Wednesday, July 25, 2012

The Williams Settlement: CALIFORNIA RENEGES ON 8-YEAR-OLD FUNDING AGREEMENT

National Education Access Network | http://bit.ly/ODy77L

July 25, 2012  ::  California has yet to pay even half of the $800 million in Emergency Funds that it promised schools in a lawsuit settlement eight years ago, leaving tens of thousands of students to continue to attend schools in decrepit buildings with severe maintenance problems. In 2000, the American Civil Liberties Union and other organizations filed a class-action suit, Williams v. State, on behalf of students attending substandard schools that allegedly had unhealthy facilities, a shortage of qualified teachers, missing libraries, a lack of instructional materials, and overcrowded schools.

Plaintiffs argued that sending students to schools in “slum conditions,” with inadequate and unsafe facilities, amounted to a deprivation of basic educational opportunities. After his predecessor spent four years and nearly $20 million in legal fees fighting the lawsuit, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger agreed in 2004 to settle the case by establishing an Emergency Repair Program, instituting a complaint process for inadequate instructional materials, teacher vacancies, and emergency facilities problems, and taking other steps to improve conditions in the state’s lowest-performing schools.

In the first years following the settlement, few districts applied for the funds because they functioned as reimbursements, meaning districts needed to pay for projects up front first. But after a 2007 amendment to state law turned the fund into a grant, hundreds of districts applied for the program and the allocation board eventually stopped accepting applications in 2010.

Despite the high demand for repairs and the agreement to allocate at least $100 million every year starting in 2005, the fund has dwindled, and after paying out $338 million, the legislature amended state law to avoid the annual payments for the past four years. Officials have also deferred spending on maintenance to address other school needs, such as teacher lay-offs or increased class sizes. Brooks Allen, the ACLU attorney overseeing the settlement’s implementation, explained that it is difficult to convince people to pay attention to the problem of poor building conditions, noting it “really is very hard to capture the attention” of the public.

The state’s failure to live up to the promises of Williams has left more than 700 schools still waiting for funds to fix broken toilets, infestation, battered walls, and clogged sewer lines. The director of maintenance and operations for Moreno Valley Unified School District, a district owed $26 million for repairs, expressed his frustration at the state’s lack of commitment to the settlement agreement: “I think the title says enough, doesn’t it? Emergency Repair Program. Should it take four years to fund an emergency?”

There are currently two new adequacy cases pending in CaliforniaRobles-Wong, et al. v. State of California and Campaign for Quality Education v. State of California – that seek to ensure sufficient funding for all educational needs. The Alameda County Superior Court has dismissed both complaints, but the cases have recently been combined and the plaintiffs have filed an appeal to the dismissal ruling.

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

CAMPBELL’S LAW: The social science principle sometimes used to point out the negative consequences of high-stakes testing in U.S. classrooms.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia | http://bit.ly/NTR9ba

Campbell's law is an adage developed by Donald T. Campbell:[1]

"The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor."

The social science principle of Campbell's law is sometimes used to point out the negative consequences of high-stakes testing in U.S. classrooms.

What Campbell also states in this principle is that "achievement tests may well be valuable indicators of general school achievement under conditions of normal teaching aimed at general competence. But when test scores become the goal of the teaching process, they both lose their value as indicators of educational status and distort the educational process in undesirable ways. (Similar biases of course surround the use of objective tests in courses or as entrance examinations.)"[1]

Campbell's law was published in 1976 by Donald T. Campbell, an experimental social science researcher and the author of many works on research methodology. Closely related ideas are known under different names, e.g. Goodhart's law, and the Lucas critique.

Technically schooled people often use the term "Heisenberg" as a shorthand to represent concepts such as Campbell's law,[citation needed] based on a rough analogy with Heisenberg uncertainty in quantum physics.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ a b Campbell, Donald T., Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change The Public Affairs Center, Dartmouth College, Hanover New Hampshire, USA. December, 1976.

References

Also:

What Is Campbell's Law? « Diane Ravitch's blog

http://dianeravitch.net/2012/05/25/what-is-campbells-law/

May 25, 2012 – Campbell's Law explains why high-stakes testing promotes cheating, narrowing the curriculum, teaching to the test, and other negative ..

GROUP CAN USE ‘PARENT TRIGGER’ LAW TO TAKE OVER CALIFORNIA SCHOOL, COURT RULES

By Lyndsey Layton, Washington Post | The Washington Post http://wapo.st/NPTEOy

Published: July 23  ::  A group of California parents has cleared a legal hurdle to become the first in the nation to take over a failing elementary school under a “parent trigger law,” a legal tool gaining popularity around the country.

San Bernardino County Superior Court Judge Steve Malone has ruled that parents in Adelanto, a desert town 90 miles northeast of Los Angeles, should be allowed to implement the state’s trigger law, which says that a majority of families at a struggling school can force major changes, from firing the principal to closing the school and reopening it as an independent charter. All they need to do to wrest control is sign a petition.At a Los Angeles gathering to celebrate the decision, the parents said they hoped to set an example for the nation of what is possible. “Our children will now get the education they deserve,” said Doreen Diaz, whose daughter attends Desert Trails Elementary in Adelanto. “We are on the way to making a quality school for them, and there’s no way we will back down.”

At Desert Trails last year, two-thirds of the children failed the state reading exam, more than half were not proficient in math, and nearly 80 percent failed the science exam. The school has not met state standards for six years, and scores place it in the bottom 10 percent of schools statewide.

It’s just the type of situation reformers had in mind when they wrote the trigger law, which applies to 1,300 public schools in California that, under certain criteria, are labeled as “failing.”

Earlier this year, the Adelanto Elementary School District rejected the parents’ trigger law petition twice, saying each time that it lacked the required number of valid signatures.

But Malone ruled Wednesday that the parents had indeed gathered enough valid signatures and ordered the school district to accept their petition. He also said the school district should immediately let the parents start soliciting and selecting charter school proposals for Desert Trails.

“These parents did it,” said Ben Austin, director of Parent Revolution, a Los Angeles-based nonprofit that gave the parents strategic and legal help. “They are the first parents in America to win a parent trigger campaign, the first parents in America to take control of the educational destiny of their children. It’s a big deal.”

Austin said that the court ruling came too late for the parents to select a charter operator for the coming school year and that any change is likely to come in 2013. “It would be irresponsible to open up a school in just weeks,” he said.

Carlos Mendoza, a high school teacher and chairman of the school district’s board of trustees, wrote in an e-mail that the board has yet to discuss the court decision. But he will recommend that the district appeal it, he said.

The idea behind the 2010 law — placing ultimate power in parents’ hands — resonates with any parent who has felt frustrated by school bureaucracy.

But others see the law as dangerous, handing the complex challenge of education to people who may be unprepared to meet it. Critics also say the law circumvents elected school boards and invites abuse by charter operators bent on taking over public schools. A group of Desert Trails parents is opposed to the trigger, and they have received help from the California Teachers Association, the state’s largest teachers union.

Trigger laws are spreading beyond California. Texas, Mississippi and Louisiana have passed similar measures, and they are being debated elsewhere, including in Maryland. Last month, the U.S. Conference of Mayors unanimously endorsed trigger laws. Even Hollywood has noticed; a feature film, “Won’t Back Down,” made by the producers of the 2010 documentary “Waiting for ‘Superman,’ ” is coming out this fall.

additional coverage from google news

CA Parents Use 'Trigger Law' Take Over Failing School
‎Reuters - 2 hours ago

California's 'parent trigger' law saw its first success on Friday in Adelanto, north of Los Angeles. Superior Court Judge Steve Malone ruled that ...

Highly Cited: Backers of parent trigger law score victory in court‎ Los Angeles Times
Local: 'Parent trigger' school reform gets lift‎ San Francisco Chronicle
Opinion: A Parent Power Watershed‎ Wall Street Journal
Washington Post - Huffington Post
all 205 news articles »

Monday, July 23, 2012

SIX MORE STATES + D.C. GET NCLB WAIVERS; MUM’S THE WORD ON CALIFORNIA

Six More States, District of Columbia Get NCLB Waivers

By Alyson Klein, Politics K-12 - Education Week http://bit.ly/MECaT9

July 19, 2012 12:01 AM  ::  Six states—Arizona, Kansas, Michigan, Mississippi, Oregon, and South Carolina—and the District of Columbia are the latest to be approved for waivers from many mandates of the No Child Left Behind Act, the U.S. Department of Education announced Thursday.

That brings the total of approved applications to 33, including almost all of the 27 applications submitted in the second round of the waiver process, which had a February deadline. Eleven states got waivers in the first go-round, announced in February.

A handful of applicants are still waiting. Vermont has dropped out of the process, but Idaho, Illinois, and Nevada still have applications pending. And even though Idaho hasn't yet gotten the go-ahead to use the new accountability plan it proposed, it's already been approved for another type of waiver, which allows the state to freeze its Annual Measurable Outcomes (the percentage of students a state wants to bring to proficiency on its tests each year).

The department has turned down Iowa's request, for now, but the state could still be on track to receive a waiver if it is able to work through some legislative hurdles dealing with its teacher-evaluation system. More background here.

California is in a bit of unique situation. It applied for a waiver— but choose not to go along with the department's conditions and went off on its own course. U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan declined to comment on the specific status of the Golden State's request on a press call with reporters yesterday.

States have until Sept. 6 throw their hats in the ring for the next round of waivers. For those that don't apply, the Education Department has floated the possibility of allowing districts—presumably those in states that didn't go along with the department's conditional waiver deal—to come up with their own waiver plans.

Some state chiefs aren't keen on the idea. But, if the department doesn't go through with a district-waiver plan, districts in some really big states—Texas, Pennsylvania, and potentially California—could miss the waiver boat entirely.

Duncan said the department is focused on the state process right now. But he left the door wide open when it comes to districts.

"At some point, we'll come back to the district [waivers]," he said on the conference call with reporters. "That absolutely remains a possibility. ... Theoretically, if 50 states came in [to the current waiver process] you won't need to, but that's probably not likely."

Three of the states that got waivers Thursday—Arizona, Kansas, and Oregon—have been conditionally approved, meaning they still must put the finishing touches on some elements of their plans. For instance, Arizona still must finalize its principal and teacher-evaluation guidelines. So far, eight states are under "conditionally approved" status.
South Carolina is fully approved, but its letter includes some language saying the state needs to reach out to districts to make sure they're on board with the plan. Some background on that drama here.


State-by-State Run-Down

To get the waiver, most of the states made changes to, or provided more detail on, their plans to hold schools accountable for the performance of students in subgroups, such as English-language learners and students in special education.

Here's a quick state-by-state run-down of some of the highlights of the plans and the changes states made to get the waivers:

Arizona will be using a combined "supersubgroup," but the state added a protection requiring districts to target interventions to schools that aren't making progress with students in traditional subgroups, not just those that miss targets for the super-subgroup. And the state beefed-up the criteria for schools to exit "priority" (bottom 5 percent) or "focus" (next bottom 10 percent) status. Arizona is hoping to get all students to proficiency on state tests by the 2019-20 school year. It's the only state with that goal.

The District of Columbia strengthened protections for students in special education, and made some changes to its plans for turning around the lowest-performing schools. And, importantly, the state got its charter schools to agree to adopt an evaluation system consistent with the department's requirements. In the District's original application, high-performing charter schools were allowed to opt out of that requirement.

Kansas revamped its AMOs so that they meet the department's requirements. Kansas is planning to cut its achievement gap in half over the next six years. The state also showed that it will target its interventions to schools that don't make progress with subgroup students, even if they are not priority or focus schools.

Michigan is also planning to use a combined subgroup of the bottom 30 percent of students in each school. The Wolverine State demonstrated to the department that the schools that will be identified for improvement under this system are the same ones that are also slipping with subgroup students.

Mississippi also added new protections for subgroups into its accountability system and revamped its AMOs. Mississippi is aiming to cut the achievement gap in half in six years.

Oregon went with a system for measuring student growth that's similar to Colorado's. It wants to get schools that are now performing in the middle of pack up to the level of its best schools within the next seven years. And Oregon put a strong focus on the role of districts in improving schools.

South Carolina gave the department a lot more detail to prove its AMOs are up to snuff. It also revamped its system for approving tutoring providers. The state will continue to use an "approved provider'' list but now districts can come up with their own lists of approved providers to give to parents. They don't have to include all of the providers on the state list if they don't think they're high-quality.

Mum’s the word on California’s request for NCLB waiver

By John Fensterwald, EdSource Today http://bit.ly/OkgKun

July 23rd, 2012 | No word yet on California’s application for a waiver from the No Child Left Behind law. Literally, no word.

At press conference last week, in which he announced that six more states would get waivers from NCLB sanctions, U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan declined to answer a reporter’s question regarding California’s status, according to Education Week. Read into that what you want, but no comment is probably not good news for California’s non-conforming application.

So far, the federal Department of Education has approved waivers for 33 states, with three more in the hopper. Vermont has dropped out, and Iowa, for now, had its application denied. The states with the waivers won’t have to meet the looming demand that all students be proficient in math and reading by 2014, and they won’t have to label additional schools as failing to meet targets. In return, they have to create their own plans for turning around the worst performing schools, describe how they will  meet career and college readiness goals, describe how they would meet needs of underperforming subgroups of students and commit to a teacher evaluation system that includes measuring student progress.

Gov. Jerry Brown and the State Board rejected the teacher evaluation requirement as a state mandate for local districts. Instead, they submitted a different, more limited request for a waiver. It calls for changing the state’s Academic Performance Index to improve instruction in schools with the lowest scores and largest achievement gaps.

States have until Sept. 6 to apply for the last round of waivers. In a press call  last week, Duncan left open the possibility that he would allow districts to apply for waivers in states that didn’t apply or had their applications rejected. Eight California districts that comprise CORE (California Office to Reform Education) have indicated they’d be first in line to apply. They include Los Angeles, Long Beach, Sacramento City and Fresno unified districts.

Diane Ravitch on Murdock+Klein’s entry into “the multibillion-dollar public education market”: NEWS CORPORATION FORMS NEW BRAND FOR EDUCATION DIVISION

Murdoch’s Bold Move into Education Market

by Diane Ravitch in Diane Ravitch's blog http://bit.ly/MC1riO

 

@rupertmurdoch: Only way to restore American dream and have real meritocracy is fix terrible public K-12 education

.

July 23, 2012  :: Make no mistake. The privatization movement is in full cry.

There are big profits to be made in the education industry.

Rupert Murdoch’s corporation just split into two divisions, with one focused on education and publishing, headed by Joel Klein.

Says the story: Mr. Klein said being a part of the spunoff publishing company (which would include the troubled British tabloid The Sun) could help ease concerns among educators.

I don’t know about you, but I don’t want any data about my grandchildren in Murdoch’s data base.

