Monday, January 18, 2010

ON FIRING BAD TEACHERS: Cases such as the one involving the LAUSD's Matthew Kim show the need for change.

LA Times Editorial

Los Angeles teacher should be fired immediately, judge again rules

RE: Los Angeles teacher should be fired immediately, judge again rules by Jason Song | LA Times   -- Matthew Kim was removed from the classroom in 2002 for alleged misconduct but continued to receive full pay for years as his case wound through an appeals process.

 

January 18, 2010 – A note of gratitude is due Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge David P. Yaffe for ordering the immediate firing of Matthew Kim after a tortuous seven-year saga. This wasn't the first time that Yaffe tried to inject common sense into the absurdly difficult and expensive task of ridding classrooms of teachers who don't belong there. His previous decision to allow the Los Angeles Unified School District to fire Kim, issued in July, was ignored by the panel that has authority over contested teacher dismissals.

The Kim fiasco is a reminder of just how many thousands of dollars and costly lawyers and innumerable court appearances are currently required to fire incompetent or otherwise troublesome teachers. And, adding insult to injury, Kim has been paid his full salary and benefits since 2003 while doing no work for the district.

So we find it a heartening coincidence that on the same day Yaffe ordered Kim's firing, the president of the American Federation of Teachers called for new procedures making it easier to remove bad teachers. Randi Weingarten, who has been one of the more progressive teachers union leaders, said the AFT would develop a proposal, with the project overseen by Kenneth R. Feinberg, the federal government's "pay czar" on executive compensation.

Here are a few ideas for fixing the system: Get rid of tenure altogether. Create a system in which all teachers, new and veteran, are entitled to regular and meaningful evaluations from both their bosses and a panel of master teachers.

Next item: Reform the California Commission on Professional Competence, the panel that considers teacher dismissals that have been appealed. Its record has been skewed to favor teachers, in part because it is made up of an administrative law judge and two teachers. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's proposal to eliminate the commission goes too far. Teachers still need protection from dismissals motivated by personal or political biases or by a desire to replace them with cheaper hires. But the commission's makeup should include representatives from school management and parent groups, and it should be required to hear cases more quickly.

In the Kim case, the panel at first decided that although he had acted unprofessionally by inappropriately touching three students, he should not have been fired because his misconduct showed only "poor judgment." Say again? When the panel was ordered to reconsider, it switched to a determination that the touching was an inadvertent result of Kim's lack of control over his limbs due to cerebral palsy. With decisions such as this, the panel's competence must be questioned as closely as the teacher's.

Sunday, January 17, 2010

PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE: Final Lists of Applicant Submissions for Focus Schools and New Schools

From the Office of the Superintendent

1/17 - This information was inadvertently left off the LAUSD PSC website - smf

Psc Applicant Submissions Focus Schools 1-12-10 Psc Applicant Submissions New Schools 1-12-10

90210|LOCALS ONLY: “Show me your papers!” + smf 2¢

All Beverly Hills students soon may be required to prove their residency. The school board plans to expel those who have been lying about where they live under a plan to recertify every family in the 4,900-student district.

By Carla Rivera | LA Times | http://bit.ly/8BOi69

17 Jan -- One student enrolled in Beverly Hills High School this year using a virtual address obtained on the Web. Other Beverly Hills students have falsely claimed to live with grandparents or cousins who reside in the city. Unethical owners of Beverly Hills properties have even sold mailing addresses to out-of-area students.

The use of fraudulent addresses to enroll in the city's acclaimed schools is an age-old problem, according to officials with the Beverly Hills Unified School District who recounted these examples.

But such deceptions soon may be harder to carry out under a proposed plan to recertify every family in the 4,900-student district and expel those who have been lying about where they live.

The district already has a full-time employee who investigates cases of questionable residency, and about 150 students annually are asked to leave. But there may be hundreds more students using fake addresses to attend school illegally, officials said.   >>story continues>>

New families that register to attend the city's schools are required to show proof of residency, including lease agreements, house titles and utility bills, identification such as children's Social Security numbers and documents verifying legal guardianship. They also are required to sign an affidavit swearing to the accuracy of the information.

But officials want all currently enrolled families to prove their residency again before the 2010-11 school year. In addition, officials hope that a recently established anonymous tip line will tempt more students and parents to turn in classmates using fake addresses.

An accurate count of legitimate students is essential as the district prepares to change its funding source to property tax revenues rather than attendance-based state money, officials said. In a controversial decision, the school board voted last week to end special permits provided to hundreds of students who live outside the city.

The recertification proposal has won general support. Some permit families, though, say the district should have dealt with the fake address issue before moving to restrict permits.

Board members argue that it is especially important that Beverly Hills taxpayers not have to subsidize the education of students who lie about their residency.

"Part of the problem is we have no idea of the scope of the problem," said board member Brian David Goldberg. "I've heard estimates of 100 to 500 students. Most families don't want to be tattletales or informants. But we can and should address this issue now."  >>story continues>>

 

●●smf ‘s 2¢:  My friend and colleague Elizabeth Bar El makes an excellent point in her letter to The Times – but the Beverly Hills School Board is playing with fire.  Eventually they are going to have to lay-off teachers to meet the decreased enrollment they have caused.

 The LAUSD Board does the same when it gives schools to outside operators.

Seniority rules and bumping will trigger all the same things that declining enrollment bring on in any school district: Poor staff morale, unhappy unions, dissatisfied parents, lower student achievement, decreased property values, declining tax base, etc. It’s called a slippery slope and gravity being gravity it only slips downward.

Beverly Hills is a retail marketplace – its tax base and business success relies on consumers from other than 90210 and 90212 spending their money in those zip codes. Maybe those “Locals Only” signs from the schools should go into the storefronts on Rodeo Road?

90210|LOCALS ONLY: Out of B.H.? Try the LAUSD

Letters to The Times | 17 Jan | http://bit.ly/4TldmK

Re “Beverly Hills schools end most nonresident permits,” Jan. 14

To Westside parents of Beverly Hills schools students:

I can feel your frustration that some of your children will not be allowed back next year. But this could be an opportunity to visit your local Los Angeles Unified School District campus and see how your children can benefit.

Parents who fight for their local schools have worked with teachers and administrators and created some jewels. Palms Middle School has a terrific music program. Hamilton and Venice high schools both have magnet programs you have probably never stopped to find out about. Your tax dollars have contributed to a massive building program.

Beverly Hills has sent a clear message about looking after your own residents first. That goes for you as an L.A. resident and parent. You and your children can be stars in L.A. Unified.


- Elizabeth Bar-El
Los Angeles
The writer is vice chair and student parent representative for L.A. Unified's School Construction Bond Citizens' Oversight Committee.

LAUSD[C]

by smf for 4LAKids

In the past few weeks a number of educators, parents students and community members have been gathering together to discuss the Public School Choice Resolution and the impending giveaway of LAUSD Schools.

The group is small and diverse, meeting on Wednesday evenings in a central city storefront over coffee and cookies – activists and troublemakers, teachers andconcerned parents; bloggers and union leaders and NYU law students; Black and Brown and White. Building consensus. The discussion has been important and fruitful.  We are well begun

LAUSDC PRESS CONFRENCE   BANNER

The Group calls itself the Los Angeles School Development Coalition (LAUSDC) and is formed under the umbrella of CORE-CA, The Congress of Racial Equality of California

WHY CORE?

  • Because Public Education IS the Civil Rights Issue of the 21st Century. Not because politicians looking for a vote say it – but because it is!

  • Because Equity and Access are key to public education.

  • Because the outside providers competing under the PSCR have questionable records on providing Equity and Access, especially to

    • Special Education Students
    • Students with Disabilities
    • English language Learners
  • Because Social Justice is fundamentally challenged under PSC – the voters have committed to a $30 billion investment in OUR SCHOOLS, not the Partnership's schools or charter schools.

  • Because we want public schools with a public agenda, not pubic schools with a private agenda or privatized public schools. We don’t want nonprofit or not-for-profit …we want  public schools.

  • Because we expect OUR Kids to attend and excel in OUR schools in OUR neighborhoods. That was the promise of the BB, K, R, Y and Q bonds.

  • Because the prepackaged/prefab parent involvement granted under the PSC Resolution (non-binding advisory votes?) and offered by outside providers – or compliance-driven by LAUSD - is not enough.

  • Because, as much as it's about Equality – it's really about Quality. Quality Education in Quality Schools.

  • BECAUSE WE ARE LAUSD AND THEY ARE OUR SCHOOLS.

Here are some discussion points the LAUSDC are working on:

The Los Angeles Unified School Development Coalition (LAUSDC) believes that once educated, the community will not tolerate the giveaway of public schools in the Los Angeles Unified School District and we hold the Mayor of Los Angles, the LAUSD Board of Education, and other private interests responsible for this power play at the expense of the people.

The Lack of a Choice in the Public School Giveaway

The Los Angeles Unified School Development Coalition (LAUSDC) is a group of concerned parents, educators, and students united for the improvement of public schools and the creation of quality educational models. The LAUSDC seeks to create quality in public education

YES TO QUALITY PUBLIC EDUCATION

No to the Public School Giveaway

10 Points to Consider

● The resolution demonstrates reckless disregard for the students and community

● The proposal completely violates the will of the tax-paying public that voted for bonds

● There is no quality or quantifiable public participation in public school giveaway

● There is no transparency in regards to charter groups, hiring practices, or budgeting

● The LAUSD is moving down a fast track towards an unknown destination

● We must help improve existing schools and the district to deal with global standards

● The new schools in the community should be open to all students in the neighborhood

● The LAUSD must produce standards for public schools created with the community

● The community must help create student focused educational models in the LAUSD

● Together, we can create improved models of education for public schools in the US

Join the Los Angeles Unified School Development Coalition (LAUSDC) on the birthday of the great Civil Rights Leader Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., January 18, 2010 as we march in THE KINGDOM DAY PARADE on Monday, January 18. It begins at 10:15 am (televised at 11 am) at Martin Luther King Blvd and Western Ave, traveling west on Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd to Crenshaw Blvd, south on Crenshaw Blvd to Vernon Ave with a festival at Leimert Park.

 

THE NEXT MEETING OF THE LAUSDC will follow the PSCR Applicants Presentation Community Meeting @ 5 PM at Jefferson High School 1314 E.. 41st St, LA 90011 [map] on Wednesday Jan 20

Help continue the legacy of improving public education that civil rights leaders created. The struggle for Quality Education continues and the people of Los Angeles plan to challenge the public school giveaway with broad based community cooperation.

Saturday, January 16, 2010

Letters to the Times: CHARTER SCHOOLS, BEVERLY HILLS ‘LOCALS ONLY’ SCHOOLS

LA Times Letters to the Editor 1/16

Charter schools -- yes and maybe


Re “An unplanned revolution in L.A.’s public schools,” Jan. 10

What a fascinating time to be in education, and what a wonderful job The Times has done keeping readers informed about the charter school movement, especially here in Los Angeles.

I'm a 6th- and 7th-grade humanities teacher at the "small, scrappy" New Los Angeles Charter School. Though we are indeed small, and our school is carved out of a church space, we are also mighty.

In our first year, we received an API of 830. Our parental involvement is impressive. Our board of directors is diverse, talented and committed. My students amaze me every day.

Our location and our open lottery have allowed for an incredibly diverse student body. Our mission is aligned with a new vision for our city and our world.

In a time of great uncertainty, I know one thing: I believe in this school.

Thank you for keeping the public informed about the direction education is taking.


Stephanie Luty Widmer
Los Angeles
::

Kudos to The Times' education writers for their engaging review of charter schools, the rising appeal of these human-scale places and their potential for boosting kids' achievement. But it is misleading to claim in a subheadline -- based on a single year of data -- that "overall they outscore traditional campuses."

The Times compared 2008-09 test scores between students attending charters and their counterparts attending regular public schools. But the advantage for charter kids is likely due to the fact that charters enroll fewer students with learning disabilities and fewer kids from non-English speaking homes, as your article notes.

It's not valid to infer that charter organizations are lifting learning curves without taking into account those schools' demographics, or without tracking student growth over time.

LAUSD chief Ray Cortines is devising a sound evaluation plan for the district's new charters-and-choice program. Hopefully, it will be designed more carefully than the crude analysis attempted by The Times.


Bruce Fuller
Berkeley
The writer is a professor of education and public policy at UC Berkeley.


Booted out by Beverly Hills


Re “Board hears clashing views,” Jan. 13

Beverly Hills' excuse for kicking nonresident students out of its schools -- that soon the city will no longer receive state aid based on attendance -- is the reddest of herrings ever presented by this island of wealth and privilege.

Having lived in L.A. nearly all of my 66 years, I can say with some authority that most of the money collected in Beverly Hills property taxes comes from property owners who make their money either directly or indirectly off of a multitude of nonresident shoppers and service-seekers.

It is divine to profit mightily off nonresidents, but an intolerable burden to share its renowned classrooms with students not lucky enough to have been born to those living within the city's confines.

As a country, we've just been subjected to an overdose of Wall Street greed. Now we get to witness an overdose of Beverly Hills-style greed.


Steven M. Goodman
Encino

TOP-SCORING CHARTER SCHOOL NAMED FOR UCLA PROFESSOR + smf’s 2¢

—Howard Blume | LA Times L.A. NOW Blog

January 14, 2010 |  6:51 pm

A four-year-old high school that became a 2009 California Distinguished School was formally named today for a respected expert on education and business management and his civic activist spouse.

The new William and Carol Ouchi High School is in its first school year in its new, $17-million Hyde Park-area campus, which was built in 56 days, officials said. The simple, two-story structure has two computer labs and updated technology hookups, but no cafeteria, no gym and limited recreation space on its 2.5-acre site, which includes an adjacent middle school.

The school’s test scores dipped slightly this year but its Academic Performance Index score of 799 ranks it among the best-scoring high schools in the Los Angeles Unified School District. The school is operated by the Alliance for College-Ready Public Schools, a locally based charter school management organization that also operates other high-scoring schools.

About 100 of the school’s original 189 ninth-graders will be in the school’s first graduating class this year, said Principal Ena LaVan. All graduates must fulfill entrance requirements to apply for the University of California/Cal State system. And the first class had to endure a temporary location and a stint in trailers while awaiting the completion of the campus.

Charters are independently run and free of some restrictions that govern traditional schools, including strict state school-construction rules that drive up construction costs and slow down the building process for schools built by L.A. Unified. Charters instead can erect their schools under city building codes.

As a fundraising tool, the Alliance sells naming rights for its schools, and in this instance, Ouchi was nominated by former Mayor Richard Riordan, an education philanthropist and political power broker who has long relied on Ouchi, a UCLA professor, for expert guidance. Riordan has donated or committed a total of $2.8 million to Alliance schools.

Ouchi has long promoted a form of school decentralization. He says principals — not a school district central office — should make decisions on how to spend a school’s money and then be held accountable for the results. In his most recent book, “The Secret of TSL,” he chronicled how principals, especially in New York City, have used autonomy to reduce the total number of students that each teacher must manage in a year. He says this allows teachers to get to know and to better assist each student. Principals have accordingly reduced support and administrative staff to pursue this strategy — because it yields results, Ouchi wrote.

At his namesake school, Ouchi helped establish a Saturday business academy offering tutoring and enrichment classes to introduce students to potential careers.

Carol Ouchi has served on the boards of philanthropic organizations including the Santa Monica YWCA, Santa Monica College Foundation and Children’s Home Society.

●●smf’s 2¢: The story above is reprinted entire as it appeared in the Times blog – in the print edition the Times editors removed all reference to the school being a charter school. As it is the poster child for successful charters one would almost think anti-charter forces were at work in the newsroom. Almost.

