●●smf’s 2¢: When a “plan” is “floated” to roll out on Christmas Day one can assume that the idea probably doesn’t depend upon a whole lot of public scrutiny and/or discussion. Remember this: The Expo Line Construction Authority – whose sole purpose is to save money, not serve the public or promote safety – is a front for and a creature of the Metropolitan Transit Authority. The MTA’s record on pedestrian safety is is not good. And even the construction authority doesn't believe the pedestrian bridges would be safe.
By Steve Hymon - December 25, 2008
California Public Utilities Commissioner Rachelle Chong filed an alternative proposal Tuesday on how best to solve the controversy involving two Expo Line light rail street crossings in South Los Angeles.
The gist of it: Chong's proposal makes it more likely that a pedestrian bridge -- at the least -- will be built across the tracks next to Dorsey High School. That means the Expo Line is going to have to find some extra money. Building the bridge could also jeopardize plans to open the line in 2010.
First, some background.
The Expo Line Construction Authority, which is building the $862-million line from downtown Los Angeles to Culver City, still needs the state's permission to build two at-grade street crossings next to schools in South Los Angeles, the Foshay Learning Center and Dorsey High. At Foshay, the authority needs the state's approval to put rails atop an existing pedestrian tunnel at Harvard Boulevard. At Dorsey, the agency needs approval to lay rails across Farmdale Avenue.
In October, a PUC administrative law judge denied those requests and instead proposed that pedestrian bridges be built over the tracks at both locations for safety reasons; with bridges, students and others would not have to walk across the tracks at those sites.
But the judge doesn't have last say on the matter. It's up to the five-member PUC to decide, and the commission has already twice postponed a vote on the issue.
At present, no one is happy with the judge's proposed solution: The construction authority doesn't believe the pedestrian bridges would be safe, saying they would funnel too many students into a confined area. . Community activists and the Los Angeles Unified School District want the train to either tunnel under Farmdale or go over it on a bridge. Activists also want the train to tunnel under both Western Avenue and Harvard (Western is near Harvard).
Under Chong's proposal, the construction authority would be allowed to build rails across the pedestrian tunnel next to Foshay, but she denied the agency's request to build an at-grade crossing of Farmdale next to Dorsey. Her proposal leaves open the possibility of a pedestrian bridge or a rail bridge over Farmdale. And because of the PUC process, her proposals makes it unlikely that a street-level crossing with no pedestrian bridge will even be considered.
Chong also proposes giving the authority something it requested: that the PUC act as the lead agency in considering future environmental review of the crossings. That's wonky, but significant. It basically means that a lawsuit over the environmental studies would go directly to the California Supreme Court (if it decided to hear it), whereas a lawsuit against the construction authority would start lower on the legal ladder, in Superior Court.
In other words, that move could shorten the time the issue is in court, thereby also shortening construction time and project costs.
The proposal from Chong will be considered at the PUC's January meeting. Keep in mind, it's just a proposal. The PUC can decide to keep it, amend it or toss it out completely.
But it does appear that the community, the LAUSD and the Expo Line authority are getting closer to knowing what they're actually building at the two crossings.