According to the story [following] , Rupert Murdoch tweeted: “Only way to restore American dream and have real meritocracy is fix terrible public K-12 education.”

And of course, Murdoch and Klein know how to fix it.

Trust them.

I wish someone would tell them that NAEP scores are at their highest point in history, in reading and in math, for grades four and eight, for whites, blacks, Hispanics, and Asians.

But they wouldn’t listen.

They have a business to run.

News Corporation Forms New Brand for Education Division

By AMY CHOZICK,  New York Times | http://nyti.ms/P7gu3Q

July 23, 2012, 12:03 pm  ::  The News Corporation said on Monday that its education division would operate under a newly formed brand called Amplify.

In partnership with AT&T, the division will offer digital learning tools to kindergarten through grade 12 students, part of the media company’s strategy to tap into the multibillion-dollar public education market.

The announcement is part of a larger restructuring by the News Corporation as it prepares to split into two separate publicly traded corporations. The education division, led by the former New York City schools chancellor Joel I. Klein, will join News Corporation’s newspapers and its HarperCollins book division in a newly formed publishing company. The more lucrative entertainment assets, like cable channels and movies and television, will form another, larger company.

Amplify will begin piloting its digital learning tools in the 2012-13 school year, News Corporation said. AT&T will provide 4G tablets, Wi-Fi service and technical assistance.

In separate moves, News Corporation also announced changes to its senior leadership in the entertainment division. Peter Rice, the chairman of entertainment for the Fox Networks Group, is adding the title of chief executive. He will be in charge of all programming and operations including sports, which David Hill took over in 1999 and built into one of the most successful sports operations in media. Mr. Hill is being promoted to senior executive vice president, with responsibilities that include programming, digital initiatives and opportunities overseas.

Mr. Klein is making the transition back to his role building the company’s education division from his role as one of Rupert Murdoch’s closest advisers dealing with the British phone hacking scandal.

“We’ve been planning this for quite a while,” Mr. Klein said in an interview. “But the fact is I am here full time, and I think we wanted to make sure the announcement coincides with that so people know I’m doing this full time.”

The News Corporation first got into the education business in 2010 when it paid $360 million for a 90 percent stake in Wireless Generation, a company based in Brooklyn that builds education software, assessment tools for teachers and data systems that help measure children’s performance and customize lessons.

Amplify will include Wireless Generation, but also expand on its core mission of data-driven tools, Mr. Klein said. He divides the education unit into three divisions: Amplify Insight, which is focused on educational analytics; Amplify Learning which focuses on curriculums in English, science and math; and Amplify Access, which would develop new delivery systems to bring digital learning into classrooms.

“This is not about digitizing textbooks,” Mr. Klein said. “The question is what comes across those new platforms, and if it’s the same old, it isn’t going to work.”

Among educators, digital learning tools are a contentious issue. Many teachers see them as a way to make classes larger, add an extra burden to the job or cut down on teachers’ jobs altogether. Mr. Klein said Amplify’s approach was “about empowering teachers.”

He added, “I’m candid that if this isn’t embraced by teachers in America, it won’t work.”

Reconstitution redux: NYC MAYOR BLOOMBERG'S NEW SCHOOLS HAVE FAILED THOUSANDS OF CITY STUDENTS

Did more poorly on state reading tests than older schools with similar poverty rates

By Rachel Monahan / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS |http://nydn.us/MY0A7O

Daily News Graphic; Photo by Jeanne Noonan for New York Daily News

Tanya King  fought without success to save Brooklyn's Academy of Business and Community Development, which grandson Donnovan Hicks attended.>>

Sunday, July 22, 2012, 3:00 AM  ::  The signature Bloomberg administration reform of shutting down failing schools and replacing them with new schools has — itself — failed thousands of city students, a Daily News analysis finds.

The new schools opened under the mayor were supposed to have better teachers, better principals, and, ultimately, better test scores than the dysfunctional failure mills they were replacing.

But when The News examined 2012 state reading test scores for 154 public elementary and middle schools that have opened since Mayor Bloomberg took office, nearly 60% had passing rates that were lower than older schools with similar poverty rates.

The new schools also showed poor results in the city’s letter-grade rating system, which uses a complicated formula to compare schools with those that have similar demographics.

Of 133 new elementary and middle schools that got letter grades last year, 15% received D’s and F’s — far more than the city average, where just 10% of schools got the rock-bottom grades.

“It’s crazy,” said Tanya King, who helped wage a losing battle to save Brooklyn’s Academy of Business and Community Development, where her grandson was a student.

The school opened in 2005, then closed in 2012.

Instead of closing struggling schools and replacing them with something else that doesn’t work, King says, the city should help with extra resources to save the existing schools.

“You have the same children in the school,” she said. “What’s going to be the difference? Put in the services that are going to make the school better.”

Her grandson Donnovan Hicks, 11, will be transferred next fall for the seventh-grade into another Bloomberg-created school, Brooklyn’s Peace Academy, where just 13% passed the state reading exams this spring.

The News conducted its analysis by grouping 154 new schools into one of five poverty categories based on how many kids in the school were eligible last year to receive a free lunch. It then compared the percent of students who passed the state reading test in each school to the average passing rate for older schools in the same poverty group.

Of the 154 schools, 90 had lower passing rates than the average school in their group.

That translates to massive failure: Just 38% of students at elementary and middle schools created by the Bloomberg administration passed the reading exams, compared with 47% of students citywide.

The News analysis — which looked just at traditional public schools, not at charters — was not the kind of thorough academic study that could be used to draw absolute conclusions on the success of school closures, but three education experts said the method offers an important insight into the city’s reforms.

“This is additional evidence that these (new) schools are not performing better than their peer schools,” said NYU Prof. Robert Tobias, who led the city’s testing program before Bloomberg took office.

City officials defended their new schools, noting they serve students with higher needs than older schools and have improved at a faster rate in recent years.

“While there is still room to improve, these new schools’ proficiency rate is nearly double that of the schools they replaced in both math and English,” said Martin Kurzweil, senior executive director of the Education Department’s research, accountability and data office.

But critics of the administration say they would have hoped for better results.

“(The administration has) been focused on expanding school choice by creating small schools as the solution to school failure when they’re setting these schools up for failure,” said Coalition for Educational Justice parent leader Zakiyah Ansari.

LAUSD ADULT EDUCATION DIVISION ANNOUNCES REGISTRATION PERIOD FOR STUDENTS: Ten centers throughout Los Angeles County will begin registering students on August 6 for the 2012-2013 academic year

 

South Gate Patch

4:34 pm  23 July 2012 ::  The Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) will begin to offer classes within its Division of Adult and Career Education (DACE) on August 14. The classes will be held at various locations throughout the District.

The adult school division, which suffered serious cuts this year due to the districts budget crisis, will offer basic academic and secondary education, as an English as a Second Language program, among other classes for older adults for a $30 class fee. Prospective students should contact their DACE location of choice for more information and fees related to technical education classes for careers.

Registration will run through August 6 to August 10 from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Interested students are encouraged to contact any of the locations below for registration information.

The following 10 adult education centers will be opened come registration according to an LAUSD press release.