Ouchi is an educator – but his expertise is in business, not in education. And in politics – he was Mayor Riordan’s chief of staff. Ouchi’s book: Making Schools Work -   championed the concept of local control – empowering principals to run their own schools at the expense of central district control. He did this at the time when centralist Roy Romer was LAUSD superintendent – and UTLA has a hard time empowering principals to do anything except take notes at faculty meetings.

4LAKids supports much of Ouchi’s message – but as a business school graduate and a retired businessperson I question how far business school business practices go in public education. Balancing the checkbook would be good, but in K-12 education Return on Investment is measured a generation later, not in a quarterly report.  And today’s LAUSD principal; has not been prepared to run their school – especially in a world where entrepreneurship collides with governance by the pink memo from downtown. Today’s pink memo seems to say: “You will be independent and that’s an order.”

Ouchi’s original message wasn’t in advocacy of charters,but the charter community has embraced it and made it their own.

Timing is everything;  troubling is this announcement against the backdrop of the Haiti Earthquake. One must remember that charter schools built with private funds – such as the Ouchi School – “Built in 56 days!” - are not subject to the same stringent building codes and earthquake standards (“The Field Act”) as publicly funded/publicly owned schools; charters only conform to local building codes. Haitian schools and Sichuan schools conformed to local building codes. The California charter law permits this …but how many parents with their children in charter schools are aware of this?

And how will they feel after the Big One?

Friday, January 15, 2010

LAUSD RECALLS 3 HIGHLY REGARDED CAMS TEACHERS IN BUDGET MOVE

By Melissa Pamer Staff Writer | Daily Breeze

01/15/2010 08:21:08 PM PST | In the nearly two decades since the California Academy of Mathematics and Science opened its doors, the diverse Carson magnet school has rocketed to the top of academic rankings, drawing national attention.

Last month, the campus placed 22nd on U.S. News & World Report's annual list of the top 100 public schools in the nation. It won 26th place in 2008 and 21st place in 2007, the first year of the list.

With a score of 975 on the state's test-based Academic Performance Index, the Long Beach Unified-operated campus is the third-highest ranked public secondary school in California.

Some 900 students from about 70 regional middle schools, many in low-income areas, compete for 167 freshman spots at the school, known as CAMS.

Alumni say they are proud of the rigorous college-preparatory program at the school, which is located in a collection of buildings on the campus of California State University, Dominguez Hills. But the welcoming and supportive sense of community is what they cherish.

Now, they say, the nurturing environment at the 600-student school may be under threat.

That's because three beloved teachers - considered by many to be the heart of the school - have been told this will be their last year at the institution.

"It's hard to think about. All of us are expecting it to fall apart without them," said junior Kasey Angsioco of Carson.

The three teachers - economics instructor Greg Fisher, history teacher Michael Denman, and math teacher Vanessa Cerrahoglu - have been on loan to CAMS from Los Angeles Unified School District for years. In 2009, LAUSD Superintendent Ramon Cortines ordered an end to all extended leaves of absence that allow such arrangements.

As with many decisions made in the financially troubled district these days, the motivation was budgetary.

"It's a small issue that's symbolic of the larger need to save money. If we're really looking everywhere, this is one of the places we need to look," said district spokeswoman Lydia Ramos.

Though LAUSD is reimbursed for the salaries and benefits of employees on leave, it remains on the hook for health benefits after their retirement - at $14,330 annually per retiree, district officials said.

The district can no longer afford to cover that cost for teachers who don't work in LAUSD schools, said Jim Morris, the district's chief operating officer.

"Some of them had been given extension after extension after extension for multiple years. There is a cost to that," Morris said. "We canceled all of them. We have made no exceptions."

Nearly a fifth of the district's $5.5 billion operating budget goes to health benefits, district officials said.

About $382 million each year goes just to retiree benefits, which cover family members and last until death. Last year the subject of heated union negotiations, those costs are expected to rise as more employees retire and live longer.

The district's cost-saving reasoning has not sat well with CAMS students and alumni, who learned about the teachers' predicament in December.

A Facebook group - called "Save CAMS!" - founded earlier this month has garnered more than 1,240 members.

Alumni are also planning to attend a Jan. 26 LAUSD board meeting to advocate for the teachers.

"When you ask any CAMS student about high school, minimally two of those teachers come to mind," said Andrea Mortley, a 2003 graduate who created the Facebook group. "Our school only has 18 full-time teachers. To lose three at once would be pretty devastating."

Others said that the three teachers are particularly important. Yearbook and student government, two of the core campus activities, are overseen by Fisher and Denman, respectively.

"These teachers are part of the fabric that is CAMS. They encapsulate what it is to be a teacher who's really involved," said Carolina Mejia, who graduated from CAMS in 2001 and now lives in Washington, D.C.

Mejia said many alumni have become involved in the campaign because the teachers' potential removal feels like a threat to an institution that was formative for them.

"I think that's why so many students are riled up. (CAMS) really has affected all of us. It was a really great experience," Mejia said.

Mejia, Mortley and others have bombarded LAUSD officials and the media with letters and e-mails.

Morris has responded to many.

"Every one of the letters that we received has been a wonderful tribute to the individual teachers. We will welcome these folks back with open arms," Morris said.

For the teachers, it's not an enticing prospect.

Fisher, who commutes 45 miles from Laguna Niguel, said he and the other two teachers are committed to projects and programs at CAMS.

"This basically feels like we're at the seventh or eighth inning and someone's changed the rules of the game," he said.

A former Westchester High teacher who's been at CAMS for 13 years, Fisher's project-based instruction methods were the subject of a 2008 profile in USA Today, which had named him one of 20 All-USA Teachers.

He said he's tried privately to reason with LAUSD, repeatedly pointing out that more than a quarter of CAMS students come from Los Angeles Unified schools.

It's been fruitless, he said.

(In addition to Long Beach Unified and LAUSD, the following school districts also send students to CAMS: Torrance, Hawthorne, Lawndale, Lennox, Palos Verdes Peninsula, Wiseburn, Compton, Inglewood and Lynwood.)

Fisher finds the student effort on his behalf flattering, though he and the other teachers have purposefully remained independent of the campaign.

He's becoming resigned to the fact that he'll have to go back to LAUSD.

District officials said they've tried to provide enough time to work with the teachers to find an appropriate placement. They must return to LAUSD on July 1.

Last week, Fisher and Denman toured LAUSD campuses in the Harbor Area. It was an exercise that Fisher called "depressing."

Denman, who lives in Redondo Beach, said for years he simply filled out a form each spring requesting an extension of his leave.

When he learned in the fall that another extension would not be offered, he thought it was a mistake.

"It didn't make any sense to me," said Denman, who's been at CAMS for 12 years. "I'm even amazed when they even realize we're still here."

Math teacher Cerrahoglu did not respond to a request for comment.

CAMS Principal Janice Filer said she did not want to speak about the matter, calling it an LAUSD issue outside her control.

Meanwhile, Long Beach Unified spokesman Chris Eftychiou said the district would likely not be in a position to hire the three CAMS teachers, even if they were willing to abandon LAUSD's comparatively plush health benefits.

"What's more likely to occur here is we simply won't replace those positions. That way we won't have to lay off teachers elsewhere," Eftychiou said.

The district needs to cut $90 million from its $715 million budget over the next two years, and a "significant number" of layoff notices are expected in coming weeks, he said.

"I'm sure that these teachers are outstanding and we're sorry that we're losing them," Eftychiou said. "It's really a Los Angeles decision."

JAN 15: MLK’s ‘REAL’ BIRTHDAY — “The function of education is to teach one to think intensively and to think critically. Intelligence plus character—that is the goal of true education.’’

Rev. Dr. Marin Luther King, Jr. (January 15, 1929 – April 4, 1968)

Dr. King tells us that critical thinking results in the ability to inform intelligence with character, and strengthen character with intelligence.  We can ask no more from public education ...or settle for less than quality education.

 

MLK said "We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny." Paraphrasing himself:  “We may have all come on different ships, but we're in the same boat now.”

"I have the audacity to believe that peoples everywhere can have three meals a day for their bodies, education and culture for their minds, and dignity, equality and freedom for their spirits.”  Martin Luther King, Jr. Nobel acceptance speech.

“Rarely do we find men who willingly engage in hard, solid thinking. There is an almost universal quest for easy answers and half-baked solutions. Nothing pains some people more than having to think.”
Martin Luther King, Jr.

The Leap of Faith: “Faith is taking the first step even when you don't see the whole staircase. Take the first step in faith. You don't have to see the whole staircase, just take the first step.”
Martin Luther King, Jr.

“The moral arc of the universe bends at the elbow of justice.”
Martin Luther King, Jr.

THE FUTURE (OF ARTS EDUCATION) BELONGS TO US? Sign the Petition! | http://bit.ly/arts_petition

LA WEEKLY ARTS NEWS BLOG/STAGE NEWS | http://bit.ly/7R9dB6

In order to close its budget deficit, the Los Angeles Unified School District plans to eliminate half of its elementary school arts teachers (music, dance, theater, visual arts) in 2011 and the remaining half in 2012, by which time there would be NO elementary school arts instruction of any kind in our public schools. The ramifications for that are as daunting as they are obvious. Arts for L.A. is circulating a petition to the LAUSD Board of Education to reconsider its draconian plan. The petition is here | http://bit.ly/arts_petition

BERKELEY CHARTER SCHOOL PRAISED AND DENOUNCED AT HEARING

By Doug Oakley - Berkeley Voice

01/14/2010 04:56:24 PM PST -- A charter school under consideration for Berkeley will bring either salvation or sorrow to students who would attend it, according to those who spoke at a public hearing Wednesday night.

On one side at the Berkeley Unified School District board hearing were parents and teachers who say the charter school is worth a try for 500 middle and high school students who either are failing in the mainstream schools or need alternative teaching methods.

On the other side were parents and teachers who said it will simply be a place to segregate black and Latino kids who make up most of those who are underperforming in Berkeley schools.

That gap between white students who do well on tests and black and Latino kids who don't is the largest in the state, according to school officials.

While board members did not weigh in Wednesday night, they will vote on the proposal Feb. 3.

"Change has got to come to Berkeley," said Nancy Williams a parent and member of Berkeley Organizing Congregations for Action, which supports the charter. "This is not about segregation. It's about a solution for this problem that the Berkeley Unified School District has had since I was in school. The people talking against it, I don't see them at the funerals of all the black students that drop out and get killed."

But Yvette Felarca, a teacher at King Middle School in Berkeley, spoke against the charter proposal.

"A charter school would take desperately needed resources from Berkeley High," Felarca said. "That makes no sense. Parents are being deceived and exploited by the charter school movement. Charter schools lead to more segregation and economic inequality. I know in two weeks you are going to vote on this. Let's have the courage to stand on our convictions." Felarca is an organizer for the Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Independence and Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality by Any Means Necessary.

That group held a news conference before the hearing opposing the charter.

The proposed school would take some students and money away from Berkeley Unified School District because some of its funding is based on how many students are in the district. Although the school would be open to any student in the adjacent areas outside Berkeley, if enough students come from the Berkeley school district, the district would be obliged by law to give it property and furniture.

The district has a large empty building on University Avenue called the West Campus that could be used for the school, said Victor Diaz, the Berkeley educator behind the charter.

If that doesn't happen, the school would be located somewhere in south or west area of town, he said.

While Diaz did not speak at the hearing, he did respond to comments that the charter would lead to segregation of black and Latino kids.

"The truth is by law charter schools cannot discriminate based on race," Diaz said.

"We have in our petition that we are going to try to match the Berkeley school district's integrated population."

Diaz said the school won't only be for black and Latino kids who underperform on tests but for kids of all colors who need a different, hands on, approach to learning.

"Those kids go across all race and socioeconomic lines," said Diaz.

School board President Karen Hemphill closed the hearing by saying the board can't make its decision Feb. 3 based on its opinion of whether or not the school will lead to segregation or even if it will improve the education of those it serves.

"We're waiting on a staff report that will focus on whether or not the proposal meets state criteria for starting a charter school," Hemphill said. "I expect to see many of you in a couple of weeks."

Thursday, January 14, 2010

BIDDERS FOR LAUSD SCHOOLS BEGIN PRESENTING PLANS TO PARENTS TODAY

meeting schedule: http://bit.ly/5NrxqK

Howard Blume | LA Times LA Now blog

January 14, 2010 | 10:01 am -- Parents today will attend the first formal presentations by groups competing to take over their neighborhood schools. The gatherings are the next step in a plan that allows groups inside or outside the Los Angeles Unified School District to bid for control of 12 existing schools and 18 new campuses. The plan was approved by the school board in August.

The main competitors are groups of teachers -- working with the teachers union -- and charter-school operators.

Charter schools are independently managed and free from some restrictions that govern traditional schools, including abiding by district union contracts.

Finding quality facilities has been one of their most difficult challenges, a primary reason they lobbied intensely for the school-control resolution.

Final bids were due early this week and, in the end, charter operators almost exclusively sought the new buildings. They turned in no proposals for Burbank Middle School and Gardena, San Pedro, Maywood Academy and Lincoln high schools.

"It is revealing that only a few charter operators are interested in LAUSD's most challenging schools," said L.A. school board member Steve Zimmer. "For most charters, public school choice seems to be about land and facilities."   

One widely respected charter operator, the Alliance for College-Ready Public Schools, was expected to bid for at least one existing school. It ultimately opted to put in for two new small schools at the new Esteban Torres high school complex, which will relieve overcrowding at Garfield and Roosevelt high schools east of downtown.

An exception is Hillcrest Elementary; there, two charters, along with a group of teachers from the school, are competing to take over.

As expected, a nonprofit controlled by Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa put in for three schools, including Jefferson High. In all, 84 bids were turned in, district officials said.

At the meetings for parents, each bidder will have 10 minutes to lay out its proposal. There will also be question-and-answer sessions. At a later date, parents will take a nonbinding vote, as will other groups, including district employees. The final recommendations will come from L.A. schools Supt. Ramon C. Cortines, with final approval by the school board next month. (emphasis smf)

SCHEDULE FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE APPLICANT PRESENTATION MEETINGS FOR PARENTS AND THE COMMUNITY

check District Website for updates – LAUSD has never set a schedule it couldn’t change!

PSCR Applicant Presentation Meetings 1-13-10

ONLY TWO APPLICATIONS RECEIVED TO OPERATE AND IMPROVE SAN FERNANDO MIDDLE SCHOOL

Written by Diana Martinez, Editor | San Fernando Valley Sun

En español: Solo se Reciben dos Aplicaciones para Operar y Mejorar San Fernando Middle School | http://bit.ly/69RDvX

Image

PHOTO: Laura Tracy, the UTLA Chapter Chair, is also a history teacher at San Fernando Middle School.

Wednesday, 13 January 2010 -- Eighty-four groups submitted applications to operate both LAUSD's under performing schools and new schools set to be opened.

San Fernando Middle School was one of the schools that has been designated as a "focus" school cited for under performing and available for an outside proposal to run the school.

Teacher teams, non-profit agencies and existing charter school operators applied for the right to operate one or more campuses, said Los Angeles Unified School District superintendent Ramon C. Cortines. "The District is committed to education reform as we determine what works best for each school and its students," said Cortines.

While there were eight letters of intent sent to LAUSD initially to operate and improve San Fernando Middle School, only two actual proposals were received by the district's deadline on Monday.

The two applications were from the San Fernando Middle School Collaborative and the Youth Policy Institute. The San Fernando Middle School Collaborative is a partnership with most of the middle school's current teachers and administration along with Project Grad and LEAP with a school based management plan. YPI, the Youth Policy Institute currently runs charter schools in other areas but has proposed a pilot school with a small group of San Fernando Middle School teachers interested in having a multi-media emphasis for the school.

Teachers at the school have described the process as disruptive and stressful for both students and teachers.

Starting this week, community meetings will be held at each of the 36 campuses, where applicants will present their plans to parents.

A meeting will be held to discuss the new high school scheduled to be built on Arroyo (swap meet site) in San Fernando, on Jan. 15 and 19 at 3:30 p.m. at Gridley Elementary School 1907 Eighth Street in San Fernando.

On Friday, Jan. 22 at 5 p.m. at San Fernando Middle School (Auditorium 130 N. Brand Blvd., San Fernando) a meeting will be held to discuss the two proposals currently on the table to run the middle school.

The district plans to appoint internal and external review panels, and ask for advisory votes from parents and other stakeholders before the superintendent makes recommendations to the school board. A final vote by the L.A. Board of Education to decide what plan will be approved is expected in February.

This week, The San Fernando Valley Sun/El Sol interviewed Laura Tracy, the UTLA Chapter Chair. Tracy is also a history teacher at San Fernando Middle School and has been very involved in the development of the Collaboration proposal.

Entire story and interview: http://bit.ly/54aAPm

Daily News: BANNINGS COACH FERRAGAMO STEPS DOWN, STRICTER RULES FOR CHARTERS, PSC APPLICATIONS IN

Banning's Ferragamo decides to pass the torch

01/13/2010 - Chris Ferragamo's second tour of duty is officially coming to an end. The legendary Banning football coach announced Tuesday that he is stepping down, culminating a four-year run during which he  
By Tony Ciniglio, Staff Writer

LAUSD OKs stricter rules for charters
01/12/2010 - The Los Angeles Unified school board voted Tuesday to approve a series of tougher standards for charter schools at a time when the district is embracing the publicly funded but independently run  
By Connie Llanos, Staff Writer

LAUSD get applications in its push toward reform
01/12/2010 - Los Angeles Unified officials received 84 applications from charter operators, non-profit groups and teacher collectives for the district's bold reform plan that opens the doors for outside entities                                                                          By Connie Llanos, Staff Writer

Fiscal malfeasance?: L.A. SCHOOLS PAID $200 MILLION MORE IN SALARIES THAN BUDGETED

By Howard Blume | LA Times | http://bit.ly/6DZ12y

Inspector General’s Audit Report: http://bit.ly/7oQOT9

The payments occurred despite the layoffs of 2,000 teachers and hundreds of other employees. Auditors say they have found no wrongdoing, but officials are puzzled.

 

  • smf: Auditors found that the District spent $200 million more than it budgeted and that’s not wrongdoing?

HUNDREDS OF STUDENTS CAN’T RETURN TO BEVERLY HILLS SCHOOLS

Hundreds of students can't return to Beverly Hills schools

By Carla Rivera | LA Times | http://bit.ly/5J6vLr

Beverly Hills school board votes to keep nonresident students out. The district, which is switching from state to municipal funding next year, voted to end its nonresident permit program. High school students will be allowed to stay through graduation.

TEACHER EVALUATIONS, UC BERKELEY RANKS HIGH IN MINORITY ENROLLMENT, CHARTER ACCOUNTABLITY IN LAUSD

from L.A. Times/LA Now blog

LAUSD RECEIVES APPLICATIONS TO OPERATE AND IMPROVE SCHOOLS :Superintendent Ramon Cortines Encouraged by Continued Interest

LAUSD OFFICE OF CHEERLEADING COMUNICATIONS PRESS RELEASE #09/10-113

January 12, 2010 -- (LOS ANGELES)— Education reform took a great leap today as 84 groups, including teacher collaborative teams, nonprofits, and charter school operators met the deadline on Monday to submit applications for the Public School Choice initiative.

Each applicant team submitted an educational plan to have the opportunity to improve one of Los Angeles Unified School District’s (LAUSD) 36 underperforming and new schools.

“This District is committed to education reform as we determine what works best for each school and its students,” LAUSD Superintendent Ramon C. Cortines said. “I look forward to reading and reviewing how these proposals could impact and improve the educational outcomes for our students.

“This is not an exclusive discussion. We are encouraging input from all community members who support our public schools including parents, guardians, students, teachers and other LAUSD employees.”

  • Community meetings are scheduled for every school that is a candidate of the initiative.
  • Applicants will have the opportunity to present their plans and respond to questions.

Scheduled to begin on Thursday, Jan. 14, these sessions are open to the entire community. Information regarding dates, times and locations can be found on the Public School Choices webpage at www.lausd.net.

For the latest Public School Choice update, please go to the ‘News and Events’ section of the LAUSD homepage at www.lausd.net. In the coming weeks, the District will continue to announce the specifics of the next steps, which will include an internal/external review panel, an advisory vote by stakeholders and recommendations by the Superintendent.   (emphasis smf)

A vote by the Los Angeles Board of Education is expected in February 2010.

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

SCHOOL BUILT ON SITE WHERE RFK SHOT NAMED FOR HIM

The New York Times

 

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS From the NY TIMES

12 Jan - 9:23 p.m. ET -- LOS ANGELES (AP) -- The school complex built on the site of Los Angeles' Ambassador Hotel where Robert F. Kennedy was killed will be named after the senator.

Los Angeles Unified school board members approved the name Tuesday as a tribute to the Democratic presidential hopeful who was gunned down in 1968. There was no opposition.

^photo: VanityFair.Com

The Ambassador site was highly contested, first by developer Donald Trump who wanted to build the world's tallest building there and later by historic preservationists, who wanted to restore the crumbling hotel to its former glamor.

The new educational complex cost more than $400 million, and is one of the most expensive ever constructed for K-12 education.

Two elementary schools are operating on the site. A middle school and high school are still under construction.

LAO: SCHWARZENEGGER’S ASSUMPTIONS FOR FEDERAL AID UNREALISTIC: It is "unclear" whether the governor has complied with the Proposition 98 constitutional guarantee for Education in his budget.

Capitol Alert

Posted by Kevin Yamamura | The latest on California politics and government from the Sacramento Bee

January 12, 2010 -- The nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office on Tuesday deemed "almost nonexistent" the chances that California will receive anywhere near the roughly $8 billion in federal aid and waivers that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is counting on in his budget plan.

In its initial review of Schwarzenegger's budget, which you can read here, LAO said California is likely to fall "several billion dollars" short of the amount the governor relies upon to balance his $82.9 billion general fund spending plan in 2010-11.

LAO excluded the governor's $1 billion reserve from the state's deficit figure, portraying the governor's deficit as an $18.9 billion problem. LAO said the governor's Department of Finance has offered a "reasonable" estimate of the budget gap but warned that lawsuits and overly optimistic revenue assumptions create plenty of "downside risk" in his budget.

In particular, LAO questions about $3.1 billion of the revenues the governor assumes for 2010-11. The nonpartisan office says that the governor may have overstated the extent to which corporate tax revenues will increase. It also questioned the governor's assumption of $892 million in estate tax proceeds, considering that current federal proposals do not restore a state estate tax exemption.

LAO also said the governor's forecast does not describe how the state will receive about $450 million in new revenues, while the state could lose money from a homebuyer tax credit and sales tax exemption for environmentally friendly technology.

The Legislative Analyst's Office, which previously recommended that the governor include additional federal funds as part of his budget, said the federal government should provide California with more ongoing funds, especially in cases such as special education. But it questioned Schwarzenegger's assumption that the state will receive $8 billion ($6.9 billion in direct aid and about $1.1 billion through waivers).

LAO said that while there is a "good prospect" for receiving more money, "the chance that anywhere near all the federal funds and flexibility sought by the governor in his budget package is almost nonexistent. The state is very likely to fall several billion dollars short of the governor's goals."

To deal with that problem, LAO recommended that the Legislature assume less in federal aid. The Analyst also suggested that the Legislature not wipe out entire social service programs but instead focus those services on the most dire recipients and create a prioritized list of "trigger" cuts depending on the amount of federal aid.

LAO did not recommend tax increases out of concern for the economy. But it did suggest that the Legislature extend a reduction in the income tax exemption for dependents, as well as modify or eliminate altogether a series of corporate tax breaks.

Schwarzenegger declared in his State of the State address Jan. 6 that he would protect school funding, but LAO said it is "unclear" whether the governor has complied with the Proposition 98 constitutional guarantee for education in his budget. LAO added that the level of funding provided by the governor may be all the state can afford, and that "education is treated relatively favorably" in the budget.

Legislative Analyst Mac Taylor will comment on his review at 1:30 p.m. today.

ED WEEK REPORT CARD IGNORES FAMILY DATA + CA LAWMAKERS APPROVE GAS & OIL TAX FOR EDUCATION + …POT TOO!

States' report card ignores family data

UPI.com

Published: Jan. 12, 2010 at 6:33 PM -- PALO ALTO, Calif., Jan. 12 (UPI) -- A California education researcher said a category in an education magazine's annual states' report card doesn't accurately assess student potential for success.

Margaret Raymond, director of the Center for Research on Education Outcomes at Stanford University in Palo Alto, said the "chance for success" area, one of six on the magazine Education Week's "Quality Counts 2010" report cards, is not reliable in measuring a state's ability to help young people succeed, a release by Stanford University reported.

Researchers from CREDO found that grades, to which the chance-for-success index looks in order to measure school quality, are closely related to matters of family income and parents' education level, and thus do not represent the contribution of a school to the success of its students, CREDO said.

Raymond and her team omitted the family background variables from the chance-for-success index and included only school-related data. With the change, the rankings of states changed drastically, indicating that the family-oriented index was crediting or blaming schools for their students' background characteristics, the university release said.

The states that gained the most in the revised index are Florida and Texas, moving up 14 places in rank; Hawaii lost rank, dropping 18 places, the release said.

 

State Lawmakers Approve Oil & Gas Tax for Education

KCBS Radio - Sacramento

Tuesday, 12 January 2010 10:03AM -- SACRAMENTO (KCBS)  -- A state Assembly committee has passed legislation that would tax oil and gas companies who do business in California.

The Revenue and Taxation Committee approved the bill, authored by Assembly Majority Leader Alberto Torrico of Fremont.

The bill would pass the extra tax revenue from oil and gas firms to the state's cash-strapped public higher education institutions.

The legislation now heads to the Assembly Appropriations Committee and will be heard on Thursday, January 21st.

Similar legislation has been vetoed by the governor in the past.

 

Assembly committee OKs bill to legalize marijuana

LA Times NOW blog

January 12, 2010 | 10:52 am -- A proposal to legalize and tax marijuana in California was approved by a key committee of the Assembly this morning, over the dire warnings of police chiefs and prosecutors.

The Public Safety Committee voted 4-3 to approve AB 390 by Assemblyman Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco), who said the bill would provide tax revenue to the state and regulation of the drug. The new law includes a requirement that users be at least 21 years old.

The measure next goes to the Health Committee, but proponents worried it would not be acted on by that panel by Friday's deadline, which would require the proposal to be reintroduced to be heard this year by the full Assembly.

"The way it exists now is harming our youth,'' Ammiano said. "Drug dealers do not ask for ID. We need to regulate something that has gone chaotic, has resulted in carnage. I understand it's not everybody's cup of tea.''

Assemblyman Danny Gilmore (R-Hanford), a former CHP commander, said the $50 tax on each ounce of marijuana sold to pay for drug education and treatment is not worth the grief that will be caused by legalization.

"We're going to legalize marijuana, we're going to tax it and then we're going to educate our kids about the harm of drugs. You've got to be kidding me,'' Gilmore said. "What's next? Are we going to legalize methamphetamines, cocaine?''

The measure was opposed in testimony today by several police chiefs and law enforcement officials including Bob Cooke, former president of the California Narcotics Officers Assn., who predicted it would lead to an increase in crime. "The mere consideration of an attempt to trade human misery for tax dollars smacks of the cynical throwing away of countless human beings,'' Cooke told the committee.

It is estimated that the bill would generate $1.3 billion a year in taxes and marijuana cultivation fees.

MOST ORANGE COUNTY DISTRICTS SAY NO TO OBAMA EDUCATION REFORMS

Logo

By SCOTT MARTINDALE and FERMIN LEAL | O.C. Register | http://bit.ly/5HKnki

2010-01-11 19:25:38 -- As few as nine Orange County school districts have committed to implement sweeping reforms championed under President Obama's federal Race to the Top grant program for schools, leaving up to 19 ineligible to receive the potentially millions of federal stimulus dollars that California is seeking.

School districts across the state were required to commit to the president's education reform agenda by Friday, ahead of a Jan. 19 deadline for California to apply for a federal Race to the Top grant. Twenty-one of O.C.'s 28 school districts initially committed to the plan, but many have since pulled out.

 

Who's on board

Committed: The following O.C. school districts have signed memorandums of understanding with the state, meaning they are committed to implementing President Obama's reform agenda for schools:

  • Capistrano Unified
  • Centralia (elementary)
  • Fountain Valley (elementary)
  • Fullerton (elementary)
  • Irvine Unified
  • Magnolia (elementary)
  • Ocean View (elementary)
  • Santa Ana Unified
  • Savanna (elementary)
  • The O.C. Department of Education and at least three charter schools – O.C. Educational Arts Academy in Santa Ana, Capistrano Connections Academy Charter in San Clemente, Journey School in Aliso Viejo – also are on board.

 

Initial, but not final: The districts that initially committed, but didn't sign the memorandum, according to the state's tally, are:

  • Anaheim City (elementary)
  • Anaheim Union High
  • Brea-Olinda Unified
  • Buena Park (elementary)
  • Garden Grove Unified
  • Huntington Beach Union High
  • Laguna Beach Unified
  • Lowell Joint (elementary)
  • Orange Unified
  • Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified
  • Saddleback Valley Unified
  • Westminster (elementary)

No commitment: The districts that didn't commit initially and thus didn't sign the memorandum are:

  • Cypress (elementary)
  • Fullerton Joint Union High
  • Huntington Beach City (elementary)
  • La Habra City (elementary)
  • Los Alamitos Unified
  • Newport-Mesa Unified
  • Tustin Unified

California stands to win up to $700 million from the competitive grant program, but only the districts that sign onto the education reforms will be eligible for a slice of those funds.

"I don't like the idea of rushing into something when we're talking about instruction and student improvement," said Superintendent Joseph Farley of the Anaheim Union High School District, which dropped out after initially committing. "We have already been engaged in instructional reform for the past five years. We were being asked to commit to a program that hadn't been fully vetted and for which there were a lot of unknown implications for schools."

After months of political wrangling, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger – a staunch proponent of Race to the Top – signed the reforms needed for California to apply for the funding.

Perhaps the most controversial reform for Orange County schools is linking teacher evaluations to students' academic achievement.

California's Race to the Top legislation also creates tough, new accountability measures for the state's lowest-performing schools and empowers parents to pull their kids out of failing schools or demand sweeping reform plans for them.

Final commitments

At least nine O.C. school districts have formally signed onto the plan via a memorandum of understanding with the state Department of Education, according to a tally posted on the department's Web site, which is updated continuously. That's in contrast to 21 O.C. school districts that tentatively committed to the reforms late last year, via a letter of intent.

Statewide, about 745 school districts and other educational agencies, out of an estimated 1,500, have submitted memorandums of understanding to the state.

"Participation in (Race to the Top) will allow us to partner with the state in building the necessary reforms to positively impact academic achievement of our students," said Superintendent Jane Russo of the Santa Ana Unified School District, Orange County's largest. "We will work with our teachers and union, as well as parents and the community, to implement the program fairly and equitably."

Russo, who noted that Santa Ana Unified could receive $3 million to $6 million if California wins, said funding was not the primary reason for the school district's participation.

"While we value this opportunity, (Race to the Top) funding is not enough to fix the structural budget problems faced by local school districts," she said.

California's Race to the Top memorandum of understanding is a 21-page document that essentially asks school districts to formally pledge support for the state's application and to collaborate with the state to implement the education reforms that California lawmakers passed last week.

'Effective' teacher criteria

The memorandum also offers, for the first time, guidelines on how to evaluate teachers based on their students' performance.

It indicates that an "effective teacher" is one whose students grow academically by at least a full grade level over the course of the school year, as measured by standardized tests. And a "highly effective" teacher is one whose students grow by more than one grade level, perhaps by 1.5 grade levels.

Even with the state's guidelines, however, the methodology for evaluating teachers cannot be changed without agreement from the school district's teachers union.

Anna Bryson, school board president of the Capistrano Unified School District, Orange County's second largest, said she was optimistic educators in this high-achieving South County district would get behind the new teacher evaluations.

"I know without a doubt that they are as interested in perfecting education methodologies as I am," Bryson said. "That is their life work. It's very important that we are able to measure the effectiveness of our teacher outcomes. ... It is through adjusting measurements that you can pretty much be assured you can succeed."

Districts dropping out

Orange County's schools superintendent, Bill Habermehl, predicted last week that many school districts that initially signed onto the reform agenda would drop out when asked to sign the final memorandum.

Habermehl said some districts were feeling uncomfortable about the vagueness of the reforms, or the rushed pace of committing to them, or the extra local resources and funding it might take to move forward on the reforms.

Anaheim City School District's superintendent, Jose Banda, said that while district trustees supported the Race to the Top principles and initiatives, they were worried about signing onto an education plan that has yet to be written. The 19,300-student district would have been eligible for up to $1.5 million if it had signed the memorandum, Banda said.

"The board and staff articulated agreement in concept with most of the requirements in the (Race to the Top) grant, but the ambiguity in some of those requirements, unknown funding level, unclear exit strategy and rushed timeline made it difficult for approval," Banda said.

If California doesn't win in the first phase of the competition, it can apply again for the second and final phase in June.

Federal officials have indicated only 10 to 20 states total are expected to win Race to the Top grants.

NYT: AS SCHOOL EXIT TEST PROVE TOUGH, STATES EASE STANDARDS

By IAN URBINA | New York Times | http://bit.ly/7959Kq

January 12, 2010 -- A law adopting statewide high school exams for graduation took effect in Pennsylvania on Saturday, with the goal of ensuring that students leaving high school are prepared for college and the workplace. But critics say the requirement has been so watered down that it is unlikely to have major impact.

The situation in Pennsylvania mirrors what has happened in many of the 26 states that have adopted high school exit exams. As deadlines approached for schools to start making passage of the exams a requirement for graduation, and practice tests indicated that large numbers of students would fail, many states softened standards, delayed the requirement or added alternative paths to a diploma.

People who have studied the exams, which affect two-thirds of the nation’s public school students, say they often fall short of officials’ ambitious goals.

“The real pattern in states has been that the standards are lowered so much that the exams end up not benefiting students who pass them while still hurting the students who fail them,” said John Robert Warren, an expert on exit exams and a professor of sociology at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities.

“The exams are just challenging enough to reduce the graduation rate,” Professor Warren added, “but not challenging enough to have measurable consequences for how much students learn or for how prepared they are for life after high school.”  >>>story continues>>>

LAUSD IN THE NEWS 1/12

Selections from the LAUSD Clipping Service

LOS ANGELES TIMES

L.A. school board will weigh new policy to both help and rein in charters

January 11, 2010 |  3:41 pm

The Los Angeles Board of Education Tuesday will consider new policies aimed at both assisting charters and holding them more accountable for their performance. The regulations, about a year in the making, include key provisions on conflicts of interest and services for disabled students that are opposed by the association that represents charter schools.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/01/la-school-board-will-weigh-new-policy-both-to-help-and-reign-in-charters.html

DAILY NEWS

Not something to be proud of: Letters for Tuesday, Jan. 12

Charters dumping special ed kids

Re "Charters, LAUSD in special ed tug-of-war" (Jan. 7):

The tug-of-war for special education funds is symptomatic of the larger issues of power and control. Case in point: For many years prior to its charter conversion, Birmingham High School had one of the best and brightest deaf and hard of hearing programs within the Los Angeles Unified School District. The fact that it was also one of the largest did not hinder its effectiveness. As the charter push began, this program was severely cut, and other special education programs on campus also suffered.

As your article stated, the deaf program was eliminated under the Birmingham charter. These students were forced out. The fact that "they were not told to enroll at another school" is a joke. They had no choice but to enroll elsewhere in order to receive services.

There may be scrupulous charter operators. Yet for every New West Charter Middle School, I suspect there are many more which follow the Birmingham model: cherry-picking students and cutting special education services.

- JEANINE D'ELIA

Granada Hills

The writer was a special education assistant at Birmingham High School for 12 years.

THE EXAIMNER

An overview of education options in Los Angeles

January 11, 8:21 PMLA Education Headlines ExaminerAmber Banks

The educational landscape in Los Angeles is changing by the day. In the coming weeks, there will be a lot of important decisions and developments regarding the structure and administration of public education in LA and within LAUSD. In the meantime, the guide below is intended to help define the different education options, as they exist today.

http://www.examiner.com/x-33526-LA-Education-Headlines-Examiner~y2010m1d11-An-overview-of-education-options-in-Los-Angeles

LA OPINION

Una carrera por fondos federales

Por muy generosa que pueda ser la "propina" del Tío Sam, los sindicatos de maestros no se apuntan a la carrera de California hacia los fondos federales de Race to the Top (RTTT). Al menos de momento.

Frente a la escuela primaria Hillcrest, el sindicato de maestros organizó una conferencia de prensa; habla la maestra Sonia Martín Solís.

Ciro Cesar /La Opinión

January 12, 2010

"Para acabar consiguiendo unos 45 millones de dólares, no vale la pena el esfuerzo", decía ayer A.J. Duffy, presidente del Sindicato de Maestros de Los Angeles (UTLA) reiterando la misma posición que mantenía antes de que el Distrito Escolar Unificado de Los Angeles (LAUSD) presentara en días pasados su intención de solicitar los fondos federales para educación.

http://www.impre.com/laopinion/noticias/2010/1/12/una-carrera-por-fondos-federal-168050-1.html

Los maestros ya tienen su plan

Yolanda Arenales/ yolanda.arenales@laopinion.com |

2010-01-12

| La Opinión

EL Sindicato de Maestros de Los Ángeles (UTLA) remitió ayer planes de reforma para las 36 escuelas incluidas en la iniciativa "Elección Libre" del Distrito Escolar Unificado de Los Ángeles, cumpliendo así con el plazo que terminaba a las 11:59 de la noche del lunes.

http://www.impre.com/laopinion/noticias/2010/1/12/los-maestros-ya-tienen-su-plan-168049-1.html

CALIFORNIA WATCH

Less money for class-size reduction under Schwarzenegger budget

January 12, 2010 | Louis Freedberg and Hugo Cabrera

For the first time since the program began 14 years ago, a California governor is planning on spending significantly less on California’s popular, but expensive, class-size reduction program than in previous years.

http://californiawatch.org/watchblog/less-money-class-size-reduction-under-schwarzenegger-budget

CITYWATCH

Of Sidewalks, Salaries and Second Jobs

ALPERN AT LARGE
By Ken Alpern
The economic/budgetary crises facing our City offer both heartburn and hope, naysaying and new opportunities, a thinning of our work force and yet also a change in how we get things done.  Just as conservatives and other capitalists have been forced to recognize that banks and big businesses need some regulation, so also do liberals and pro-union advocates need to recognize that unions (particularly governmental unions) need some serious reigning in. Closer to home, government salary and pension reform is being embraced (or at least confronted) by an increasing number of both liberal and conservative politicians who all must recognize that the giveaway of taxpayer dollars for the comfort of the public sector (who, by and large, remain cherished by most of us who recognize what they do for our society) must be slowed or even reversed in order to make the budgets sustainable.

http://citywatchla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3087

ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER

State applies for $490 million more in stimulus funds for schools

By FERMIN LEAL

2010-01-11 19:18:53

The state Department of Education today submitted an application for the final allocation of federal stimulus funds for California's public schools and universities.

http://www.ocregister.com/common/printer/view.php?db=ocregister&id=228649

SACRAMENTO BEE

Editorial: School reformers celebrate a victory

Last Modified: Monday, Jan. 11, 2010 - 8:13 am

Californians who care about public schools have something to cheer about. Pushed by President Obama's Race to the Top competition and by grass-roots parent efforts, lawmakers finally passed bills that position California to make big changes long resisted by entrenched educational interests.

http://www.sacbee.com/editorials/v-print/story/2443583.html

USA TODAY

Union to propose test scores figure into teacher ratings

By Greg Toppo, USA TODAY

Comparing the way most teachers are evaluated to a football team watching game tapes "once the season is over," the head of the USA's second-largest teachers union is expected Tuesday to propose a new, detailed system of teacher ratings that includes not only classroom observations by supervisors but also written-work, portfolio and lesson-plan reviews — and student test scores.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2010-01-12-aft12_ST_N.htm

California passes major school-reform package

SACRAMENTO (AP) — The California Legislature has sent Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger landmark education reforms designed to overhaul the state's worst schools.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2010-01-06-California-education_N.htm

NEW YORK TIMES

States Lower Test Standards for a High School Diploma

By IAN URBINA

January 12, 2010

A law adopting statewide high school exams for graduation took effect in Pennsylvania on Saturday, with the goal of ensuring that students leaving high school are prepared for college and the workplace. But critics say the requirement has been so watered down that it is unlikely to have major impact.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/12/education/12exit.html?ref=education&pagewanted=print

“At what point do financial gifts begin reshaping public decision-making to fit a private agenda?”

‘GIFTED’ SCHOOLS: Public education must be careful when accepting private funding, even for worthy projects.

LA Times Editorial | http://bit.ly/5UIo3E

January 12, 2010 -- It's natural -- and smart -- for cash-strapped public schools to seek out private financial help. In the Los Angeles Unified School District, though, this raised eyebrows when the help took the form of key employees whose salaries are paid by wealthy benefactors. As The Times has reported, some see a conflict of interest when people who work for the schools receive their paychecks from individuals or groups with their own ideas about public education. So far, the district appears to be handling this merger of public and private resources responsibly. But there's no question that when privately financed reform plays a large and long-term role in public schools, everyone should be a little wary.

  • Matt Hill, L.A. Unified's administrator in charge of overseeing the district's new policy to allow outside groups to manage new or failing schools, is paid by philanthropist Eli Broad.
  • The Wasserman Foundation provides the salaries for an instructional officer and an advisor on teacher effectiveness.

In other words, private money is generously being donated to advance district reforms. But the question educators must continually ask themselves going forward is: At what point do financial gifts begin reshaping public decision-making to fit a private agenda?

Outside entities that pour money into education tend to have a view of reform that favors charter schools (as the Broad and Wasserman foundations do), stiffer curriculum standards, weakened teachers unions and more testing. As much as we often agree with that view, public schools -- which are responsible for using public money wisely and are accountable to voters -- must set their own goals.

One example of private money shaping school reform was the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's emphasis over the last decade on smaller schools. Convinced that more intimate schools of 500 students or fewer would boost achievement, the foundation spent $1 billion on this project, prompting a nationwide trend. But when it conducted a study of the results, it found that school size by itself didn’t make a substantial differencedidn’t make a substantial difference in achievement. Small schools are more expensive to run and tend to offer fewer electives, including Advanced Placement classes. There still may be long-term merit to smaller schools when combined with other reforms, but a single philanthropic push had an enormous effect on public schools before the results could be measured.

Even the best-intentioned gifts have a way of shifting behavior. Educators and the public, not individual philanthropists, should set the agenda for schools.

●● smf's 2¢: “Cynicism,” Lillian Hellman said, “is an unpleasant way of saying the truth.” Sometimes one wonders if these ‘gifts’ are not to support public education but rather to grease the skids.

CAMPUS TAKEOVER APPLICATIONS BEGIN FLOWING IN TO L.A. UNIFIED

By Jason Song – LA Times | http://bit.ly/74i4Vc

Charter organizations, nonprofits and teachers groups have until midnight to submit applications to take over 30 new or struggling campuses. The superintendent will make recommendations next month.

12 Jan -- The Los Angeles city school district on Monday began receiving applications from inside and outside groups seeking to take over 30 new or struggling campuses.

Groups that filed letters of intent to apply for the schools in the fall had to file their requests electronically before midnight tonight. The district is scheduled to announce how many applications they received today.

The Los Angeles Unified Board of Education voted in August to allow outside operators, including charter schools, to apply for control of 18 new and 12 low-performing campuses. Groups of teachers have prepared applications for some schools, and United Teachers Los Angeles has filed a from taking over the new campuses.

Several outside groups, including some charter organizations and Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's nonprofit Partnership for Los Angeles Schools, had said they would submit applications. Supt. Ramon C. Cortines will review the applications before making recommendations to the school board in February.  >>>more>>>

ALLOW SCHOOLS TO SUCCEED

Editorial: Language Magazine – The Journal of Communication and Education | http://languagemagazine.com |December 2009

December 2009 Cover

As we near the end of President Obama’s historic first year in office, we can reflect upon the changes that have already been implemented, and imagine the possibility that the unprecedented federal investment of $100 billion in education may provide the impetus to close the achievement gap.

However, 2009 also saw the passing of one of public education’s most outspoken supporters, Gerald Bracey, whose annual report on the condition of public education has for the last 18 years shattered widespread myths with fact and measured argument to which only a trial lawyer could aspire. Bracey’s final report [http://bit.ly/2aO9gD] tackles “the research support for what the author considers to be three of the most important assumptions about how to reform public education” including the assertion that high-quality schools can eliminate the achievement gap between whites and minorities.

Bracey – photo Washington Post-->

While tackling the question of how to define a “high-quality” school and making the point that test scores alone cannot define quality, Bracey concludes that “school improvement must be accompanied by attention to social inequalities.” This conclusion ties in with the recurring findings in Bracey’s work that schools can only do so much to overcome the tragedy of childhood poverty and that U.S. public schools are remarkably effective at teaching all but the most impoverished of students despite widespread belief that they are failing all students.

The latest initiative aimed at closing the achievement gap is the $4.35 billion Race to the Top program, which the administration claims will reward only those states that raise their academic standards, improve teacher quality, and expand the reach of charter schools. “This competition will not be based on politics, ideology or the preferences of a particular interest group,” said President Obama recently. “Instead, it will be based on a simple principle — whether a state is ready to do what works. We will use the best data available to determine whether a state can meet a few key benchmarks for reform, and states that outperform the rest will be rewarded with a grant.”

Our media welcome the prospect of a program that may benefit just a few small states, and thus perpetuate the myth that public schools are failing our children. Ignoring education experts, The Wall Street Journal recently published an editorial by real estate and financial services billionaire, Eli Broad, IBM’s former chairman, Louis Gerstner, and Harold Ford that warned the administration against diluting the program’s requirement that states adopt performance pay for teachers and weakening its support for charter schools, despite the lack of evidence that such measures actually improve education. LangMag_Tee-Shirt

Although Race to the Top is bound to have some impact and any additional funds for education should be applauded, it does not even take into account the fundamental problem that poverty is preventing schools and teachers from educating students, especially English learners who are often at the bottom of the economic ladder. No benchmarks, standards, or testing are going to overcome the barrier to education that poverty creates.