from Politco Morning Ed (via e-mail)
April 18, 2016 :: ESSA RULEMAKING DOWN TO THE WIRE:
A negotiated rulemaking committee on the Every Student Succeeds Act
meets for the third and final time today and Tuesday. The goal:
agreement on assessments, and supplement, not supplant - the language
that says school districts can't use federal Title I dollars to replace
state and local funds. SNS is by far the most difficult issue and the
committee likely won't tackle it until Tuesday, since it's the last item
on the agenda.
The Education Department heard from a very divided
committee during the first and second rulemaking sessions and translated
that feedback into draft language revisions, which were released [
http://politico.pro/1V72F9m] Friday.
Senate HELP Chairman Lamar Alexander didn't like the department's original proposed language, and he doesn't like [http://politico.pro/1U0eVHB] the new language. Despite making some changes, [http://politico.pro/1Qcvnh5
] a provision remains that Alexander and other advocates worry will
essentially require districts to use a method for demonstrating
compliance with SNS that also shows how much they spend per student -
which goes beyond the scope of the department's regulatory authority.
The updated materials for today's meeting: http://1.usa.gov/1STBqZR.
- Alexander told Morning Education over the weekend:
"The law Congress wrote, the president signed and that teachers,
governors, parents and other educators worked so hard to enact last
year, appears to have no meaning to unelected bureaucrats who still seem
determined to act as a national school board for 100,000 public
schools. I will use every tool at my disposal to see that this law is
implemented the way Congress wrote it, and I hope others will join me."
If the rulemaking committee fails to agree on assessments, SNS or both,
the Education Department can move forward with writing the regulation.
If Alexander still isn't happy with it, he can do a couple things. He
has already threatened [
http://politico.pro/1TPZMsz]
to use one tool at his disposal - appropriations - to block the
department's rules when they are final. And he can use the Congressional
Review Act to undo executive branch regulations.
- Nora Gordon, an associate professor at Georgetown University's McCourt School of Public Policy
and a research associate of the National Bureau of Economic
Research, writes in Education Next that the department's proposed SNS
language could "backfire on equity." For example, she writes that the
language could incentivize districts using weighted student funding
formulas to concentrate higher needs students in Title I schools - and
that goes against the Obama administration's goal of promoting economic
integration. (The Education Department has said that districts using
weighted student funding formulas wouldn't have any major issues
complying with SNS and federal officials took such formulas into account
when revising the language.) More:
http://bit.ly/1p9iG0y.
- On assessments, the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities
is pushing the committee to carry out "meaningful" regulations for
students with disabilities who take alternative tests. The group is
looking for the committee to "prove clarity on key terms, such as
'students with the most significant cognitive disabilities,'" - a
definition the committee has yet to agree on - while also describing
"the process school districts and states must follow if they have reason
to exceed" a 1 percent cap on the number of students allowed to take
alternative tests, "in limited circumstances." More: http://bit.ly/1Td8RJF.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment