sales to help with the funeral. Songs and raps were written, filmed and sent out to the world, in her honor, via the Internet. Thousands of friends and strangers, kids and parents poured their emotions out to her on a memorial Web page, talking to her as if she were reading their words. Black shirts were worn in her honor in Long Beach. And in Washington. And Pennsylvania. And Canada.

It was not that she was elite, or a superstar, or necessarily headed for international greatness. It was just that she was a normal kid -- friendly, embracing, kind, close to her family, a permanent smile on her face. It was just that her life was not long enough. But it was long enough to matter.

::

Tori Rowles and Melody were inseparable. They conspired to go to college together. They would be fashion designers; the future beckoned. Tori was next to Melody when she fell.

The next day, Tori and a few others went to that spot. A plan arose, to wear black shirts for Melody. A memorial tribute with a rebel twist: It broke the Wilson dress code.

The kids took to their version of Paul Revere's lanterns -- texting on their cellphones. On Monday morning, thousands wore black. Not just at Melody's home school but also at Poly, the crosstown rival that Wilson had played in the homecoming game. And at Lakewood High School, and Millikan. And at the local colleges, where siblings spread word. And further than that.

"It's really strange, though," said Tori, still trying to choke her words out past the sobs. "We were just kidding about doing it. . . . "

Dylan Vassberg was not particularly close to Melody; they had shared a chemistry class. He didn't believe the news at first -- "she was just such a nice girl; she was always smiling" -- but once it sank in he started a Facebook page in her honor. "Just to make a place for people to talk," he said. Within 24 hours there were 1,100 members. By the end of last week the number approached 4,000.

Word spread on Facebook too, of wearing black, and kids signed up. Across the country Emma Barnes wore black at Penn, which she's attended since graduating from Wilson in 2008. Her little sister had a class with Melody.

"High school students just don't die in the arms of their peers on homecoming night," she said. "That is something that will stay with the students forever."

Emily Frake, another Wilson grad, wore black at Gonzaga University in Spokane. Coincidentally, her school was holding a weeklong event called "Random Acts of Kindness" and she was supposed to spend an hour giving out hugs. When the hour was up, she blew off studying and spent a second hour on hugs.

"I realized that these moments are the ones that matter," she said. "After Melody's death, it's pretty clear that this world needs a little more love. . . . Even if I only made a little difference, it's still a difference."

The Facebook page overrun by Melody's fans reads like a high-tech recording of the stages of grief. Despair, anger, compassion, humor -- from her family and friends but also, strikingly, from people she never knew. Thoughts spill out both in text shorthand and perfect grammar, often posted in the night-owl hours kept by teenagers, from the first day through the memorials and, finally, the arrest of her alleged killer. He, like Melody, age 16.

"You're still here. I know it, I can feel it," said one disbelieving friend.

"What is wrong with us? We are killing off all the few good-hearted souls we have left," said another.

"I just wanna send my condolences and prayers to the family of Melody Ross. We all need to unite and quit with all this nonsense of bangin. None of that ain't worth it," said a Poly student.

"You don't know how much everyone loves you! It's ridiculous!" said a Wilson friend.

"He was Melody's age. I can't even believe it," said another.

And from one boy, who did not know Melody: "Your story is a true testament of how love can find its way around, even in the darkest of times."

::

Trying to figure out tragedy is hard enough for adults, much more for kids whose lives are organized on the presumption of immortality. They are making their way.

From Tori, who barely escaped herself: "I feel like I'm not going to be as cautious. It can just happen to anybody at any time. I want to live my life for the both of us. I want to try to make the best of it."

From Dylan, whose memorial continues to grow: "Anybody who ever knew her, even just a little bit, like me, they are going to remember her face. Forever, if you think about it. . . . It's not like it's going to go away. It's everywhere. It's engraved in everybody's hearts."

"Every kid our age -- we don't ever think we're going to die. We never think that. We think we're going to college and we're going to have a long life and die of old age. Not die because someone decided to shoot a gun. We never think of that. It's not something that crosses our mind ever. Not even fathomable, really."

TWO WORLDS ON ONE CAMPUS: The adversarial aura remains as students at Daniel Pearl journalism magnet high school and Birmingham charter high school settle into their new, segregated arrangement.

By Mitchell Landsberg | LA Times

Daniel Pearl Journalism and Communication Magnet High School

Jeremy Liebenthal, 17, Naira Piliposyan, 15, and Eric Ballew, 17, from left, attend animation class at Daniel Pearl high. The small magnet, which focuses on journalism, must compete for space with Birmingham charter high. (Francine Orr / Los Angeles Times / November 12, 2009)

A fresh start at Pearl high A fresh start at Pearl high A popular principal A popular principal

November 15, 2009 -- On a quiet Sunday in September, a strange scene played out at the school once known simply as Birmingham High.

A locksmith strode onto campus, escorted by Los Angeles Unified School District police. They made their way along outdoor corridors to Room G-44, a large classroom wired as a computer lab. The locks were replaced with shiny new ones. Furniture was removed.

Mission accomplished, the group left.

Thus did Supt. Ramon C. Cortines resolve a dispute over classroom space between two schools now sharing the campus in the San Fernando Valley community of Lake Balboa. Fed up with stalled negotiations over control of that one room, the superintendent said he decided to simply take the room from Birmingham Community Charter High School and give it to the much smaller Daniel Pearl Journalism and Communications Magnet High School, his district's last outpost on a campus otherwise given over to charters.

"I don't think it's one of my greatest moments," he conceded in an interview. He denied reports by Birmingham staff that he was present during the raid, saying of his role: "I was kept informed."

Privately, Birmingham staff expressed indignation over the incident, which came at a time when things seemed to be settling down after a year of turmoil over the school's conversion to charter status. One of the touchiest issues has been how to divide space for the two schools that share, not very comfortably, a single campus. (A third school, High Tech Charter High, is also on the site.)

But then, real estate is at the crux of most disputes about charter schools in Los Angeles. Do charters have the same rights to district property as traditional schools? Who decides? What is happening at Birmingham may be a harbinger of a larger battle, as L.A. Unified puts as many as 250 schools up for bid by both district and outside entities. Or it might just be the fruit of Birmingham's tumultuous recent history.

Charters are public schools that are given independence from the rules and management of traditional school districts. Magnets, like Pearl, are usually district-run and by court order must attract a racially diverse student body by offering special programs. Pearl is named after the Wall Street Journal reporter and Birmingham graduate who was kidnapped in Pakistan and slain by Islamic militants in 2002.

Until this year, Pearl was part of Birmingham High, a once-storied school whose academic reputation has suffered over time. Once predominantly white and middle class, the school has become poorer and serves many immigrant families, mostly Latinos. Birmingham was allowed to convert to a charter in July, some eight months after a majority of teachers signed a petition in favor of the change, and Pearl was supposed to be part of the new school.

But many Pearl teachers were among the sizable, vocal minority that opposed the charter. When the Pearl staff proposed breaking off from the rest of the school, Cortines agreed -- over howls of protest from charter supporters, who said the move violated state education law.

With Cortines taking a strong personal role in the following months, L.A. Unified has spared no expense to support the Pearl magnet, which has seen a sharp drop in enrollment -- from roughly 500 to 330 -- since splitting off from the larger school, which now has roughly 2,600 students.

At a time of severe budget cuts in most schools, L.A. Unified has given Pearl $117,000 in bond funding for computers and other technology and has paid to keep three of six teachers who faced reassignment because of the enrollment decline.

Pearl also brought in new teachers for courses such as physical education that were provided by Birmingham last year.

All this has meant, among other things, that Pearl has been able to keep class sizes even smaller than last year, with most below 30 and some as small as 11. Most L.A. Unified schools have seen significant increases in class size this year.

Cortines said he owed it to the school to provide the extra resources, especially after the turmoil its students experienced last year.

"I think we have the responsibility," he said. "If you're going to establish a school, a separate school unto itself, it's not any different than when we open a new school -- we give extra support for almost a year before the school opens."

This hasn't been an easy year for those at Pearl. Students complain that they have been stopped from setting foot on the adjacent charter grounds and have been shunned by their old teachers and classmates. "A lot of my friends don't really talk to me anymore," said senior Virginia Gomez. "My old Spanish teacher saw me over there and she told me to get off and get to my side."

Said Sarah Bradford, Pearl's student body president: "It seems like Birmingham just doesn't like us."

Pearl students have been allowed to join Birmingham's sports teams and participate in other extracurricular activities, but they have been told that their successors might not enjoy those privileges. Students are barred from taking classes, such as engineering, that are offered at the larger school but not at Pearl.

Birmingham Principal Marcia Coates said the charter is obligated for at least the next five years to let Pearl students play on its sports teams. But she acknowledged that they can't take courses at the charter, largely for financial reasons. "We're different schools," she said, and the charter would not receive state funding for magnet students.

For all that, the consensus at Pearl seems to be that a combination of adversity and district support have helped the school pull together.

"It feels like we have more of a community now, because it's smaller," said Gomez. "We get a lot more interaction with the teachers and other students." And others agreed with her praise of Principal Janet Kiddoo, who was brought in by the district last spring.

"You can tell she loves us," Gomez said. "She does everything she can."

Kiddoo said she has been striving to create all the features of a free-standing school, even while coping with unexpected crises. "It's the old adage about trying to build an airplane while you're flying it -- but you don't expect to have wings fall off while you're doing it."

Kiddoo was referring to the fact that 460 students were enrolled at Pearl the day before school began this fall, but more than 100 of them went to the charter instead. That led to a decline in Pearl's per-pupil revenue, which in turn led to staff cuts.

She has coped not only by relying on district largesse but also through innovation. For instance, students at Pearl used to be able to count on a full menu of Advanced Placement classes at Birmingham, but they no longer have access to those. So Pearl offers an online AP class in which students can take a variety of courses through the Los Angeles Virtual Academy.

Science teacher Stephen Schaffter assists as students in a single classroom take online courses in psychology, statistics, Spanish, English and history, among others.

And in the sort of innovation not always associated with a traditional L.A. Unified school, Schaffter has begun videotaping condensed versions of his physics lectures for posting on the school website, so students can watch at home if they're sick.

Rachel Ferreira, editor in chief of the student newspaper, the Pearl Post, said that after the tension and turmoil of last year, this year has been a refreshing new start.

"There's just more of an effort as a community to be the best we can," she said. "Because before, we were sort of swallowed up by the whole. I guess we feel like we have something to prove now."

YOU WONDER WHERE THE MONEY WENT WHEN LAUSD DOESN’T SPEND IT WHERE IT’S MEANT

Stuart Goldurs, LA Public Education Examiner | Examiner.com

November 15, 7:33 AM -- On Friday, November 13, 2009, Los Angeles Unified Superintendent Ramon Cortines told District unions that all employees must take four furlough days and a 12% pay cut during the next school year.

Or else!

If these concessions are not agreed to the District would have to lay off from 7,500 to 8,500 employees. “The news of more cuts comes just months after LAUSD eliminated more than 5,000 jobs - 2,000 teachers, 400 counselors and an estimated 2,800 nonteaching school workers to cover a $596 million deficit.”

I have been searching the Internet for a LAUSD line budget so I could so where the money should be cut first. Nothing is available.

smf: check out the following – though I do agree that the FINAL budget as approved by the Bd of Ed and presented to the LA County Office of Ed SHOULD be available on both the LAUSD and LACOE websites! Supt. Brewer assured his CAT Team that LAUSD’s budget and checkbook register would be posted online as they are in Districts such as Houston and Miami; CFO Megan Riley has said she sees no problem with this.

I have located the addresses of the nine local District offices. How many are rentals? They should be moved to schools to save money.

Once again, we do not know how many administrators and other employees from outside the schools have retired, have returned to campuses, or have been laid off.

Once again, we do not know what departments have been eliminated.

Once again, we do not know whether any worthless programs have ended.

Once again, we do not know whether any positions have been eliminated as people retire.

Once again, we do not know where the public tax dollars are going and whether the vast majority are going to the schools.

At the schools we do know that class sizes have increased while clerical time, assistant principal time, custodial time, district support time, supplies, and much more have decreased.

Outside of the schools we know nothing!

  • Goldurs has been a teacher in the Los Angeles Unified School District for 28 years