Abram Friedman Occupational Center

1646 S. Olive St., Los Angeles, CA 90015

Phone: (213) 765-2400

 

East L.A. Service Center

3921 Selig Place, Los Angeles, CA 90031

Phone: (323) 224-5970

 

Evans Service Center

717 N. Figueroa St., Los Angeles, CA 90012

Phone: (213) 626-7151

 

Harbor Service Center

740 N. Pacific Avenue, San Pedro, CA  90731

Phone: (310) 547-5551

 

Huntington Park Service Center

2945 Belgrave Ave., Huntington Park, CA 90255

Phone: (323) 826-2400

Los Angeles Technology Center

3721 W. Washington Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90018

Phone: (323) 732-0153

 

Maxine Waters Service Center  

10925 S. Central Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90059

Phone: (323) 564-1431

 

North Valley Service Center

11450 N. Sharp Ave., Mission Hills, CA 91345

Phone: (818) 365-9645

 

Van Nuys Service Center

6200 Winnetka Ave., Woodland Hills, CA 91367

Phone: (818) 346-3540

 

Venice Service Center

611 Fifth Ave., Venice, CA 90291

Phone: (310) 664-5888

 

web_headers-01.jpg

District News | http://bit.ly/M6plVA

LAUSD Opens Division of Adult & Career Education

Register at Ten Service Centers for the 2012-13 School Year

LOS ANGELES (July 18, 2012) - The Division of Adult and Career Education (DACE) will begin offering classes on Tuesday, Aug. 14. The classes will be held at multiple locations/branches that serve communities throughout the District.

This year, DACE will offer academic basic and secondary education, English as a Second Language, as well as programs for older adults, and adults with disabilities for a $30 class fee. For career technical education classes, prospective students should contact their school of choice for class fee information.

Registration runs Aug. 6 - 10 from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m., and Friday from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Beginning Monday, July 30, students should contact the branch site listed below for registration information.

Belmont Service Center - http://adulted-lausd-ca.schoolloop.com/BelmontSC

Register at Abram Friedman Occupational Center

1646 S. Olive St., Los Angeles, CA 90015

Phone: (213) 765-2400

East L.A. Service Center- http://adulted-lausd-ca.schoolloop.com/EastLASC

Register at East L.A. Skills Center

3921 Selig Place, Los Angeles, CA 90031

Phone: (323) 224-5970

Evans Service Center - http://adulted-lausd-ca.schoolloop.com/EvansSC

717 N. Figueroa St., Los Angeles, CA 90012

Phone: (213) 626-7151

Harbor Service Center - http://adulted-lausd-ca.schoolloop.com/HarborSC

740 N. Pacific Avenue, San Pedro, CA 90731

(310) 547-5551

Huntington Park Service Center – http://adulted-lausd-ca.schoolloop.com/HuntingtonParkSC

2945 Belgrave Ave., Huntington Park, CA 90255

Phone: (323) 826-2400

Manual Arts Service Centerhttp://adulted-lausd-ca.schoolloop.com/ManualArtsSC

Register at Los Angeles Technology Center

3721 W. Washington Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90018

Phone: (323) 732-0153

Maxine Waters Service Center - http://adulted-lausd-ca.schoolloop.com/MaxineWatersSC

10925 S. Central Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90059

Phone: (323) 564-1431

North Valley Service Center - http://adulted-lausd-ca.schoolloop.com/NorthValleySC

11450 N. Sharp Ave., Mission Hills, CA 91345

Phone: (818) 365-9645

Van Nuys Service Center - http://adulted-lausd-ca.schoolloop.com/VanNuysSC

Register at West Valley Occupational Center

6200 Winnetka Ave., Woodland Hills, CA 91367

Phone: (818) 346-3540

Venice Service Center - http://adulted-lausd-ca.schoolloop.com/VeniceSC

Register at Venice Skills Center

611 Fifth Ave., Venice, CA 90291

Phone: (310) 664-5888

The adult career and education website (http://adulted-lausd-ca.schoolloop.com) includes all classes offered at the 10 service centers. For general information, interested students may call (888) 730-EARN (3276).

Contact: Andres Ameigeiras (213) 241-3150

THE INVADING ARMY THAT OCCUPIES OUR SCHOOLS

2cents smf: The metaphor of war is not mine .

A Nation at Risk: The Imperative For Educational Reform-  the 1983 report of President Ronald Reagan's National Commission on Excellence in Education infamously said: "If an unfriendly foreign power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war."

[The data and statistics that drove  the Nation at Risk  report were repudiated in 1990 by the Sandia Report – which held the 1983 data was skewed by Simpson’s Paradox – the statistical outcome of  comparing the progress of different subgroups  “To our surprise, on nearly every measure, we found steady or slightly improving trends." Unlike the N2R  report, the Sandia Report was initially suppressed – and when finally published received almost no attention]

The Invading Army That Has Occupied America's Public Schools

by Mark Naison, With a Brooklin Accent Blog |http://bit.ly/NH7dyr 

Saturday, July 14, 2012at  3:08 AM   ::  When a nation is invaded by an occupying army, there are multiple responses from those who communities have been occupied. Some resist openly, at great risk; some decide to collaborate; others grimly go about their business in sullen compliance; others decide to feign compliance, but take their resistance underground.

Such would be a good description of the varied resistance to the Corporate takeover of American schools, which has many of the elements of a foreign invasion.

Those who have coordinated the campaign of privatization, testing and union busting that has swept through America's public schools, Bill Gates, Eli Broad, Arne Duncan, Michael Bloomberg, and the like, none of whom have a background in teaching, have used the Shock and Awe tactics employed by invading armies to overwhelm opposition. They have crushed or bought off opponents, controlled public media, and found an eager army of mercenaries- Teach for America corps members- to implement their policies, which undermine the best practices of those who have spent their lives working in the nation's schools.

If you freeze this Corporate takeover in time, it would look like a resounding success.

Not only has the federal education bureaucracy been taken over by the invading group, one state and locality after another has adopted the policies they have proposed. Charter schools have been replacing public schools with breakneck speed; teacher evaluations based on student test scores have become the norm throughout the nation, and in school testing is multiplying while other pathways to learning are being crowded out.

But one should not underestimate the extent, or the complexity of the opposition to these policies that is arising. When rules are imposed by an invading army using overwhelming force, compliance doesn't necessarily mean consent. And this is true of the testing regime the Corporate reformers are introducing,

Many teachers, parents, union leaders, and school administrators secretly despise the policies being imposed on them; but see no way off opposing them with sacrificing their careers or children's welfare. But little by little, voices of resistance are appearing, some public, some private, which are not only raising doubts about the wisdom of the policies, but also building hope that some day they can be reversed. What we now have is non-violent army of resistance to Corporate Education Reform, small in number, but high in courage, morale, and vision, which is exposing the flaws of these policies on every front. And as the policies themselves become more invasive, demoralizing and counterproductive, more people are joining the opposition, some clandestinely, others publicly.

The Chicago Teachers Strike mobilization,, the New York Principals and Professors petitions against high stakes testing,, the national movement to have parents opt out of high stakes testing, the student and neighborhood protests against school transformation policies, all show that the Corporate invaders have not been able to effectively pacify the territories they have occupied.

And as their policies become more brutal- as poverty proliferates and the middle class shrinks, as class size mounts, and as K through 12 testing becomes the norm while all activities which foster creativity and critical thinking are discarded, resistance will grow Few battles have more significance for the future of Democracy in the United States than this one. Who knows, even some member of the Mercenary Armies recruited to implement these policies may decide to rebel.

WATCHDOG GROUP LAUNCHES PETITION DRIVE TO PROTECT BROWN ACT

Californians Aware appeals to voters to help protect key provisions of the state's open-government law.

Eagle Rock, CA Patch http://bit.ly/LIWb8I

23 July 2012, 5:00am  ::  A Sacramento-based organization launched an online petition drive Sunday to amend the California constitution to ensure that municipal meeting agendas continue to be offered to the public.

