Tuesday, July 22, 2008

PAY2PLAY AFFECTING PARTICIPATION IN YOUTH SPORTS GROUPS

 

By George B. Sánchez, Staff Writer | LA Daily News

July 22, 2008 - Just four months after Los Angeles Unified began charging for after-hours use of its fields and facilities, one of the San Fernando Valley's biggest youth sports groups is seeing a dramatic drop in some of its club memberships.

Valley Youth Conference officials had feared the potential backlash from the controversial higher rates and now say the group's Valley Falcons football club in the East Valley could be in jeopardy.

"Usually about this time we have 60 to 75 kids signed up," said Falcons coach Santos Juarez. "Right now, we have about 13. We're in a real dilemma."

Without at least 16-18 kids, the team will be unable to play this season, club President Virginia Quiroz said.

The membership slump is the first clear sign of what hundreds of nonprofit youth groups had feared when the LAUSD kicked off its pay-to-play program earlier this year with a three-tier fee structure designed to offset annual facilities costs of $3.8 million.

LAUSD officials defend the fees, however, saying they are needed in the wake of state budget shortfalls that have strapped the district.

LAUSD officials cut more than $350 million from the district budget as Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger trimmed $3 billion in funding from K-12 education.

Superintendent David Brewer III said last year that the new fees would cover the nearly $4 million in facilities costs.

"This is framed by the cutbacks by the governor and the budget crisis in education," said Kathryn Friedman, manager of L.A. Unified's civic center permit program. "This is not something we did lightly."

District officials considered imposing the new fees three years ago, but public outcry against the potential loss of affordable after-school programs forced the school board to abandon the proposal.

But the LAUSD isn't the only agency charging new fees for fields and facilities. The city's Department of Recreation and Parks recently raised its activities fee by $5 and has a new charge of $10 for permit applications.

Now, with a struggling economy also taking its toll on Valley residents, officials with the Valley Falcons say the less-expensive early bird registration still has only drawn 10 players.

While late registration is not uncommon - and some athletes arrive even three weeks after the first day of practice - the low numbers this year are unprecedented.

As with all 16 sports clubs that make up the Valley Youth Conference and use LAUSD fields and facilities, the Falcons were hit with fees for practice and game space this spring.

The fees took effect March 1, when the LAUSD implemented a $77.10 flat charge for a permit, $5 daily custodian fees and an hourly rate of $10 for the club and up to $30 an hour for night use of football fields.

The club hasn't been billed yet, but is expecting to pay $4,000 to $6,000 once its permit and schedule are approved to play at John H. Francis Polytechnic High School in Sun Valley, Quiroz said.

That means the club has boosted its participation fees by $50 per athlete, she continued, which is difficult to charge considering that many of the club's kids come from one-income families getting by on about $1,500 a month.

"The parents were aware of this since last year," Juarez said. "Gas prices are going up. Food prices are going up. Now our prices are going up. The economy is taking a toll on our parents."

Youth groups that charge admission or have concession stands pay the same permit and custodian fee and are charged between $25 and $45.50 an hour for events.

"We are not making a dime on this," Friedman said. "We're trying to recoup our out-of-pocket costs. This is not rent."

With more than 9,600 elementary and junior high students involved, the Valley Youth Conference fields teams in football, track, basketball and cheerleading. And conference officials said if they are unsuccessful in fundraising, they will be forced to pass at least some of the increased costs on to participants.

"These costs will drive it up almost $100 per kid this year," said Bill Speer, publicity director for the conference. The new fees amount to more than $210,000 for the conference overall, he said.

The West Valley Girls Softball league is in the same boat.

For the past nine years, more than 350 girls and up to 80 women have played softball at Charles E. Hughes Middle school in Woodland Hills.

"We haven't paid anything for the field until February of this year," said Dana Ashton, president of the softball league.

Now, he estimates that the league is paying more than $2,600 a month to practice and play games. If it can't cover the new fees through sponsorships and fundraising, the cost will likely be passed on to players, he noted.

For now, they pay $100 to play in the fall league and $190 in the spring.

"We want to stay there," he said. "Hughes has always been our home."

He estimates that over the years, the team has invested about $70,000 in the school to pay for new bleachers, a sprinkler system, an awning and maintenance.

Reza Shahmirzadi, former commissioner for the American Youth Soccer Organization, Region 71, which covers Woodland Hills, West Hills and Canoga Park, said new permit fees from the LAUSD and the city will eat up as much as 20 percent of the group's budget.

"We're looking at over $30,000 in fees, just for permits," he said.

For the past five years, registration has stayed at $135 per child, but that will increase next year once the group calculates the impact of the LAUSD's new fees, Shahmirzadi said.

"It's going to have a major impact," he said. "For next season, we'll have to collect more for registration."

Monique Franklin, the region's current commissioner, said reserve funding will cover this year's cost, but that the increase will be passed on next year to parents of the 1,400 kids who play soccer with the league.

Friedman estimates that 238 permits a month are issued to youth groups leasing LAUSD facilities. About 150 high school and middle school sites are available for use, she said, about one-third of them in the Valley.

So far, she said, the LAUSD has not seen a decline in permit requests as a result of the new fees.

"There are very few recreation facilities and we've always had greater demand than facilities available," she said.

The district even goes out of its way to accommodate some groups, she said, including seeking compromises when groups seek the same site, even if one offers higher lease payments.

After the West Valley Girls Softball league applied for its field in the spring, Ashton discovered that Barcelona California, a youth soccer league, also had bid on the spot.

Instead of sharing the field at Hughes, LAUSD officials agreed to help the soccer league find another site, said Rui Guimarais, the club's president. The 200-member club is still searching, he said.

For the Valley Falcons' Juarez, this would be the first time in 40 years of coaching with the conference that he has had a team sit out a season for lack of players.

Money has always been a concern for his team, he said, noting that many kids live in apartments in San Fernando, Pacoima and Sun Valley and can't afford other sports clubs.

Last year, he estimates, he spent about $2,000 of his own money to help his players.

"We normally field seven teams. Now we don't have enough for one," he said. "We might have to skip this year."

Juarez will have an answer soon: The Falcons' first day of practice is Aug. 1.

Monday, July 21, 2008

Inside LAUSD: MAYOR PUSHES BIGGER BOND

-- Howard Blume | LOS ANGELES TIMES

clip_image001

03:20 PM PT, Jul 21 2008 - As reported in The Times, L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has joined the push for a new local school bond -- and wants $300 million of it for charter schools. That level of charter funding has resulted in resistance from some school board members and senior district staff, including L.A. Unified  Supt. David L. Brewer.

To smooth the path for the bond, Villaraigosa began suggesting a bond larger than the proposed $3.2 billion measure. That way, charters could receive $300 million without cutting into funds for other purposes.

Villaraigosa would not confirm this position, though he did say that he'd spent 10 hours on the phone over three days last week talking up the bond. His phone calls included a long conversation with Brewer.

Brewer said the talk lasted an hour, but, like Villaraigosa, he declined to recount details. Still, district and mayoral staff privately confirmed that Villaraigosa has supported sealing the deal by increasing the total bond dollars.

During a Friday news conference at Roosevelt High School in Boyle Heights, Villaraigosa declined to answer reporters directly when they asked about the size of the bond issue. Most of the journalists on hand had not been covering the issue; they asked the question merely because they did not know the proposed amount, which has stood at $3.2 billion for weeks.

Instead of offering that number, Villaraigosa consistently refused to mention a figure. But at one point, he said, offhandedly, that the bond could range from $3.2 billion to $10 billion. His tone suggested that he was pulling both numbers out of thin air, but apparently that wasn't the case. A figure as high as $10 billion has been floated in negotiations, insiders said.

If the bond gets too pricey, the district could lose a talking point for the bond campaign to come. The proposed $3.2 billion amount can be raised without increasing the current tax rate for property owners. Instead, that money would be raised by keeping current tax rates in force for a longer period of time. (Absent the new bond, property tax rates would decline sooner -- as the existing bonds are paid off.)

But the debate isn't simply about money, which might explain the length of the conversation between Villaraigosa and Brewer. Members of Brewer's senior staff complain that investing too heavily in charter schools puts control of reform efforts too much outside their reach. Of course, that's precisely what charter school advocates say they want to do. Charters are independently managed public schools that are free from many regulations that govern traditional schools. Next year, L.A. Unified, the nation's second-largest school district, will have about 150 charter schools, the most in the nation.

Besides charters, the bond also would include money to repair and modernize existing schools, upgrade their safety systems and build traditional campuses.

The Friday event, called ostensibly to "announce" the bond, was put together hastily by the mayor's office and the staff of school board President Monica Garcia, who was the only one of seven board members who attended. Also on hand were Brewer (who made a point to get there on short notice); Caprice Young, head of the California Charter Schools Assn.; charter operator Steve Barr; and staff representatives of the Los Angeles Parents Union, a group closely associated with Barr.

Barr's Green Dot charter schools could benefit substantially from the bond, but he's also argued that creating effective small schools - -whether they're charters or not -- is crucial to improving student achievement.

Sunday, July 20, 2008

WHY DO ASIAN STUDENTS GENERALLY GET HIGHER MARKS THAN LATINOS? Trying to bridge the grade divide in L.A. schools: Lincoln High students have candid ideas.

COLUMN ONE | By Hector Becerra, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

 

Carlos Garcia, second from right, is president of the Asia Club at Lincoln High School. He is pictured here with his cabinet members during a lunch-hour meeting.

PHOTO: Barbara Davidson, Los Angeles Times

Carlos Garcia, second from right, is president of the Asia Club at Lincoln High School. He is with his Cabinet members during a lunch-hour meeting.

 

July 16, 2008 — The eight students walked into a room at Lincoln High School prepared to discuss an issue many people, including some of their teachers, considered taboo.

They were blunt. Carlos Garcia, 17, an A student with a knack for math, said, "My friends, most of them say, 'You're more Asian than Hispanic.' "

Related Content

    "I think Carlos is Asian at heart," said Julie Loc, 17, causing Carlos to laugh good-naturedly. Asian students who get middling grades often get another response, she said.

    "They say, 'Are you really Asian?' " Julie said.

    "It's sad but true," said Eliseo Garcia, a 17-year-old with long rocker hair, an easy manner and good grades. "I had an Asian friend, but he didn't necessarily get that great a grades. We used to say, 'He's Mexican at heart.' "

    What accounts for such self-deprecating humor? Or the uneven academic performance that prompts it?

    The state's top education official, Supt. Jack O'Connell, called for that kind of discussion last fall when he decried the "racial achievement gap" separating Asian and non-Latino white students from Latinos and blacks.

    At The Times' request, the Eastside students gathered to talk about this touchy subject.

    Lincoln Heights is mostly a working-class Mexican American area, but it's also a first stop for Asian immigrants, many of them ethnic Chinese who fled Vietnam.

    With about 2,500 students, Lincoln High draws from parts of Boyle Heights, El Sereno and Chinatown.

    Both the neighborhood and student body are about 15% Asian. And yet Asians make up 50% of students taking Advanced Placement classes. Staffers can't remember the last time a Latino was valedictorian.

    "A lot of my friends say the achievement gap is directly attributable to the socioeconomic status of students, and that is not completely accurate," O'Connell said. "It is more than that."

    But what is it? O'Connell called a summit in Sacramento that drew 4,000 educators, policymakers and experts to tackle the issue. Some teachers stomped out in frustration and anger.

    No Lincoln students stomped out of their discussion. Neither did any teachers in a similar Lincoln meeting. But the observations were frank, and they clearly made some uncomfortable.

    To begin with, the eight students agreed on a few generalities: Latino and Asian students came mostly from poor and working-class families.

    According to a study of census data, 84% of the Asian and Latino families in the neighborhoods around Lincoln High have median annual household incomes below $50,000. And yet the Science Bowl team is 90% Asian, as is the Academic Decathlon team.

    "Look at the statistics. It's true," said George De La Paz, 17, whose single mother works as a house cleaner.

    Asian parents are more likely to pressure their children to excel academically, the students agreed.

    "They only start paying attention if I don't do well," said Karen Chu, 15, whose parents emigrated from Vietnam. "They don't reward me for getting straight A's. I don't get anything for that. But if I get a B, they're like, 'What's this?' "

    If her grades slipped, she said, her parents laid on the guilt extra thick. "My parents are always like, 'If you don't do well in school, then it's all going to be worth nothing,' " Karen said, laughing nervously.

    Julie Loc, the daughter of a seamstress and a produce-truck driver, said that if she gets a B, her parents ask whether she needs tutoring. She said her father used to compare her to other people's children, noting their hard course loads or saying, "They have a 4.3 [grade-point average]. Why do you only have a 4.0?' "

    Julie said her mother, Kin Ho, finally told her father to stop making comparisons. Ho, in an interview, said with a slightly embarrassed smile, "My daughter has embraced American culture, where she expects my reassurance and approval. Our children, if they did something well, they would ask us if we were proud of them, if they did good. They ask if we love them."

    George said his mother, a Mexican immigrant, has high expectations for him too, but she is not so white-knuckled when it comes to school. She wants him to do well -- he's now thinking of college -- but the field of endeavor is up to him.

    "She said, 'I came here to do better for you,' " he said. "But that's about it. Being happy and getting by, that's what she wants."

    For Carlos Garcia, the one with the knack for math, the message from his parents was to focus on school. Neither got to finish grade school in their native countries.

    His mother, Maribel, from El Salvador, is a homemaker; his father, Santos, a Mexican immigrant, is a drywall finisher who once took Carlos and his older brother to work with him -- to scare them away from manual labor. Two of their children have college degrees, one is still in college and Carlos, the only Latino on Lincoln's Academic Decathlon team, wants to attend Caltech.

    Ericka Saracho, 16, an A student, said her Latino family did not push her to do well in school. When she got a rare B, "they're like, 'Oh, wow, Ericka finally got a B! How do you feel about that?' " she said. She is one of the few Latina students on Lincoln's Science Bowl team.

    The students talked not just about parental expectations, but also about those of peers. Karen drew laughter when she said of other students, "They expect me to be smart. Even if, like, I do everything wrong on purpose, they still copy off of me -- as if I'm right just because I'm Asian."

    She said expectations came into play in an even odder way in Lincoln High's hallways.

    "In our school we have tardy sweeps, and normally the staff members let the Asians go," Karen said. "They don't really care if we're late."

    The group, nodding, erupted into laughter. "They don't even ask them for a pass sometimes," George added.

    "Generally speaking -- like it's stereotypical that Asians all do better -- I also think there's a stereotypical view that Asians are usually late," Julie said. "They'll come to school late, but they'll get to class and do their work."

    This drew more laughter.

    Many factors influence academic performance: class size, poverty, and school and neighborhood resources. But as the discussions at Lincoln show, expectations loom large.

    Fidel Nava, a coordinator for English learners at Lincoln, said some Latino students say that Asians get higher grades simply because, well, they're Asian.

    "In a sense, they have come to believe that it's OK for Asians to be smart and not for Hispanics," said Nava, who immigrated from Mexico at 14.

    Nava, the only one of six siblings to go to college, said he was once like many of his students. His parents wanted the children to finish high school, but there also was an expectation that they get jobs and help the family.

    "A lot of my relatives don't see my job as a stressful job at all," Nava said. "If I tell them I'm tired, they say, 'Why? You're not doing any labor. You're not doing anything.' "

    Rocio Chavez, 18, said that even though her older sister graduated from high school, their mother didn't really expect her to go to college.

    "I guess she didn't expect that from me, either," Rocio said. "And now that I'm going to move on to college, she's kind of scared. She gets kind of sad I'm leaving. She's like, 'You're supposed to graduate from high school, go to work and help me out.' "

    Frank D. Bean, a professor of sociology at UC Irvine's Center for Research on Immigration, Population and Public Policy, has studied the Mexican work ethic and found that work and education occupy the same pedestal, and in some cases, work is even more valued.

    Bean said his research shows that children of Latino immigrants, if they drop out of school, are more likely to be working than most other students who leave school.

    "In Latino families, being able to work to provide defines your manhood, your worthiness," said Min Zhou, a UCLA sociology professor who has studied working-class Korean and Chinese communities.

    Latino and Asian families in Lincoln Heights were essentially in the same socioeconomic boat, she said, but Asian immigrants were more likely to have been more affluent and had better education opportunities in their native countries.

    Of course, there are exceptions to stereotypes at Lincoln. "My mom just wants me to pass," said Thin Lam, 17.

    But Thin said counselors assumed he wanted to take a slew of AP classes, and a counselor urged him to take AP calculus.

    "I said, 'Yeah, sure, I want to take it,' " he said. "In the end, I dropped it."

    A few hours after the eight students concluded their discussion, some teachers gathered in Principal James Molina's office.

    "I feel a little bit uncomfortable talking about racial and ethnic generalizations," said Cynthia High, a 20-year teaching veteran now in charge of teachers' aides and other programs.

    "In some situations, it sparks a good conversation. In others, it's more taboo-ish to talk about it," said William Olmedo, who teaches AP physics.

    Barbara Paulson, who coordinates Lincoln's magnet program and teaches AP biology, said it had been understood for a long time that teachers needed to try harder to recruit Latino students for AP classes because "the Asian kids come on in droves."

    Gilbert Martinez, who teaches AP government, said he didn't think the school did as good a job as it could to raise expectations among Latino students and to get them into AP classes.

    "But I do," Paulson said.

    "I'm not saying you, Barbara. I'm saying all over."

    Olmedo said many capable Latino students refused to take AP classes or join other academically rigorous activities.

    Teachers said they were saddened by self-defeating attitudes.

    "I think the thing I always hear from the Latino kids is, 'Oh, well, Miss, he's Asian, she's Asian. Of course they do well,' " said Alli Lauer, who teaches English. "It's frustrating to hear them do it to each other."

    But as one student said in a separate interview, many Latino students are responding to cues. Johana Najera, 17, said the Academic Decathlon offers a not-so-subtle cue about who belongs.

    "We already know that it's Asian, and they kind of market it more for Asians," Najera said. She noted that the shirts for the Academic Decathlon team have a logo done in the style of anime, Japanese animation. "It appeals more to Asian students," she said.

    Martinez turned the conversation toward parents' attitudes, summarizing a discussion from one of his Chicano studies classes.

    "Let's say a Latino student is studying and an Asian student is studying," Martinez said. "The Latino parent will often say, 'Hey, come help me out real quick, then you can go back to your studying.' Where the Asian parent will say, 'Oh, you're doing your homework. OK, you finish, and then after you're done, you come help me.' "

    High recalled a good Latino student she had a few years ago. He also was a gang member.

    "He would wear baggy pants, and he would load up his pants with books," she said. "He looked around to make sure no one was seeing him so he could look like the baddest kid in the block."

    The teachers were then asked about tardy sweeps, the topic the students had found so amusing. Was it true that Asians could wander outside class without a hall pass?

    "My Asian kids laugh at that," Olmedo said. "I say, 'Take the pass.' They say, 'I'm Asian. Who's going to ask an Asian student for a pass?' "

    "Oh, you're kidding!" High said with a gasp.

    "I'll send one of my [Latino] boys out just to get water, and here comes the security, 'Please make sure you send him out with a pass,' and I'll say I will," Olmedo continued. "And the Asian kid will walk around the whole campus, the whole day, the whole week, for a whole month!"

    Don Brewer, an English teacher, said some Latino students were allowed to slide by without hall passes, including athletes and others involved in school activities.

    "But you know," Brewer said, "when you're looking down the hall and you see that one kid pop out, you go, 'OK, he's Asian. I can go back in.' You know, I think that happens. It's obvious it happens."

    High shook her head. "But I must say I don't feel comfortable with that. And if we're doing that, that's not OK. That's just not OK."

    "Oh, it's happening," Olmedo said. "It's happening."

     

    UPDATE from the LA Times Homeroom blog:

    The Homeroom

    Opening the conversation on achievement gap

    July 17, 2008 — Writing about anything dealing with race, ethnicity or cultural differences is like a big Rorshach test. Everyone sees something different. I got a lot of e-mails about the story about ethnic achievement gaps, and most said they thought it was good that it ran in The Times.

    Some e-mailers said the story should have delved into genetics and IQ. A few questioned why I would write such a story, saying it reinforced stereotypes.

    But most e-mailers were thoughtful, even if they wondered why I didn’t delve into other issues. One wrote that Asians “outperform the rest of us” not just because of expectations, but because of their “willingness and ability to delay gratification.”

    That issue came up during my reporting, but I had limited space for the story. Most of the time, it was Latino parents who brought it up.

    Antonia Hernandez, 46, said that from when her children were very young, she noticed that the Asian children seemed to wear less expensive clothing than the Latino children.

    “I see the Chinese children with cheap tennis shoes, even Payless, and our kids, they want the best sneakers,” Hernandez said. “They say, ‘How am I going to wear those cheap shoes?’ It’s different priorities.”

    I met Hernandez at a meeting at Lincoln High for the parents of students failing algebra, a graduation requirement. She listened nervously as math teachers spoke, worried about her 14-year-old son, Gabriel. She told me she tried to stress to him the importance of education, but that he just wanted to be done with school so he could work.

    But Hernandez said it wasn’t easy. Her own father had pulled her from school back in her central Mexican town just after the second grade. She had dreamed of becoming a chef and owning a restaurant. Her father wanted her to work.

    “I missed a lot. If he let me go to school, I wouldn’t have married so young,” she said sadly. “When I was little, I imagined so many things. I’d have a nice job, a big house for my parents. I would have liked to have gone to school longer, but I didn’t get that opportunity.”

    One Chinese American Lincoln High alumna said she liked the story, but felt I did not give enough credit to the Asian students’ “personal drive/pride.”

    “My parents expected me to do well, but much of that ‘push’ to succeed wasn’t parent-directed, it was personally-directed,” she said.

    I figured it went without saying that many Asian students — as well as Latino students or any other student — had great personal drive to excel.

    A couple of e-mailers and one caller asked how I could ignore blacks. I explained that Lincoln High had an extremely small number of black students. I heard from a good number of educators, or retired teachers. Few disputed what students at Lincoln High said. But some said more blame should have been placed at the feet of the academic institutions.

    “Your article brushed the surface of the school’s role in this perpetuation, while placing most of the blame on family and peer expectations,” wrote one teacher. “I believe the school is more influential than your article suggests.”

    But the story wasn’t really about laying blame. It wasn’t an analysis or a survey. It was, in the end, really just a snapshot. It was certainly not a definitive piece on such a complex issue. I basically chose to take an angle I thought was not often broached.

    Lincoln High Principal James Molina and Assistant Principal Howard Yao were receptive from the get-go. I can’t imagine they saw a personal upside in tackling such a sensitive issue, but they didn’t shy away from it. Molina, who just retired, could relate to many of his Latino students.

    His parents did not push him to go to college. As long as he worked, that was fine by them, he said. After he graduated from high school — Lincoln High no less — he joined the Marines and was shipped off to Vietnam.

    Yao said his parents pressured him hard. One day, he told me that it was something he came to resent in his early 20s. Maybe he would have had a happier youth had his parents laid off of him a bit, he said with a wry smile.

    The two administrators said the achievement gap between Latino and Asian students defied easy solutions. They acknowledged there were a lot of reasons for it, but differing expectations was clearly a major one, they agreed. The school even had classes which had in effect become regarded as either “Asian” or “Latino” classes.

    There were many exceptions. There were mediocre Asian students as well as elite Latino students. But students and teachers agreed that there was a more cohesive, academically driven culture among Asians than Latinos.

    Patricia Garcia, 18, said Asian students were more competitive over grades — most often with one another. “It’s like a competition we don’t have,” she said. “We don’t compete like that.”

    That wasn’t always true. Carlos Garcia, 17, the lone Latino on last year’s Academic Decathlon team, was extremely competitive. Since the ninth grade, when he really began to focus on school, Carlos’ friends increasingly became Asian. He was even elected president of the Asia Club.

    On a few occasions, some of the students I talked to struggled to hide emotions. When I asked Karen Chu, 15, whether her parents ever gave her a proverbial pat on the back for acing her classes, her voice cracked. She explained that they only really noticed if she did not get all A's. Ericka Saracho, 16, one of the few Latinas on the Science Bowl team, patted Karen on the back consolingly.

    I tried to put a positive spin on it, telling Karen that maybe it was a great compliment — that her parents had such lofty expectations for her.

    “I don’t see it that way,” she said flatly.

    In the end, I wrote the story as a kind of primer. It’s far from definitive, as e-mailers have well reminded me. It shouldn’t be the end of the discussion. I don’t see an upside to eschewing issues like these, no matter how uncomfortable. And you never know, maybe we can all learn a little something in the end.

    -- Hector Becerra

     

    Posted by Mary Macvean on July 17, 2008 in Education , High school , Students | Permalink

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/816965/31344910

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Opening the conversation on achievement gap:

    Comments

    Congratulations. You're breaking new ground. How are we going to reduce the achievement gap between the cultures, without first trying to figure out why there is this gap. I remember in a public meeting in Oakland California someone asking the then Mayor Jerry Brown why don;t we have more programs to stop the drug trade, the murders, the failure. He quoted then the incredibly low numbers of African American students taking academic (college prep.) classes, and the huge percentage of high school drop-outs in that same group, and then he said, what else are they qualified to do in this society but sell drugs and take drugs.

    Posted by: roy krausen | July 17, 2008 at 06:37 PM

    Parents, teachers and students have to have high expectations. At the school where I teach, there is an expectation gap from some in admin, and a counselor and a couple teachers have brought it up, but it's tough to change people. It has to start with the parents, though, when the children are very small.

    Posted by: Carol | July 17, 2008 at 07:47 PM

    It’s probably true that self-direction is more important then parents pushing children into higher academic achievement. In my own case my sister achieved academically and career wise because of her self inspired personal drive while I did poorly because I got sucked into immediate gratification of drug culture of the ‘70’s.

    Posted by: Jerry Martinez | July 17, 2008 at 09:30 PM

    I am a Sansei, third generation Japanese American. My father was a lot like Karen Chu's parents. When asked why my father always criticized rather than praised he replied that we know when we do well and that we need to be pushed to do better in the things that we do not excel. Of course anythng less than an A was not doing well.

    Posted by: Helen Keelan | July 17, 2008 at 10:00 PM

    Are you comparing Asian Kids and Hispanic kids from the same neighborhood or just Asian and Hispanic kids in general.
    Hispanic kids are at a disadvantage due to several reasons:

    1) Single parents-
    2) Gang Infested areas, some may live with gangs within their families.
    3) how does economics play a part in the childs education.
    4) Go to Cal Poly Pomona and conduct the same study
    at the college of engineering. You will find that when you do a fair comparison Hispanics outnumber and outperform Asian children on a level playfield.

    Posted by: Fernando | July 17, 2008 at 10:04 PM

    It's interesting that some people tried to censor this topic.

    Posted by: Schimpff | July 18, 2008 at 01:56 AM

    Being of Asian origin and of second generation Taiwanese, I can attest to the relentless pressure to succeed from family and also from Asian peers.

    When I get asked the same question, I have a very simple response: Asians don't see any choice in life if they fail academically.

    There is no Asian role model in popular culture (i.e. in North America), and that is a strong motivator for Asian parents to push their kids towards academic success. The message is subtle but stark: fail in academia, and you end up with no other viable way to succes.

    Interestingly, the same kind of Asian stereotype exists in South American societies. There, like North America, the only real path to success is through a college education. Latin America may have produced a Japanese-Peruvian president, but up to today, that is the only public Asian figure and may very well be an anomaly.

    Posted by: mtlyorel | July 18, 2008 at 02:46 AM

    What are you talking about? I go to Cal Poly as a Mechanical Enineering major and 80% of the people in there are asian and they are usually the top 5%.

    Posted by: Steve | July 18, 2008 at 12:50 PM

     

    The news that doesn't fit from July 20th

    Video - WHAT IS RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION: Dr. Judy Elliott      Dr. Elliot is the Chief Academic Officer of LAUSD

    JUDGE BLOCKS CONSTRUCTION OF ECHO PARK SCHOOL: L.A. Unified submitted a flawed environmental impact report, ruling says. District must now consider other sides and gather community opinion.

    TEACHERS TO LEARN SIGNS OF SUICIDE The governor signed into law today a measure that would allow teachers to get up to two hours of suicide prevention training. The Jason Flatt Act, SB 1378, authorizes school districts to use some of their Professional Development Block Grant funding to pay for the training.

    WHAT TO DO ABOUT DROPOUTS: State statistics should boost efforts to reduce the number of students who quit before graduation.                It wasn't true, what the critics said about half the students in Los Angeles Unified School District dropping out. One in three do. The first state database to count dropouts in a more realistic way revealed this week that although the district's numbers weren't as bad as feared, neither were they statistics to inspire a happy dance. L.A. Unified is finally taking meaningful measures to keep kids in school, a formidable task. But how did we get to this place?

    DROP-DEAD DROPOUT NUMBERS: One-third of all L.A. Unified students don't finish high school — where's the civic outrage?          We've all become so inured to the unending stream of dreary and dispiriting news produced by the Los Angeles Unified School District that Thursday's horrific report on the high-school dropout rate came and went with barely a civic whimper.

    ARNOLD TERMINATES EDUCATION BUDGET   Arnold Schwarzenegger is back as the Terminator once more. It's not in a feature film this time but as the trigger of impending budget cuts in California education.

    GAS PRICES AND LAUSD   In a year the amount of money LAUSD has spent on fuel for its 1300 busses, 400 other vehicles and gas-operated machines has increased from $9.85 million for the 2006 -2007 school year to $12.4 million in 2007-2008 for the school year,

    ULTIMATE COLLECTOR: Eli Broad wields his vast fortune like a blunt instrument—buying art, hiring architects, and shaping L.A. through a mix of civic vision and force of will. The Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) has long been notorious for stalled construction and indecisive leadership. When its old headquarters on Grand Avenue became the proposed site for a new high school, Broad stepped in and spent much of 2002 holding backroom meetings to convince the district to scrap a complete (and admittedly unexciting) plan by AC Martin Partners and to build a Fame-style performing-arts academy by Wolf Prix of Coop Himmelb(l)au.

    STATE SCHOOL DROPOUT RATE CAUSE FOR CONCERN   "Not good news," says California's Superintendent of Public Instruction. That, after he revealed that nearly a quarter of all public high school students in the state dropped out last year.

    RIGHTING RODRIGUEZ: IMPLICATIONS FOR ADVANCING A FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO EDUCATION   Lynn Huntley, President of the Southern Education Foundation, introduced the topic by making the case for a U.S. Constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right to a quality education for all children. The idea for such an amendment is not new. Representative Jesse Jackson, Jr. introduced a bill in Congress five years ago to guarantee students such a right. Jackson’s efforts have not gained much traction, although, according to Huntley, his ideas have broad public support.

    SCHOOL BOARD RESOLUTION AND CAMPAIGN BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLES QUALITY PHYSICAL EDUCATION FOR ALL   Thirty seven school districts throughout California including LAUSD did not enforce physical education requirements in 2006.

    SWITCHING BAD VARIABLE RATE DEBT: LAUSD Refunding Ambac-Backed Certificates of Participation   The Los Angeles Unified School District plans to refund $120.9 million of Ambac Assurance Corp.-insured variable-rate demand obligations early next month after seeing rates on the debt surge to as much as 10% after the insurer's credit ratings were cut.

    CITY READIES A 'BEAUTIFUL 'VISTA' : Park on Long-Troubled Belmont Learning Center Site to Open This Week This week, City West will get a lot greener with the debut of a 10-acre park. If some people thought it might never arrive, that's understandable: It is opening on a notorious site where construction first began a decade ago.

    Saturday, July 19, 2008

    Video - WHAT IS RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION: Dr. Judy Elliott

     

    Dr. Elliot is the Chief Academic Officer of LAUSD

    YouTube - What is RTI: Judy Elliott

    JUDGE BLOCKS CONSTRUCTION OF ECHO PARK SCHOOL: L.A. Unified submitted a flawed environmental impact report, ruling says. District must now consider other sides and gather community opinion.

    By Evelyn Larrubia | Los Angeles Times Staff Writer


    July 19, 2008 — A Los Angeles County Superior Court judge on Friday halted construction of an Echo Park elementary school, saying that the Los Angeles Unified School District acted in bad faith by putting together a shoddy environmental review.

    Judge John A. Torribio's decision to nullify the district's review is a major setback.

    The district will have to consider other sites and gather community opinions before moving forward. That could take months and delay opening of the $60-million school, which was expected in 2010.

    School district officials are considering an appeal, district associate general counsel Michelle Meghrouni said.

    "We are comfortable that we complied" with the law," she said. She added that district demographers insist the school is still needed, despite plummeting enrollment at nearby campuses.

    Friday's decision marks the second time that the Right Site Coalition, a small community group on a shoestring budget, has beaten L.A. Unified. Christine Peters, head of the opposition, said she was almost too tired to cheer.

    "I just feel like Sisyphus pushing the rock up the hill," said Peters, who has financed a significant portion of the fight, once charging $6,000 on her credit card for a district report. The $50,000 her group has raised through garage sales, silent auctions and $100 individual contributions has not been enough to cover the costs.

    For four years, Peters and others have argued against the proposed site on Alvarado Boulevard, complaining that it would displace dozens of low-income residents during a period of gentrification.

    Board members were not swayed and moved forward with the 875-seat school.

    The group sued, saying that the district's fast-track environmental study was inadequate. Undeterred, the district bought the homes and businesses on the site while defending itself against the lawsuit, which it lost in December 2006. Superior Court Judge Daniel S. Pratt ordered the school system to complete a full environmental impact report to address safety and traffic concerns, including the question of whether a planned street closure next to a fire station would delay emergency response.

    The district produced a longer report and the Board of Education approved it. L.A. Unified hired a firm to bulldoze the homes and businesses on the 3.3-acre site.

    Again, Peters' group sued and the project was put on hold. The group lost that suit but an appeals court reversed that decision and sent it back to trial.

    Pasadena lawyer Robert P. Silverstein has been litigating the case pro bono (the district appealed an earlier court decision to award Silverstein attorney fees). He called the district's environmental report "a bogus document to give them cover for an illegal decision they had already made."

    In court papers, he accused the school system of failing to address the project's effects on low-income housing or seriously consider other sites, principally the LAPD's former Rampart station. In addition, he said, the agency kept changing the project's attendance boundaries, making its pedestrian safety and traffic analyses out of date before the project was even built.

    Among the schools the district initially said it needed to relieve was nearby Rosemont Elementary, which ran on a year-round system to accommodate its 1,500 students. But last fall, the school returned to a traditional September-June schedule amid an enrollment decline of 536 students. The district has changed the schools that the new campus would relieve.

    On Friday, Torribio agreed with Silverstein's criticisms.

    "The writ is granted in its entirety," the judge wrote in a tentative ruling, which he made final at Friday's hearing in Norwalk. "The district did not act in good faith. . . . "

     

    smf: This much is clear: The Right Site Coalition would have the public believe that this is a triumph of scrappy the little guy over the giant heartless juggernaut. They have so convinced a judge.

    In truth the Echo Park Community wants and needs this school and it wants it where the District proposes to build it. There have been countless meetings and contentious neighborhood council elections over this issue. The RSC has lost the fight in their own community - so now this small group of property owners are arguing the adminsitrivia of environmental law (this is not about saving whales or or preventing global warming - this is about protecting an endangered NIMBY special interest).

    The argument that the vacant land amounts to blight is spurious; the residents have already been displaced - there would be a school on the site already if the RSC hadn't stood in the way!  The argument that the demographic projections and attendance zone of the proposed school change is bizarre — the population of every neighborhood is dynamic, attendance areas shift to meet the need.

    If the District did a shoddy job on the EIR then the shoddy EIR adults should be held accountable - shoddy is inexcusable -  but instead the kids of Echo Park are paying in overcrowded facilities.

    Los Angeles Times: Judge halts construction of Echo Park school

    TEACHERS TO LEARN SIGNS OF SUICIDE

    Mary MacVean | LA Times Homeroom Blog

    July 18, 2008 - The governor signed into law today a measure that would allow teachers to get up to two hours of suicide prevention training.

    The Jason Flatt Act, SB 1378, authorizes school districts to use some of their Professional Development Block Grant funding to pay for the training.

    According to the bill, by Sen. Robert Dutton (R-Rancho Cucamonga), suicide is the third-leading cause of death for young people 15 to 24.

    “It’s my sincere hope other states will follow our lead in helping ensure teachers across the nation are trained to recognize the warning signs of youth suicide,”  Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said in a statement.

    The bill is named for Jason Flatt, who committed suicide at age 16.

    --

    smf 2¢ : In a recent stint as "principal-for-a-day" at an inner city elementary school the real principal shared with me a file of suicide notes and suicide related writings from 6 - 12 year olds - this is a very real problem. It would be better if the legislation above used the word "requires" instead of "authorize" and "allow" - but legislation that actually calls for money rather than good intentions to be invested doesn't get the governor's signature. Hopefully the bill that puts it right isn't named for another child suicide victim.

    Teachers to learn signs of suicide | The Homeroom | Los Angeles Times

    MAYOR, CHARTER SCHOOLS FAVOR NEW SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND AIMED AT HELPING CHARTERS + VILLARAIGOSA PUSHES SCHOOL BONDS

    NEW SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND AIMED AT HELPING CHARTERS

    By Kerry Cavanaugh and George B. Sanchez, Staff Writers | LA Daily News

    July 19, 2008 - Amid concerns that voters may hesitate to approve a fifth multibillion-dollar school construction bond in a decade, Los Angeles Unified officials and Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa have crafted a proposal to woo the public with promises to fund charter schools and small learning communities.

    At a hastily called news conference Friday afternoon, Villaraigosa and LAUSD leaders provided few details of the proposed bond measure but said a portion would be dedicated to developing charter schools and breaking up behemoth public schools into independent, mini-campuses.

    "This is not about slapping another coat of paint on a problem," Villaraigosa said. "This reform-minded bond will create smaller, independent schools rooted in community and free from downtown bureaucracy."

    The mayor and school-district leaders would not say how much money would be sought - or how it would be spent. LAUSD officials had discussed a $3.2 billion figure this spring, but Villaraigosa would only say it would be a significant, multibillion-dollar bond.

    Villaraigosa's office has survey research that indicates voters would support a school-bond of up to $10 billion on the November ballot, according to a source briefed on the research.

    The president of the California Charter Schools Association said she supports a bond but is apprehensive because she has not yet seen details in writing. She wants $320 million for charters.

    A draft of a proposed 2008 $3.2billion bond measure sets aside $150million for charter schools.

    "We're supportive of a $3.2billion bond as long as there is a fair share for charter schools," said association President Caprice Young.

    "We consider a fair share 10percent of the bond."

    While LAUSD officials have pitched the need for another school-construction bond, the district has not appeared to have strong support among civic leaders for a new measure.

    And at least two board members said Friday that talk of a bond and how funds would be divided is preliminary.

    "I haven't seen any specifics or numbers," said board member Tamar Galatzan.

    Board member Julie Korenstein said while there have been discussions of funding for school modernization and construction, there has been no decision on a bond, its total or how it might be divided.

    "This board of education has not yet taken a position," she said.

    Korenstein was adamant that the Friday news conference was not an LAUSD event and even though board President M nica Garc a attended she was not representing the district.

    At the news conference, officials said the proposed bond measure would be discussed at a Tuesday board meeting. However, the board meeting has been canceled.

    Voters have already approved four construction bonds for the LAUSD totaling $13.5 billion over the past 11 years.

    Voters in November already are being asked to approve $17billion in state bond measures, a $36 per-year parcel tax for Los Angeles residents to fund gang-prevention programs, and possibly a half-percent sales-tax increase in Los Angeles County to pay for transportation.

    Kris Vosburgh, executive director of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, immediately assailed the announcement.

    "This is buffoonery of the highest order," he said. "This would make five bonds in 11 years. Taxpayers are already on the hook for $20 billion including interest."

    But Villaraigosa said he is willing to sign on to a bond that dedicates money for small-learning-community construction.

    "I need to see a commitment that as we build we're going to build smaller, smarter, more successful schools," he said.

    Billionaire philanthropist and LAUSD reformer Eli Broad announced Friday that he also would back a bond that dedicates money for small, independent schools.

    Broad donated $23 million earlier this year to help open 17 new charter schools through three organizations, including the Knowledge Is Power Program for school development.

    Still, LAUSD Superintendent David Brewer III stressed that a large portion of the bond would go toward maintenance of existing schools.

    "Clearly about 40 percent of this bond will be used to continue to modernize and refurbish all of the schools that need it," Brewer said.

    "Even though we've built new schools and we've done some modernization, the need is horrendous."

    The previous LAUSD bonds raised $13.5 billion and state matching funds provided $6.5billion for new school construction to relieve overcrowding.

    The district so far has allocated $12.3 billion for construction of 132 new schools, 65 campus additions and about 160,000 new classroom seats.

    Half of the work is completed and the rest is on schedule to be done by 2012 - when the district is expected to reach its goal of having all schools on a two-semester calendar.

    But the average age of the district's 800 schools is 45 years and the district has received about $7 billion in voter-approved funding for modernization.

     

    VILLARAIGOSA PUSHES SCHOOL BONDS: Mayor works with charter-school advocates to get measure on ballot.

     

    By Howard Blume, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer


    July 19, 2008  - Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa teamed up with charter school advocates Friday in Boyle Heights to pressure school board members and district officials to put a multibillion-dollar school bond on the November ballot -- and to include at least $300 million for charter schools.

    Though not present, billionaire philanthropist Eli Broad and former Mayor Richard Riordan have added their support -- and political weight -- to the anticipated bond, which would include more local dollars than ever for charters.

    "Today we're putting the muscle behind the reform movement to break down our system into schools that work for all of our kids," Villaraigosa said at Roosevelt High School, defining such campuses as the "small, safe and independent community schools our students so desperately need here in the city."

    The bond also would include money to repair and modernize existing schools, upgrade their safety systems and build traditional campuses.

    The event's hasty scheduling -- even L.A. schools Supt. David L. Brewer had to adjust his schedule to attend -- was the latest strategic turn in a drama that has occurred mostly behind closed doors. Most of the jousting has been over how much money would go to charter schools, which are independently managed public schools free from some state regulations.

    The charter community, led by former school board member Caprice Young, wanted no less than $300 million, or about 10% of the proposed $3.2-billion bond. But that level of support met with resistance from some board members of the Los Angeles Unified School District.

    The board was to vote on the bond at its Tuesday meeting, but late Friday, officials postponed the item until July 31. Five of the seven board members must approve placing the measure on the November ballot by Aug. 8.

    Before the news conference, Young, who now heads the California Charter Schools Assn., said in an interview that she remained dissatisfied with how the dollars are divvied up.

    Senior district administrators want to set aside $150 million for charters, according to a district report. Another $150 million would go to "educational partners to operate schools" that work within the system.

    In other words, equal dollars would support reforms in district-controlled schools. The bond negotiations, in effect, have became another battlefront over who will control the path of reform in L.A. Unified.

    Like Young, Broad, who funds reform efforts around the country, has concluded that charter schools are the best path in Los Angeles. In their view, the more removed they can make the L.A. Unified bureaucracy, the better. This goal also matches up with Broad's personal commitment to help fund new schools started by the more successful charter school organizations, which will need campuses.

    Whatever emerges is also likely to help the 10 low-performing schools (none of them charters) now operating under the mayor's purview.

    In private discussions, Young has sought an undiluted $300 million for charters.

    At one point, she threatened to lead the charter community in an anti-bond campaign if it contained anything less.

    But the goal Friday was simply to call for the bond, implicitly bring district officials in line and presage the campaign pitch to come.

    Villaraigosa said he spent 10 hours on the phone over the last three days with civic and labor leaders and district officials, including Brewer, to promote the bond and take part in negotiations.

    WHAT TO DO ABOUT DROPOUTS: State statistics should boost efforts to reduce the number of students who quit before graduation.

    Editorial From the Los Angeles Times

    July 19, 2008 - It wasn't true, what the critics said about half the students in Los Angeles Unified School District dropping out. One in three do. The first state database to count dropouts in a more realistic way revealed this week that although the district's numbers weren't as bad as feared, neither were they statistics to inspire a happy dance.

    L.A. Unified is finally taking meaningful measures to keep kids in school, a formidable task. But how did we get to this place? By ignoring our dropouts with great thoroughness for many years and even by covering up their existence. If researchers questioned the high numbers of youngsters leaving inner-city schools, district administrators would respond that this mostly reflected families who had moved away.

    The district does in fact have an alarmingly high mobility rate -- each year, 27% of its students move -- but until this week there was no regular system in place to track where the missing had gone. It didn't help that both the state and federal departments of education paid most of their attention to test scores and very little to dropout rates. In fact, a school could look better under the No Child Left Behind Act by having its low achievers leave.

    As a result, dropout rates at some Los Angeles schools don't just reach half, they go beyond. Nearly 60% of the students at Jefferson High leave without diplomas. But L.A. Unified is hardly the only district in the county where dropout rates exceed the statewide number of 24.2%. The new database lists Inglewood Unified as having a 43.9% dropout rate, Compton Unified at 43.3% and Lynwood Unified at a whopping 49.5%.

    Throughout California, black and Latino youngsters have higher dropout rates, and that's reflected in L.A. Unified as well, where 35.4% of Latinos and 40.2% of African Americans fail to earn diplomas. Numbers like that lead to such false excuses as, "Well, what can you expect from inner-city schools? Those poor, minority kids just can't or won't do the work."

    Then what to make of Santa Ana Unified, where 92% of the students are Latino, many of them from impoverished families, yet the dropout rate is 9.1%? It's worth noting that, in L.A. Unified, the dropout rate for white students is more than twice that high.

    There's no big mystery to why kids drop out. They fall behind in their studies to the point where catching up seems hopeless. They feel stupid, and even dropping out seems better than being reminded daily of their stupidity. Their schools are chaotic, even dangerous. They fall into a habit of truancy that no one helps them break. They are lured by gangs or are overwhelmed by financial and personal problems.

    Under Supt. David L. Brewer, Los Angeles schools had begun contacting apparent dropouts, trying to coax them back into the classroom. Now, Senior Deputy Supt. Ramon C. Cortines is mapping a more comprehensive intervention. Schools would receive financial incentives for raising attendance -- something the district could afford because it gets more money from the state for each day students are in class. By the end of the first grading period, ninth-grade teachers would have to report on failing students and provide an immediate remediation plan. Schools themselves would get regular report cards based not only on their test scores but on such factors as whether students feel safe.

    Most important, the state each year will reveal and refine the dropout data. Just as the No Child Left Behind Act led to major reforms in urban education, so should putting these bleak numbers before the public eye.

    Los Angeles Times: What to do about dropouts

    DROP-DEAD DROPOUT NUMBERS: One-third of all L.A. Unified students don't finish high school — where's the civic outrage? + a parent chimes in

      L.A. Times columnist Tim Rutten

    July 19, 2008 - We've all become so inured to the unending stream of dreary and dispiriting news produced by the Los Angeles Unified School District that Thursday's horrific report on the high-school dropout rate came and went with barely a civic whimper.

    The statewide numbers were stunning; the figures for Los Angeles were tragic. According to the California Department of Education, one in every four of the state's students fails to finish high school. In the LAUSD -- which is supposed to educate 10% of all California's school-age children -- a third of all students drop out.

    Those figures are even more distressing when you break them down racially and ethnically: More than 40% of the LAUSD's black students will not complete high school, and 35.4% of the Latinos will drop out. (Currently, 73% of LAUSD's nearly 700,000 students are Latino; 11% are African American; 9% are white; and 4% are Asian.)

    But there's failure enough for everyone. According to the new numbers, whites and Asians also drop out at double-digit rates -- 20.1% and 13.4%, respectively.

    Now, it's probably true that the LAUSD deserves to be ranked among the American republic's most incompetent public agencies. The people who run it might as well have learned their managerial skills at the Myanmar generals' military staff college. It's hard to know which of the multiple examples of their failure deserves to be designated "Exhibit A" in the case for their fecklessness, but somehow the fact that these are state numbers stands out. That's because the LAUSD has never been able to develop a reliable way of its own to keep track of how many students actually graduate.

    You would think that a group of people charged with managing a budget of nearly $20 billion for the nation's second-largest school district might have a kind of rudimentary interest in whether they're succeeding or failing -- or, perhaps, a simple intellectual curiosity about what was occurring in the world around them. Not this bunch. The philosophical category "invincibly ignorant" might as well have been created to describe them.

    The only reason these dropout numbers exist at all is that embarrassing studies by civil rights groups and pressure from pro-school-voucher organizations shamed the state into passing a law that assigns each student a number when he or she enters school, allowing the Department of Education to track pupils' progress.

    Those same groups, however, still suspect that California and, particularly, the LAUSD may be understating the problem drastically, in part because the new system relies on self-reporting by school officials. (Imagine asking that of the LAUSD, which can't even calculate its employees' paychecks with any reliability.)

    In an economy that increasingly rewards participation in knowledge-based industries, failure to graduate from high school is a virtual guarantor of perpetual helotry. But that's exactly the role the LAUSD is content to assign tens of thousands of black and Latino young people, year after year.

    Every June, according to a study conducted last year, California's failing schools add another 120,000 dropouts to a statewide workforce whose unemployment rate is now just under 7%. Over their working lives, each dropout will earn about $290,000 less than their classmates who graduated and, therefore, will pay $100,000 less in federal, state and local taxes.

    Nor is that the end of the social cost of our schools' dereliction: A high school graduate is 20% less likely to commit a violent crime than a dropout, 11% less likely to commit a crime against property and 12% less likely to be arrested for breaking the drug laws.

    One of the few who did react to Thursday's numbers was Betty T. Yee -- former chief deputy director for budget of the California Department of Finance -- who pointed out that, over their lifetimes, each succeeding "class" of 120,000 dropouts will cost the state $46 billion because "they are more likely to be unemployed and pay no taxes, resort to criminal activity and rely on publicly funded programs for basic subsistence and healthcare. ... A high school graduate is 68% less likely to be on any public assistance program than a high school dropout." (By the way, $46 billion is 2.9% of California's annual gross state product.)

    If that's not enough to get somebody's attention, consider the current dropout rates at these Los Angeles high schools: Jefferson (58%), Belmont (56%), Locke (50.9%), Crenshaw (50%), Roosevelt (49.6%), Fremont (46%) and Jordan (43.7%).

    Does anybody really think it's an accident that these schools draw their students from the neighborhoods in which the city's gang problem is most serious and most intractable?

    There are a lot of failing marks to be passed out here, and they shouldn't go only to our children.

    david wyles, chair of the lausd cac responds;

    Dear Mr. Rutten,

    Your column was spot-on. But it's not only LAUSD that's at fault. It's the community, the families (even if single-parented), and the kids themselves. It's a tragic circle, one that can only be broken by deep civic support to alleviate poverty and by the individual efforts of dedicated parents and children.

    LAUSD has many faults, but it alone should not be singled out for the too many drop-outs. Many of these kids have no role models, many of their parents are absent or unemployed, many of them are subject to awful peer pressure (gangs, drugs, etc.).

    The school system should definitely keep better track of kids who drop out (for instance, some 60 per cent of future drop-outs can be reliably targeted by their attendance in third grade!). But ultimately, it is the community, the family, and the child himself who determines the drop-out rate.

    We can't blame all of our social ills on LAUSD.

    Sincerely,

    David Wyles

    P.S. I'm presently Chairman of the Community Advisory Committee of LAUSD, which represents the interests of the parents of the more than 82,000 children with special needs in the School District.

    Kids with learning disabilities are more likely to drop out and go to juvenile hall or prison than the general population, so they definitely need more attention from everybody -- and that includes LAUSD, the Mayor, and the Los Angeles Times.

    Los Angeles Times: Drop-dead dropout numbers

    Friday, July 18, 2008

    MAYOR SAYS DROPOUT REPORT IS WRONG

    By Rick Orlov & George B. Sanchez | Daily Breeze

    7/18/08 - Sharply disputing a state report, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa on Thursday said he believes the dropout rate at Los Angeles schools is even worse than the dismal 33 percent estimated by state officials.

    Villaraigosa, who previously used the dropout rate issue as leverage to take control of a handful of schools, said the new state figures released Wednesday did not take into account all relevant factors.

    For example, he said, the state report did not count students who dropped out before ninth grade.

    "I'm heartened they are highlighting the dropout issue but I know it is higher than they are saying," Villaraigosa said. "We know it's 50 to 60 percent and in some parts of the city 65 or 70 percent."

    State Superintendent Jack O'Connell on Wednesday released a report showing the dropout rate at districts throughout the state, trying to quell years of debate over the issue.

    O'Connell said Los Angeles Unified has a dropout rate of 33.6 percent, above the state average of 24.6 percent.

    The new report, which tracked students using a unique identification number, was heralded by education experts and local school officials as a new benchmark to measure dropout rates and end the debate over the accuracy of figures cited in the past.

    Deputy State Superintendent Rick Miller on Thursday stood by the results of the state's work.

    "This is not a study," Miller said. "Everything before this was a study. We looked at individual students by their ID number and reported on whether they were enrolled or not. If the mayor would look at our documentation, he would see what we did."

    LAUSD Senior Deputy Superintendent Ray Cortines did not dispute the state's report, even after hearing Villaraigosa's statement.

    Cortines said he shared the report with the mayor's staff Wednesday morning, hours before the report was publicly released, and heard no questions or concerns about the findings.

    The mayor issued a written statement on Wednesday afternoon that did not dispute the report's findings.

    But Villaraigosa said he is now convinced the figures are higher than the state determined.

    As evidence, Villaraigosa's staff cited reports by Education Week and Harvard University as well as his own experience in taking over 10 LAUSD schools.

    A 2006 study by Education Week estimated that only 44 percent of LAUSD students received a high school diploma.

    A joint study by UCLA and Harvard University released in 2005 stated only 48 percent of black and Latino students in LAUSD who start ninth grade complete grade 12 four years later.

    Cortines said the state's new tracking system is the first to generate agreement by local and state education officials as well as nonprofit groups and education experts.

    He acknowledged there are schools with dropout rates as high as those cited by the mayor.

    "In his schools, it is closer to 50 percent," Cortines said.

    At Roosevelt Senior High School in Boyle Heights, the adjusted dropout rate is 49.6 percent, according to the state, and at Santee Education Complex near downtown, the figure is 44.3 percent.

    "The issue should not be what the percentage is, but what we are going to do about it," Cortines said. "It'll take the city and school district working together, combining social services, law enforcement, gang reduction and everyone to deal with the problem."

    Villaraigosa said dropout rates are one of the factors he will look at with his partnership schools.

    "We are going to track the dropout rates and focus on what it takes to keep kids in school. Our goal is to graduate every student and see them go on to college."

    Villaraigosa took over control of the 10 schools on July 1. They are among the worst performing schools in the LAUSD.

     

    Hammering Hamlet: "Me thinks thou dost protest too much."  The mayor has a vested and special  interest in keeping this years dropout numbers high - he has inherited ten low performing schools and the statistical baseline from which they must improve has been raised. He really has nothing to complain about - the truth and the challenge remain - there is plenty of room for improvement. - smf

    Thursday, July 17, 2008

    ARNOLD TERMINATES EDUCATION BUDGET

     

    By: Jeremy Chen | Chaffey Breeze - the independent student newspaper of Chaffey College

    7/21/08- Arnold Schwarzenegger is back as the Terminator once more.

     image Media Credit: Jimmy Purcell

    It's not in a feature film this time but as the trigger of impending budget cuts in California education. His proposed budget is expected to hit education hard with a 10 percent reduction in funds. This includes community colleges like Chaffey, which has given students concern for the future.

    With Chaffey, $5 million in cuts may be offset through millions already set aside in reserves.

    Earl Davis, the Vice President of Business Services, gave the specifics of what will happen for the 2008-2009 school year. "The 2008-2009 budget has insured that we will not reduce access for our students to educational opportunities," Davis explained. "In fact, we will actually be offering additional sections in core classes." Good news for current and prospective students.

    This doesn't mean that cuts won't happen, but the repercussions of Schwarzenegger's cuts will be minimized, he said. At the moment, a hike in tuition doesn't seem to be an option under consideration.

    "Tuition is not going to go up," Davis said.

    "All the community colleges are being subjected to the cuts, but here [at Chaffey] we are utilizing a reserve fund that will significantly reduce any negative impact that might occur," Davis said. "The cuts that will occur though will be restricted to energy usage and other outside costs, such as non instructional expenses." The reserve fund comes from previous budgets in the past that required a certain percentage of surpluses be set-aside in reserves. This will allow Chaffey to bounce back effectively from $5 million worth of cuts.

    The recent cuts have been a result of the slumping economy. "Cuts to community colleges will only hurt the economy even more as people won't be allowed to access the education they possibly need to find a career path," Davis observed.

    The California Community College System- which includes Chaffey - is the largest higher educational system in the nation as it serves more than 2.6 million students annually. Chancellor Diane Woodruff, head of the state's community college system, has noted previously that a $525 million reduction facing the system would not allow them to serve 52,000 new students next year. It is the state's largest provider of workforce training, and would become compromised with the proposed budget cuts. Although Chaffey might not feel the brunt of the cuts, other community colleges likely will.

    The students of Chaffey College shouldn't worry about possibly having their class choices be limited by government bureaucracy, according to Davis.

    smf 2¢Everything is just fine at Chaffey this year . . . too bad about the 52,000 students in the state being denied entrance to community colleges.

    Of course next year Chaffey will have no reserves and Woodruff will not be Chancellor of the Community College system.

    The Breeze - Arnold terminates education budget

    Hollywood Happy Ending for Dropouts: STUDENTS AT L.A. ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL TELL SUCCESS STORIES IN THEIR OWN WORDS

    By Howard Blume, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

    July 17, 2008  - The new state system of tracking individual students to determine a more accurate dropout rate is also a step toward helping those who have left school and preventing others from leaving, officials say. Behind each dropout statistic is the narrative of an education that derailed. But these independent-study students at the Alternative Education and Work Center in Hollywood are on their way to turning things around. The center enrolls students who complete most of their work on their own and then come in for tests and help.

    image Leslie Lopez and Angel Yos, right, are among those rehearsing Tuesday for graduation from the Hollywood Alternative Education and Work Center. The center specializes in getting high school dropouts to return and earn their diplomas. The school is on the second floor of a Hollywood strip mall, but commencement will take place Thursday at Hollywood High School.

    PHOTOS: Luis Sinco / Los Angeles Times
    image Hollywood Alternative Education and Work Center students rehearse their commencement ceremony at Hollywood High.
    image Jasmin Alas, left, Leslie Lopez and Angel Yos will deliver speeches Thursday at Hollywood Alternative Education and Work Center's graduation ceremony.
    image Program Director Kathy Petrini hands out caps and gowns to the graduating class of Hollywood Alternative Education and Work Center.
    image The graduating class of Hollywood Alternative Education and Work Center rehearse Tuesday for their commencement ceremony at Hollywood High.

    The program, which is intended for high school-age students, is part of Hollywood Community Adult School, which is managed by the Los Angeles Unified School District. The students either dropped out or are considered at great risk of dropping out.

    Name: Kimberly Marquez

    Age: 19

    Residence: Atwater Village

    High school: Marshall

    Story: "Marshall High always had the best intentions, but it's hard to keep track of all those students. I was just a bit of a wild one. I got drunk at school too often. I enjoyed doing a lot of other stuff more than going to school: ditching, drugs, alcohol. I was a meth user. Most of my friends were. [Two friends have died; she's not certain of the circumstances.] If it wasn't for this program, I don't think I'd ever consider college. [With] the one-on-one attention, it wasn't as easy to sneak away. They make you grow up. They make you responsible."

    Goal: College

    Note: Marquez graduated in June 2007 and now works as a teaching assistant at the center.

    Name: Leslie Lopez

    Age: 19

    Residence: South Los Angeles

    High school: Hollywood

    Story: "In the 11th grade, I got pregnant and I started feeling sick. [The family had moved from Hollywood to the Watts area, but she tried to continue at Hollywood High -- a 45-minute bus ride.] I had a really bad pregnancy. I'd get dizzy a lot and wouldn't be able to read my books. I was behind in credits and my age was a concern to the school. I thought about giving up."

    Goals: Saving to move in with her boyfriend, attend college and pursue a career in computer drafting.

    Name: Angel Yos

    Age: 18

    Residence: Koreatown

    High school: Fairfax

    Story: "My parents had new jobs that required me to help them, starting when I was 13. I had to take care of my brothers and help Dad maintain the store. And we also did swap meets. . . . I had so much responsibility that was bestowed upon me. All that work I had to do at school plus all the work I had to do at home. It distorted me inside. At school, I was just purely not doing my work. I'd go to classes and sleep or talk to friends. I wanted to have fun with them. They said, 'Skip school. It won't really hurt you.' On the contrary, it did hurt me a lot. It took the school a while to catch on. They didn't even notice how weird it was to show up one day and not another, or miss a week. [When the school called home,] I would delete messages before my parents saw them. . . . I did consider dropping out."

    Goals: Attend college, major in political science and learn the business of the music industry.

    Name: Jasmin Alas

    Age: 18

    Residence: Hollywood

    High school: Fairfax

    Story: "In middle school, you name it, I did it: meth, marijuana. I hung out with people way older. [But she started going to church and changing her behavior.] I had gotten myself away from taking the wrong path in life. I didn't want to go to parties or hang out or drink. I became an outsider with my friends. . . . It was like a lot of peer pressure. It got to the point that I just didn't show up for school. The work I had no problem with. It was getting up in the morning and going to school. I would tell my mom I didn't want to go. The doctor told her I was depressed. I probably went like once a week. [She once had been a good student. Late last year, when catching up seemed impossible, she quit entirely.] I didn't show up. I failed everything. [At the center in Hollywood,] it just felt different than any other school. They made the effort. They would say little things like 'How is your day?' They made me feel so comfortable coming here. . . . My old friends, they're either pregnant or have kids -- every single one. I'm not lying. Most of them they just didn't finish high school."

    Goals: College, manage a business.

    Students at L.A. alternative school tell success stories in their own words - Los Angeles Times

    Los Angeles Times: 1 in 4 CALIFORNIA HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS DROP OUT, STATE SAYS

     

    Using a new system for tracking dropouts, California discloses a rate considerably higher than previously reported. About 1 in 3 students in Los Angeles Unified left school.

    Thank gosh for print journalists who know how to read a press release and tell the story!   —  Related content

    By Mitchell Landsberg and Howard Blume | Los Angeles Times Staff Writers

    July 17, 2008 - Deploying a long-promised tool to track high school dropouts, the state released numbers Wednesday estimating that 1 in 4 California students -- and 1 in 3 in Los Angeles -- quit school. The rates are considerably higher than previously acknowledged but lower than some independent estimates.

    The figures are based on a new statewide tracking system that relies on identification numbers that were issued to California public school students beginning in fall 2006.

    The ID numbers allow the state Department of Education to track students who leave one school and enroll in another in California, even if it is in a different district or city. In the past, the inability to accurately track such students gave schools a loophole, allowing them to say that departing students had transferred to another school when, in some cases, they had dropped out.

    The new system -- which will cost $33 million over the next three years, in addition to the millions spent for the initial development -- promises to eventually provide a far better way to understand where students go, and why. But state and school district officials acknowledged that the data initially available Wednesday, after a final one-day delay, were limited in usefulness.

    "I think as the system stabilizes, you will get better data," said Esther Wong, assistant superintendent for planning, assessment and research in the Los Angeles Unified School District. For now, she said, the numbers tell only part of the story, albeit more accurately than in the past.

    Jack O'Connell, state superintendent of public instruction, presented the new data, based on the 2006-07 school year, as a quantum leap forward in understanding the nature of the dropout problem. But, he said, "no one will argue that the number of dropouts is good news. . . . It represents an enormous loss of potential."

    State data analysts were able to come up with a four-year "derived" dropout rate, which estimates how many students drop out over the course of their high school careers.

    For the state overall, it was 24.2%, up substantially from the 13.9% calculated for the previous school year using an older, discredited method. Statewide, 67.6% of students graduated and 8.2% were neither graduates nor dropouts. The last category included those who transferred to private schools or left the state.

    School districts have until the end of August to correct data, so figures could change.

    The statistics highlight a problem that is getting worse in California, said Russell Rumberger, a professor of education at UC Santa Barbara who directs the California Dropout Research Project.

    Even using the old system of measurement, he said, the number of dropouts has grown by 83% over five years while the number of high school graduates has gone up only 9%.

    "So that's sobering, it's really sobering," he said.

    Rumberger attributed the trend to three primary factors: an increase in Latino immigrants, who are among the most likely to drop out; the raising of academic standards; and insufficient funding for public education.

    For Los Angeles Unified, the new dropout rate was 33.6%. The rate was 25.3% under the old system in 2005-06.

    Critics, including Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, have said that as many as half of Los Angeles Unified students drop out. But a recent report by an independent research group, Policy Analysis for California Education, put the district's dropout rate at 25.7%.

    O'Connell chose Birmingham High School in Van Nuys for his announcement, noting that it was the focus of a Times series on dropouts in 2006. He said he was particularly concerned by data showing a dropout rate of 41.6% for black students and 30.3% for Latino students, compared with 15.2% for whites and 10.2% for Asians.

    "This is a crisis," he said.

    In Los Angeles Unified, African American students dropped out at a lower rate than their counterparts statewide. That was not true of the other three groups.

    Among large, comprehensive L.A. high schools, the highest dropout rates were recorded at Jefferson, 58%; Belmont, 56%; Locke, 50.9%; Crenshaw, 50%; and Roosevelt, 49.6%.

    Those with the lowest rates were Palisades Charter High, 2.5%; Granada Hills Charter, 6.4%; Canoga Park, 11%; Cleveland, 12.8%; El Camino, 13%; Taft, 13.1%; Chatsworth, 14.5%; and Fairfax, 14.9%.

    State officials acknowledge that even the latest figures are less than ideal. The four-year rate is based not on students' actual progress over four years but on one year's worth of data for all four grades. In the spring of 2011, data will be released based on students' actual journey over four years.

    Moreover, it remains difficult to say why students left school because codes designed to explain that, listing choices such as "graduated," "died" and "no show," are based on a different time period than the dropout rate itself.

    Eventually, the two sets of figures will be synchronized, but the state was unable to do that before the release of the latest dropout figures.

    The new system drew accolades even from some critics of the Department of Education.

    "Though it has taken far too long and it is only partial progress, we applaud today's advances," said John Affeldt, managing attorney of Public Advocates, which has battled the department in court over the high school exit exam, among other matters.

    Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger hailed the data, but said it was important "that we don't just look at numbers."

    "It's good information," he said at a briefing for reporters in Sacramento, but "what we need to find out is, what is the reason for the dropouts? . . . We've got to find out what the reason is and then we can work on that to eliminate those problems."

    Some of the new dropout numbers are open to misinterpretation. For instance, some continuation schools -- which cater to the most troubled students -- show dropout rates of more than 100%. That is because their enrollment is based on a single date in October, but such schools typically have students who come and go throughout the year, so more students can drop out by June than were enrolled in the fall.

    Nevada County, a semirural swatch of Northern California whose schools generally perform well, showed a dropout rate of nearly 77%. The explanation, Associate Supt. Stan Miller said, is that the county charters one of the largest dropout recovery programs in California, with campuses spread throughout the state but reported as if they were in Nevada County.

    Even the most successful of such programs have high dropout rates, and the Nevada County program is large enough to outweigh the relatively low dropout rate of the county's own students.

    What is inescapable, ultimately, is that the effort to statistically capture the complications of teen life does not lend itself to the simple analysis that a dropout rate suggests.

    Susana Garcia, 18, counts as neither a dropout nor a graduate but as a "completer" because she elected to take the general educational development test, or GED, rather than earn a diploma.

    "Obviously, people ask you, 'Did you graduate or do you have your diploma or GED?' " she said. "I don't want to be seen as a failure -- or a complete failure." She added: "In my mind, I still want to go back and get the diploma."

    Los Angeles Times: 1 in 4 California high school students drop out, state says