Showing posts with label "pay to play". Show all posts
Showing posts with label "pay to play". Show all posts

Sunday, May 25, 2008

FINANCIAL CRUNCH HURTS LAUSD ATHLETES

 

By Ramona Shelburne, Columnist - LA Daily News

05/25/2008 — Why is it always the good stuff, the stuff that makes things special, that gets cut when times are lean?

Why do we always need to resort to nickel and diming our way to balancing the budget?

Is it really less painful that way?

Over the next couple of years, every kid who plays sports in the Los Angeles Unified School District will find out as the district attempts to get through these lean economic times by cutting into nonessential expenses and raising revenues from facility usage.

First up on the chopping block: Funding for championship venues. In other words, the City Section has probably played its last football championship at the Coliseum, its last basketball championship at the Sports Arena and its last volleyball championship at Cal State Northridge.

And first up to the cash register: Youth groups like the Valley Youth Conference, a nonprofit, tax-exempt group that runs Pop Warner football leagues, AAU Track, AAU basketball and cheerleading programs for 9,600 kids in the San Fernando Valley eachyear.

In the past, groups like the Valley Youth Conference were able to pay a nominal fee to use LAUSD facilities, but now they are being asked to pay hourly permit fees for every game, every practice, even every meeting they hold at a district field or classroom.

"It's probably going to put us out of business," said Bill Speer, the director of the Valley Youth Conference. "Next year, we're looking at about $200,000

in extra fees. And we've got no choice but to pass that on to the kids. We're worried that a lot of them aren't going to be able to pay it."

There is a compelling argument for charging fees for for-profit groups that use district facilities, but Speer doesn't make any money in his capacity as Valley Youth Conference director. He's been a detective with the LAPD for over 30 years and donates his time, energy and money to the Valley Youth Conference because he's seen firsthand the positive impact sports can make in kids' lives.

The Valley Youth Conference has also donated money to the high schools whose fields it uses, providing a large percentage of the funding for things like snack shacks and lights and fields at Canoga Park High, San Fernando High and Van Nuys High.

But next year, the 12 Pop Warner teams the organization operates will have to charge approximately $100 more in yearly fees (from $300 to $400) to offset the new facility fees.

And it's not just private groups. Effective immediately, City Section programs will have to pay a $77.10administrative fee to apply for a permit to play at a district facility, then pay a rental fee of $10an hour and a custodial fee of $5 an hour.

The only way to waive those fees is if all the teams participating in the activity are from LAUSD schools.

"Basically, if we want to play against schools from outside the district that can give us a different look, we have to pay for that different look," Birmingham football coach Ed Croson said.

For now, Croson has elected to play only against City Section schools and save the money for the summer passing league tournaments against top Southern Section competiton.

But each school, and each team, will have to make it's own decision.

Then there's the issue of championship venues. Sure, a game can be played anywhere, but having them at such historic sites is what makes them memorable for the players, coaches and schools.

City Section commissioner Barbara Fiege seemed sick over the situation. She doesn't want to cut, but it's not completely her choice. So she's trying cut where it does the least harm.

"Although we believe that our student-athletes deserve to play in these venues, this may not be possible in the upcoming years," Fiege said. "What we don't want to do is cut participation opportunities."

Still, Fiege seemed sad that it's come to this and is determined to find solutions to the problem

"In the past, I've had to rearrange schedules with the Dodgers (for the City baseball final) and I always call some of the coaches and say, `How do you guys feel about that?'

"And they always say, `We would play at 2 a.m. if that's when we had to because it's so special, such great place to play,"'she said.

It's going to take creativity and generosity to solve the issue, but there is hope.

Already, the City Council has figured out a way to fund LA 36, the cable access channel that televises City Section championships but was on the chopping block in the mayor's initial budget proposal.

The championship venues can be saved, too. In other cities, professional and college teams donate the facilities for schools to host their championships, or charge a nominal fee. It's good community service, good public relations and good business. And it really doesn't cost that much money. All of the site fees are in the five-figure range.

Fiege said some of the venues the City Section works with have been open to the idea.

The new facility fees will be harder to roll back, at least in the short term. It's revenue the City badly needs to balance the budget. But if the revenue can come from somewhere else, be offset by private donations, or is no longer needed, the fees don't have to be permanent.

The good news is that the City Section has a leader in Fiege who understands the value of these "special" things and is looking for creative solutions.

Nickels and dimes don't seem like much when they're taken individually, but when you add them all up, the cost is enormous: All the good stuff is gone.

Financial crunch hurts LAUSD athletes - LA Daily News

Friday, June 29, 2007

SCHOOL BOARD OKS GENERAL FUND BUDGET

by Joel Rubin, LA Times Staff Writer

June 29, 2007 The Los Angeles Unified Board of Education on Thursday approved a $6.2-billion general fund budget for the coming school year.

The unanimous vote came after the seven board members peppered Supt. David L. Brewer and other school district officials with questions and concerns during lengthy debate that spanned two meetings this week.

The budget, which calls for the reduction and reorganization of several programs and departments in the mammoth school district in order to close a $95-million shortfall, still must be certified by county education officials. And until the state Legislature finalizes California's budget, which includes most of the funding public schools receive, allotments are still somewhat tentative.

Faced with growing public criticism, Brewer relented somewhat on a proposal to recoup nearly $5 million by charging after-school youth groups to use district athletic fields and facilities. He agreed to lower the fees that will be imposed and to use a sliding scale so groups that serve low-income children pay less.

Brewer also scrambled to appease some board members' concerns about his proposal to reduce at midyear the number of teachers assigned to those schools where student enrollment drops. To help administrators keep staffing levels stable at such schools, Brewer agreed to free up some so-called restricted funds and to allow schools to put aside money at the start of the year.

AN OPEN LETTER TO SUPERINTENDENT BREWER AND THE BOARD OF EDUCATION

June 28, 2007

Please excuse this last minute appeal - I have just returned from vacation to discover that "Pay to Play" has - like a bad penny - returned to LAUSD as a budget cutting strategy.

Two plus years ago I delivered to the Board of Ed the following resolution from PTA, opposing charging fees for after school use of school playgrounds and facilities. Afterwards I apologized to John Liechty, who as the Beyond the Bell assistant superintendent was official advocate for the fees. I considered John the most knowledgeable and most "for kids" person at Beaudry - I was uncomfortable opposing him on this matter.

John looked at me square in the eye with his no nonsense glare and told me PTA and I was on the right side and his and the budget office's proposal was wrong; wrong for Beyond the Bell, wrong for LAUSD and wrong for kids.

With that endorsement I bring the resolution back to you - and suggest that subsidizing after school recreation programs is a mission not for program operators but for city government, private fundraising, the Chamber of Commerce, etc. The board rejected the proposal back ion '05, I ask that you do it again.


Scott Folsom
President
Los Angeles Tenth District PTSA

NO PAY TO PLAY: A Resolution of the Los Angeles Tenth District PTSA, California Congress of Parents, Teachers and Students, Inc.

20 April 2005

WHEREAS the LAUSD Budget Office proposes that Community, Youth, After School and Weekend Community Groups – including but not limited to Girl and Boy Scouts, PTA and other parent and community associations, nonprofit after school supplemental education, recreation and sports programs that have traditionally used LAUSD facilities for free – be charged a fee in the future for such use, and

WHEREAS these groups and programs provide incalculable value to the children of Los Angeles, providing safe and supervised programs that enhance and compliment the educational mission of the school district, and

WHEREAS District staff has demonstrated preference for adult recreation and sports programs that pay a fee over youth programs that traditionally do not because adult programs generate revenue, and

WHEREAS Schools are by statute and by district policy Centers of the Community they serve, all School District property is public property, and the public is entitled to the use of its property whenever possible, now

THEREFORE THE LOS ANGELES TENTH DISTRICT PTSA RESOLVES

1. That we are OPPOSED to charging any bona-fide nonprofit community, parent or youth group that serves the public good for use of School District property where such use has been free in the past.

2. That the Board of Education direct that Youth After School and Recreation Programs be given precedence over adult groups in scheduling and access to LAUSD property without consideration to whether the adult programs generate revenue — the value of these programs to the schoolchildren served and the greater community far exceeds any revenue generated or lost.

3. That the School District actively partner with other public agencies and philanthropic organizations to find and secure funding streams to defray its costs in providing after school educational and recreational access and use of the public property it holds in trust.

4. That this resolution be delivered to the LAUSD Board of Education, circulated to the units and councils of Los Angeles Tenth District PTSA and forwarded to Thirty-first District PTSA for their consideration

Motion made by Scott Folsom, Vice President for Education, as a recommendation of the Education Committee/No second required

Voted upon and adopted by the Executive Board at a regular meeting April 20, 2005

/s/ Marta Lear, President and Chair of the Executive Board
/s/ Martha Wenkel. Secretary


ON PAY TO PLAY: WHERE ARE THE ANGELS?

"…so that groups that serve low income children pay less?" How about nothing?

If this city can't come up with five million dollars a year – from the private or public sectors - so kids can play organized sports on school playgrounds after school and on weekends without charging volunteers, non-profits and/or the kids and their parents for use of facilities we the taxpayers already own Los Angeles deserves the gang problems we have and we are simply not worthy to be the great city we aspire to be. There are billionaires among us who find that kind of money in their washing machines after a couple of loads – or between the pillows of their couches. smf