Showing posts with label LAUSD School Construction Bonds. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LAUSD School Construction Bonds. Show all posts

Monday, May 02, 2011

L.A. UNIFIED SUES CITY OVER CONTAMINATION AT TAYLOR YARDS HIGH SCHOOL + smf’s 2¢

The district says solvents and other chemicals seeped from city-owned land onto the Taylor Yard campus, which is nearing completion.

L.A. Unified lawsuit

L.A. Unified is nearly finished building the 2,295-seat Central Region High School No. 13. It borders the L.A. River in the Taylor Yard area northeast of downtown. (Gary Friedman, Los Angeles Times / April 20, 2011)

By David Zahniser, Los Angeles Times | http://lat.ms/jAPE75

  May 1, 2011, 5:14 p.m. - Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has been a constant salesman on the topic of public schools, pushing for reforms, helping elect new school board members and raising millions of dollars for local campuses.

But those efforts didn't stop school board members, including some who were elected with the mayor's help, from taking City Hall to court over a contaminated campus in Glassell Park.

<<GRAPHIC:  New high school in Glassell Park

The Los Angeles Unified School District filed the federal lawsuit earlier this year, alleging that solvents and other hazardous substances at an empty city-owned lot seeped into the soil at a 2,295-seat high school being built next to the Los Angeles River.

The case presents the latest twist in the history of the $239-million project in the Taylor Yard area northeast of downtown.

In 2005, when school officials were negotiating to buy the property, a real estate developer swooped in and purchased it. That led to a lawsuit that ended when the district paid Meruelo Maddux Properties, headed by developer Richard Meruelo, a settlement of $50 million, considerably more than he had paid for the site.

With the school now only months from opening, the district is calling on the city to hand over $4 million, the amount it spent to remove contaminated soil from the campus.

L.A. Unified lawyer Michelle Meghrouni said the school board voted 5 to 0 to bring the lawsuit, which was designed to get the city's attention after negotiations stalled. "It's in their court now," she said.

Lawyers with City Atty. Carmen Trutanich's office contend that the city has no responsibility for the district's cleanup. Just the fact that the lawsuit was filed drew the ire of City Councilman Ed Reyes, who represents the Glassell Park neighborhood where the school is being built.

Reyes said the two sides should have resolved their issues without having to retain expensive lawyers, some of whom are being paid $330 an hour by the district.

"I'm disappointed because we should be working together. We're serving the same constituents," he said. "I feel like I'm being blindsided."

Villaraigosa, who made his partnership with L.A. Unified the centerpiece of his recent State of the City speech, said he hoped the two sides could resolve the dispute. His spokeswoman, Sarah Hamilton, said the mayor received a memo on the lawsuit in January but would not comment further.

With 85 classrooms, the new school building — known as Central Region High School No. 13 — is going up on a stretch of the L.A. River that, for decades, was lined with rail yards, warehouses and manufacturing plants. Reyes, among others, has been working to replace some of those industrial buildings with playing fields and parkland.

L.A. Unified officials identified the spot for a school in 2004, just as the district was in the throes of a $20-billion construction boom. District officials favored the site, in part because it would keep them from having to force out a large number residents and businesses.

Although L.A. Unified had finalized a purchase agreement to pay the seller more than $27 million, Meruelo tied up the property and bought it for $31.8 million.

Stung by its failure to get the land, the school board filed an eminent domain lawsuit, forcing Meruelo to give up the property and sparking a long back-and-forth over the site's worth.

At that time, Meruelo was known as the largest landowner in downtown Los Angeles, a businessman who had spent nearly $200,000 to help Villaraigosa win the 2005 mayor's race.

Two years later, Villaraigosa succeeded in electing a trio of allies to the school board. In 2008, a majority of that board settled its lawsuit by paying Meruelo $18.3 million more for the site than he had spent on it three years earlier.

The only Villaraigosa ally to oppose the settlement was board member Tamar Galatzan, who won office with $2.2 million in support from the mayor. Galatzan called the purchase "a sweetheart deal for the developer" and said the district should have taken its eminent domain lawsuit to trial.

"I thought we should litigate it and we would win. The price was so far over any estimate for what the property was worth that I thought it was obscene," said Galatzan, who said she is not involved in the latest lawsuit because she works in the city attorney's office.

Even with Meruelo's land, the school site has an odd layout. A privately owned billboard sits in front of the campus on San Fernando Road on property the district didn't buy. Also in front of the campus is a city-owned yard that is used to hold construction equipment during sewer repairs, Reyes said.

In 2009, the same year that Meruelo Maddux filed for bankruptcy protection against its creditors, the district's lawyers found contaminants on one end of the campus. They concluded that the chemicals had come from a site once occupied by the Profile Plastics manufacturing plant. That site was purchased by the city in 2001 and belongs to the Bureau of Sanitation, according to city officials.

William Carter, Trutanich's chief deputy, said the city cleaned up its property in 2005. And he disagreed with the notion that the city has responsibility for the district's remediation work.

"It's obvious that L.A. Unified understood they were purchasing contaminated property — not to say that it was contaminated by our property," he said.

Carter has some familiarity with soil contamination. From 2006 to 2009, he worked for the law firm that helped the district file its case against the city. As a lawyer in that firm, Carter helped L.A. Unified secure compensation from private companies for the cleanup of polluted soil on its newly bought land.

2cents smf: I will write at length about this this weekend.

Suffice it to say the best school board the mayor could buy is now biting the hand of the best mayor Mr, Meruelo could buy. The mayor and Councilman Reyes stood by and let this happen, as city officials and responsible adults they bear some (ir)responsibility. The city may not be right one to bite – and Meruelo’s activity in adding to the toxic contamination of the site is well documented (the site is probably the most environmentally well-documented parcel since the discovery of dirt!). The morally bankrupt Meruelo is now fiscally bankrupt. And any court – whether of public opinion or Federal – where these shenanigans get discussed is the right court.

The people must get their accountability and their accounting where they can find it.

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

THE DENOUEMENT OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE: The day that was: Tuesday Feb 23rd as of 8:35 pm

`de·noue·ment

/ˌdeɪ|nuˈmɑ̃/  Show Spelled[dey-noo-mahn]|

–noun

1.the final resolution of the intricacies of a plot, as of a drama or novel.

2.the place in the plot at which this occurs.

3.the outcome or resolution of a doubtful series of occurrences.

smf writes for 4lakids:

The board meeting today produced interesting results, some expected – some not. For the most part the superintendent's recommendations were accepted – but there were notable exceptions.

  • ICEF, Green Dot and The Alliance for College Ready Schools – powerhouse charter operators with programs recommended for acceptance – were repudiated.

  • The Mayor’s Partnership for LA Schools picked up a school that they weren’t recommended for.

  • The veracity of evidence and data challenging charter school acceptance of English Language Learners and Special Ed students was intensely questioned – 'good data' supports one's position, 'bad data' is to be denied.

  • And though the entire PSC evaluation and review process was supposed to be data driven and evidence based, it t turned out that potential operators were not evaluated on past performance on but on whether they agree to follow the rules in the future.

  • The board followed the unwritten 'Don't mess in my bailiwick' rule of following the lead of the member in their district when Boardmember LaMotte offered an amendment that was accepted denying ICEF at Obama Middle School in her district.

  • Board President Garcia then violated the same rule on the next vote (denying Green Dot and The Alliance at Estaban Torres High School) by offering an amendment on a school not in her district but in Yolie Flores’. Garcia's amendment carried.

  • As Flores is the author of the PSC resolution – and the champion of the superintendent’s recommendations – the tension rose, the board grew more and more divided and the politics got fast and furious.

  • Horsetrading happened in the open – and operators denied this time were assured of better treatment next time (unless some wise judge stops them before they choose again!)

  • Advance approval was guaranteed of a Pilot School at Gratts Elementary next year even though one wasn't even requested.

Democracy is messy when the sausage is made.

Notable quotes:

NURY MARTINEZ resurrected Connie Rice's metaphor of LAUSD reform as building the aircraft in flight. They have built their plane and it follows the script of Flight of the Phoenix – where it turns out the designer of the plane has only built scale models. Now they have to fly it – and land the puppy!

SUPT. CORTINES: “The Public School Choice process has divided us..... (that's Freudian) ….I mean provided us with an opportunity.....”

STEVE ZIMMER: (On the 'Parent Trigger'): “You can't declare war on people and not expect them to act like combatants.” “The 'red shirts' and the 'white shirts' are not the future. The future is in the plans.”

TAMAR GALATZAN: “Nothing is happening in my district, no Focus Schools, no pilots for individual student funding. You are ignoring half of the valley; successful schools are and need to be part of the wave of the future.”

MARGUERITE LAMOTTE: “It has been said by some that charter schools reestablish segregation; I cannot and will not say to my constituents that the money you gave for the bonds is being given to charter schools.”

RICHARD VLADOVIC: “In the past we have written the best plans in the worlds. We have placed them on the best shelves in the world where they collected the best dust in the world.”

MONICA GARCIA: “No one on this board takes their job lightly; I hope I can say no one in this district takes their job lightly. Tomorrow it takes all of us.”

 

from Google News

LA School Board Snubs Charter School Operators

CBS 13 - Christina Hoag - ‎27 minutes ago‎

The district already boasts the highest number of charter schools of any school district in the country. More than 160 of its 800 schools are run by ...

City Approves School Plan

Wall Street Journal - Tamara Audi - ‎44 minutes ago‎

He recommended awarding the remaining 28 schools to groups led by Los Angeles Unified School District teachers. The board ratified most of Mr. Cortines's ...

Los Angeles Times

LAUSD turns over control of schools to outside groups

Los Angeles Times - ‎1 hour ago‎

... outside the downtown Los Angeles Unified School District headquarters. Bidders inside and outside the district have been vying for the schools under a ...

LAUSD Grants Control Of Several Campuses To Outside Groups

LA Weekly (blog) - Dennis Romero - ‎2 hours ago‎

23 2010 @ 5:58PM ​Despite a demonstration by members of the teacher's union, the board of the Los Angeles Unified School District Tuesday voted to roughly ...

LA school board OKs handing schools to nonprofits

San Jose Mercury News - Christina Hoag - ‎2 hours ago‎

AP LOS ANGELES—The Los Angeles school board has approved a plan to turn over the operation of 30 campuses to nonprofit educational groups, but most of the ...

 

LAUSD board approves new administration for 36 schools

89.3 KPCC - ‎2 hours ago‎

The powerful United Teachers Los Angeles, which helped teachers craft successful reform plans, wants to put a stop to the process before then. ...

School Handoff Plan Divides LA

Wall Street Journal - Tamara Audi - ‎3 hours ago‎

He recommended awarding the remaining 28 schools to groups led by Los Angeles Unified School District teachers. The changes would affect 38000 students. ...

Awards for Teachers and Schools in Arts Education to be Held Downtown

LA Downtown News Online - ‎6 hours ago‎

DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES - The Music Center of Los Angeles County this week announced the 14 teachers and six schools named as finalists in the 28th annual ...

Hundreds protest LA board vote on school choice

MyMotherLode.com - ‎7 hours ago‎

Hundreds of teachers and parents chanted slogans and waved placards in front of the Los Angeles school district headquarters Tuesday as the school board ...

Hundreds to protest LA board vote on school choice

Education Week News - ‎7 hours ago‎

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Hundreds of teachers and parents plan to protest at a Los Angeles school board meeting in which the district could approve the transfer ...

 

Sunday, October 11, 2009

RFK SITE TO BECOME SCHOOLS + smf comments

 

By Tony Castro, Staff Writer | LA Newspaper Group (Daily News)

October 11, 2009 -- On the grounds of the old Ambassador Hotel where Robert F. Kennedy was assassinated in 1968, officials Saturday dedicated a site of national tragedy into one of potential local triumph.

Two of Kennedy's grandchildren were among those who witnessed ribbon-cutting ceremonies for a new elementary education facility featuring two pilot schools.

"This is sacred ground," labor leader and Kennedy friend Dolores Huerta told about 500 people who attended the dedication.

The ceremony marked the culmination of a long political battle to raze the famed hotel and convert the 24-acre grounds into an urban school site. In addition to the new elementary schools, a new Robert F. Kennedy High School is scheduled to open in September 2010.

"My father was a champion of those who suffered disadvantages in America," Kennedy's son Maxwell said in a statement released by the Los Angeles Unified School District.

"This new K-12 learning center will educate and empower our young people and their parents to fight for economic and social justice. "I know of no better way to advance the living legacy of Robert Kennedy."

When complete, the educational complex will serve 4,400 students in grades K-12 in heavily Latino neighborhood west of downtown.

"My dream has been to make the schools a living memorial to Robert Kennedy," said Paul Schrade, a former senior aide to the late senator and head of the RFK-12 Community Task Force, the local group that worked toward construction of the learning complex.

Among obstacles that had to be overcome were Donald Trump's dream to build five towers at the site, one of them 125 stories tall, plans by Wal-Mart to put a store at the location and a movement by the Los Angeles Conservancy to preserve the landmark.

"Robert Kennedy told us what makes life worthwhile is the health of our children and the quality of their education," said Schrade.

Kennedy was gunned down at the Ambassador Hotel just minutes after winning the Democratic Party's 1968 California primary, an attack in which Schrade was also wounded.

LAUSD school board President Monica Garcia said Kennedy's message is "alive with us as we celebrate the opening of not one, but two exciting new pilot schools."

"We are inspired by the memory of Senator Kennedy who reminds us every day that we each have something to contribute," Garcia said. "And he reminds us every day that we can absolutely do better."

______________________

●● what smf said at the RFK-12 ribboncutting:

The good news is that I'm the last speaker today.

The really good news is that the youngsters behind me haven’t waited for any of us to sit down and shut up to play on the playground equipment behind this stage!

President Obama reminded us yesterday that we rise to meet challenges far more often than we solve them. This city and this school district have risen to meet the challenges of overcrowding and forced busing and the year round calendar; of disrepair and lack of vision. Those will, in time certain, be obstacles in the rear view mirror, thanks to the voters and taxpayers of this city.

Other challenges loom: Class sizes and underinvestment; a misunderstanding of the roles of art and music and physical activity in education and society. You kids must rise and meet the challenge of education and education reform --- you must rise to it, accept it and make the best of it …here in this new school, your new school – and onward – ever onward …into the high school that will be part of this incredible complex – and on to colleges and universities and art schools - to law school and medical school and engineering school; architecture school, trade school and business school.

Be safe here, Make lifelong friends. Do good work. Learn from your mistakes. Have fun.

It is a hero's journey: You must go forth …and come back and build the future. That is the dream and the vision and the promise of RFK-12.

Robert Kennedy made Bernard Shaw’s words his own: "Some men see things as they are and say why. I dream things that never were and say why not”. Those words, Boys and Girls, must be your words; those dreams must be your dreams. THEN we will be the City of Angeles we aspire to be.

Dare to dream. Ask "Why not?" Re-imagine the American Dream. Your dreams are our future.

Because you, the students, are the magic, and the promise.

Monday, October 05, 2009

YOUNG OAK KIM ACADEMY: LAUSD school relies on treating boys and girls differently + smf remarks at school's dedication

LAUSD school relies on treating boys and girls differently

By Connie Llanos, Staff Writer | LA Daily News

10/6 -- With special math and science programs for girls and "brain breaks" for boys, Los Angeles Unified embarked Monday on an educational experiment as it opened a campus that segregates students by gender.

kim A ribbon-cutting ceremony formally recognized the opening of Young Oak Kim Academy Middle School in the Pico-Union District, where 750 boys and girls attend academic classes on separate floors and come together only at lunch.

"This is yet another element of reform," school board President Monica Garcia said. "We have to try as many strategies as possible to see what helps our students excel and grow ... We cannot continue to do one-size-fits-all."

Garcia said the single-gender concept could someday be replicated at other district schools.

Studies cited by the National Association for Single Sex Education have shown that students in a single-gender classroom can outperform their counterparts taught in a coed setting.

A three-year study conducted by Stetson University in Florida found that boys in single-sex classes demonstrated a proficiency of 86 percent on standardized tests compared to 37 percent for boys in coed settings.

And students in all-girl classes earned a 75 percent score, compared with 59 percent proficiency among girls in coed classes.

At YOKA, educators have taken the program a step further, creating separate lesson plans for boys and girls.

Because research shows that adolescent girls thrive in groups and learn well in lectures, teachers at YOKA assign the girls a lot of collaborative projects. There's also an emphasis on math, science and technology because girls traditionally do not pursue these fields as aggressively as boys do.

The boys' classes, meanwhile, incorporate "brain breaks" that allow the students time to digest the lesson they've just been taught. There are even amplifiers in the boys' classrooms because studies show that adolescent boys have a less developed sense of hearing than adolescent girls.

Teachers say YOKA provides an opportunity to understand the differences in how boys and girls learn - and experiment with ways to help them achieve.

"You need to think about equity versus equality," art teacher Katherine Harrison.

"`Equity' says everyone has access, `equal' says everyone gets the same thing ... But we are not all exactly the same," she said. "This is about finding individual strengths and using them to overcome weaknesses."

The process of introducing the single-gender campus started in 2004, under the guidance of then-District 4 Superintendent Richard Alonzo, who began recruiting teachers and counselors trained for the alternative environment.

"We didn't just bring children to a new school," Alonzo recalled. "We thought very carefully about what kind of school we wanted."

Advocates for a single-gender school faced an obstacle early on because of federal laws that mandated equal access to programs and services for boys and girls. Changes made in those laws in 2006, coupled with incentives for innovation included in the No Child Left Behind Act, paved the way for YOKA and other single-sex campuses.

Now, more than 500 schools in the country offer single-sex educational programs or classes.

Named for the first Asian-American colonel to lead a U.S. battalion in war, YOKA was built as part of LAUSD's $20 billion construction program. It is designed to relieve overcrowding at Virgil and Berendo middle schools, which still operate on year-round calendars.

For many parents in the Pico-Union community - home to many Latino or Asian immigrants - the single-sex concept is very familiar.

"I was raised the same way in El Salvador," said Lucy Cortes, whose sixth-grade son attends YOKA. "I think it's a great option that allows our kids to focus more in school."

 

smf's Dedication Speech at YOKA

Comments by Bond Oversight Committee Representative Scott Folsom

Good and Glorious Morning. This is a great and glorious day for this Community, for this school district and for the greater community - for the City of Angels we aspire to be.

This community, your community - you kids - is getting a new middle school.

There is no more important or challenging level of education than middle school; it is here - within the walls we dedicate today , that the future will be formed, dreamed and begun …or lost and allowed to get away.

Building schools is the best thing any community does. When we build schools we make positive investments in our future way beyond the news cycle or the election cycle or the demographic projection …we are stretching the blank canvas that will be your masterpiece.

I did my homework for this little speech: I refreshed my memory about Young Oak Kim. How his father ran a grocery at Temple and Figueroa. How he graduated from Belmont High School and attended LACC. How, with war on the horizon he fought for the right to fight for his country. How he said "There is no Japanese nor Korean here. We're all Americans and we're fighting for the same cause."  He fought long and hard and well; he truly served his country, in war and peace; in the military and in civilian life. He won medals and he built museums and monuments, education and cultural and health centers. The headline in his obituary said Young Oak Kim was "a World War Two and Korean War Hero …and a Uniter of LA Asian Communities". A Hero among heroes …and a Uniter. An inspiration and a visionary. It doesn't get any better than that …and we dearly need more Americans like him.

I read in a book once that kids find magic because they look for itI believe in magic because I believe in kids.

The kids who will go to this school - some of the young faces we see here today - will learn things in their lives that Nobel Prize winners haven't discovered yet. And as they go through life they will discover and learn even newer things …things they will teach their children; things that will win them Nobel Prizes. That is what civilization and the magic of education is all about.

These things are not easy; challenges never are.. They are promises made in one generation and kept by the next - in making the promise and keeping the promise we pass the challenge into the future.

We have made a promise to parents, voters and taxpayers — but mostly to the children; present and future: We promised to build new schools and fix up the old ones when the approved Proposition BB and Measures K, R. Y  and Q.

You don’t need me to tell you, you only have to look around you to see the promise is being kept.

  • We are building new schools.
  • We are fixing the old schools.
  • We are creating and fostering partnerships in the community.
  • We are ending Involuntary Busing.
  • We have implemented Full Day Kindergarten in every elementary school in this district.
  • And we will eliminate the Multi-Track Year-round Calendar, once and for all.

We need it put up our magic tent many more times …and we will.

Kids, Treat this school and the schools you attend today well and learn good things. Treat each other well. Work hard, Play fair and be safe. Make lifelong friends. Do your homework. Earn extra credit. Take every opportunity and make the best of it. Learn from your mistakes. Paint. Sing. Graduate. Win medals, build museums. Unify. Make a little magic every day. Go from here on to high schools, colleges and universities and community colleges and art schools — to law school and medical school and trade schools and – go to teachers colleges. Win medals, build museums, unite communities. And if you go to beauty school become the best beautician in the history of beauty itself!

Parents and teachers, fellow adults: Help them do these things - and then stand back!

Because you kids are magic and you are the future. So let's roll.

Monday, September 28, 2009

L.A. UNIFIED TAKES HAMMER TO ITS BUILDING UNIT:The loss of the head of the LAUSD's construction division could be the beginning of waste, cost overruns, political contracts and worse.

 

Opinion By Constance L. Rice | LA Times

4:21 PM PDT, September 28, 2009 -- The construction unit of the Los Angeles Unified School District has successfully and cost-effectively built 80 new schools and won scores of awards. So how has Supt. Ray Cortines rewarded this efficient unit? By driving out its superb leadership.

Guy Mehula, the talented head of the construction division, resigned Monday after LAUSD leaders made clear their intention of dragging Mehula's quasi-independent team back under the tight control of the district.

Taking away the unit's autonomy would be a huge mistake. The district has tried micromanaging the construction of schools, and it failed miserably. If you need convincing, just think about the disastrous cost overruns and construction errors of the Belmont Learning Complex.

For those who don't remember the horrific details, the district began construction at Belmont (or the Edward R. Roybal Learning Center, as it was finally called) without required environmental reviews or professional managers, ultimately building a $160-million high school that the state declared unusable for children. A scathing audit of the debacle concluded that the project had violated environmental and public safety laws, and that the uninformed district had "tolerated a culture remarkably indifferent" to standards or accountability. The audit referred several of its findings to the district attorney for criminal investigation.

With a pressing need for new schools, then-Supt. Roy Romer and a newly elected board of education were determined to avoid more Belmonts, so they established a facilities division that was independent, expertly run and free of the district's torpid bureaucracy. The new unit was staffed by construction professionals and experienced Navy engineers who were insulated from political and union pressures. Schools were built by carefully selected contractors who were closely monitored by an expert staff of auditors and managers.

The new division, charged with managing a $20-billion construction effort, quickly established a system of value-based contracting that permitted necessary -- but not political -- changes to contracts. And Romer was true to his word: The school board set policy and acquired land for schools, but otherwise stayed out of the way.

Now Cortines has rescinded key provisions that helped shield the facilities division from unwarranted interference. He proposes to remove the unit's specially assigned and quasi-independent lawyers and limit the hiring of contractors to 10-month periods -- something few competent construction professionals would agree to. Cortines and the board also want to set salary limits that are not competitive. Mehula resigned because these and other proposals would end the independence that has made the school construction unit a success.

Cortines' actions come as the construction program is also facing other threats.

Some school board members, in actions reminiscent of the group that brought us Belmont, have started pushing for expensive and wasteful changes to building contracts. They have tried to use bond funds for things that are prohibited by the bond measure. And they have increasingly questioned contract awards and dismissed the judgment of facilities professionals. Most discouraging, I have heard two school board members suggest that the facilities division needs to "look more like Los Angeles." Although diversity is important, it cannot be allowed to trump the expertise needed to manage a massive school construction program.

With Mehula's resignation, bondholders, taxpayers and contractors should be very worried. If his expert management team leaves, the successful phase of school construction is almost certain to end -- and bond money will once again be wasted.

It is time to consider creating an independent construction authority for building schools. Doctors don't build hospitals, and lawyers don't build courthouses. Why should educators who can barely manage the mission of education build schools?

Constance L. Rice is a civil rights attorney and a member of the School Construction Bond Oversight Committee.

Friday, September 25, 2009

$1.5 BILLION UP FOR GRABS

…but it's not about the money!

a 4LAKids Spreadsheet

24 NEW SCHOOLS SUBJECT TO PSC RFP

School Students Co$t
Gratts PC 400 $66,877,385
Valley Region ES #6 950 $59,861,759
Valley Region ES #7 800 $62,224,883
Valley Region ES #8 725 $48,567,191
Valley Region ES #9 800 $57,818,486
Valley Region ES #10 650 $36,548,280
Central Region ES #13 875 $75,512,417
Central Region ES #15 575 $70,931,735
Central Region ES #16 675 $66,748,089
Central Region ES #17 725 $64,486,404
Central Region ES #18 575 $54,465,009
South Region ES #1 1,050 $85,379,327
South Region ES #2 1,050 $97,156,182
South Region ES #3 775 $81,238,658
South Region ES #4 775 $86,419,831
South Region MS # 2A 1,404 $127,675,163
South Region MS # 2B inc inc
South Region MS # 2C inc inc
South Region MS #6 1,404 $136,636,484
Esteban E. Torres HS #1 2,322 $206,707,370
Esteban E. Torres HS #2 inc inc
Esteban E. Torres HS #3 inc inc
Esteban E. Torres HS #4 inc inc
Esteban E. Torres HS #5 inc inc
TOTAL 16530 $1,485,254,653

Thursday, August 27, 2009

PLAN B/ROUND 1: The Mayor Has His Way – <cut …I mean> A New Way with LAUSD

By smf for 4LAKids

These WebPages mourn.

We mourn the death Tuesday night of "Liberal Lion" Teddy Kennedy - A champion if not THE champion of public education. As his friend Ramón Cortines said: "He was a friend of public education all the time, every day he was in office."

And we mourn the tragic outcome for public education in the LAUSD boardroom Tuesday afternoon with the passage of Yolie Flores Aguilar's "Public School Choice" Resolution.

Mr. Mayor, Mr. Barr …which schools do you choose?

We do not question Yolie's heart or her good intent. Her frustration at the lack of urgency of reform in LAUSD is heartfelt and genuine - but 4LAKids cannot miss the genesis of her plan and respectfully questions the authorship. Mayor Villaraigosa probably over describes his role as it being his "Plan B" - Plan A being his failed attempt at mayoral takeover and control, thrice quashed in the courts. But the fingerprints are there - and the confession: "my plan" - must mean something.

Despite public denial of the 'done deal" by the doers - and anguish and attempts-at-amendment and pretence-at-compromise, the Deal as realized was Done.

It wasn't pretty.

The list of advocate organizations named in whereas #5 grew with each draft as the 'me too's' tasted victory and wanted their logos on the t-shirt. A least one of the alphabet soup sponsors (and the most potentially powerful partner) withdrew their support at the last moment. Ultimately the entire list - the total active membership of which is probably a couple of thousand at most - was amended out.

ON THE DONE DEAL: According a speaker in public comment the mayor at one time claimed to have "six school board votes in his pocket".

All six came through Tuesday.

As Meredith Willson wrote:

Ya got one, two, three, four, five, six pockets in a table.
Pockets that mark the diff'rence
Between a gentlemen and a bum,
With a capital "B,"
And that rhymes with "P" and that stands for pool!

Friends, we got trouble right here in (L.A.) River City!

DONE DEAL II: A couple of weekends ago Board President Garcia had a soiree at her house and invited the Board of Ed and the superintendent. Apparently District Counsel Bobbi Fesler gave this get together her blessing - as long as the Boardmembers didn't discuss certain things. Like any pending or potential action before the board.

All well and good - if they didn't discuss those things.  As long as they didn't think about the elephant in the room.

  • The Ralph M. Brown Act is an open meeting law - a by-invitation-only-meeting at anyone's house is not an open meeting in my appointment book …even if partners and the kiddies are invited!
  • Make no mistake, the invitees were invited in their official capacity; the invitation is addressed  "Dear Board Members"this was not "Dear Yolie, Tamar, Richard, Steve, Nuri and Marguerite".
  • Of course I'm strict constructionist (What part of 'no!' is it you don't understand?) who considers the intent of the law rather than the wiggle room within it.

DONE DEAL III: After the big vote at Tuesday's meeting - but before the meeting was over and adjourned - the Board of Ed had special visitors: Mayor Villaraigosa and entourage! How kewl is that? And did Hizzonner stand in the well of the boardroom and congratulate the Board of Ed? No. He took the superintendent's chair up on the dais and sat therein -- master of all he surveyed. When Superintendent Cortines returned another chair had to be found for him.

  • Fifty new schools, financed by $20 billion+ in public financing - schools the taxpayers are about to get higher tax bills for - are to be up for grabs. Charter operators? Mayor's Partnership? Jiffy Lube? C'mon down!*
  • As an afterthought - or perhaps a 'leftover' - two hundred existing underperforming schools were added to the mix of schools up for grabs.

It remains to be seen how interested outside operators will be in taking over those "Program Improvement " schools in light of the Mayor's Partnership's record at his ten schools …and that of Green Dot at Locke.

The promise of 'Choice' in the resolution is the resolution is illusory. The charter school model  (parents choose their child's school) is incompatible with the neighborhood school model (all students attend their local school per attendance catchment areas). The lesson of the Belmont Zone of Choice (open enrollment within a greater geographic area) has apparently been lost completely. The YFA resolution commits the District to continue attendance area boundaries - if anything perpetuating lack-of-choice.

The Board of Ed chooses between operators who choose to apply. Yes, the resolution promises to involve parents and teachers and the community in the decision making process - but their role is advisory. The superintendent recommends; the Board of Ed decides. Who's 'Choice' is that?  How many 6 to 1 votes will it take before we realize what's going on?

I suppose operators get to choose whether to honor collective bargaining agreements; under some interpretations of the plan they may get to choose which education standards and provisions of the Ed Code they choose to observe.

Bill Ring, in last week's 4LAKids wrote: "…. true public school choice means I have a choice as a parent as to the school my child will attend."

"Me."

"I choose."

Bill wasn't allowed into the Boardroom Tuesday. There wasn't room for him. Or maybe his radical ideas.

Three speakers spoke extraordinary Truth to Power Tuesday afternoon:

Jackie Goldberg, the liberal lioness of L.A. politics presented the actual bond language of the five school construction bonds to the board. It may be language previous boards wrote but is nonetheless binding on this board because it was enacted overwhelming by the voters. "If this resolution passes," Ms Goldberg warned, "Have no doubt. You will be sued!"

Boardmember La Motte posed a couple of good questions but in the end questioned the Board's authority to give up any schools to anyone, citing the California Constitution, Article IX, §6, ¶3: "No school or college or any other part of the Public School System shall be, directly or indirectly, transferred from the Public School System or placed under the jurisdiction of any authority other than one included within the Public School System."

And Boardmember Zimmer - almost a tragic figure - spoke of his anguish, disputing the process and the outcome - bemoaning the raw politics and threats made against him by both sides. Decrying the fact that the fight was about the fight and the color of the t-shirts - not about the kids. Ultimately Zimmer held his nose and voted yes - in order, he said, to be at the table in the future.

Ms LaMotte retorted that she was not voting for it and she would be at the table too ...because that's what the people elected her to do.

As for Winners and Losers…

The parents in the light blue t-shirts, paid for by the mayor and Green Dot celebrated their victory and filed back onto the buses that bused them in.

As Jackie Goldberg said three years ago in the fight against Plan A, when adults fight with adults over adult issues it is always the kids who lose.


* OK, Jiffy Lube, a for-profit corporation is excluded. But the Jiffy Lube Educational Foundation? C'mon down!

Monday, March 16, 2009

CENTRAL REGION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL #14 IN ECHO PARK: The adults push and shove …and the children + the voters + the taxpayers + the school (and $16 million) are potentially left behind.

Central Region ES #14, 56.40002

1018 Mohawk St., Los Angeles, CA 90026

Map and Directions

 

by smf for 4LAKids

Much has been made about Central Region Elementary School #14 — which was conceived and designed to relieve overcrowding and gets kids off the bus, out of multitrack year 'round calendars and into schools in their neighborhood.

The process at CRES#14 was not all that different than any other school construction project. A need was established, there were community meetings, alternative sites were identified and discussed, a site was proposed, the Board of Ed agreed, land was purchased - and where the purchase price couldn't be agreed upon eminent domain was exercised. Fifty families were bought out and relocated. A school was designed; approvals were secured along the way.

At the same time a very vocal and legally connected group of folks - some from the area and apparently some not - organized opposition and filed suit, challenging LAUSD at every step of the way and ultimately prevailing in court on a technicality that the environmental study had been inadequate.

The law is technical, LAUSD was adjudged wrong, they won.

A second court-ordered study was done, one that satisfied the court. The opponents continued to agitate - threatening to continue legal action - and ultimately LAUSD settled with them.

  • Some might say LAUSD paid them to go away.
  • The more politic characterization would be that a settlement was reached.

The project was cleared to proceed and ground to be broken - but Councilman Garcetti continued to object. Additional design modifications ensued. Still the councilman continues to object - and kids are no closer to getting their new school - or getting their old schools less crowded - than they were before the tempest first stirred. Now deadlines loom and the project may indeed be forced to cancel, postpone, go on "turn-around" at a cost of $16 million - money L.A. taxpayers will have to pay back to Sacramento. And no school.

Following are the two most recent salvos in the war of words, a public exchange between Superintendent Cortines and Board President Garcetti.

  • The FIRST ENTRY is a letter to Garcetti from Cortines. Note that the greeting "Dear Eric" has been changed in Cortines hand to "Dear sir", symptomatic of whatever symbolism one cares to attach.
  • THE SECOND ENTRY is a statement by Garcetti read to a well attended community meeting last week - a meeting which neither Cortines, Garcetti, nor Local District Superintendent Alonzo attended. The meeting featured angst and accusation, outrage from people whose silence was supposed to have been bought-and-paid-for, a translation headset was thrown and some people called other people names. Whether Cortines, Garcetti or Alonzo avoided attending is a conclusion you, gentle reader, must reach for yourself.

There is nothing but white space between these lines.

clip_image002

clip_image002[5]

From Council President Garcetti, read to the CRES#14 Meeting at Rosemont ES 3/12/98

Dear Friends, Neighbors, and Community Leaders:

I strongly believe that we should be building small schools, and I have made my position known to LAUSD. I have appeared before the school board, met one-on-one with our school board member, and my staff has had numerous meetings with district staff.

As the President of the City Council and the Councilmember for one of the most underresourced districts in the City of Los Angeles, I have seen time and again that our students can too easily fall through the cracks in large, overcrowded schools. And I have seen that the smaller school environments in District 13 provide a more personalized learning environment for our students, where they feel like they matter.

In small schools, teachers and administrators can more easily work together as a unit and enjoy greater flexibility. Evidence demonstrates that small schools help close the achievement gap, make our campuses safer, increase parent and community involvement, and lead to greater teacher satisfaction and retention. I’m very glad that we are represented by a School Board Member who not only shares this belief in small schools, but who has championed it.

The school that will be built at Site 9A will be a part of our community for generations to come. So often in Los Angeles we miss opportunities, and I don’t want parents and students in this neighborhood to miss out on the opportunity to have a successful, small school to serve our needs.

Our community deserves a school, but it also deserves a great school for our kids and for our neighborhood. We deserve a great streetscape on Alvarado, that makes us feel safe and is in conformance with our neighborhood’s recently-updated community plan, written by and with Echo Park residents. We deserve a school that is the right size for our students, and we will continue to fight for building that great school.

Thank you for being engaged on this issue. I look forward to working with all of you moving forward.

Monday, February 02, 2009

LAUSD BOND SALES: Munis Slightly Firmer in Afternoon Trade

The Bond Buyer: The Daily Newspaper of Public Finance

By Michael Scarchilli | MARKET POST | Bond Buyer 

Monday, February 2, 2009 — NEW YORK — The municipal market was slightly firmer today. Traders said tax-exempt yields were lower by about two or three basis points overall.

“We’re starting the week off a little better here,” a trader in New York said. “There isn’t a ton of activity out there right now, but there’s definitely a firmer tone, and we’re seeing some gains. I’d say we’re better by two or three basis points overall, maybe one basis point on the short end.”

The Treasury market showed gains today. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note, which opened at 2.85%, was recently quoted at 2.74%. The yield on the two-year note was quoted recently at 0.91%, after opening at 0.94%. And the yield on the 30-year bond, which opened at 3.60%, was quoted recently at 3.50%.

After a lull in supply during the last two weeks, the first week of February will kick off with noticeably more vigor thanks to at least two significantly sized deals - a $950 million California school deal and a $614 million Georgia general obligation sale.

The offerings are part of an estimated $3.86 billion in total new-issue volume expected in the competitive and negotiated markets this week, compared with a revised $3.38 billion last week, according to Thomson Reuters.

Tomorrow, retail investors will get first crack at the week's largest deal - $950 million of GOs from the Los Angeles Unified School District - ahead of Wednesday's institutional pricing by Barclays Capital.

The deal is structured to mature serially from 2010 to 2024 with term bonds expected in 2029 and 2034, and is rated Aa3 by Moody's Investors Service and AA-minus by Standard & Poor's.

The LAUSD issue is among the five out of six largest deals whose issuers are using retail order periods to capitalize on the strength of retail demand in recent months.        [emphasis added]

In the new-issue market today, RBC Capital Markets priced $171.3 million of refunding and improvement bonds for the Texas Tech University System Board of Regents. The bonds mature from 2009 through 2028, with term bonds in 2033 and 2038. Yields range from 1.60% with a 4% coupon in 2011 to 5.41% with a 5.25% coupon in 2038. Bonds maturing in 2009 and 2010 will be decided via sealed bid. The bonds, which are callable at par in 2019, are rated Aa3 by Moody’s and AA by both Standard & Poor’s and Fitch Ratings.

In economic data released today, personal income fell 0.2% in December, after a revised 0.4% drop the previous month. Economists polled by Thomson Reuters had predicted a 0.4% decline.

Personal consumption dipped 1.0% in December, after a 0.8% drop the previous month. Economists polled by Thomson Reuters had predicted a 0.9% decrease.

The core personal consumption expenditures deflator showed no change in December, after no change the previous month. Economists polled by Thomson Reuters predicted no change.

Spending on construction projects fell 1.4% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $1.054 trillion in December as private construction decreased 1.7%, and public construction slid 0.8%. The overall decrease, which was larger than the 1.2% decrease projected by Thomson Reuters, followed a revised November level of $1.069 trillion, a 1.2% decline from the prior month.

Also, the overall economy failed to grow for the fourth straight month after 83 months of expansion, while the manufacturing sector was contracted for the twelfth month in a row, according to the Institute for Supply Management’s monthly report on business. The ISM index gained to 35.6 in January from 32.9 in December. Economists polled by Thomson Reuters predicted the index would rise to 32.6.

Visible Supply
The Bond Buyer’s 30-day visible supply rose $128.8 million to $10.906 billion. The total is comprised of $1.360 billion of competitive deals and $9.546 billion of negotiated bonds.

Previous Session's Activity
The Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board reported 41,268 trades of 13,290 separate issues for volume of $12.51 billion yesterday. Most active was insured North Carolina Medical Care Commission 5.625s of 2029, which traded 1,141 times at a high of 102.375 and a low of 98.500.