In June, the state Legislature gave California cities and counties the option of not posting meeting agendas and other reports to save money. This action suspended a key provision of the 1953 Brown Act, which requires California cities, counties, school boards and special districts to follow a range of provisions in conducting their meetings openly.

On Sunday, Californians Aware launched a petition drive to place a proposition on the statewide ballot.

"Even though the law might not hold public officials accountable for no longer posting agendas or providing adequate descriptions of items on them, angry voters would hold them accountable," stated Californians Aware on its website. "Political exposure has always been a far more powerful motivator of Brown Act compliance than legal exposure."

A bill designed to preserve the Brown Act provisions is in limbo in the Assembly Appropriations Committee after the state Senate passed it.

"Staying in compliance with the Brown Act makes organizations like the ERNC much less effective on the local level," Eagle Rock Neighborhood Council President Michael Larsen said of the latest effort to revive certain elements of the law no longer in force. "I think all levels of government should be required to make their agendas and minutes available online, but posting them in various public places seems a bit antiquated."

Free the Brown Act from Budget Suspense!

SIGN THIS PETITION

Free the Brown Act from Budget Suspense!

  1. Petitioning:  California Assembly Speaker John A. Pérez (+ 17 others)
  1. Created By

    Terry Francke
  2. Carmichael, CA

The Brown Act, which requires California cities, counties, school boards and special districts to conduct their meetings openly and with adequate advance notice, has had some of its key protections suspended indefinitely by the state legislature. The reason: there is no money to reimburse these local agencies for their claimed costs of composing and posting a meaningful agenda and disclosing actions taken in closed sessions.

That reimbursement is constitutionally required.

The only way to change that requirement is to amend the constitution. The only way to amend the constitution is to place a proposition to do so on the statewide ballot so the voters can approve it. A legislative bill to do just that—Senate Constitutional Amendment (SCA) 7—has been passed by unanimous bipartisan votes in the Senate and in the first of two committees in the Assembly.

But that bill sits sidelined in the Assembly Appropriations Committee since late last summer, supposedly because it would cost too much just to do the processing to get it on the ballot.

That excuse is dubious at best. The Senate Appropriations Committee, bound to uphold exactly the same spending discipline standards as its Assembly counterpart, found no such cost obstacle and passed the bill promptly last year.

And after all, the amendment proposed by SCA 7 would free state government from future annual reimbursement claims that have recently been amounting to $20 million per year!

The Assembly committee holding SCA 7 is dominated by Democrats, and they are answerable to Speaker Pérez. A directive from him could see SCA 7 voted out of committee and onto the Senate Floor, where Republicans would support it as readily as they have up to now.

Or the committee members themselves—Democrats and Republicans—could send SCA 7 to the Assembly floor on their own initiative, there to be placed on the ballot with the same overwhelming support the bill has earned so far.

Make no mistake—once given the chance, the people of California would make the Brown Act's open government protections safe in the constitution from the state's sorry budget dramas. Please sign this petition to tell Speaker Pérez to use his power and Free SCA 7.

Allow voters to add open meeting protections to the State Constitution

to:: California Assembly Speaker John A. Pérez.


----------------

The Brown Act, which requires California cities, counties, school boards and special districts to conduct their meetings openly and with adequate advance notice, has had some of its key protections suspended indefinitely by the state legislature. The reason: there is no money to reimburse these local agencies for their claimed costs of composing and posting a meaningful agenda and disclosing actions taken in closed sessions.

That reimbursement is constitutionally required.

The only way to change that requirement is to amend the constitution. The only way to amend the constitution is to place a proposition to do so on the statewide ballot so the voters can approve it. A legislative bill to do just that—Senate Constitutional Amendment (SCA) 7—has been passed by unanimous bipartisan votes in the Senate and in the first of two committees in the Assembly.

But that bill sits sidelined in the Assembly Appropriations Committee since late last summer, supposedly because it would cost too much just to do the processing to get it on the ballot.

That excuse is dubious at best. The Senate Appropriations Committee, bound to uphold exactly the same spending discipline standards as its Assembly counterpart, found no such cost obstacle and passed the bill promptly last year.

And after all, the amendment proposed by SCA 7 would free state government from future annual reimbursement claims that have recently been amounting to $20 million per year!

The Assembly committee holding SCA 7 is dominated by Democrats, and they are answerable to Speaker Pérez. A directive from him could see SCA 7 voted out of committee and onto the Senate Floor, where Republicans would support it as readily as they have up to now.

Or the committee members themselves—Democrats and Republicans—could send SCA 7 to the Assembly floor on their own initiative, there to be placed on the ballot with the same overwhelming support the bill has earned so far.

Make no mistake—once given the chance, the people of California would make the Brown Act's open government protections safe in the constitution from the state's sorry budget dramas. Please sign this petition to tell Speaker Pérez to use his power and Free SCA 7.

----------------
Sincerely,

[Sign Here]

Sunday, July 22, 2012

REGENTS TIE TUITION TO BROWN’S PROP 30: UC tuition could rise 20% if tax measure fails

By TERENCE CHEA, Associated Press from the Sacramento Bee | http://bit.ly/QnAcdR

Tuesday, Jul. 10, 2012 - 6:29 pm  ::  SAN FRANCISCO -- University of California students will likely face a steep midyear tuition increase if voters reject Gov. Jerry Brown's tax initiative.

The 10-campus system will need to consider raising tuition by as much as 20 percent in January if the November ballot measure fails, according to documents posted online ahead of next week's UC Board of Regents meeting. Under that scenario, in-state undergraduate tuition would rise by $2,472 to $14,664.

At their meeting in San Francisco, the regents are expected to vote on a measure to freeze tuition at 2011-2012 levels and endorse the governor's initiative, which temporarily raises the sales tax and boosts the income tax on people who make more than $250,000 a year.

Under the recently adopted state budget for 2012-2013, state funding for the UC system would remain stable this fiscal year and increase by $125 million next year - if the university does not raise tuition and voters approve Brown's tax measure.

But if the initiative doesn't pass, the university system would face a midyear funding reduction of $250 million - and wouldn't get the additional $125 million next year. That "trigger cut" would lower state funding of UC to $2.13 billion, compared with $3.26 billion in 2007-2008.

UC officials say the university would need to raise tuition by 20 percent if the entire budget shortfall was covered by a tuition increase alone. The system could raise tuition by a lesser amount if it finds other ways to raise revenue or cut costs.

"The stakes are pretty clear," UC spokesman Steve Montiel said Tuesday. "If the initiative doesn't pass, it would be a tough situation for the university and ultimately for the students."

In recent years, UC has repeatedly raised tuition - and made deep cuts to campus services and academic programs - in response to sharp reductions in state funding. Students now pay nearly twice as much as they did five years ago.

The prospect of another sharp tuition hike should motivate students and other people who care about higher education to support the governor's tax initiative, said Claudia Magana, president of the University of California Students Association.

The students association plans to ramp up efforts to register students to vote this fall, Magana said.

"We want to educate students on what this vote means," she said. "We'll be doing everything in our power to make sure that it does pass."

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/07/10/4622456/uc-tuition-could-rise-sharply.html#storylink=cpy

Tuesday, Jul. 10, 2012 - 6:29 pm  ::  SAN FRANCISCO -- University of California students will likely face a steep midyear tuition increase if voters reject Gov. Jerry Brown's tax initiative.

The 10-campus system will need to consider raising tuition by as much as 20 percent in January if the November ballot measure fails, according to documents posted online ahead of next week's UC Board of Regents meeting. Under that scenario, in-state undergraduate tuition would rise by $2,472 to $14,664.

At their meeting in San Francisco, the regents are expected to vote on a measure to freeze tuition at 2011-2012 levels and endorse the governor's initiative, which temporarily raises the sales tax and boosts the income tax on people who make more than $250,000 a year.

Under the recently adopted state budget for 2012-2013, state funding for the UC system would remain stable this fiscal year and increase by $125 million next year - if the university does not raise tuition and voters approve Brown's tax measure.

But if the initiative doesn't pass, the university system would face a midyear funding reduction of $250 million - and wouldn't get the additional $125 million next year. That "trigger cut" would lower state funding of UC to $2.13 billion, compared with $3.26 billion in 2007-2008.

UC officials say the university would need to raise tuition by 20 percent if the entire budget shortfall was covered by a tuition increase alone. The system could raise tuition by a lesser amount if it finds other ways to raise revenue or cut costs.

"The stakes are pretty clear," UC spokesman Steve Montiel said Tuesday. "If the initiative doesn't pass, it would be a tough situation for the university and ultimately for the students."

In recent years, UC has repeatedly raised tuition - and made deep cuts to campus services and academic programs - in response to sharp reductions in state funding. Students now pay nearly twice as much as they did five years ago.

The prospect of another sharp tuition hike should motivate students and other people who care about higher education to support the governor's tax initiative, said Claudia Magana, president of the University of California Students Association.

The students association plans to ramp up efforts to register students to vote this fall, Magana said.

"We want to educate students on what this vote means," she said. "We'll be doing everything in our power to make sure that it does pass."

LOS ANGELES SCHOOL POLICE CHIEF RETHINKING DISCIPLINE POLICY

By Susan Ferriss, iWatch News – Huffington Post | http://huff.to/NVcgO4

7/20/2012 10:39 am  ::   In response to controversy over court citations to students as young as 10, the police chief of Los Angeles' largest school district said he's working with school officials to reduce such tickets and establish, by mid-August, more out-of-court counseling options for kids who are cited.

But Chief Steven Zipperman, who leads the nation's largest school police force, defended his 340 sworn officers' authority to issue citations when officers believe it's appropriate. Students have been cited for everything from truancy to vandalism to possessing a marker that could be used for graffiti. They've also been summoned to court for jaywalking, cigarette and pot smoking. Large numbers of students have additionally been cited for fisticuffs and for being disruptive inside and outside school. 

"Our number one priority is for these to be handled administratively," inside schools, Zipperman said in a recent interview. "But sometimes a court visit is something that's necessary."

Zimmerman has been meeting regularly with community organizers since the Center for Public Integrity and Southern California Public Radio reported this spring that Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) police had issued more than 33,5000 tickets over three years to students between 10 and 18 years of age.  The Los Angeles Unified district is about 74 percent Latino, but Latinos and especially black students have received tickets at disproportionate rates. Los Angeles Unified is not the only school district in the city of Los Angeles, but it is by far the largest.   

Examining previously unreleased data, the Center found that more than 40 percent of the tickets issued from 2009 through 2011 for minor offenses went to children between 10 and 14 years of age. One of the top citations for middle school pupils was fighting or disturbing the peace.

In fact, out of nearly 2,380 citations for disturbing the peace issued to all kids between 10 and 18 last year, far more than half of them -- in excess of 1,520 -- went to students between 10 and 14 years old.

Zipperman, who took over as school police chief in 2011, said he doesn't dispute the Center's analysis. But he's not convinced that the pace of ticketing during the time analyzed, about 30 a day based on a full calendar year, was excessive, given that the district has about 670,000 students.  Since the release of raw school police data is relatively new, it's hard to compare districts. Records recently made public show that New York City's school police, who are facing lawsuits for alleged excessive force, appear to issue an average of about six tickets a day year-round.

Zipperman said he is concerned about ticketing of young children, and open to talking more about the circumstances of those citations. "If we are giving 11- and 12-year-olds citations," he said, "I would like to look at those."

Last year, LAUSD officers gave out 21 court summonses to children between the ages of 7 and 10. All these students were black or Latino.

More than 170 citations were also issued to 11-year-olds. Nearly 770 were issued to 12-year-olds. And more than 1,550 were issued to 13-year-olds. Citations were concentrated in more than a dozen middle schools where the number of tickets issued ranged from 60 to more than 100 in a school year. All these schools have majority Latino and black student bodies.    

Given the size of the LAUSD police force, the department's response to accusations of excessive ticketing could influence how other school districts nationwide treat school-based incidents. Schools throughout the country are rethinking "zero tolerance" policies that have led to increases in students getting suspended, expelled and sent to court.

The U.S. Department of Education's Civil Rights Division, which investigates allegations of disproportionate punishment of minority students, is scrutinizing the history of citations in the LAUSD as part of a review of the district's promise to reduce disproportionate suspensions of black students. The division last year began asking districts nationwide to submit data detailing how many students are referred to law enforcement in a school year. The Los Angeles Unified District failed to turn in records.

In mid-June, budget cuts forced the city of Los Angeles to close a series of lower-level, informal traffic and juvenile courts where students accused of minor offenses were summoned to appear with parents. The charges often carried monetary penalties, but court referees could impose community service.

With the lower-level courts shut down, officials are devising a new system.

Zipperman expects that truant students, at minimum, will be referred directly to counseling at about a dozen community-based centers in Los Angeles that have received funding for this purpose. Other offenders are already being referred to the Los Angeles County Probation Department, which is setting up a diversion program its officers will supervise. Some students could still end up in full-blown juvenile court.

Manuel Criollo, an organizer with the Los Angeles Labor-Community Strategy Center, a civil rights group, has been meeting with Zipperman. He'd like to see fewer tickets issued overall. "It's totally inappropriate to give a 10-year-old a ticket," he said.

Criollo, whose group did its own analysis of citations numbers, said that because schools have had to slash staff due to budget cuts, police have become a default disciplinary authority in some schools.

But a number of juvenile judges and other legal experts are concerned that introducing students to the criminal-justice system at a young age is backfiring, and hardening some kids' behavior instead of improving it. Los Angeles high schools with high rates of ticketing also have some of the worst graduation rates. Middle schools with large numbers of citations feed into these same high schools.

Some parents also question if police scrutiny is harsher in certain neighborhoods. 

Zipperman, a 30-year veteran of the Los Angeles city police, strongly disputed that his officers are guilty of discrimination. Officers aim to establish "mentoring" relationships with kids, he said, and are generally posted evenly throughout the district, not just in low-income schools where kids have been more heavily ticketed.  

"Unfortunately, there are a higher percentage of kids involved in these activities in those schools," Zipperman said. He said the district and community need to ask: "What do we need to put in place in these challenged areas?"

Los Angeles mother Shalice Davis, whose 15-year-old daughter was ticketed in March, said she was disturbed that when her daughter got into an altercation at school, the response was not to suspend her, or require her to submit to some other disciplinary procedure. She was instead immediately issued a court citation. Her daughter attends Thomas Jefferson High School in South Los Angeles, and had never been in trouble before, Davis said.

The teenager had been struggling with being bullied, Davis said, a problem for which she had sought help at school. She was ticketed after another student began repeatedly taunting her out on a blacktop area at school, Davis said, and a security guard stood by, doing nothing, until a physical fight broke out.

"Instead of security taking the girls aside and the school trying to resolve this, they radioed school police officers to come and give them tickets," Davis said. "Somebody told her she could go to jail."

With a lawyer from the Labor-Community Strategy Center at their side, Davis and her daughter appeared in court weeks later, successfully arguing for a warning.    

No one was available at the Thomas Jefferson High School to comment.  Zipperman said he couldn't comment on individual cases whose details he doesn't know. 

But he said his own internal department records are showing that citations are already on the decline. Between January and June, officers issued 50 percent fewer truancy, or daytime curfew, tickets compared to last year, he said. Disturbing-the-peace citations, he said, appear to be down by about a quarter.

The fall in curfew tickets follows a long campaign by parents, judges and Los Angeles elected officials who objected to what they viewed as overly aggressive police enforcement. Officers were catching students as they walked up to school minutes late, sometimes handcuffing and searching them. In February, Los Angeles' city council voted to drop large fines for daytime curfew violations and limited police from ticketing students clearly on their way to school.

Zipperman said he's considering the possibility of a plan to refer a portion of students accused of disturbing the peace and tobacco violations to community-based counseling, along with truants. "No matter what we have in place," he said, "we have to keep revisiting this to make sure we are doing the best we can for kids."

Saturday, July 21, 2012

Lax security at charter school suspected: NORTH HOLLYWOOD H.S. CLEARED IN STATE TEST LEAK

A former North Hollywood student, however, is believed to have posted some state test information online after transferring. State officials are still investigating.

By Howard Blume, Los Angeles Times | http://lat.ms/PtTTiN

July 21, 2012  ::  North Hollywood High School has been cleared in a leak of secure state test items, but a former student at the school has some explaining to do.

The student was among those who allegedly posted online a total of 36 questions from various standardized exams conducted last spring. The questions were traced to 12 schools across California, including North Hollywood — but the student no longer attended that campus during the testing period.

By that time, the student had transferred to an independently managed charter school, according to a source who was not authorized to comment publicly. There, the student took the standardized test for chemistry and photographed two items that subsequently appeared online. Cellphones and other picture-taking devices are prohibited during testing.

North Hollywood High was the only campus mentioned on the student's social-networking site, leading to a mistaken conclusion about where the student was enrolled, said Paul Hefner, a spokesman for the California Department of Education. Hefner confirmed that the state had identified the student as well as the current school. He declined to name the second school to avoid the possibility of publicly identifying the student.

But L.A. Unified officials also have access to the student's identity — which means the student could face discipline. The issue is complicated, however, for students enrolled in charter schools. An independent charter has its own board of directors, and it is typically responsible for discipline.

In all, 249 individuals posted 442 images of test materials that were linked to 147 schools in 94 California school districts — though most images were not of actual test questions. State officials were most concerned with determining whether the 2012 tests were broadly compromised; they've determined that the results for the state and school districts remain valid.

But individual schools could have issues. The former North Hollywood student could have leaked information either to students at that school or to friends at the charter. As a consequence, the scores at both schools will be evaluated.

In the worst case, a security breach or other violation could result in a school being stripped of its score on the state's Academic Performance Index as well as other sanctions.

Friday, July 20, 2012

MAYORS SUPPORT “PARENT TRICKER” LAW

by Diane Ravitch  | Bridging Differences - Education Week http://bit.ly/O4cwc9

June 26, 2012 9:05 AM  ::  On June 18, the U.S. Conference of Mayors unanimously endorsed "parent trigger" laws that would let parents "seize control of low-performing public schools and fire the teachers, oust the administrators, or turn the schools over to private management." I call it the "parent tricker" law for reasons I explain below.

Let's be clear what the so-called parent trigger means. If 51 percent of the parents in a public school sign a petition, they can take control of the school, fire the staff, and hand the school over to a private corporation run by themselves or someone else.

Parent trigger laws are an invitation, as economist Bruce Baker put it, to mob rule.

I wonder how the mayors would react to a similar proposal to allow citizens to seize control of the public housing projects they live in or their local firehouse or police station, if they are dissatisfied with them. Perhaps they should also be permitted to take control of the sanitation trucks and give the jobs to one another.

It is frankly bizarre to pass a law allowing 51 percent of the present users of a public facility or public service to seize control and hand it off to a private corporation. The public paid for it, why should the people who use it this year claim the power to give it away? What about the rights of those who plan to attend the school in years to come? Supposing next year half of those who signed the petition are no longer parents in the school that they privatized? To me, this is akin to saying that those riding on a public bus should have the power to "seize control" and give it to a private bus company.

The national parent organization Parents Across America opposes the parent trigger as a stealth way to privatize public schools. When Florida considered parent trigger legislation this past spring, the law failed because of opposition from every Florida parent organization.

I wonder why parent trigger laws never include the right of charter school parents to "seize control" of their school and give it back to the public system.

Let's be clear about where the "parent trigger" idea came from. It originated with the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), the shadowy group of 2,000 right-wing state legislators that writes model legislation to promote vouchers and parent triggers and anything else they can dream up to privatize public schools.

The first parent trigger law was passed by the California legislature in 2010. It sounded innocuous: Why not let parents of a low-performing school petition to turn their school over to a charter operator? The prime mover behind the trigger bill in California was not parent organizations, however, but a then-little-known group called Parent Revolution, which is funded by the Eli Broad foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Walton Family Foundation. The chief executive officer of Parent Revolution is a Beverly Hills lawyer named Ben Austin, who was appointed to the very charter-friendly state board of education by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. (When Gov. Jerry Brown was elected, he replaced several members of the board, including Austin.)

Parent Revolution sent its paid organizers into two low-income communities to gather signatures in hopes of using the parent trigger to turn their schools over to a charter operation. In both cases, the petitions led to squabbling about who signed, whether the signatures were valid, whether the parents knew what they were signing, and whether the petitions were clear about the purpose. Neither school was converted to a charter.

So, two years after passage of the parent trigger law in California, here are the results. Three other states have passed similar laws: Connecticut, Mississippi, and Texas. Not a single school in California or anywhere else has been turned into a charter.

The Los Angeles Times recently opined in an editorial that the law had been a disappointment: "With Parent Revolution started in large part by charter operators and funded by their supporters, it was assumed that the parent trigger would create a tidal wave of charter conversions," but "charter organizations are showing no interest in trigger schools." The reason for their lack of interest, said the Times, was that charters prefer "a lottery enrollment system, in which motivated parents sign up their children for a random drawing that might allow them a seat in the school." Charters don't want to "have to accept all students within the low-performing school's attendance boundaries, just as regular public schools do. Few charter operators have been willing to work under that scenario, which tends to result in less dramatic test results for them. Furthermore, the current woeful state of school funding makes it difficult if not impossible for charter schools to provide needed resources—just as it's difficult for traditional public schools. And turning around a deeply troubled school is harder than starting a new school with its own campus culture."

I wonder how the mayors will react when Occupy Wall Street begins seizing control of public parks and other public facilities. No, wait, no need to wonder. We know how they reacted. They sent in riot police to clear the parks and streets.

I am trying to imagine what would happen if someone made a similar proposal in Finland or Japan or South Korea or Singapore. I think they would be an object of ridicule. People would give them funny looks. People would laugh. No one would take them seriously.

Time for a summer break. Let's all take a deep breath and spend the summer hoping that our leaders regain some common sense.

 

2cents smf smf: This “endorsement”  was outgoing President of the Conference of Mayors Antonio Villaraigosa’s gift to his fellow mayors …or to public education …or maybe his fellow mayor's’ gift to  his legacy?

Mayor Tony is the godfather of the Parent Trigger.  His toady Ben Austin – an on-the-payroll deputy LA city attorney who moonlights as the executive director of Parent Revolution and who was briefly-but-dangerously a Schwarzenegger appointee to the State Board of Ed wrote and promoted the wretched mess.  (When Tony sponsored Austin’s run for the LAUSD Board of Ed Austin’s campaign infamously got the nominating petitions signed in the wrong district.)  State Senator Gloria Romero was godmother to the Parent Trigger,  shepherding it through the legislature while Austin lobbied from the sidelines in utter disregard for the niceties of things like conflict of interest,  legislative ethics  and decorum.  Romero similarly shepherded Mayor Tony’s AB 1381 (his unconstitutional LAUSD school takeover bill) back in 2006 – Tony played the Austin role back then.

Oh so sadly Romero has been termed out of the legislature – and Tony’s term as el alcalde de los todos alcaldes has ended. His career as L.A. mayor is winding down – 345 days and counting.. Austin remains at large, armed and presumed dangerous.

NO WAIVERS FOR TRANSITIONAL K: State Board tells districts Transitional Kindergarten is a must

By Kathryn Baron | EdSource Today http://bit.ly/NEraXR

July 20th, 2012 | Probably the strongest indication of how the State Board of Education would vote on waiver requests from nine school districts seeking to delay the start of Transitional Kindergarten came from the districts themselves; not a single representative showed up to even try to argue their case.

On Wednesday afternoon, the Board unanimously agreed with Department of Education analysts and rejected the waiver applications. That decision sent a clear message to other districts, said Scott Moore, Preschool California’s senior policy director. “There was a sense of people are watching this to see how the State Board acts,” said Moore. “Granting them a waiver to not provide public education to these students isn’t something that they feel is legal.”

Transitional Kindergarten is a new program, but doesn’t involve new students. The same bill that raised California’s age requirement for kindergarten created TK to provide the kids who miss the new cutoff with an additional year of kindergarten the way it used to be; puppets, play kitchens, and an introduction to phonics.

Because these children would have been in regular kindergarten anyway, TK doesn’t cost the state any more money. But Gov. Brown tried to spin it as a new program and proposed eliminating its funding to help pay down the state deficit. In the few months between the time the governor released that proposal and the Legislature rejected it, a number of school districts panicked, thinking they’d have to add a new grade without any state funding to pay for it. They appealed to the State Board of Education for an extra year to put the program into place.

This has all been incredibly frustrating to Democratic State Senator Joe Simitian of Palo Alto, who authored SB 1381, the bill that established Transitional Kindergarten. “What’s a little bit surprising to me is that it is still not fully understood now, almost two years after the bill passed,” Sen. Simitian told EdSource.

For example, in a separate waiver request, a charter school wrote that it only had four children displaced by the new age requirement and it would be too expensive to start a new class just for them. Department of Education staff recommended that the Board approve the request on the condition that the school creates a split TK/kindergarten class. But the bill already gives schools and districts the flexibility to implement TK however they want, Simitian said, as long as it’s age and developmentally appropriate. The State Board put off a decision on that request until its next meeting.

So, on the belief that you can never explain things too often, Simitian went before the State Board to give a synopsis of SB 1381 in an effort to clear up confusion. “I think the Board appreciated the recap on just how much flexibility we built into the system, and the fact that we had two years to plan, so this wasn’t something that we simply rolled out in the fall without notice,” said Simitian. “That being said, I think it’s important to remember these are the exceptions to the rule. The buzz we get from around the state is quite positive that people are really excited that this is one of the few bright spots on the public education horizon.”

SECURITY BREACH WILL DELAY RELEASE OF CST RESULTS

By John Fensterwald, EdSource Today | http://bit.ly/Lyu1gD

July 18th, 2012  ::   The public release of this year’s California Standards Tests results will be delayed two weeks, until Aug. 31. Blame it on the students who took cell phones into test sites in April, and then posted photos of exam questions on Facebook and other social media.

ETS, the contractor for administering tests, and the state Department of Education have determined that the breach of security didn’t affect test results, Paul Hefner, spokesperson for Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson, said Tuesday. But the effort it took to reach that conclusion – looking for patterns of irregularities in answers – has led to the delay, Hefner said.

Mainly high school students posted 441 photos from test sites on social media over about a 10-day period, Hefner said, but only 36 – less than 10 percent – were photos of actual test questions. The rest were shots of desks, closed exam books, and words that students created by filling in bubbles (clearly not the correct answers) on answer sheets. What worried ETS was the possibility that more photos were shared but not posted on the Internet.

Some schools apparently disciplined students who posted photos from the exams, but the Department of Education has not decided what, if any, action to take against districts that violated the no-phones protocol, Hefner said.

Facebook and other media sites cooperated when asked to take down the photos as a violation of copyrighted material, Hefner said.

STUDENTS' ONLINE PHOTOS OF CALIFORNIA TESTS DELAY RELEASE OF SCORES

Results of the standardized tests won't be released until Aug. 31. Millikan High in Long Beach and North Hollywood High are among the schools that could have their API scores invalidated, leading to sanctions or loss of grants.

By Howard Blume, Los Angeles Times  | 

Standardized test

A sample answer sheet for a standardized test is shown. Students at schools across California posted photos of standardized test materials on social media sites. Officials have delayed the release of the scores and are reviewing some schools, including North Hollywood High and Millikan High in Long Beach -- which could face sanctions. (Los Angeles Times)

July 18, 2012, 9:31 p.m.  ::  Student photos of state standardized tests posted on social networks have caused a two-week delay in the release of scores and could result in more serious ramifications for nearly 150 California schools.

In a letter sent to all state school districts this week, the Department of Education announced the postponement of the 2012 test results until Aug. 31.

"It is imperative that when districts, teachers, parents and students receive their test results, we all can be assured that the integrity of the system remains intact," Deb Sigman, deputy superintendent of public instruction, said in the letter.

Most of the posted images were of such things as "closed test booklets or blank answer documents," said Paul Hefner, a spokesman for the Education Department.

Still, students posted 36 different test items online, prompting an analysis by the state and the Educational Testing Service, based in Princeton, N.J. So far, experts have concluded that test scores were unaffected at the state or district level, Hefner said. Individual schools' scores remain under review.

A potential problem looms for campuses where students took the photos, most likely with their cellphones. In the worst-case scenario, these schools could lose scores on the state's Academic Performance Index, California's rating system for schools. That embarrassment also could expose a school to the loss of grants or to sanctions — because being stripped of a score means a school hasn't met performance targets.

The state identified one middle school and 11 high schools where one or more students posted test items. Officials said they would decide the fate of such schools.

But Long Beach Unified officials said they only learned Wednesday, from a reporter, that one of their schools, Millikan High, is on the state's list.

Ditto in L.A. Unified. North Hollywood High Principal Randy Delling, who didn't know his school was on the list, added that he isn't surprised the issue has arisen.

"The teenagers aren't held accountable in any way, shape or form for the test," he said. "Of course they're going to take a picture with a cellphone. They also write the names of their boyfriend or girlfriend in the bubbles on the answer sheet."

The problem emerged in April, near the start of the testing period. In all, 249 students posted 442 images on social-networking sites, including Facebook, Tumblr, Instagram, Webstagram and Pinterest. The 147 affected schools are spread across 94 school districts.

The issues are deeper than the 36 compromised items. A student who posted a vanity photo of himself posing with a test booklet also could have taken photos of test items that were shared among friends but never posted online.

A school can lose its score if 5% of tests are invalidated. Cheating or lesser mistakes by teachers and other staff led to canceled scores at about two dozen California schools last year.