Monday, January 10, 2011

COLLEGE ISN'T FOR EVERYONE + ONE WORD FOR CALIFORNIA: EDUCATION

LA Times Letters to the Editor 1/10/11 | http://lat.ms/gatvKu

College isn't for everyone

Re "One word for California: education," Opinion, Jan. 3 [follows]

Does state Senate President Pro-Tem Darrell Steinberg expect tow-truck operators, plumbers and waitresses to have bachelor's degrees?

College may not be a path that will benefit every child. The financial burden of supporting children through college may overwhelm families.

High schools should provide classes such as auto shop, construction and business, all areas that employ a large proportion of our population.

Those youngsters who are candidates for successful college educations will always find a way to reach their goals. Let the rest of them find satisfaction in helping California's economy and themselves in a different, but not lesser, way.

Char Salkin

San Clemente

It's discouraging to see the Democrat who is head of our state Senate bemoan our pre-college education system without once mentioning the teachers unions that have made it nearly impossible to get rid of bad teachers.

Until his party is willing to confront the unions, those who can will pay for their children to escape to private schools or move to good school districts in affluent neighborhoods, while the rest of the children pay the price.

Arthur O. Armstrong

Manhattan Beach

●●smf: The first writer is right in 61 words or less: College isn't for everyone! With deference to Garrison Keillor, it's doubtful that waitress Dorothy of the Chatterbox Cafe or many of the other citizens of Lake Wobegon, MN (where all of the children are above average) – are college grads.

But I find it amusing that tunnel-visionaries such as the second writer have two simple answers to the right questions from the University of California Curriculum Integration Institute Monterey Conference that Steinberg writes about in hid op-ed: Charter Schools + Firing "Bad Teachers". One or the other (along with No-New-Taxes) solves all things …including the recession, jobs and tunnel vision itself..

Hooray for Steinberg. He not only recognizes that school systems developed a century ago are not serving most children to the best advantage, but he wants to find remedies to improve their lives.

I suggest that he expand his goals to include K-12 education. If children do not conquer the basics in the early years, they are lost and become future dropouts.

Valerie Fields

Los Angeles

The writer is a former member of the Los Angeles Board of Education.

 

Los Angeles Times Op-Ed | http://lat.ms/e2FgGU

Solving California's jobs crisis: ONE WORD FOR CALIFORNIA: EDUCATION

The key to job creation, economic development and sustained economic growth in California is a high-quality, and more relevant, education for our children.

By Darrell Steinberg

January 3, 2011 - As we enter the new year with a new governor, new Legislature and renewed commitment to restoring California's luster, our singular focus as a state must be on job creation in the short term and job competitiveness in the long term. A meeting held in Monterey in November might hold the key that unlocks the door to California's economic future.

In a small conference facility and with little fanfare, the University of California Curriculum Integration Institute brought together a group of teachers, researchers and administrators from across the state and country to develop new ways to teach our children. Their goal: Create high school courses that hold kids' interest and better prepare them for college and/or careers.

The UC's role in a fundamental redesign of the educational experience is critical, because it's the UC that defines rigor in California high schools through its role as arbiter of which courses qualify as college prerequisites. The California State University system has linked itself to these eligibility requirements as well, thus extending the UC's influence over what and how many of our high school students are taught, whether they are college-bound or not.

There is no question the challenge of our time is jobs. The unemployment rate in California stands at 12.4%. But the more important numbers are these: Unemployment for Californians without a high school diploma is 19.2%; for those with a high school degree, 15.6%; for those with an associate's (2-year college) degree, 9.1%; for those with a bachelor's degree, 6.4%.

And 1 of every 5 high school students will drop out before receiving a diploma. For African American and Latino students, the numbers are more stark, with 2 out of every 5 dropping out.

These numbers lay bare the reality that if we are going to get serious about jobs in this state, we must get serious about the direct relationship between jobs and education. We need to align public education with the jobs that will exist in a knowledge-intensive, innovation economy.

In the 20th century, the state's public education system played a critical role in the creation of the jobs that made California one of the world's largest economies. Today, we need to align our schools with the labor market of the 21st century so that California can lead the world in fields such as clean energy and biotechnology, which will generate high-quality jobs. Look no further than what has happened in Silicon Valley to see the direct connection between what is being taught today and the jobs and industry of tomorrow.

Our kids must not only have access to college; they must be prepared to graduate from college. In this economy — and the economy of the future — the difference between having a job and not having a job will increasingly depend on whether you have some kind of education or training beyond high school.

This year the College Board announced that the United States had fallen from first to 12th in the share of adults ages 25 to 34 with postsecondary degrees. Other countries are improving rapidly and are graduating more students, while the U.S. numbers have been generally static. Global demand for college graduates means we will no longer be able to import our way out of this shortage — and why should we, when the solution should be homegrown? If post-high school education is the passport to a job, California must graduate students at a rate higher than the current 36% in order to compete globally.

As a state, we must increase college and career readiness and degree completion by first setting a "man on the moon" goal of increasing the number of young adults with a postsecondary credential to 55% in 10 years.

If we are serious about preparing our students to fill those high-quality jobs, public education must not be a Democratic issue or a Republican issue. It must be a California issue, with all parties — business and labor, politicians, educators — coming together to find areas of agreement to foster the education transformation we need to serve Californians and drive a strong and sustainable recovery.

That's exactly what happened in that meeting in Monterey. The people in that room put aside the traditional battle lines drawn by various education factions. Instead, the UC Institute created an environment in which people started asking, and answering, the right questions.

Questions such as: What is the best way to teach algebra and geometry to high schoolers who now find it boring and abstract, so that they understand its application in fields including engineering, energy efficiency and agriculture?

How can we better recruit, keep, develop and support teachers who engage our students in not just the "what" of their subject matter, but also the "why" that makes it relevant to their futures?

How can we build stronger bridges between our K-12 system, our institutions of higher education and the businesses that will lead us to recovery?

The challenge of our time is jobs. But the key to job creation, economic development and sustained economic growth in California is a high-quality, and more relevant, education for our children. Let's get our priorities straight and bring our education system into the 21st century.

Darrell Steinberg (D- Sacramento) is the California Senate president pro tem.

No comments: